Artificially smart optimization of crash cushion device sustained by experimental and numerical study of re-entrant auxetic honeycomb

References

• Papka SD, Kyriakides S. In-plane compressive response and crushing of honeycomb. J Mech Phys Solids. 1994;42(10):1499–1532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson LJ. Cellular solids. MRS Bull. 2003;28(4):270–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruan D, Lu G, Wang B, et al. In-plane dynamic crushing of honeycombs—a finite element study. Int J Impact Eng. 2003;28(2):161–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarpa F, Panayiotou P, Tomlinson G. Numerical and experimental uniaxial loading on in-plane auxetic honeycombs. J Strain Anal Eng Des. 2000;35(5):383–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Standard. EN1317-1. road restraint systems, part 1: Terminology and general criteria for test methods; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• European Standard. EN1317-3. road restraint systems - part 3: Performance classes, impact test acceptance criteria and test methods for crash cushions; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Crash Cushion. Road barrier - SMA 50P. https://www.smaroadsafety.com/en/gamma/view/8/50p.
   Google Scholar
• Hou X, Deng Z, Zhang K. Dynamic crushing strength analysis of auxetic honeycombs. Acta Mech Solida Sin. 2016;29(5):490–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu L, Zhou MZ, Deng H. Dynamic crushing response of auxetic honeycombs under large deformation: theoretical analysis and numerical simulation. Thin-Walled Struct. 2018;131:373–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imbalzano G, Linforth S, Ngo TD, et al. Blast resistance of auxetic and honeycomb sandwich panels: comparisons and parametric designs. Compos Struct. 2018;183:242–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dirrenberger J, Forest S, Jeulin D. Elastoplasticity of auxetic materials. Comput Mater Sci. 2012;64:57–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanami M, Ravirala N, Alderson K, et al. Auxetic materials for sports applications. Proc Eng. 2014;72:453–458.
   Google Scholar
• Alderson A, Alderson K. Auxetic materials, proceedings of the institution of mechanical engineers. Part G: J Aerospace Eng. 2007;221(4):565–575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakes R. Foam structures with a negative poisson’s ratio. Science. 1987;235(4792):1038–1040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans KE. Auxetic polymers: a new range of materials. Endeavour. 1991;15(4):170–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans KE, Alderson A. Auxetic materials: functional materials and structures from lateral thinking. Adv Mater. 2000;12(9):617–628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dirrenberger J, Forest S, Jeulin D, et al. Homogenization of periodic auxetic materials. Proc Eng. 2011;10(0):1847–1852.
   Google Scholar
• Masson R, Bornert M, Suquet P, et al. An affine formulation for the prediction of the effective properties of nonlinear composites and polycrystals. J Mech Phys Solids. 2000;48(6–7):1203–1227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong Z, Li Y, Zhao T, et al. Experimental and numerical studies on the compressive mechanical properties of the metallic auxetic reentrant honeycomb. Mater Des. 2019;182:108036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Javadi AA, Faramarzi A, Farmani R. Design and optimization of microstructure of auxetic materials. Eng Comput. 2012;29(3):260–276.
   Google Scholar
• Pal A, Bertoldi K, Pham MQ, et al. Optimal turbine blade design enabled by auxetic honeycomb. Smart Mater Struct. 2020;29(12):125004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan O, Shepherd T, Moroney C, et al. Review of auxetic materials for sports applications: Expanding options in comfort and protection. Appl Sci. 2018;8(6):941.
   Google Scholar
• Masters I, Evans K. Models for the elastic deformation of honeycombs. Compos Struct. 1996;35(4):403–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang T, Li Z, Wang L, et al. Crashworthiness analysis and collaborative optimization design for a novel crash-box with re-entrant auxetic core. Struct Multidisc Optim. 2020;62(4):2167–2179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qi C, Pei L-Z, Remennikov A, et al. Parametric study and optimization of the protect system containing a re-entrant hexagon cored sandwich panel under blast impact. Compos Struct. 2020;252:112711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crash Cushion. Road Barrier - SMA 110W. https://www.smaroadsafety.com/en/gamma/view/14/110w.
   Google Scholar
• Qiu N, Gao Y, Fang J, et al. Topological design of multi-cell hexagonal tubes under axial and lateral loading cases using a modified particle swarm algorithm. Appl Math Modell. 2018;53:567–583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiang J, Du J. Energy absorption characteristics of bio-inspired honeycomb structure under axial impact loading. Mater Sci Eng: A. 2017;696:283–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao Q, Zhao X, Wang C, et al. Multi-objective crashworthiness optimization for an auxetic cylindrical structure under axial impact loading. Mater Des. 2018;143:120–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ExpéChoc. LBMC experimental plateform in crash. https://lbmc.univ-gustave-eiffel.fr/plateformes/expechoc-plateforme-dexperimentation-en-choc.
   Google Scholar
• European Standard, ISO 6487. Road vehicles — measurement techniques in impact tests — instrumentation; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Clough EC, Plaisted TA, Eckel ZC, et al. Elastomeric microlattice impact attenuators. Matter. 2019;1(6):1519–1531.
   Google Scholar
• Di Cesare N, Chamoret D, Domaszewski M. A new hybrid pso algorithm based on a stochastic markov chain model. Adv Eng Software. 2015;90:127–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Cesare N, Domaszewski M. A new hybrid topology optimization method based on i-pr-pso and eso. application to continuum structural mechanics. Comput Struct. 2019;212:311–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy J, Eberhart R. Particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of ICNN’95-International Conference on Neural Networks. Vol. 4. IEEE; 1995. p. 1942–1948.
   Google Scholar
• Holden N, Freitas AA. A hybrid pso/aco algorithm for discovering classification rules in data mining. J Artif Evol Appl. 2008;2008:1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Victoire TAA, Jeyakumar AE. Hybrid PSO–SQP for economic dispatch with valve-point effect. Electr Power Syst Res. 2004;71(1):51–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Şenel FA, Gökçe F, Yüksel AS, et al. A novel hybrid pso–gwo algorithm for optimization problems. Eng Comput. 2019;35(4):1359–1373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsopoulos KE, Vrahatis MN. Particle swarm optimization method for constrained optimization problems. In: Intelligent technologies–theory and application: new trends in intelligent technologies, P. Sincak, J. Vascak, V. Kvasnicka, J. Pospichal (eds.), IOS Press (Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications series, vol. 76), Fairfax, VA, 2002. p. 214–220.
   Google Scholar
• Ozcan E, Mohan CK. Particle swarm optimization: surfing the waves. In: Proceedings of the 1999 Congress on Evolutionary Computation-CEC99 (Cat. No. 99TH8406). Vol. 3; 1999. p. 1939–1944.
   Google Scholar
• Clerc M. The swarm and the queen: towards a deterministic and adaptive particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of the 1999 congress on evolutionary computation-CEC99 (Cat. No. 99TH8406). Vol. 3; 1999. p. 1951–1957.
   Google Scholar
• Clerc M, Kennedy J. The particle swarm-explosion, stability, and convergence in a multidimensional complex space. IEEE Trans Evol Comput. 2002;6(1):58–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trelea IC. The particle swarm optimization algorithm: convergence analysis and parameter selection. Inf Process Lett. 2003;85(6):317–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armaghani DJ, Hajihassani M, Mohamad ET, et al. Blasting-induced flyrock and ground vibration prediction through an expert artificial neural network based on particle swarm optimization. Arab J Geosci. 2014;7(12):5383–5396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajihassani M, Armaghani DJ, Monjezi M, et al. Blast-induced air and ground vibration prediction: a particle swarm optimization-based artificial neural network approach. Environ Earth Sci. 2015;74(4):2799–2817.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suganthan PN. Particle swarm optimiser with neighbourhood operator. In: Proceedings of the 1999 Congress on Evolutionary Computation-CEC99 (Cat. No. 99TH8406). Vol. 3; 1999. p. 1958–1962.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang H, Ren Y, Jin Q, et al. Crashworthiness of novel concentric auxetic reentrant honeycomb with negative poisson’s ratio biologically inspired by coconut palm. Thin-Walled Struct. 2020;154:106911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar