Leadership in low- and underperforming schools—two contrasting Scandinavian cases

References

• Aas, M. (2017). Understanding leadership and change in schools: Expansive learning and tensions. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 20(3), 278–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2015.1082630
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aas, M., & Brandmo, C. (2016). Revisiting instructional and transformational leadership: The contemporary Norwegian context of school leadership. Journal of Educational Administration, 54(1), 92–110. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-08-2014-0105
   Google Scholar
• Aas, M., & Brandmo, C. (2018). Assessment tools for transforming practice: School leaders’ contribution. Nordic Studies in Education, 38(2), 174–193. https://doi.org/10.18261/.1891-5949-2018-02-06
   Google Scholar
• Aasen, P., Telhaug, A. O., & Mediås, A. (2006). The Nordic model in education. Education as part of the political system in the last 50 years. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 50(3), 245–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313830600743274
   Google Scholar
• Anagnostopoulos, D. (2006). “Real students”and “True demotes”: Ending social promotion and the moral ordering of urban high schools. American Educational Research Journal, 43(1), 5–42. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312043001005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, S. (2015). Education, governance and the tyranny of numbers. Journal of Education Policy, 30(3), 299–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2015.1013271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, S., Maguire, M., & Braun, A. (2012). How schools do policy. Policy enactments in secondary schools. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Bryk, A., & Schneider, B. (2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. Russel Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Camburn, E., Rowan, B., & Taylor, J. E. (2003). Distributed leadership in schools: The case of elementary schools adopting comprehensive school reform models. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(4), 347–373. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737025004347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day, C., Johansson, O., & Møller, J. (2011). Sustaining improvements in student learning and achievement: The importance of resilience in leadership. In L. Moos, O. Johansson, & C. Day (Eds.), How school principals sustain success over time. International perspectives (pp. 167–182). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Day, C., Sammons, P., Hopkins, D., Harris, A., Leithwood, K., Gu, Q., Kington, A. (2009). The impact of school leadership on pupil outcomes (Final Report. (Research Report DCSF-RR018). Nottingham University
   Google Scholar
• Eisner, E. W. (1991). The enlightened eye: Qualitative inquiry and the enhancement of educational practice. Macmillan Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Engeström, Y. (2007). Active theory an individual and social transformation. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R. Punamäki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 19–38). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frost, T., Stimpson, D. V., & Maughan, M. R. (1978). Some correlates of trust. The Journal of Pshycology, 99(1), 103–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1978.9921447
   Google Scholar
• Goddard, R. D., Hoy, W., & Hoy, A. (2004). Collective efficacy beliefs: Theoretical developments, empirical evidence and future directions. Educational Researcher, 33(3), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033003003
   Google Scholar
• Gronn, P. (2002). Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(4), 423–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(02)00120-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. (1999) Can Leadership Enhance School Effectiveness? In T. Bush, L. Bell, R. Bolam, R. Glatter & P. Ribbins (Eds.), Educational management: Redefining theory, policy and practice, (pp. 178–190). http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446219676.n14
   Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2010). Leadership for learning: Does collaborative leadership make a difference in school improvement? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 38(6), 654–678. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143210379060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, A. (1998). Läraren i det postmoderna samhället. Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, A., Leithwood, K., Day, C., Sammons, P., & Hopkins, D. (2007). Distributed leadership and organizational change: Reviewing the evidence. Educational Change, 8(4), 337–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-007-9048–4
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2008). Visible learning - A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Heck, R. H., & Hallinger, P. (1999). Next generation methods for the study of leadership and school improvement. In J. Murphy & K. S. Louis (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational administration (pp. 141–162). Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Hines, E. M., Moore, J. L., Mayes, R. D., Harris, P. C., Vega, D., Robinson, D. V., Gray, C. N., & Jackson, C. E. (2017). Making student achievement a priority: The role of school counselors in turnaround schools. Urban Education, 55(2), 216–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085916685761
   Google Scholar
• Hogan, R., Curphy, G. J., & Hogan, J. (1994). What we know about leadership: Effectiveness and personality. American Psychologist, 49(6), 493–504. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.49.6.493
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, C., & Peters, G. (2004). The middle aging of new public management: Into the age of paradox? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14(3), 267–282. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muh019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Höög, J., & Johansson, O. (2011). Struktur, kultur, ledarskap: Ett projekt och dess resultat [Structure, culture, leadership: A project and the results]. In J. Höög & O. Johansson (Eds.), Struktur, Kultur, Ledarskap: Förutsättningar för framgångsrika skolor [Structure, culture, leadership: Prerequisites for successful schools]. Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Hoy, W., & Tarter, J. (1992). Measuring the health of the school climate: A conceptual framework. NASSP Bulletin, 76(547), 74–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/019263659207654709
   Google Scholar
• Kanfer, R. (1990). Motivation theory and industrial/organizational psychology. In M. D. Dunnette & Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Vol. 1 Theory in industrial and organizational psychology (pp.75–170). Consulting Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2008). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. School Leadership & Management, Formerly School Organisation, 28(1), 27–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632430701800060
   Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., & Louis, K. S. (2012). Linking leadership to student learning. Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Liedman, S.-E. (2011). Hets – En bok om skolan [Torment - A book about the school]. Albert Bonnier Förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Liljenberg, M. (2016). Teacher leadership modes and practices in a Swedish context – A case study. School Leadership & Management, 36(1), 21–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2016.1160209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mausethagen, S., & Granlund, L. (2012). Contested discourses of teacher professionalism: Current tensions between education policy and teachers’ union. Journal of Education Policy, 27(6), 815–833. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2012.672656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, G. J. (1996). Hierarkins ekonomi - Att styra effektiva organisationer. SNS Förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Mintrop, H. (2004). Schools on probation: How accountability works (And doesn’t work). Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Møller, J. (2009). School leadership in an age of accountability: Tensions between managerial and professional accountability. Educational Change, 10(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-008-9078-6
   Google Scholar
• Møller, J. (2012). The construction of a public face as a school principal. International Journal of Educational Management, 26(5), 452–460. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513541211240246
   Google Scholar
• Møller, J., & Skedsmo, G. (2013). Modernizing education - NPM reform in the Norwegian education system. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 45(4), 336–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620.2013.822353
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, J. (2008). The place of leadership in turnaround schools: Insights from organizational recovery in the public and private sectors. Journal of Educational Administration, 46(1), 74–98. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230810849826
   Google Scholar
• Nordenbo, S. E., Holm, A., Elstad, E., Scheerens, J., Søgaard Larsen, M., Uljens, M., … Hauge, T. E. (2010). Input, process, and learning in primary and lower secondary schools. A systematic review carried out for The Nordic Indicator Workgroup (DNI). The Evidence Base. Danish Clearinghouse for Educational Research, DPU, Aarhus University.
   Google Scholar
• Paulsen, J. M., & Høyer, H. C. (2016). External control and professional trust in Norwegian school governing: Synthesis from a nordic research project. Nordic Studies in Education, Special Issue:Educational Leadership in Nordic Countries, 36(2), 86–102. https://doi.org/10.18261/.1891-5949-2016-02-01
   Google Scholar
• Paulsen Merok, J., Johansson, O., Moos, L., Nihlfors, E., & Risku, M. (2014). Superintendent leadership under shifting governance regimes. International Journal of Educational Management, 28(7), 812–822. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-07-2013-0103
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, D., Sammons, P., De Fraine, B., Van Damme, J., Townsend, T., Teddlie, C., & Stringfield, S. (2014). Educational effectiveness research (EER): A state-of-the-art review, school effectiveness and school Improvement. An International Journal ofResearch, Policy and Practice, 25(2), 197–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2014.885450
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, V. M. J. (2010). From instructional leadership to leadership capabilities: Empirical findings and methodological challenges. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 9(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700760903026748
   Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P. (2006). Distributed leadership. Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P. (2013). The practice of leadning and managing teaching in educational organisations. In OECD (Ed.), Leadership for 21st century learning, educational research and innovation (pp. 59–82).
   Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P. Leadership and learning: Conceptualizing relations between school administrative practice and instructional practice. (2015). Societies, 5(2), 277–294. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc5020277
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein, L. (2012). The art of saving a failing school. Phi Delta Kappan, 93(5), 51–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171209300512
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stogdill, R. (1974). Handbook of leadership: A survey of theory and research. The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stoll, L., & Fink, D. (1996). Changing our schools: Linking school effectiveness and school improvement. Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tchannen-Moran, M., & Gareis, C. (2014). Faculty trust in the principal: An essential ingredient in high-performing schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 53(1), 66–92.
   Google Scholar
• Tschannen-Moran, M., & Gareis, C. R. (2004). Principals’ sense of efficacy: Assessing a promising construct. Journal of Educational Administration, 42(5), 573–585. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230410554070
   Google Scholar
• Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, W. (1997). Trust in schools: A conceptual and empirical analysis. Journal of Educational Administration, 36(4), 334–352. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578239810211518
   Google Scholar
• Vennebo, K. F., & Ottesen, E. (2014). The emergence of innovative work in School development. Journal of Educational Change, 16, 197–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-014-9234-0
   Google Scholar