159
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Bureaucratic connections and local development: A study of Palwal district in India

&

References

  • Afridi Farzana, Vegard Iversen, and M. R. Sharan. 2017. “Women Political Leaders, Corruption, and Learning: Evidence from a Large Public Program in India.” Economic Development and Cultural Change 66 (1): 1–30.
  • Agnihotri Anustubh, and Anirvan Chowdhury. 2020. Party Alignment and Fiscal Transfers: Evidence From West Bengal, India. Working Paper.
  • Ban Radu, and Vijayendra Rao. 2008. “Tokenism or Agency? The Impact of Women's Reservations on Village Democracies in South India.” Economic Development and Cultural Change 56 (3): 501–530.
  • Bardhan Pranab. 2002. “Decentralization of Governance and Development.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 16 (4): 185–205.
  • Bardhan Pranab, Dilip Mookherjee, and Parra Torrado Monica. 2010. “Impact of Political Reservations in West Bengal Local Governments on Anti-poverty Targeting.” Journal of Globalization and Development 1 (1): 1–38.
  • Besley Timothy, Rohini Pande, and Vijayendra Rao. 2012. “Just Rewards? Local Politics and Public Resource Allocation in South India.” The World Bank Economic Review 26 (2): 191–216.
  • Bhavnani Rikhil, and Alexander Lee. 2018. “Local Embeddedness and Bureaucratic Performance: Evidence from India.” The Journal of Politics 80 (1): 71–87.
  • Bohlken Anjali Thomas. 2018a. “Targeting Ordinary Voters or Political Elites? Why Pork is Distributed Along Partisan Lines in India.” American Journal of Political Science 62 (4): 796–812.
  • Bohlken Anjali Thomas. 2018b. Democratization from Above: The Logic of Local Democracy in the Developing World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Brollo Fernando, and Tomasso Nannicini. 2012. “Tying Your Enemy's Hands in Close Races: The Politics of Federal Transfers in Brazil.” American Political Science Review 106 (4): 742–761.
  • Bussell Jennifer. 2019. Clients and Constituents: Political Responsiveness in Patronage Democracies. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
  • Chandra Kanchan. 2004. Why Ethnic Parties Succeed: Patronage and Ethnic Head Counts in India. Cambridge University Press.
  • Chattopadhyay Raghabendra, and Esther Duflo. 2004. “Women as Policy Makers: Evidence from a Randomized Policy Experiment in India.” Econometrica 72 (5): 1409–1443.
  • Das Sabyasachi, Abhiroop Mukhopadhyay, and Rajas Saroy. 2017. “Efficiency Consequences of Affirmative Action in Politics: Evidence From India.” IZA DP No. 11093.
  • Dasgupta Aditya, and Devesh Kapur. 2020. “The Political Economy of Bureaucratic Overload: Evidence from Rural Development Officials in India.” American Political Science Review 114 (4): 1316–1334.
  • Dongre Ambrish, Yamini Aiyar, and Anirvan Chowdhury. 2017. “Do Gram Panchayats Get Their Money? An Analysis of the State of Fiscal Devolution in Birbhum, West Bengal.” In Decentralisation, Governance and Development: An Indian Perspective. Hyderabad,India: Orient Blackswan.
  • Dunning Thad, and Janhavi Nilekani. 2013. “Ethnic Quotas and Political Mobilization: Caste, Parties, and Distribution in Indian Village Councils.” American Political Science Review 107 (1): 35–56.
  • Garman Christopher, Stephan Haggard, and Eliza Willis. 2001. “Fiscal Decentralization: A Political Theory with Latin American Cases.” World Politics 53 (2): 205–236.
  • GOI. 2011. Roadmap for the Panchayati Raj (2011–17): An All India Perspective. Ministry of Panchayati Raj, Government of India.
  • Granovetter Mark. 1985. “Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness.” American Journal of Sociology 91 (3): 481–510.
  • Grossman Guy, and Tara Slough. 2022. “Government Responsiveness in Developing Countries.” Annual Review of Political Science 25: 5.1–5.23.
  • Gulzar Saad, and Benjamin Pasquale. 2017. “Politicians, Bureaucrats, and Development: Evidence From India.” American Political Science Review 111 (1): 162–83.
  • Ivanyna Maksym, and Anwar Shah. 2012. How Close Is Your Government to Its People? Worldwide Indicators on Localization and Decentralization. WPS6138, 1–41. The World Bank.
  • Jensenius Francesca, and Pradeep Chhibber. 2022. Privileging One's Own? Voting Patterns and Politicized Spending in India. Working Paper.
  • Kitschelt Herbert, and Steven I. Wilkinson. 2007. Patrons, Clients and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kumar Chinmaya, and M. R. Sharan. 2021. It's Complicated: The Distributional Consequences of Political Reservation. Working Paper.
  • Marcesse Thibaud. 2018. “Public Policy Reform and Informal Institutions: The Political Articulation of the Demand for Work in Rural India.” World Development 103: 284–296.
  • Mohanty Manoranjan, George Mathew, Richard Baum, and Rong Ma. 2007. Grass-Roots Democracy in India and China: The Right to Participate. Delhi: SAGE Publications India.
  • Nataliá Bueno. 2017. “Bypassing the Enemy: Distributive Politics, Credit Claiming, and Non-state Organizations in Brazil.” Comparative Political Studies 51 (3): 304–340.
  • Purohit Bhumi. 2022. Bureaucratic Resistance Against Female Politicians: Evidence From Telangana, India. Working Paper.
  • Rural Local Body Core Functions and Finances. 2014. Centre for Policy Research.
  • Sadanandan Anoop. 2017. Why Democracy Deepens: Political Information and Decentralization in India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Sharan M. R. 2021. Last Among Equals: Power, Caste & Politics in Bihar's Villages. Chennai: Westland Publications.
  • Singh Rajkamal, and Rahul Hemrajani. 2018. “Concentric Clientelism: A Case Study of Rural Saharanpur.” Studies in Indian Politics 6 (2): 247–266.
  • Stokes Susan, Thad Dunning, Marcelo Nazareno, and Valeria Brusco. 2013. Brokers, Voters, and Clientelism: The Puzzle of Distributive Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Tsai Lily. 2007. “Solidary Groups, Informal Accountability, and Local Public Goods Provision in Rural China.” American Political Science Review 101 (2): 355–372.
  • Vaishnav Milan, and Saksham Khosla. 2016. The Indian Administrative Service Meets Big Data. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. https://carnegieendowment.org/2016/09/01/indian-administrative-service-meets-bigdata-pub-64457.
  • Vats, Abhinav. 2019 Applying Competitive Federalism to Facilitate Applying Competitive Federalism to Facilitate Policy Implementation for Rural Development Policy Implementation at District and Sub-District Levels: The Case of Super Village Challenge in Palwal District, Haryana.” In An Outlook for Change. Sonepat: Ashoka University.
  • Venugopal Varsha, and Serdar Yilmaz. 2009. “Decentralization in Kerala: Panchayat Government Discretion and Accountability.” Public Administration and Development: The International Journal of Management Research and Practice 29 (4): 316–329.
  • Venugopal Varsha, and Serdar Yilmaz. 2010. “Decentralization in Tanzania: An Assessment of Local Government Discretion and Accountability.” Public Administration and Development 30 (3): 215–231.
  • Wade Robert. 1982. “The System of Administrative and Political Corruption: Canal Irrigation in South India.” The Journal of Development Studies 18 (3): 287–328.
  • Yilmaz Serdar, and Varsha Venugopal. 2013. “Local Government Discretion and Accountability in Philippines.” Journal of International Development 25 (2): 227–250.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.