References
- Lavasani M, Jin X, Du Y. Market penetration model for autonomous vehicles on the basis of earlier technology adoption experience. Transp Res Rec. 2016;2597(1):67–74. doi: 10.3141/2597-09.
- Fagnant DJ, Kockelman K. Preparing a nation for autonomous vehicles: opportunities, barriers and policy recommendations. Transp Res A: Policy Pract. 2015;77:167–181.
- Combs TS, Sandt LS, Clamann MP, et al. Automated vehicles and pedestrian safety: exploring the promise and limits of pedestrian detection. Am J Prev Med. 2019;56(1):1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.06.024.
- Dixit VV, Chand S, Nair DJ. Autonomous vehicles: disengagements, accidents and reaction times. PLoS One. 2016;11(12):e0168054. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168054.
- Self-Driving Uber Car Kills Pedestrian in Arizona, Where Robots Roam - The New York Times [Internet]. [cited 2022 Jul 12]. Available from: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/19/technology/uber-driverless-fatality.html.
- Peden M, Scurfield R, Sleet D, et al. World report on road traffic injury prevention. Vol. 61, Geneva: World Health Organization; 2005.
- Traffic Bureau National Police Agency [Internet]. [cited 2022 Jul 12]. Available from: https://www.npa.go.jp/english/bureau/traffic/index.html.
- Hùng Anh L, Nguyen DB, Nguyen AH. Head injury of Vietnamese pedestrian in crash accident with SUV using numerical simulation. Sci Tech Dev J- Eng Tech. 2021;3(SI2). doi: 10.32508/stdjet.v3iSI2.555.
- Liu W, Zhao H, Li K, et al. Study on pedestrian thorax injury in vehicle-to-pedestrian collisions using finite element analysis. Chin J Traumatol. 2015;18(2):74–80. doi: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2015.03.003.
- Xu T, Sheng X, Zhang T, et al. Development and validation of dummies and human models used in crash test. Appl Bionics Biomech. 2018:1–12.
- Hodgson VR, Patrick LM. Dynamic response of the human cadaver head compared to a simple mathematical model. 12th Stapp Car Crash Conference, SAE Technical Paper. Detroit, USA; 1968.
- Kroell CK, Schneider DC, Nahum AM. Impact tolerance and response of the human thorax II [Internet]. Vol. 83, Transactions; 1974:3724–3762. Available from https://www.jstor.org/stable/44723986
- Ono K, Kikuchi A, Nakamura M, et al. Human Head Tolerance to Sagittal Impact Reliable Estimation Deduced from Experimental Head Injury Using Subhuman Primates and Human Cadaver Skulls; 1980.
- Moffatt E, Hare B, Hughes R, et al. Head excursion of restrained human volunteers and hybrid III dummies in steady state rollover tests. Annu Proc Assoc Adv Autom Med. 2003;47:445–465.
- Viano DC, King AI, Melvin JW, et al. Injury biomechanics research: an essential element in the prevention of trauma. J Biomech. 1989;22(5):403–417. doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(89)90201-7.
- Yang JK, Lövsund P, Cavallero C, et al. A human-body 3D mathematical model for simulation of car-pedestrian impacts. J Crash Prev Inj Control. 2000;2(2):131–149. doi: 10.1080/10286580008902559.
- Anderson RWG, Long AD, Serre T. Phenomenological continuous contact-impact modelling for multibody simulations of pedestrian-vehicle contact interactions based on experimental data. Nonlinear Dyn. 2009;58(1-2):199–208. doi: 10.1007/s11071-009-9471-6.
- Peng Y, Chen Y, Yang J, et al. A study of pedestrian and bicyclist exposure to head injury in passenger car collisions based on accident data and simulations. Saf Sci. 2012;50(9):1749–1759. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2012.03.005.
- Mizuno K. Head Injuries in Vehicle-Pedestrian Impact. Journal of Passenger Cars: Mechanical Systems Journal. 2000;109:232–243.
- Yang J. Effects of vehicle front design parameters on pedestrian head-brain injury protect. In 18th International ESV Conference. Nagoya, Japan; 2003.
- Han Y, Yang J, Mizuno K, et al. Effects of vehicle impact velocity, vehicle front-end shapes on pedestrian injury risk. Traffic Inj Prev. 2012;13(5):507–518. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2012.661111.
- Yao J, Yang J, Otte D. Investigation of head injuries by reconstructions of real-world vehicle-versus-adult-pedestrian accidents. Saf Sci. 2008;46(7):1103–1114. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2007.06.021.
- Crandall JR, Lessley DJ, Kerrigan JR, et al. Thoracic deformation response of pedestrians resulting from vehicle impact. Int J Crashworthiness. 2006;11(6):529–539. doi: 10.1533/ijcr.2006.0146.
- Eppinger R, Sun E, Bandak F, et al. Development of Improved Injury Criteria for the Assessment of Advanced Automotive Restraint Systems - II. Nhtsa. 1999.
- Schneck DJ, Bronzino JD. Biomechanics principles & Applications; 2002. 309 p.
- Carollo F, Virzì Mariotti G, Naso V, et al. Head, chest and femur injury in teenage pedestrian–SUV crash; mass influence on the speeds. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part D: J Autom Eng. 2019;233(4):790–809. doi: 10.1177/0954407017753803.
- Mariotti GV, Golfo S. Determination and analysis of the head and chest parameters by simulation of a vehicle-teenager impact. Proc Inst Mech Eng D: J Autom Eng. 2014;228(1):p. 3–20.
- McHenry B. Head injury criterion and the ATB. ATB Users’ Group. 2004;(February):5–8.
- Bellavia G, Mariotti GV, Meccanica D, et al. Development of an anthropomorphic model for vehicle-pedestrian crashtest. In 21st International Automotive Conference “Science and Motor Vehicles”, Belgrade, Serbia. 2007.
- Mariotti GV. Head injury criterion: mini review. AJBSR. 2019;5(5):406–407. doi: 10.34297/AJBSR.2019.05.000957.
- Namjoshi DR, Good C, Cheng WH, et al. Towards clinical management of traumatic brain injury: a review of models and mechanisms from a biomechanical perspective. Dis Model Mech. 2013;6(6):1325–1338. doi: 10.1242/dmm.011320.
- Meet Olli 2.0. a 3D-printed autonomous shuttle | TechCrunch [Internet]. [cited 2022 Aug 3]. Available from: https://techcrunch.com/2019/08/31/come-along-take-a-ride/?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAABiOF0BMxMAYF-n90itW8ggI63M-I9JByIqWCazc0aAaKH7aeDmQmndove2MLFeu-34YloeigrMmFwSGw_TwExjHAXiUPXB3g7py3T1e5Jd72pn07hpxsZ8iNA8Z7tkw1gvUh1wRjKRO6fcGe5IX5SzMgueMCE9jvofCauXvj1SI.
- Mertz HJ. Anthropomorphic Test Devices. Accidental Injury 2002;66–84.
- Hybrid III 50th Percentile Male Standing. | Livermore Software Technology Corp. [Internet]. [cited 2022 Mar 12]. Available from: https://www.lstc.com/products/models/dummies/H3_50th_Standing.
- Self-Driving OLLI minibus - Global Motor Media [Internet]. [cited 2022 Apr 10]. Available from: https://www.globalmotormedia.com/self-driving-olli-minibus/?fbclid=IwAR39a9kw_o_sJx_okDNXVDJhLkuT7_g9-UYX61goD313m2_q2qRLSeElM9o.
- Florida City Deploys 3D-Printed Autonomous Shuttle [Internet]. [cited 2022 Jul 14]. Available from: https://www.wardsauto.com/vehicles/florida-city-deploys-3d-printed-autonomous-shuttle.
- Crash Simulation Vehicle. Models | NHTSA [Internet]. [cited 2022 May 12]. Available from: https://www.nhtsa.gov/crash-simulation-vehicle-models.
- Kong C, Yang J. Logistic regression analysis of pedestrian casualty risk in passenger vehicle collisions in China. Accid Anal Prev. 2010;42(4):987–993. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2009.11.006.
- Coyner K, Blackmer S, Good J, et al. Low-Speed Automated Vehicles (LSAVs) in Public Transportation. National Academies Press, Washington, DC; 2021. doi: 10.17226/26056.
- Han Y, Yang J, Nishimoto K, et al. Finite element analysis of kinematic behaviour and injuries to pedestrians in vehicle collisions. Int J Crashworthiness. 2012;17(2):141–152. doi: 10.1080/13588265.2011.632243.