To protect or not protect? Comparing nature conservation policies in the German federal states

References

• Abgeordnetenhaus von Berlin. 2013. Wortprotokoll StadtUm 17/22 vom 6. März 2013, Berlin,https://www.parlament-berlin.de/ados/17/StadtUm/protokoll/su17-022-wp.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Anan, D. 2017. Parteiprogramme im Wandel. Ein Vergleich von FDP und Grünen zwischen 1971 und 2013. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Auel, K. 2010. “Between Reformstau and Länder Strangulation? German Co-operative Federalism Reconsidered.” Regional & Federal Studies 20: 229–249.
   Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, M. 2015. “Parsimony and Causality.” Quality & Quantity 49: 839–856.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behnke, N., and S. Kropp. 2016. “Arraying Institutional Layers in Federalism Reforms: Lessons from the German Case.” Regional & Federal Studies 26: 585–602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benz, A. 2007. “Inter-Regional Competition in Co-operative Federalism: New Modes of Multi-level Governance in Germany.” Regional & Federal Studies 17: 421–436.
   Google Scholar
• Benz, A. 2016. “Gradual Constitutional Change and Federal Dynamics – German Federalism Reform in Historical Perspective.” Regional & Federal Studies 26: 707–728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benz, A., J. Detemple, and D. Heinz, eds. 2016. Varianten und Dynamiken der Politikverflechtung im deutschen Bundesstaat. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Benz, A., and G. Lehmbruch. 2002. Föderalismus - Analysen in entwicklungsgeschichtlicher und vergleichender Perspektive. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Bernauer, T., et al. 2007. “Explaining Green Innovation. Ten Years After Porter’s Win-Win Proposition: How to Study the Effects of Regulation on Corporate Environmental Innovation?” In Politik und Umwelt. Politische Vierteljahresschrift Sonderheft 39, edited by K. Jacob, and F. Biermann, 323–341. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Bernauer, T., T. Böhmelt, and V. Koubi. 2013. “Is There a Democracy – Civil Society Paradox in Global Environmental Governance?” Global Environmental Politics 13: 88–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernauer, T., and V. Koubi. 2009. “Effects of Political Institutions on Air Quality.” Ecological Economics 68: 1355–1365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biela, J., A. Hennl, and A. Kaiser. 2013. Policy Making in Multilevel Systems. Federalism, Decentralisation, and Performance in the OECD Countries. Colchester: ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Binder, S., and E. Neumayer. 2005. “Environmental Pressure Group Strength and air Pollution: An Empirical Analysis.” Ecological Economics 55: 527–538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bischof, D., and M. Wagner. 2020. “What Makes Parties Adapt to Voter Preferences? The Role of Party Organization, Goals and Ideology.” British Journal of Political Science 50: 391–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bündnis 90/Die Grünen Hessen. 2010. Ursula Hammann: Gesetz zur Neuregelung des Rechts des Naturschutzes und der Landschaftspflege, https://www.gruene-hessen.de/landtag/reden/ursula-hammann-gesetz-zur-neuregelung-des-rechts-des-naturschutzes-und-der-landschaftspflege/.
   Google Scholar
• Böcher, M., and Töller A.E. 2016. “Umwelt- und Naturschutzpolitik der Bundesländer.” In Zwischen Föderalismusreform und Schuldenbremse, edited by A. Hildebrandt and F. Wolf, 259–281. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Böcher, M., and C. Hubo. 2011. “Vergleich zwischen Wettbewerb idee.natur und “Normalverfahren”.” In Regionenwettbewerb als Instrument zur Akquisition neuer Naturschutzgroßprojektgebiete, edited by M. Böcher, and M. Krott, 94–127. Bonn: Bundesamt für Naturschutz.
   Google Scholar
• Böcher, M., and A. E. Töller. 2012. Umweltpolitik in Deutschland. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Bomberg, E. 2007. “Policy Learning in an Enlarged European Union: Environmental NGOs and New Policy Instruments.” Journal of European Public Policy 14: 248–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bräuninger, T., M. Debus, J. Müller, and C. Stecker. 2020. Parteienwettbewerb in den deutschen Bundesländern. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Bräuninger, T., Debus M., Müller J., and Stecker C. 2019. “Die programmatischen Positionen der deutschen Parteien zur Bundestagswahl 2017: Ergebnisse einer Expertenbefragung.” In Jahrbuch für Handlungs- und Entscheidungstheorie. Vol. 11, edited by M. Debus, M. Tepe, and J. Sauermann, 93–113. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, R. D. 1995. “Party Cleavages and Welfare Effort in the American States.” American Political Science Review 89: 23–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burkhart, S., P. Manow, and D. Ziblatt. 2008. “A More Efficient and Accountable Federalism? An Analysis of the Consequences of Germany's 2006 Constitutional Reform.” German Politics 17: 522–540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bußjäger, P. 2015. “Austria’s Cooperative Federalism.” In Austrian Federalism in Comparative Perspective, edited by G. Bischof, and F. Karlhofer, 11–33. New Orleans: University of New Orleans Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caughey, D., and C. Warshaw. 2016. “The Dynamics of State Policy Liberalism, 1936–2014.” American Journal of Political Science 60: 899–913.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caughey, D., and C. Warshaw. 2017. “Policy Preferences and Policy Change: Dynamic Responsiveness in the American States, 1936–2014.” American Political Science Review 112: 249–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crepaz, M. M. L. 1995. “Explaining National Variations of air Pollution Levels: Political Institutions and their Impact on Environmental Policy-making.” Environmental Politics 4: 391–414.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, R. J., D. M. Farrell, and I. McAllister. 2011. Political Parties and Democratic Linkage: How Parties Organize Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Block, D., and B. Vis. 2019. “Addressing the Challenges Related to Transforming Qualitative Into Quantitative Data in Qualitative Comparative Analysis.” Journal of Mixed-Methods Research 13: 503–535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dose, N., and I. Reus. 2016. “The Effect of Reformed Legislative Competences on Länder Policy-making: Determinants of Fragmentation and Uniformity.” Regional & Federal Studies 26: 625–644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dose, N., and F. Wolfes. 2016. “Die Höhe der Beamtenbesoldung in den Ländern. Der Versuch einer Erklärung: Parteiendifferenzhypothese oder Verschuldungsdruck?” Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft 9: 267–293.
   Google Scholar
• Duchacek, I. D. 1970. Comparative Federalism. The Territorial Dimension of Politics. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Dusa, A. 2019. QCA with R. A Comprehensive Resource. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Engels, J. I. 2006. Naturpolitik in der Bundesrepublik. Paderborn: Schöningh.
   Google Scholar
• Erikson, R. S., G. C. Wright, and J. P. McIver. 1989. “Political Parties, Public Opinion, and State Policy in the United States.” American Political Science Review 83: 729–750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forschungsgruppe Wahlen Mannheim. 2020. Politbarometer 2019 (Cumulated Data Set), Cologne, GESIS Data Archive, ZA7599 Data file Version 1.0.0.
   Google Scholar
• Fraktion Bündnis 90/Die Grünen. 2016. Rüße: Naturschutz erhält höheren Stellenwert. Pressemitteilung vom 09. November 2016, https://gruene-fraktion-nrw.de/presse/ruesse-naturschutz-erhaelt-hoeheren-stellenwert/.
   Google Scholar
• Freitag, M., and A. Vatter. 2008. Die Demokratien der deutschen Bundesländer. Opladen: Barbara Budrich. (UTB).
   Google Scholar
• Gehm, E. 2011. Nabu bricht mit Bauernverband, https://www.shz.de/regionales/schleswig-holstein/panorama/nabu-bricht-mit-bauernverband-id1166831.html.
   Google Scholar
• Hildebrandt, A., and F. Wolf, eds. 2016a. Die Politik der Bundesländer: Zwischen Föderalismusreform und Schuldenbremse. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Hildebrandt, A., and F. Wolf. 2016b. “How Much of a Sea-Change? Land Policies After the Reforms of Federalism.” German Politics 25: 227–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., G. Marks, and A. H. Schakel. 2010. The Rise of Regional Authority: A Comparitive Study of 42 Democracies. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jahn, D. 2016. The Politics of Environmental Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jeffery, C., N. M. Pamphilis, C. Rowe, and E. Turner. 2014. “Regional Policy Variation in Germany: The Diversity of Living Conditions in a ‘Unitary Federal State’.” Journal of European Public Policy 21: 1350–1366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeffery, C., N. M. Pamphilis, C. Rowe, and E. Turner. 2016. “Introduction to the Special Issue: Reframing German Federalism.” German Politics 25: 165–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser, A., and S. Vogel. 2017. “Dynamic De/Centralization in Germany, 1949–2010.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 49: 84–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keman, H. 2000. “Federalism and Policy Performance. A Conceptual and Empirical Inquiry.” In Federalism and Political Performance, edited by U. Wachendorfer-Schmidt, 196–227. London/New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kincaid, J. 1995. “Values and Value Tradeoffs in Federalism.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 25: 29–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klingemann, H.-D., R. I. Hofferbert, and I. Budge. 1994. Parties, Policies, and Democracy. Boulder/San Francisco/Oxford: Westview.
   Google Scholar
• Knill, C., M. Debus, and S. Heichel. 2010. “Do Parties Matter in Internationalised Policy Areas? The Impact of Political Parties on Environmental Policy Outputs in 18 OECD Countries, 1970–2000.” European Journal of Political Research 49: 301–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korpi, W. 1983. The Democratic Class Struggle. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kropp, S., and N. Behnke. 2016. “Marble Cake Dreaming of Layer Cake: The Merits and Pitfalls of Disentanglement in German Federalism Reform.” Regional and Federal Studies 26: 667–686.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landesbüro der Naturschutzverbände NRW. 2016. Stellungnahme 16/3901, https://www.lb-naturschutz-nrw.de/fileadmin/redaktion/Fachthemen/Naturschutzrecht/STN_LNatschG-E_BUND_LNU_NABU_23052016.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Lax, J. R., and J. H. Phillips. 2012. “The Democratic Deficit in the States.” American Journal of Political Science 56: 148–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MELUR SH (Ministerium für Energiewende, Landwirtschaft, Umwelt und ländliche Räume des Landes Schleswig-Holstein). 2016. Naturschutzrecht für Schleswig-Holstein, https://www.schleswig-holstein.de/DE/Landesregierung/V/Service/Broschueren/Broschueren_V/Umwelt/pdf/naturschutzrechtSH2016.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=4.
   Google Scholar
• NABU Rheinland-Pfalz & BUND. 2015. Gemeinsame Stellungnahme zur Novellierung des Landesnaturschutzgesetzes zur Drucksacke 16/4910, https://dokumente.landtag.rlp.de/landtag/vorlagen/5498-V-16.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Naurin, Elin, Terry J. Royed, and Robert Thomson, eds. 2019. Party Mandates and Democracy: Making, Breaking, and Keeping Election Pledges in Twelve Countries. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neumayer, E. 2003. “Are Left-Wing Party Strength and Corporatism Good for the Environment? Evidence from Panel Analysis of air Pollution in OECD Countries.” Ecological Economics 45: 203–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oana, N. I.-E., and C. Q. Schneider. 2018. “SetMethods: An add-on R Package for Advanced QCA.” The R Journal 10 (1): 507–533.
   Google Scholar
• Oates, W. 1972. Fiscal Federalism. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
   Google Scholar
• Pacca, L., D. Curzi, G. Rausser, and A. Olper. 2021. “The Role of Party Affiliation, Lobbying, and Electoral Incentives in Decentralized US State Support of the Environment.” Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists 8: 617–653.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pacheco, J. 2013. “The Thermostatic Model of Responsiveness in the American States.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 13: 306–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragin, C. C. 2008. Redesigning Social Inquire. Fuzzy Sets and Beyond. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Renzsch, W. 2010. “Closing the Gap? The Financial Crisis and the German Länder.” L'Europe en Formation 358: 51–60.
   Google Scholar
• Reus, I., and S. Vogel. 2018. “Policy-Vielfalt zwischen den Bundesländern nach der Föderalismusreform I: Art, Ausmaß und Akteure.” Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft 12: 621–642.
   Google Scholar
• Rowe, C., and E. Turner. 2016. “Justice and Prisons Policy.” In Die Politik der Bundesländer, edited by A. Hildebrandt, and F. Wolf, 87–113. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Sack, D., and A. E. Töller. 2018. “Einleitung: Policies in den deutschen Ländern.” Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft 12: 603–619.
   Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F. W. 2008. “Community, Diversity and Autonomy: The Challenges of Reforming German Federalism.” German Politics 17: 509–521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F. W. 2009. Föderalismusreform: Kein Ausweg aus der Politikverflechtungsfalle? New York/Frankfurt a.M.: Campus.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, M. G. 1980. CDU und SPD an der Regierung. Ein Vergleich ihrer Politik in den Ländern. Frankfurt am Main/New York: Campus.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, M. G. 1996. “When Parties Matter: A Review of the Possibilities and Limits of Partisan Influence on Public Policy.” European Journal of Political Research 30: 155–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, M. G. 2016. “Conclusion: Policy Diversity in Germany's Federalism.” German Politics 25: 301–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, C. Q. 2018. “Realists and Idealists in QCA.” Political Analysis 26: 246–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, C. Q., and C. Wagemann. 2012. Set-Theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences: A Guide to Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scruggs, L. A. 1999. “Institutions and Environmental Performance in Seventeen Western Democracies.” British Journal of Political Science 29: 1–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senat der Freien und Hansestadt Hamburg. 2013. Mitteilung des Senats an die Bürgerschaft. Entwurf eines Gesetzes zur Änderung des Landeswaldgesetzes und zur Änderung weiterer Vorschriften, Drucksache 20/7549, 09.04.13.
   Google Scholar
• Simonovits, G., A. M. Guess, and J. Nagler. 2019. “Responsiveness Without Representation: Evidence from Minimum Wage Laws in U.S. States.” American Journal of Political Science 63: 401–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder, Richard. 2001. “Scaling Down: The Subnational Comparative Method.” Studies in Comparative International Development 36: 93–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stecker, C. 2016. “The Effects of Federalism Reform on the Legislation Process in Germany.” Regional & Federal Studies 26: 603–624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson, Robert, et al. 2017. “The Fulfillment of Parties’ Election Pledges: A Comparative Study on the Impact of Power Sharing.” American Journal of Political Science 61: 527–542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Töller, A. E., and U. Roßegger. 2018. “Auswirkungen der Abweichungsgesetzgebung der Länder. Methodische Überlegungen und erste Resultate am Beispiel des Naturschutzrechts.” Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft 4: 663–682.
   Google Scholar
• Tsebelis, G. 2002. Veto Players. How Political Institutions Work. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Volkens, A., Krause W., Lehmann P., Matthieß T., Merz N., Regel S., and Weßels B. 2019. The Manifesto Data Collection. Version 2019b. Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung.
   Google Scholar
• Weingast, B. R. 1995. “The Economic Rolen of Political Institutions: Market-Preserving Federalism and Economic Development.” Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 11: 1–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenzelburger, G. 2013. “Das goldene Zeitalter der Vermögenserlöse. Die Determinanten der Einmalerlöse der Bundesländer 1995–2007.” Politische Vierteljahresschrift 54: 111–154.
   Google Scholar
• Wenzelburger, G., S. Wurster, and M. B. Siewert. 2020. “Responsive Politikgestaltung in den deutschen Bundesländern? Versuch einer Systematisierung und Konzeption eines Forschungsprogramms.” Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft 14: 33–47.
   Google Scholar
• Wiseman, H. J., and D. Owen. 2018. “Federal Laboratories of Democracy.” U.C. Davis Law Review 52: 1119–1191.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, F. 2006. Die Bildungsausgaben der Bundesländer: Welche Faktoren erklären ihre beträchtliche Variation? Münster: Lit Verlag.
   Google Scholar