Multi-objective crashworthiness optimization of square aluminum tubes with functionally graded BCC lattice structure filler

References

• Meran AP, Baykasoglu C, Toprak T, et al. Development of a design for a crash energy management system for use in a railway passenger car. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit. 2016;230(1):206–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mat F, Ismail KA, Yaacob S, et al. Impact response of thin-walled tubes: a prospective review. AMM. 2012;165:130–134.
   Google Scholar
• Ha NS, Lu G. Thin-walled corrugated structures: a review of crashworthiness designs and energy absorption characteristics. Thin-Walled Struct. 2020;157:106995.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abramowicz W. Thin-walled structures as impact energy absorbers. Thin-Walled Struct. 2003;41(2–3):91–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alghamdi AAA. Collapsible impact energy absorbers: an overview. Thin-Walled Struct. 2001;39(2):189–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosseini-Tehrani P, Pirmohammad S. Collapse study of thin-walled polygonal section columns subjected to oblique loads. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part D J Automob Eng. 2007;221(7):801–810.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baykasoğlu C, Baykasoğlu A, Tunay Çetin M. A comparative study on crashworthiness of thin-walled tubes with functionally graded thickness under oblique impact loadings. Int J Crashworthiness. 2019;24(4):453–471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li G, Xu F, Sun G, et al. A comparative study on thin-walled structures with functionally graded thickness (FGT) and tapered tubes withstanding oblique impact loading. Int J Impact Eng. 2015;77:68–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai M, Ying L, Ma H, et al. Comparative study on thin-walled structures with function graded strength and tapered angle. Int J Crashworthiness. 2019;24(3):257–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qi C, Yang S, Dong F. Crushing analysis and multiobjective crashworthiness optimization of tapered square tubes under oblique impact loading. Thin-Walled Struct. 2012;59:103–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagel GM, Thambiratnam DP. Dynamic simulation and energy absorption of tapered thin-walled tubes under oblique impact loading. Int J Impact Eng. 2006;32(10):1595–1620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asanjarani A, Dibajian SH, Mahdian A. Multi-objective crashworthiness optimization of tapered thin-walled square tubes with indentations. Thin-Walled Struct. 2017;116:26–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu F, Zhang X, Zhang H. A review on functionally graded structures and materials for energy absorption. Eng Struct. 2018;171:309–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baykasoglu A, Baykasoglu C. Crashworthiness optimization of circular tubes with functionally-graded thickness. Eng Comput. 2016;33(5):1560–1585.
   Google Scholar
• Baykasoǧlu A, Baykasoǧlu C. Multiple objective crashworthiness optimization of circular tubes with functionally graded thickness via artificial neural networks and genetic algorithms. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C J Mech Eng Sci. 2017;231:2005–2016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baroutaji A, Sajjia M, Olabi AG. On the crashworthiness performance of thin-walled energy absorbers: recent advances and future developments. Thin-Walled Struct. 2017;118:137–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baroutaji A, Arjunan A, Niknejad A, et al. Application of cellular material in crashworthiness applications: an overview. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd.; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Supian ABM, Sapuan SM, Zuhri MYM, et al. Hybrid reinforced thermoset polymer composite in energy absorption tube application: a review. Def Technol. 2018;14(4):291–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussein RD, Ruan D, Lu G, et al. Crushing response of square aluminium tubes filled with polyurethane foam and aluminium honeycomb. Thin-Walled Struct. 2017;110:140–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao Q, Wang L, Wang Y, et al. Optimization of foam-filled double ellipse tubes under multiple loading cases. Adv Eng Softw. 2016;99:27–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu G, Li S, Sun G, et al. On design of graded honeycomb filler and tubal wall thickness for multiple load cases. Thin-Walled Struct. 2016;109:377–389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang J, Sun G, Qiu N, et al. On hierarchical honeycombs under out-of-plane crushing. Int J Solids Struct. 2018;135:1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu G, Liao J, Sun G, et al. Comparative study on metal/CFRP hybrid structures under static and dynamic loading. Int J Impact Eng. 2020;141:103509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Jin X, Li Q, et al. On crashworthiness design of hybrid metal-composite structures. Int J Mech Sci. 2020;171:105380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cetin E, Baykasoğlu A, Erdin ME, et al. Experimental investigation of the axial crushing behavior of aluminum/CFRP hybrid tubes with circular-hole triggering mechanism. Thin-Walled Struct. 2023;182:110321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammadiha O, Ghariblu H. Crush behavior optimization of multi-tubes filled by functionally graded foam. Thin-Walled Struct. 2016;98:627–639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun G, Li G, Hou S, et al. Crashworthiness design for functionally graded foam-filled thin-walled structures. Mater Sci Eng A. 2010;527(7-8):1911–1919.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin H, Wen G, Hou S, et al. Multiobjective crashworthiness optimization of functionally lateral graded foam-filled tubes. Mater Des. 2013;44:414–428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attia MS, Meguid SA, Nouraei H. Nonlinear finite element analysis of the crush behaviour of functionally graded foam-filled columns. Finite Elem Anal Des. 2012;61:50–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maconachie T, Leary M, Lozanovski B, et al. SLM lattice structures: properties, performance, applications and challenges. Mater Des. 2019;183:108137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Askari M, Hutchins DA, Thomas PJ, et al. Additive manufacturing of metamaterials: a review. Addit Manuf. 2020;36:101562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Zhou Y, Lin L, et al. Overview of 3D additive manufacturing (AM) and corresponding AM composites. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf. 2020;139:106114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu W, Hu W, Qian G, et al. Mechanical design and multifunctional applications of chiral mechanical metamaterials: a review. Mater Des. 2019;180:107950.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang C, Li Y, Zhao W, et al. Structure design and multi-objective optimization of a novel crash box based on biomimetic structure. Int J Mech Sci. 2018;139:138–501.
   Google Scholar
• Ma F, Liang H, Pu Y, et al. Multi-objective optimization of crash box filled with three-dimensional cellular structure under multi-angle impact loading. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part D J Automob Eng. 2021;235(9):2397–2412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ushijima K, Cantwell WJ, Chen DH. Prediction of the mechanical properties of micro-lattice structures subjected to multi-axial loading. Int J Mech Sci. 2013;68:47–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gümrük R, Mines RAW, Karadeniz S. Static mechanical behaviours of stainless steel micro-lattice structures under different loading conditions. Mater Sci Eng A. 2013;586:392–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ushijima K, Tsopanos S, Smith M. An investigation into the compressive properties of stainless steel micro-lattice structures; 2010. p. 2–3.
   Google Scholar
• Cetin E, Baykasoğlu C. Energy absorption of thin-walled tubes enhanced by lattice structures. Int J Mech Sci. 2019;158:471–484.
   Google Scholar
• Baykasoğlu A, Baykasoǧlu C, Cetin E. Multi-objective crashworthiness optimization of lattice structure filled thin-walled tubes. Thin Walled Struct. 2020;149:106630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cetin E, Baykasoğlu C. Crashworthiness of graded lattice structure filled thin-walled tubes under multiple impact loadings. Thin-Walled Struct. 2020;154:106849.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cetin E, Baykasoğlu C. Bending response of lattice structure filled tubes under transverse loading. Hittite J Sci Eng. 2022;9:151–158.
   Google Scholar
• Yang S, Qi C. Multiobjective optimization for empty and foam-filled square columns under oblique impact loading. Int J Impact Eng. 2013;54:177–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun G, Song X, Baek S, et al. Robust optimization of foam-filled thin-walled structure based on sequential kriging metamodel. Struct Multidisc Optim. 2014;49(6):897–913.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin H, Wen G, Hou S, et al. Crushing analysis and multiobjective crashworthiness optimization of honeycomb-filled single and bitubular polygonal tubes. Mater Des. 2011;32(8-9):4449–4460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang J, Sun G, Qiu N, et al. On design optimization for structural crashworthiness and its state of the art. Struct Multidisc Optim. 2017;55(3):1091–1119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng X, Liu W. Multi-objective optimization of thin-walled sandwich tubes with lateral corrugated tubes in the Middle for energy absorption. Thin-Walled Struct. 2019;137:303–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng X, Cao L. Crushing analysis and crashworthiness optimisation for a novel bioinspired multicell filled tubular structure. Int J Crashworthiness. 2020;0:1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Baykasoglu A. Optimizing cutting conditions for minimizing cutting time in multi-pass milling via weighted superposition attraction-repulsion (WSAR) algorithm. Int J Prod Res. 2020;59:4633–4648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baykasoğlu A, Baykasoğlu C. Weighted superposition attraction-repulsion (WSAR) algorithm for truss optimization with multiple frequency constraints. Structures. 2021;30:253–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li P, Wang Z, Petrinic N, et al. Deformation behaviour of stainless steel microlattice structures by selective laser melting. Mater Sci Eng A. 2014;614:116–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Saedi DSJ, Masood SH, Faizan-Ur-Rab M, et al. Mechanical properties and energy absorption capability of functionally graded F2BCC lattice fabricated by SLM. Mater Des. 2018;144:32–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Lu M, Sun G, et al. On functionally graded composite structures for crashworthiness. Compos Struct. 2015;132:393–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Wang J, Wang C, et al. Crashworthiness of bionic fractal hierarchical structures. Mater Des. 2018;158:147–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dassault Systems Inc. Abaqus user’s manuel ver. 6.13. Providence: Lowell, MA; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Zarei HR, Kröger M. Multiobjective crashworthiness optimization of circular aluminum tubes. Thin-Walled Struct. 2006;44(3):301–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khajehmirza H, Heydari Astaraee A, Monti S, et al. A hybrid framework to estimate the surface state and fatigue performance of laser powder bed fusion materials after shot peening. Appl Surf Sci. 2021;567:150758.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao S, Zhou Y, Li Z, et al. Energy absorption characteristics of square frustum lattice structure. Compos Struct. 2021;275:114492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tripathy L, Lu WF. Evaluation of axially-crushed cellular truss structures for crashworthiness. Int J Crashworthiness. 2017;8265:1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Liu T, Ren H, et al. Dynamic compressive response of additively manufactured AlSi10Mg alloy hierarchical honeycomb structures. Compos Struct. 2018;195:45–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karagiozova D, Nurick GN, Kim Yuen C. S. Energy absorption of aluminium alloy circular and square tubes under an axial explosive load. Thin-Walled Struct. 2005;43(6):956–982.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai Z, Sun K, Zhu F, et al. Crashworthiness optimal design of a new extruded octagonal multi-cell tube under dynamic axial impact. IJVS. 2018;10(1):40–57.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng G, Wu S, Sun G, et al. Crushing analysis of foam-filled single and bitubal polygonal thin-walled tubes. Int J Mech Sci. 2014;87:226–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karagiozova D, Alves M. Dynamic elastic-plastic buckling of structural elements: a review. Appl Mech Rev. 2008;61:1–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baykasoglu C, Cetin MT. Energy absorption of circular aluminium tubes with functionally graded thickness under axial impact loading. Int J Crashworthiness. 2015;20(1):95–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikkhah H, Baroutaji A, Olabi AG. Crashworthiness design and optimisation of windowed tubes under axial impact loading. Thin-Walled Struct. 2019;142:132–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu X, Zhang Y, Wang J, et al. Crashworthiness design of novel hierarchical hexagonal columns. Compos Struct. 2018;194:36–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baroutaji A, Gilchrist MD, Smyth D, et al. Analysis and optimization of sandwich tubes energy absorbers under lateral loading. Int J Impact Eng. 2015;82:74–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gümrük R, Mines RAW. Compressive behaviour of stainless steel micro-lattice structures. Int J Mech Sci. 2013;68:125–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santosa SP, Wierzbicki T, Hanssen AG, et al. Experimental and numerical studies of foam-filled sections. Int J Impact Eng. 2000;24(5):509–534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nedoushan RJ. Improvement of energy absorption of expanded metal tubular structures under compressive loads. Thin-Walled Struct. 2020;157:107058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao Q, Wang L, Wang Y, et al. Crushing analysis and multiobjective crashworthiness optimization of foam-filled ellipse tubes under oblique impact loading. Thin-Walled Struct. 2016;100:105–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ying L, Dai M, Zhang S, et al. Multiobjective crashworthiness optimization of thin-walled structures with functionally graded strength under oblique impact loading. Thin-Walled Struct. 2017;117:165–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Zhang Y, He N, et al. Crashworthiness behavior of koch fractal structures. Mater Des. 2018;144:229–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleijnen JPC. Experimental design for sensitivity analysis, optimization, and validation of simulation models. İn: Banks J, editor. Handbook of simulation. New York: Wiley; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Kutner MH, Nachtsheim CN. Applied linear regression models. New York: McGraw Hill; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Baykasoglu, A., Multiple Objective Optimization with Weighted Superposition Attraction-Repulsion Algorithm (moWSAR) (In Book: Modeling and Advanced Techniques in Modern Economics), 1st Edition, September 2022, World Scientific Publishing, Edited By: Cagdas Hakan Aladag and Nihan Potas, pp.173–185, ISBN: 978-1-80061-176-4, London, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/9781800611757_0008
   Google Scholar
• Zeleny M. Compromise programming, multiple criteria decision-making. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press; 1973.
   Google Scholar