Alignment of highly resolved time-dependent experimental and simulated crash test data

References

• Spethmann P, Herstatt C, Thomke SH. Crash simulation evolution and its impact on R&D in the automotive applications. IJPD. 2009;8(3):291–305. In
   Google Scholar
• Erickson MS, Bauer JJ, Hayes WC. The accuracy of photo-based three-dimensional scanning for collision reconstruction using 123D catch. In SAE Technical Paper, SAE International, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Gall J, Rosenhahn B, Gehrig S, et al. Model-based motion capture for crash test video analysis. In Pattern recognition. Berlin (Heidelberg): Springer, 2008. pp. 92–101.
   Google Scholar
• McClenathan RV, Nakhla SS, McCoy RW, et al. Use of photogrammetry in extracting 3D structural deformation/dummy occupant movement time history during vehicle crashes. In SAE Trans. 2005;114:736–742. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44725108
   Google Scholar
• Heist S, Lutzke P, Schmidt I, et al. High-speed three-dimensional shape measurement using GOBO projection. Optic Laser Eng. 2016;87:90–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iza-Teran R, Garcke J. A geometrical method for Low-Dimensional representations of simulations. SIAM/ASA J. Uncertain Quan. 2019;7(2):472–496. In
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demirci E, Yildiz AR. An experimental and numerical investigation of the effects of geometry and spot welds on the crashworthiness of vehicle thin-walled structures. Materialpruefung/Mater Test. 2018;60(6):553–561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mert SK, Demiral M, Altin M, et al. Experimental and numerical investigation on the crashworthiness optimization of thin-walled aluminium tubes considering damage criteria. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 2021;43(2):1–22. In
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besl PJ, McKay ND. Method for registration of 3-D shapes. In Sensor Fusion IV: Control Paradigms and Data Structures. SPIE, 1992. pp. 586–606.
   Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Medioni G. Object modelling by registration of multiple range images. Image Vision Comput. 1992;10(3):145–155. In
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rusinkiewicz S, Levoy M. Efficient variants of the ICP algorithm. In: Proceedings of International Conference on 3-D Digital Imaging and Modeling, 3DIM, 2001. pp. 145–152.
   Google Scholar
• Tam GKL, Cheng Z-Q, Lai Y-K, et al. Registration of 3D point clouds and meshes: a survey from rigid to nonrigid. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2013;19(7):1199–1217. In
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thanou D, Chou PA, Frossard P. Graph-based compression of dynamic 3D point cloud sequences. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2016;25(4):1765–1778. In
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu J, Akhtar N, Mian A. Deep reconstruction of 3D human poses from video, inIEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAI.2022.3164065.
   Google Scholar
• Dvořák J, Vanecek P, Vása L. Towards understanding time varying triangle meshes In International Conference on Computational Science (ICCS) 2021. Springer, 2021. p. 45–58.
   Google Scholar
• Dvořák J, Káčereková Z, Vaněček P, et al. As-rigid-as-possible volume tracking for time-varying surfaces. Comput Graph. 2022;102:329–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bojsen-Hansen M, Li H, Wojtan C. Tracking surfaces with evolving topology. ACM Trans. Graph. 2012;31(4):1–10. In
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ovsjanikov M, Ben-Chen M, Solomon J, et al. Functional maps: a flexible representation of maps between shapes. ACM Trans. Graph. 2012;31(4):1–11. In
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang J, Xu D, Jia K, et al. Learning parallel dense correspondence from Spatio-Temporal descriptors for efficient and robust 4D reconstruction. In Proceedings of CVPR. 2021. pp. 6018–6027.
   Google Scholar
• Lee JA, Verleysen M. Nonlinear dimensionality reduction. Information science and statistics. New York (NY): Springer New York, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Bohn B, Garcke J, Iza-Teran R, et al. Analysis of car crash simulation data with nonlinear machine learning methods. Procedia Computer Science. 2013;18:621–630.
   Google Scholar
• Iza-Teran R. Enabling the analysis of finite element simulation bundles. Int J Uncertain Quan. 2014;4(2):95–110. In:
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kracker D, Garcke J, Schuhmacher A. Automatic analysis of crash simulations with dimensionality reduction algorithms such as PCA and t-SNE. In: 16th International LS-DYNA Users Conference, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Mertler S. Comparative analysis of crash simulation results using generative nonlinear dimensionality reduction [dissertation]. Universität Wuppertal, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz A-L. Analysis of crash simulation data using spectral embedding with histogram distances. In: Informatik 2014, E Plödereder, L Grunske, E Schneider, and D Ull, edtors. Bonn: Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V., 2014. pp. 2449–2460.
   Google Scholar
• Goodfellow I, Bengio Y, Courville A. Deep learning. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Hinton GE, Salakhutdinov RR. Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks. Science. 2006;313(5786):504–507. In
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahner S, Garcke J. Mesh convolutional autoencoder for Semi-Regular meshes of different sizes In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV). 2022. p. 885–894.
   Google Scholar
• Diez C, Harzheim L, Schumacher A. Effiziente Wissensgenerierung zur Robustheitsuntersuchung von Fahrzeugstrukturen mittels Modellreduktion und Ähnlichkeitsanalyse -- Big Data in der Crashsimulation. VDI-Berichte. 2016;2279:137–150.
   Google Scholar
• Diez C, Kunze P, Toewe D, et al. Big-Data based rule-finding for analysis of crash simulations. In: World Congress on Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization. June. 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Meywerk M. CAE-Methoden in der Fahrzeugtechnik. Berlin (Heidelberg): Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Kuczyński J, Woźniakowski H. Estimating the largest eigenvalue by the power and lanczos algorithms with a random start. SIAM J. Matrix Anal. & Appl. 1992;13(4):1094–1122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell JB, Wynne RH. Introduction to remote sensing. New York: Guilford Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• National Crash Analysis Center (NCAC). Finite element model archive. [cited 2016, October 1]. http://web.archive.org/web/20160110143219/www.ncac.gwu.edu/vml/models.html.
   Google Scholar
• Hahner S, Iza-Teran R, Garcke J. Analysis and prediction of deforming 3D shapes using oriented bounding boxes and LSTM autoencoders. In: Artificial neural networks and machine learning - ICANN 2020. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2020. pp. 284–296.
   Google Scholar