Performance analysis and optimization of square tubes with different shapes, sizes, and patterns of holes under axial compression loading

References

• Davoodi MM, Sapuan SM, Aidy A, et al. Development process of new bumper beam for passenger car: a review. Mater Des. 2012;40:304–313. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2012.03.060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Jin X, Li Y, et al. Improved design of the main energy-absorbing automotive parts based on traffic accident analysis. Mater Des. 2008;29(2):403–410. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2007.01.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abramowicz W. Thin-walled structures as impact energy absorbers. Thin Wall Struct. 2003;41(2–3):91–107. doi:10.1016/S0263-8231(02)00082-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander J.M. An approximate analysis of the collapse of thin cylindrical shells under axial loading. Q J Mechanics Appl Math. 1960;13(1):10–15. doi:10.1093/qjmam/13.1.10.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Wen Z, Zhang H. Axial crushing and optimal design of square tubes with graded thickness. Thin Wall Struct. 2014;84:263–274. doi:10.1016/j.tws.2014.07.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu R, Liu X, Chen S, et al. Axial crashing analysis for tailor rolled square tubes with axially graded both wall thickness and material strength. Thin Wall Struct. 2017;117:10–24. doi:10.1016/j.tws.2017.04.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abramowicz W, Jones N. Dynamic progressive buckling of circular and square tubes. Int J Impact Eng. 1986;4(4):243–270. doi:10.1016/0734-743X(86)90017-5.
   Google Scholar
• Liu Z, Huang Z, Qin Q. Experimental and theoretical investigations on lateral crushing of aluminum foam-filled circular tubes. Compos Struct. 2017;175:19–27. doi:10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.05.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alkbir M, Sapuan S, Nuraini A, et al. Effect of geometry on crashworthiness parameters of natural kenaf fibre reinforced composite hexagonal tubes. Mater Des. 2014;60:85–93. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2014.02.031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou S, Li Q, Long S, et al. Design optimization of regular hexagonal thin-walled columns with crashworthiness criteria. Finite Elem Anal Des. 2007;43(6–7):555–565. doi:10.1016/j.finel.2006.12.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Day M. Development of simplified finite element models for straight thin-walled tubes with octagonal cross-section. Int J Crashworthiness. 2007;12(5):503–508. doi:10.1080/13588260701483557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tehrani PH, Pirmohammad S. Study on crashworthiness characteristics of several concentric thin wall tubes. In Proceedings of the 10th Biennial Conference on Engineering Systems Design and Analysis, American Society of Mechanical Engineers; 2010. p. 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Wierzbicki T, Suh MS. Indentation of tubes under combined loading. Int J Mech Sci. 1988;30(3–4):229–248. doi:10.1016/0020-7403(88)90057-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mamalis AG, Manolakos DE, Baldoukas AK, et al. Deformation characteristics of crashworthy thin-walled steel tubes subjected to bending. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C. 1989;203(6):411–417. doi:10.1243/PIME_PROC_1989_203_135_02.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song J. Numerical simulation on windowed tubes subjected to oblique impact loading and a new method for the design of obliquely loaded tubes. Int J Impact Eng. 2013;54:192–205. doi:10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2012.11.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarigopula V, Langseth M, Hopperstad OS, et al. Axial crushing of thin walled high-strength steel sections. Int J Impact Eng. 2006;32(5):847–882. doi:10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2005.07.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baroutaji A, Sajjia M, Olabi A-G. On the crashworthiness performance of thin walled energy absorbers: recent advances and future developments. Thin Wall Struct. 2017;118:137–163. doi:10.1016/j.tws.2017.05.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aktay L, Toksoy AK, Güden M. Quasi-static axial crushing of extruded polystyrene foam-filled thin-walled aluminium tubes: experimental and numerical analysis. Mater Des. 2006;27(7):556–565. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2004.12.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Z, Liu S, Tang Z. Crashworthiness investigation of kagome honeycomb sandwich cylindrical column under axial crushing loads. Thin Wall Struct. 2010;48(1):9–18. doi:10.1016/j.tws.2009.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen W, Wierzbicki T. Relative merits of single-cell, multi-cellandfoam- filled thin-walledstructuresinenergyabsorption. Thin Wall Struct. 2001;39(4):287–306. doi:10.1016/S0263-8231(01)00006-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Z, Rakheja S, Shangguan W-B. Study on crushing behaviour of foam filled thin-walled square tubes with different types and number of initiators under multiple angle loads. Thin Wall Struct. 2019;145:106376. doi:10.1016/j.tws.2019.106376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mamalis AG, Manolakos DE, Spentzas KN, et al. The effect of the implementation of circular holes as crush initiators to the crushing characteristics of mild steel square tubes: experimental and numerical simulation. Int J Crashworthiness. 2009;14(5):489–501. doi:10.1080/13588260902826547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee S, Hahn C, Rhee M, et al. Effect of triggering on the energy absorption capacity of axially compressed aluminum tubes. Mater Des. 1999;20(1):31–40. doi:10.1016/S0261-3069(98)00043-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou C, Ming S, Xia C, et al. The energy absorption of rectangular and slotted windowed tubes under axial crushing. Int J Mech Sci. 2018;141:89–100. doi:10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.03.036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han H, Taheri F, Pegg N. Quasi-static and dynamic crushing behaviors of aluminum and steel tubes with a cutout. Thin Wall Struct. 2007;45(3):283–300. doi:10.1016/j.tws.2007.02.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirmohammad S, Esmaeili-Marzdashti S. Multi-objective crashworthiness optimization of square and octagonal bi-tubal structures including different hole shapes. Thin Wall Struct. 2019;139:126–138. doi:10.1016/j.tws.2019.03.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alghamdi AAA. Collapsible impact energy absorbers: an overview. Thin Wall Struct. 2001;39(2):189–213. doi:10.1016/S0263-8231(00)00048-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Djamaluddin F, Abdullah S, Ariffin AK, et al. Optimization of foam-filled double circular tubes under axial and oblique impact loading conditions. Thin Walled Struct. 2015;87:1–11. doi:10.1016/j.tws.2014.10.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daneshi GH, Hosseinipour SJ. Grooves effect on crashworthiness characteristics of thin-walled tubes under axial compression. Mater Des. 2002;23(7):611–617. doi:10.1016/S0261-3069(02)00052-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta NK, Gupta SK. Effect of annealing, size and cut-outs on axial collapse behaviour of circular tubes. Int J Mech Sci. 1993;35(7):597–613. doi:10.1016/0020-7403(93)90004-E.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta NK. Some aspects of axial collapse of cylindrical thin-walled tubes. Thin Wall Struct. 1998;32(1–3):111–126. doi:10.1016/S0263-8231(98)00029-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta NK, Nagesh. Collapse mode transitions of thin tubes with wall thickness, end condition, and shape eccentricity. Int J Mech Sci. 2006;48 2):210–223. doi:10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2005.09.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikkhah H, Guo F, Chew Y, et al. The effect of different shapes of holes on the crushing characteristics of aluminum square windowed tubes under dynamic axial loading. Thin Wall Struct. 2017;119:412–420. doi:10.1016/j.tws.2017.06.036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song J, Chen Y, Lu G. Light-weight thin-walled structures with patterned windows under axial crushing. Int J Mech Sci. 2013;66:239–248. doi:10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2012.11.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nalla Mohamed M, Yuvarajan P, Umasankar M. Energy enhancement of long cylindrical tubes with grooves subjected to axial impact. AMM. 2015;787:345–349. doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.787.345.
   Google Scholar
• Arnold B, Altenhof W. Experimental observations on the crush characteristics of AA6061 T4 and T6 structural square tubes with and without circular discontinuities. Int J Crashworthiness. 2004;9(1):73–87. doi:10.1533/ijcr.2004.0273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang J, Gao Y, Sun G, et al. Crashworthiness design of foam-filled bi-tubal structures with uncertainty. Int J Non Lin Mech. 2014;67:120–132. doi:10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2014.08.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tran T, Baroutaji A. Crashworthiness optimal design of multi-cell triangular tubes under axial and oblique impact loading. Eng Fail Anal. 2018;93:241–256. doi:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2018.07.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ching CL, Hwang L, Yoon K. Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications a state-of-the-art survey. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer; 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang C-L, Lai Y-J, Liu T-Y. A new approach for multiple objective decision making. Comput Oper Res. 1993;20(8):889–899. doi:10.1016/0305-0548(93)90109-V.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Praveen Kumar A, Mohamed MN, Jusuf A, et al. Axial crash performance of press-formed open and end-capped cylindrical tubes – a comparative analysis. Thin Wall Struct. 2018;124:468–488. doi:10.1016/j.tws.2017.12.037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ABAQUS (2014) Analysis User’s Manual, Version 6.14. Dassault Systemes Simulia, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Pirmohammad S, Esmaeili Marzdashti S. Crashworthiness optimization of combined straight-tapered tubes using genetic algorithm and neural networks. Thin Wall Struct. 2018;127:318–332. doi:10.1016/j.tws.2018.01.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar