Comparative study of statistical and machine learning methods for streetcar incident duration analysis

References

• Nguyen-Phuoc DQ, Currie G, De Gruyter C, et al. Net impacts of streetcar operations on traffic congestion in melbourne, australia. Transp Res Rec. 2017;2648(1):1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Wang B, Wang W, Hu X, et al. 2015. A segmented signal progression model for the modern streetcar system. In Discrete dynamics in nature and society. London: Hindawi Publishing Corporation. p. 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Leung CK, Elias JD, Minuk SM, et al. An innovative fuzzy logic-based machine learning algorithm for supporting predictive analytics on big transportation data. In: 2020 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE), IEEE; 2020. p. 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Tan Z, Xu M, Meng Q, et al. Evacuating metro passengers via the urban bus system under uncertain disruption recovery time and heterogeneous risk-taking behaviour. Transp Res Part C: Emerg Technol. 2020;119:102761.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weng J, Zheng Y, Yan X, et al. Development of a subway operation incident delay model using accelerated failure time approaches. Accid Anal Prev. 2014;73:12–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louie J, Shalaby A, Habib KN. Modelling the impact of causal and non-causal factors on disruption duration for toronto’s subway system: an exploratory investigation using hazard modelling. Accid Anal Prev. 2017;98:232–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weng J, Zheng Y, Qu X, et al. Development of a maximum likelihood regression tree-based model for predicting subway incident delay. Transp Res Part C: Emerg Technol. 2015;57:30–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weng J, Feng L, Du G, et al. Maximum likelihood regression tree with two-variable splitting scheme for subway incident delay. Transp A: Transp Sci. 2019;15(2):1061–1080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu J, Ma X, Xing Y. Risk factors affecting the severity of disruptions in metro operation in shanghai, 2013–2016. J Transp Saf Secur. 2021;13(1):69–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volovski M, Ieronymaki ES, Cao C, et al. Subway station dwell time prediction and user-induced delay. Transp A: Transp Sci. 2021;17(4):521–539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agbelie B, Libnao K. Unobserved heterogeneity analysis of rail transit incident delays. Transp Res Part A: Policy Pract. 2018;117:39–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juan L, Yesheng F, Jian H. Analysis of subway delay based on data mining. In: 2019 IEEE 4th International Conference on Cloud Computing and Big Data Analysis (ICCCBDA), IEEE; 2019. p. 254–258.
   Google Scholar
• Diab E, Shalaby A. Metro transit system resilience: Understanding the impacts of outdoor tracks and weather conditions on metro system interruptions. Int J Sustainable Transp. 2020;14(9):657–670.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaghini M, Khoshraftar MM, Seyedabadi M. Railway passenger train delay prediction via neural network model. J Adv Transp. 2013;47(3):355–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Ma W, Chan A. Exploring the relationships between the topological characteristics of subway networks and service disruption impact. Sustainability. 2020;12(10):3960.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chawla NV, Bowyer KW, Hall LO, et al. Smote: synthetic minority over-sampling technique. jair. 2002;16:321–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleinbaum DG, Klein M. 2010. Introduction to logistic regression. In: Logistic regression. New York: Springer. p. 1–39.
   Google Scholar
• Haq MT, Zlatkovic M, Ksaibati K. Assessment of tire failure related crashes and injury severity on a mountainous freeway: Bayesian binary logit approach. Accid Anal Prev. 2020;145:105693.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Train KE. 2009. Discrete choice methods with simulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chang LY, Chien JT. Analysis of driver injury severity in truck-involved accidents using a non-parametric classification tree model. Saf Sci. 2013;51(1):17–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Therneau TM, Atkinson EJ, et al. 2019. An introduction to recursive partitioning using the RPART routines Technical Report. Technical report Mayo Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Cover T, Hart P. Nearest neighbor pattern classification. IEEE Trans Inform Theory. 1967;13(1):21–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iranitalab A, Khattak A. Comparison of four statistical and machine learning methods for crash severity prediction. Accid Anal Prev. 2017;108:27–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman JH. Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine. Ann Stat. 2001;29(5):1189–1232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng Z, Lu P, Lantz B. Commercial truck crash injury severity analysis using gradient boosting data mining model. J Saf Res. 2018;65:115–124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breiman L. Random forests. Mach Learn. 2001;45(1):5–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Haghani A. A gradient boosting method to improve travel time prediction. Transp Res Part C: Emerg Technol. 2015;58:308–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ripley BD. 2007. Pattern recognition and neural networks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidhuber J. Deep learning in neural networks: an overview. Neural Netw. 2015;61:85–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar K, Parida M, Katiyar VK. Short term traffic flow prediction in heterogeneous condition using artificial neural network. Transport. 2013;30(4):397–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu H, Li Z, Zhang G, et al. Fusion convolutional neural network-based interpretation of unobserved heterogeneous factors in driver injury severity outcomes in single-vehicle crashes. Anal Methods Accid Res. 2021;30:100157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar