Autonomy à la carte: The creative claiming tactics of the Hungarian minority in Romania

References

• Alonso, S. 2012. Challenging the State: Devolution and the Battle for Partisan Credibility: A Comparison of Belgium, Italy, Spain and the United Kingdom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bakk, M. 2004. “Az autonómia-tervek két szakasza Erdélyben 1989 után.” Magyar Kisebbség 9 (1–2): 39–60.
   Google Scholar
• Balogh, L. 2017. “Felállt a Tudose-kormány, megcsappant a PSD–ALDE támogatottsága.” Krónika.ro. Accessed March 25, 2020. https://kronikaonline.ro/belfold/felallt-a-tudose-kormany-megcsappant-a-psdnalde-tamogatotsaga.
   Google Scholar
• Basta, K. 2017. “The State Between Minority and Majority Nationalism: Decentralization, Symbolic Recognition, and Secessionist Crises in Spain and Canada.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 48 (1): 51–75. doi:10.1093/publius/pjx048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basta, K. 2020. “‘Time’s Up!’: Framing Collective Impatience for Radical Political Change.” Political Psychology 41 (4): 755–770. doi:10.1111/pops.12649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beissinger, M. 2002. Nationalist Mobilization and the Collapse of the Soviet State. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benedek, J., and H. Bajtalan. 2015. “Recent Regionalization Discourses and Projects in Romania with Special Focus on the Székelyland.” Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences 44: 23–41.
   Google Scholar
• Benedikter, T. 2009. The World’s Modern Autonomy Systems Concepts and Experiences of Regional Territorial Autonomy. Bozen: EURAC.
   Google Scholar
• Bermeo, N. 2002. “The Import of Institutions.” Journal of Democracy 13 (2): 96–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bermeo, N. 2003. Ordinary People in Extraordinary Times: The Citizenry and the Breakdown of Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bernauer, J. 2015. Ethnic Politics, Regime Support and Conflict in Central and Eastern Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bieber, F., and S. Keil. 2009. “Power-Sharing Revisited: Lessons Learned in the Balkans?” Review of Central and European Law 34 (4): 337–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birnir, J. K. 2007. Ethnicity and Electoral Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bochsler, D., and E. Szöcsik. 2013a. “Building Inter-Ethnic Bridges or Promoting Ethno-Territorial Demarcation Lines? Hungarian Minority Parties in Competition.” Nationalities Papers 41 (5): 761–779.
   Google Scholar
• Bochsler, D., and E. Szöcsik. 2013b. “The Forbidden Fruit of Federalism: Evidence from Romania and Slovakia.” West European Politics 36 (2): 426–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botoran, C., A. Dutu, and M. Retegan. 1993. Transylvania and the Romanian-Hungarian Relations. Bucharest: Institute of Military History and Theory.
   Google Scholar
• Bottoni, S. 2003. “The Creation of the Hungarian Autonomous Region in Romania (1952): Premises and Consequences.” Regio – Minorities, Politics, Society 1: 71–94.
   Google Scholar
• Brancati, D. 2006. “Decentralization: Fuelling or Dampening the Flames of Ethnic Conflict and Secessionism?” International Organization 60 (3): 651–685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brancati, D. 2009. Peace by Design: Managing Intrastate Conflict Through Decentralization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cederman, L. E., Simon Hug, Andreas Schädel, and Julian Wucherpfennig. 2015. “Territorial Autonomy in the Shadow of Conflict: Too Little, Too Late?” American Political Science Review 109 (2): 354–370. doi:10.1017/S0003055415000118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandra, K. 2005. “Ethnic Parties and Democratic Stability.” Perspectives on Politics 3 (2): 235–252.
   Google Scholar
• Csata, Z., and L. Marácz. 2018. “Regulatory Environment, Linguistic Inequalities, and New Opportunities for Hungarian Minority Interest Representation in Romania.” In Language Policy and Linguistic Justice. Economic, Philosophical and Sociolinguistic Approaches, edited by M. Gazzola, T. Templin, and B.-A. Wickström, 393–430. Cham: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-75263-1.
   Google Scholar
• Csergő, Z. 2013. “Kosovo and the Framing of Non-Secessionist Self-Government Claims in Romania.” Europe-Asia Studies 65 (5): 889–911. doi:10.1080/09668136.2013.805960.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, K. G. 2013. “Understanding Strategic Choice: The Determinants of Civil War and Nonviolent Campaign in Self-Determination Disputes.” Journal of Peace Research 50 (3): 291–304. doi:10.1177/0022343313475467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dembinska, M. 2012. “(Re)Framing Identity Claims: European and State Institutions as Opportunity Windows for Group Reinforcement.” Nations and Nationalism 18 (3): 417–438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dembinska, M., L. Máracz, and M. Tonk. 2014. “Introduction to the Special Section : Minority Politics and the Territoriality Principle in Europe.” Nationalities Papers. Taylor & Francis 42 (3): 355–375.
   Google Scholar
• de Winter, L., and H. Tursan, eds. 1998. Regionalist Parties in Western Europe. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Divald, S. 2021. “Back to the Future and Forward to the Past: The Hungarian Minority in Slovakia.” East European Politics & Societies. doi:10.1177/0888325420953490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EMNP. 2013. “Javaslatok Románia regionális átalakítására.”
   Google Scholar
• EMNT. 2013. “Szatmári nyilatkozat.”
   Google Scholar
• Eplényi, K. 2006. “Székelyek és autonómia – tervek a mérlegen (2003–2006); The Szeklers and the Question of Autonomy – Consideration (2003–2006).” Regio 3: 61–80.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Romania. 2005. “The Draft Law on the Status of National Minorities (Draft Law No. 502/2005).”
   Google Scholar
• Government of Romania. 2016. Fourth Report Submitted by Romania Pursuant to Article 25, Paragraph 2 of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities. Bucharest.
   Google Scholar
• Green, J. 2007. “When Voters and Parties Agree: Valence Issues and Party Competition.” Political Studies 55 (3): 629–655. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00671.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurr, T. R. 1993a. Minorities at Risk: A Global View of Ethnopolitical Conflicts. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gurr, T. R. 1993b. “Why Minorities Rebel: A Global Analysis of Communal Mobilization and Conflict Since 1945.” International Political Science Review 14 (2): 161–201. doi:10.1177/019251219301400203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gyula, F. 2018. “A nemzeti kisebbségi jogok biztosításának avagy ‘A gyulafehérvári ígéretek megtagadásától a Minority SafePack ellenzéséig – 100 év romániai kisebbségjogi történet’.” Acta Univ Sapientiae, Legal Studies 2: 165–261.
   Google Scholar
• Hale, H. E. 2004. “Divided We Stand: Institutional Sources of Ethnofederal State Survival and Collapse.” World Politics 56 (2): 165–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannum, H. 1990. Autonomy, Sovereigny and Self-Determination. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., A. H. Schakel, and G. Marks. 2010. The Rise of Regional Authority: A Comparative Study of 42 Democracies. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Horowitz, D. L. 1985. Ethnic Groups in Conflict. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Institutual National de Statistica. 2011. Rezultate definitive ale Recensământului Populaţiei şi al Locuinţelor – 2011. Bucharest.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson Preece, J. 1998. National Minorities and the European Nation-States System. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jenne, E. 2007. Ethnic Bargaining: The Paradox of Minority Empowerment. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kettley, C. 2014. “Power-Sharing and Ethnic Conflict : The Consociational-Integrative Dichotomy and Beyond.” In Minority Governance in and Beyond Europe: Celebrating 10 Years of the European Yearbook of Minority Issues, edited by T. Malloy and J. Marko, 1–21. Leiden: Brill Nijhoff.
   Google Scholar
• Kiss, T. 2018. “Introduction: Unequal Accommodation, Ethnic Parallelism, and Increasing Marginality.” In Unequal Accommodation of Minority Rights: Hungarians in Transylvania, edited by T. Kiss, István Gergő Székely, Tibor Toró, Nándor Bárdi, and István Horváth, 1–33. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kiss, T., T. Toró, and I. G. Székely. 2018. “Unequal Accommodation: An Institutionalist Analysis of Ethnic Claim-Making and Bargaining.” In Unequal Accommodation of Minority Rights: Hungarians in Transylvania, edited by T. Kiss, István Gergő Székely, Tibor Toró, Nándor Bárdi, and István Horváth, 71–165. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kovács, Z. 2019. “Újra benyújtották a székelyföldi autonómiáról szóló tervezetet a parlamentbe.” Maszol.ro.
   Google Scholar
• Lapidoth, R. 1997. Autonomy: Flexible Solutions to Ethnic Conflicts. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.
   Google Scholar
• Magyar Polgári Párt. 2008. “Az Új Lehetőség: a Magyar Polgári Párt politikai keretprogramja.”
   Google Scholar
• Malloy, T. 2015. “Introduction.” In Minority Accommodation Through Territorial and Non-Territorial Autonomy, edited by T. Malloy and F. Palermo, 1–9. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Malloy, T., A. Osipov, and B. Vizi. 2015. Managing Diversity Through Non-Territorial Autonomy: Assessing Advantages, Deficiences and Risks. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Malloy, T., and F. Palermo, eds. 2015. Minority Accommodation Through Territorial and Non-Territorial Autonomy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Massetti, E. 2016. “Between Autonomy and Secession : Decentralization and Regionalist Party Ideological Radicalism.” Party Politics 22 (1): 59–79. doi:10.1177/1354068813511380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maszol.ro. 2017. “Bizalmi szavazás: az RMDSZ várja a kormányprogramot és a miniszterek listáját.” Maszol.ro. Accessed March 25, 2020. https://www.maszol.ro/index.php/belfold/82582-bizalmi-szavazas-az-rmdsz-varja-a-kormanyprogramot-es-a-miniszterek-listajat.
   Google Scholar
• Maszol.ro. 2018. “Elutasította a szenátus a Székelyföld autonómiájáról szóló törvénytervezetet.” Maszol.ro. Accessed November 11, 2019. https://www.maszol.ro/index.php/belfold/96987-elutasitotta-a-szenatus-a-szekelyfold-autonomiajarol-szolo-torvenytervezetet.
   Google Scholar
• McAdam, D., S. Tarrow, and C. Tilly. 2001. Dynamics of Contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McGarry, J., and M. Moore. 2005. “Karl Renner, Power Sharing and Non-Territorial Autonomy.” In National Cultural Autonomy and Its Contemporary Critics, edited by E. Nimni, 74–94. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Meadwell, H. 1993. “The Politics of Nationalism in Quebec Author.” World Politics 45 (2): 203–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minorities at Risk Project. 2007. Minorities at Risk (MAR) Codebook Version 2/2009. College Park, MD: Center for International Development and Conflict Management. http://www.mar.umd.edu.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, C. 2008. “A Europe of the Regions vs. the Regions in Europe: Reflections on Regional Engagement in Brussels.” Regional & Federal Studies 18 (5): 517–535.
   Google Scholar
• Nimni, E. 2013. “The Conceptual Challenge of Non-Territorial Autonomy.” In The Challenges of Non-Territorial Autonomy: Theory and Practice, edited by E. Nimni, A. Osipov, and D. J. Smith, 1–24. Bern: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Nootens, G. 2015. “Can Non-Territorial Autonomy Bring an Added Value to Theoretic and Policy-Oriented Analysis of Ethnic Politics?” In Minority Accommodation Through Territorial and Non-Territorial Autonomy, edited by T. Malloy and F. Palermo, 33–55. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pasquier, R., and C. Perron. 2008. “Régionalisation et Régionalismes dans l’Europe Élargie : Les Enjeux d’Une Comparaison Est-Ouest.” Revue d’ Études Comparatives Est- Ouest 3 39 (3): 5–18.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, R. 1983. National Minorities in Eastern Europe 1848–1945. Basingstoke: MacMillan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Philipp, M. 2013. “Coming Together: Power-Sharing and the Durability of Negotiated Peace Settlements.” Civil Wars 15 (3): 332–358.
   Google Scholar
• Profiroiu, C. M., A. G. Profiroiu, and S. R. Szabo. 2017. “Decentralization Process in Romania.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Decentralisation in Europe, edited by M. Profiroui and J. M. Ruano, 353–387. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Prunel, K. 2011. “Hungarians Living in Romania Between 1956–1965. Minority Status and Communitarian Identity.” Anuarul Institutului de Istorie ‘George Baritiu’ Series HISTORICA 50: 275–292. doi:10.1300/J123v53n01_15
   Google Scholar
• Pytlas, B. 2013. “Radical-Right Narratives in Slovakia and Hungary: Historical Legacies, Mythic Overlaying and Contemporary Politics.” Patterns of Prejudice 47 (2): 162–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabushka, A. R., and K. A Shepsle. 1972. Politics in Plural Societies. A Theory of Democratic Instability. Colombus: Charles E. Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• Reilly, B. 2006. “Political Engineering and Party Politics in Conflict-Prone Societies.” Democratization 13 (5): 811–827.
   Google Scholar
• RMDSZ. 2000. “RMDSZ törvénytervezet a nemzeti kisebbségekről és autonóm közösségekről 1993.” In Útkeresés és Integráció, edited by N. Bárdi and G. Éger, 124–136. Budapest: Teleki Lázsló Alapítvány.
   Google Scholar
• RMDSZ. 2014. “A romániai Székelyföld autonómia statútuma.”
   Google Scholar
• RMDSZ. 2016. “Parlamenti Választási Program 2016.”
   Google Scholar
• RMDSZ kongresszus. 2000. “Az RMDSZ III. Brassó Kongresszusának Határozatai 1993.” In Útkeresés és Integráció, edited by N. Bárdi and G. Éger, 89–111. Budapest: Teleki Lázsló Alapítvány.
   Google Scholar
• Roeder, P. G. 1991. “Soviet Federalism and Ethnic Mobilization.” World Politics 43 (2): 196–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothchild, D., and P. G. Roeder. 2005. “Dilemmas of State-Building in Divided Societies.” In Sustainable Peace: Power and Democracy After Civil Wars, edited by P. G. Roeder and D. Rothchild, 1–25. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saideman, S. M., Lanoue D. J., Campenni, M., and Stanton, S. 2002. “Democratization, Political Institutions, and Ethnic Conflict. A Pooled Time-Series Analysis, 1985-1998.” Comparative Political Studies 35 (1): 103–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salat, L. 2014. “The Changes of Ethnic Autonomy in Romania – Between Theory and Practice.” In Autonomies in Europe: Solutions and Challenges, edited by Z. Kántor, 125–141. Budapest: L’Harmattan.
   Google Scholar
• Schreier, M. 2012. Qualitative Content Analysis in Practice. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Siroky, D. S., and J. Cuffe. 2015. “Lost Autonomy, Nationalism and Separatism.” Comparative Political Studies 48 (1): 3–34. doi:10.1177/0010414013516927.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, D. 2014a. “Minority Territorial and Non-Territorial Autonomy in Europe: Theoretical Perspectives and Practical Challenges.” In Autonomies in Europe: Solutions and Challenges, edited by Z. Kantor, 15–24. Budapest: L’Harmattan.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D. 2014b. “National-Cultural Autonomy in Contemporary Estonia.” In Autonomy Arrangements Around the World: A Collection of Well and Lesser Known Cases, edited by L. Salat, Sergiu Constantin, Alexander Osipov, and István Gergő Székely, 299–319. Cluj-Napoca: Institutului pentru Studierea Problemelor Minorităţilor Naţionale.
   Google Scholar
• Sorens, J. 2009. “The Partisan Logic of Decentralization in Europe.” Regional & Federal Studies 19 (2): 255–272.
   Google Scholar
• Stefanova, B. M. 2014. “An Ethnonational Perspective on Territorial Politics in the EU: East – West Comparisons from a Pilot Study.” Nationalities Papers 42 (3): 449–468. doi:10.1080/00905992.2014.916661.
   Google Scholar
• Suksi, M. 2014. “Territorial Autonomy : The Åland Islands.” In Autonomies in Europe: Solutions and Challenges, edited by Z. Kántor, 37–58. Budapest: L’Harmattan.
   Google Scholar
• Szász, J. 2011. “Székelyföldet a jó Isten is autonómiára teremtette.” Székely Nép 2: 4.
   Google Scholar
• Székely, I. G. 2014. Dynamics of Party Politics, Electoral Competition and Cooperation Within the Hungarian Minorities of Romania, Serbia and Slovakia. Budapest. Central European University.
   Google Scholar
• SZNT. 2003. “Székelyföld Autonómia Statútuma.”
   Google Scholar
• Szöcsik, E., and C. I. Zuber. 2015. “EPAC – A New Dataset on Ethnonationalism in Party Competition in 22 European Democracies.” Party Politics 21 (1): 153–160. doi:10.1177/1354068812462927.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilly, C., and S. Tarrow. 2015. Contentious Politics. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tokár, G. 2014. “Autonomy in Slovakia – Difficulties and Problems.” In Autonomies in Europe: Solutions and Challenges, edited by Z. Kántor, 141–150. Budapest: L’Harmattan.
   Google Scholar
• Transindex.ro. 2017. “Levették napirendről az RMDSZ törvénykezdeményezéseit.” transindex.ro. Accessed March 25, 2020. http://itthon.transindex.ro/?pp=27.
   Google Scholar
• Walter, B. 2009. Reputation and Civil War: Why Separatist Conflicts Are so Violent. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wolff, S. 2011. “Post-Conflict State Building: The Debate on Institutional Choice.” Third World Quarterly 32 (10): 1777–1802.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolff, S., and M. Weller. 2005. “Self-Determination and Autonomy: A Conceptual Introduction.” In Autonomy, Self-Governance and Conflict Resolution: Innovative Approaches to Institutional Design in Divided Societies, edited by S. Wolff and M. Weller, 1–25. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zuber, C. I. 2013. “Beyond Outbidding? Ethnic Party Strategies in Serbia.” Party Politics 19 (5): 758–777.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar