101
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

EGT-Moodle: an educational game theoretic mechanism in Moodle to establish an efficient online peer-learning environment

Pages 91-113 | Received 04 Jul 2022, Accepted 19 Jun 2023, Published online: 27 Jun 2023

References

  • Al-Dhanhani, A., Mizouni, R., Otrok, H., & Al-Rubai, A. (2012). "Game theoretical analysis of collaborative social applications", 8th International Conference on Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications and Worksharing (CollaborateCom). Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 2012, pp. 628-634, doi: 10.4108/icst.collaboratecom.2012.250665
  • Al-Dhanhani, A., Mizouni, R., Otrok, H., & Al-Rubaie, A. (2014). A game theoretical model for collaborative groups in social applications. Expert Systems with Applications, 41(11), 5056–5065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2014.02.050
  • Banerjee, D., & Sen, S. (2007). Reaching pareto-optimality in prisoner’s dilemma using conditional joint action learning. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 15(1), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10458-007-0020-8
  • Beltadze, G. N. (2016). Game theory-basis of higher education and teaching organization. International Journal of Modern Education & Computer Science, 8(6). https://doi.org/10.5815/ijmecs.2016.06.06
  • Bhasker, S. (2018). Modelling teacher student class interaction in higher education as a prisoner’s dilemma. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3713658
  • Bless, C., Higson-Smith, C., & Kagee, A. (2006). Fundamentals of social research methods: An African perspective. Juta and Company.
  • Burguillo, J. C. (2010). Using game theory and competition-based learning to stimulate student motivation and performance. Computers & Education, 55(2), 566–575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.02.018
  • Chandra, S., & Palvia, S. (2021). Online education next wave: Peer to peer learning. Journal of Information Technology Case and Application Research, 23(3), 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228053.2021.1980848
  • Chiong, R., & Jovanovic, J. (2012). Collaborative learning in online study groups: An evolutionary game theory perspective. Journal of Information Technology Education, 11(1), 81–101. https://doi.org/10.28945/1574
  • Cohen, M., Bhattacharya, S., Nabin, M., & Rafiq, S. (2018). Student engagement in postgraduate education: Using game theory to improve results (pp. 1–15). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0468-1_20-1
  • Colman, A. M., Pulford, B. D., & Krockow, E. M. (2018). Persistent cooperation and gender differences in repeated prisoner’s dilemma games: Some things never change. Acta Psychologica, 187, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.04.014
  • Correa, H. (1993). An economic analysis of class size and achievement in education. Education Economics, 1(2), 129–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/09645299300000019
  • Correa, H. (2001). A game theoretic analysis of faculty competition and academic standards. Higher Education Policy, 14(2), 175–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0952-8733(01)00008-3
  • Correa, H. (2003). A game theoretical analysis of the educational impact of differences in the abilities and work ethics of teachers and students. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 32(3), 249–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-5357(03)00038-6
  • Correa, H., & Gruver, G. W. (1987). Teacher-student interaction: A game theoretic extension of the economic theory of education. Mathematical Social Sciences, 13(1), 19–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4896(87)90057-6
  • Cullen, J.. (2020). Prosumerism in Higher Education—Does It Meet the Disability Test?. In R. H. Kinshuk, M. Jemni, N. Chen, & J. M. Spector (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Educational Technology (pp. 105–121). Springer.
  • Fan, C.-P. (2000). Teaching children cooperation – An application of experimental game theory. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 41(3), 191–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2681(99)00072-4
  • Fang, J.-W., Shao, D., Hwang, G.-J., & Chang, S.-C. (2022). From critique to computational thinking: A peer-assessment-supported problem identification, flow definition, coding, and testing approach for computer programming instruction. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 60(5), 07356331211060470. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331211060470.
  • Fernández-Berrocal, P., Extremera, N., Lopes, P. N., & Ruiz-Aranda, D. (2014). When to cooperate and when to compete: Emotional intelligence in interpersonal decision-making. Journal of Research in Personality, 49, 21–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2013.12.005.
  • Gamage, S. H., Ayres, J. R., & Behrend, M. B. (2022). A systematic review on trends in using Moodle for teaching and learning. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00323-x
  • Ghic, G., & Grigorescu, C. J. (2014). Applications of games theory in analyzing teaching process. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 3588–3592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.807
  • Göktepe Yıldız, S., & Göktepe Körpeoğlu, S. (2019). A new approach for assessing teachers’ teaching methods used in lessons: Game theoretic analysis. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 12(2), 30–44. https://doi.org/10.24193/adn.12.2.3
  • Gou, Q., Wang, X., & Zhang, J. (2019). Equilibrium and incentives for supervisor–postgraduate collaborations: A game-theoretic approach. RAIRO-Operations Research, 53(5), 1729–1747. https://doi.org/10.1051/ro/2018067
  • Griebeler, M. d. C. (2017). Friendship and in-class academic dishonesty. Economics Letters, 150, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2016.10.040
  • Griebeler, M. d. C. (2019). “But everybody’s doing it!”: A model of peer effects on student cheating. Theory and Decision, 86(2), 259–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-018-9680-x
  • Hemesath, M. (1994). Survey article: Cooperate or defect? Russian and American students in a prisoner’s dilemma. Comparative Economic Studies, 36(1), 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1057/ces.1994.6
  • Johnson, C., Gray, I., & Marshall, J. (2017). Game theory and the effects of age on cooperation. 1st Annual Undergraduate Research Experience in Entomology Symposium, Manhattam, KS.
  • Kim, J.-H. (2007). A game theoretical approach to private tutoring in South Korea. https://ncspe.tc.columbia.edu/working-papers/files/OP144.pdf
  • Klein, G. (2018). The effectiveness of peer assessment and a proposal for its analysis using game theory. Journal of Education for Business, 93(8), 436–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2018.1494531
  • Ko, Y., Issenberg, S. B., & Roh, Y. S. (2022). Effects of peer learning on nursing students’ learning outcomes in electrocardiogram education. Nurse Education Today, 108, Article 105182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105182
  • Lange, C., & Baylor, A. L. (2007). Teaching the repeated prisoner’s dilemma with a computerized tournament. The Journal of Economic Education, 38(4), 407–418. https://doi.org/10.3200/JECE.38.4.407-418
  • Lazo, J. G. L., De Oliveira, S. N., Stucchi, L., & Ariza, C. P. O. (2018). Application of cooperative game theory as strategy for designing the evaluation process in engineering disciplines. 2018 IEEE World Engineering Education Conference (EDUNINE).
  • Ma, J., Jiao, H., Zhang, Q., Zhang, C., & Pan, L. (2011, 17-18 July 2011). Game theory analysis on college student cheating. 2011 Third Pacific-Asia Conference on Circuits, Communications and System (PACCS).
  • Matsumoto, A., & Szidarovszky, F. (2016). Game theory and its applications. Springer.
  • Matsushima, H. (2022). Free-rider problem and sovereignty protection. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4020104
  • Mendieta-Aragón, A., Arguedas-Sanz, R., Ruiz-Gómez, L. M., & Navío-Marco, J. (2022). Tackling the challenge of peer learning in hybrid and online universities. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 1–25.
  • Moga, H., Antonya, C., Sandu, F., & Cocorada, S. (2012). Using game theory for modeling the student-professor interaction. 2012 13th International Conference on Optimization of Electrical and Electronic Equipment (OPTIM).
  • Mohammadhasani, N., & Asadi, S. (2020). The investigation of the effect of computer supported collaborative learning (CSCL) environment and dynamic mathematics software on trigonometric problem solving skill. Technology of Education Journal (TEJ), 14(4), 867–875. https://jte.sru.ac.ir/article_1362.html?lang=en
  • Molina, J. A., Giménez-Nadal, J. I., Cuesta, J. A., Gracia-Lazaro, C., Moreno, Y., & Sanchez, A. (2013). Gender differences in cooperation: Experimental evidence on high school students. PLoS One, 8(12), e83700. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083700
  • Myerson, R. (2013). Game theory. https://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog.php?isbn=9780674341166
  • Narahari, Y. (2014). Game theory and mechanism design (Vol. 4). World Scientific.
  • Noorani, S. F., Manshaei, M. H., Montazeri, M. A., & Omoomi, B. (2022). Fostering peer learning with a game-theoretical approach in a blended learning environment. IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems, 9(2), 571–580. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSS.2021.3101467
  • Noorani, S. F., Manshaei, M. H., Montazeri, M. A., & Zhu, Q. (2018). Game-theoretic approach to group learning enhancement through peer-to-peer explanation and competition. IEEE Access, 6, 53684–53697. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2871155
  • Noorani, S. F., & MirAbedini, S. (2020). Game theory and learning: Moving from Nash equilibrium to Pareto optimal. 27th International Computer Conference, the Computer Society of Iran, Iran. https://csi.org.ir/fa/paper/view/id/2704
  • Oltean, V. E., Borangiu, T., & Drăgoicea, M. (2016). On a qualitative game theoretic approach of teacher-student interaction in a public higher education service system. International Conference on Exploring Services Science.
  • O'Roark, B., & Grant, W. (2018). Games superheroes play: Teaching game theory with comic book favorites. The Journal of Economic Education, 49(2), 180–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220485.2018.1438861
  • Osborne, M. J. (2004). An introduction to game theory (1st ed.). Oxford University Press. https://www.amazon.com/Introduction-Game-Theory-Martin-Osborne/dp/0195128958
  • Papamitsiou, Z., & Economides, A. A. (2018a). Motivating students in collaborative activities with game-theoretic group recommendations. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 13(2), 374–386. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2018.2869582
  • Papamitsiou, Z., & Economides, A. A. (2018b). Recommendation of educational resources to groups: A game-theoretic approach. 2018 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON).
  • Rasheed, R. A., Kamsin, A., & Abdullah, N. A. (2021). An approach for scaffolding students peer-learning self-regulation strategy in the online component of blended learning. IEEE Access, 9, 30721–30738. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3059916
  • Renbarger, R. L., & Morgan, G. B. (2018). The SAGE encyclopedia of educational research, measurement, and evaluation. SAGE Publications.
  • Saito, E., Khong, T. D. H., Sumikawa, Y., Watanabe, M., & Hidayat, A. (2020). Comparative institutional analysis of participation in collaborative learning. Cogent Education, 7(1), Article 1779556. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1779556
  • Shih, S.-G., Hu, T.-P., & Chen, C.-N. (2006). A game theory-based approach to the analysis of cooperative learning in design studios. Design Studies, 27(6), 711–722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2006.05.001
  • Sundjaja, J. H., Shrestha, R., & Krishan, K. (2020). McNemar and Mann-Whitney U tests.
  • Tabatabaei, M., Afrazeh, A., & Seifi, A. (2019). A game theoretic analysis of knowledge sharing behavior of academics: Bi-level programming application. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 131(1), 13–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.03.031.
  • Teti̇k, M. (2020). Investigating factors affecting cooperative and non-cooperative behavior: An experimental game in the classroom. Theoretical and Applied Economics, 27(2 (623), Summer), 205–214. http://store.ectap.ro/articole/1462.pdf
  • Topping, K. (2023). Advantages and disadvantages of online and face-to-face peer learning in higher education: A review. Education Sciences, 13(4), 326. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040326
  • Topping, K., Buchs, C., Duran, D., & Van Keer, H. (2017). Effective peer learning: From principles to practical implementation. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315695471
  • Vallam, R. D., Bhatt, P., Mandal, D., & Narahari, Y. (2021). Improving teacher-student interactions in online educational forums using a Markov Chain based Stackelberg Game Model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.01239. https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.01239
  • Waddell, J. C., & Peng, W. (2014). Does it matter with whom you slay? The effects of competition, cooperation and relationship type among video game players. Computers in Human Behavior, 38(), 331–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.06.017.
  • Wei, N. (2022). Approaches to the development of language intelligence in multimedia English teaching from the perspective of game theory. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2022, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7762399
  • Yusri, R., Abusitta, A., & Aïmeur, E. (2020). Teens-online: A game theory-based collaborative platform for privacy education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 31, 72–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-020-00224-0.
  • Zhang, Q., Lin, S., Liu, J., & Jin, Y. (2022). A game perspective on collaborative learning among students in higher education. Cogent Education, 9(1), 2115617. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2115617
  • Zia, A., & Usman, M. (2018). Elective learning objects group recommendation using non-cooperative game theory. 2018 International Conference on Frontiers of Information Technology (FIT).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.