Structural Characteristics of the Earthquake-Prone Building Stock in Istanbul and Prioritization of Existing Buildings in Terms of Seismic Risk-A Pilot Project Conducted in Istanbul

References

• Achs, G., and C. Adam. 2012. A rapid-visual-screening methodology for the seismic vulnerability assessment of historic brick-masonry buildings in Vienna, 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• AFAD. 2018. Earthquake hazard map of Turkey. Ankara, Turkey: Turkish Ministry of Interior Affairs Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency. https://tdth.afad.gov.tr/TDTH/userLogin.xhtml
   Google Scholar
• AJI. 1983. Manual of non-destructive test methods for the evaluation of concrete strength. Architectural Institute of Japan (in Japanese).
   Google Scholar
• Ansal, A., A. Akinci, G. Cultrera, M. Erdik, V. Pessina, G. Tönük, and A. Gabriele. 2009. Loss estimation in Istanbul based on deterministic earthquake scenarios of the Marmara Sea region (Turkey). Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 29 (4):699–709. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2008.07.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aydinoglu, M. N. 2007. From seismic coefficient to performance based design: 40 years of earthquake engineering from an engineer’s viewpoint (in Turkish), Sixth National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 15–41, Istanbul, Turkey, October 16-20.
   Google Scholar
• Aydogdu, H. H., C. Demir, T. Kahraman, and A. Ilki. 2022. Evaluation of rapid seismic safety assessment methods on a substandard building stock. Structures 56: 104962. Submitted on January 2023. doi:10.1016/j.istruc.2023.104962.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aydogdu, H. H., and A. Ilki. 2023a. Case study for a performance based rapid seismic assessment methodology (PERA2019) based on actual earthquake damages. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, submitted on 17 January 2023, Preprint (Version 1) available at Research Square. doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-2467979/v1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aydogdu, H. H., and A. Ilki. 2023b. Developments in seismic safety of rc building stock of Istanbul according to the years and seismic design codes, fib Symposium 2023, Istanbul, Turkey, June 5-7.
   Google Scholar
• Bal, I. E., H. Crowley, R. Pinho, and F. Gülay. 2008. Detailed assessment of structural characteristics of Turkish RC building stock for loss assessment model. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 28 (10–11):914–32. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2007.10.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bal, I. E., S. S. Tezcan, and G. Gülay. 2007. P25 scoring method for defining rapidly the collapse vulnerability of rc structures. Sixth National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 661–74, Istanbul, Turkey, October 16-20.
   Google Scholar
• Bibbee, A., R. Gönenç, S. Jacobs, J. Konvitz, and R. Price. 2000. Economic effects of the 1999 Turkish earthquakes: An interim report. OECD, Economics Department, OECD Economics Department Working Papers.
   Google Scholar
• Binici, B., A. Yakut, G. Özcebe, and A. Erenler. 2013. Provisions for the seismic risk evaluation of existing RC buildings in Turkey under urban renewal law. Earthquake Spectra 31 (3):1353–70. doi:10.1193/040513EQS093M.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruneau, M. 2001. Building damage from the Marmara, Turkey earthquake of August 17, 1999. Journal of Seismology 6 (3):357–77. doi:10.1023/A:1020035425531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cakti, E., E. Safak, U. Hancilar, and K. Sesetyan. 2019. Updating probable earthquake loss estimates for Istanbul province, Technical Report prepared for Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality (In Turkish).
   Google Scholar
• Cosenza, E., C. Del Vecchio, M. Di Ludovico, M. Dolce, C. Moroni, A. Prota, and E. Renzi. 2018. The Italian guidelines for seismic risk classification of constructions: Technical principles and validation. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 16:5905–35. doi:10.1007/s10518-018-0431-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del Gaudio, C., M. T. De Risi, and G. Verderame. 2021. Seismic loss prediction for infilled rc buildings via simplified analytical method. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 26 (11):5477–510. doi:10.1080/13632469.2021.1875940.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del Gaudio, C., M. Di Ludovico, M. Polese, G. Manfredi, A. Prota, P. Ricci, and G. M. Verderame. 2019. Seismic fragility for Italian RC buildings based on damage data of the last 50 years. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 18 (5):2023–59. 2020. doi:10.1007/s10518-019-00762-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demir, C., M. Comert, H. H. Aydogdu, and A. Ilki. 2022. Seismic risk assessment and preliminary intervention cost-benefit analysis for the building stock of Istanbul. Progresses in European earthquake engineering and seismology. ECEES. 10.1007/978-3-031-15104-0_13
   Google Scholar
• Di Ludovico, M., A. Prota, C. Moroni, G. Manfredi, and M. Dolce. 2017. Reconstruction process of damaged residential buildings outside historical centres after the L’Aquila earthquake: Part II—“heavy damage” reconstruction. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 15 (2):693–729. doi:10.1007/s10518-016-9979-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erberik, M. A. 2008. Fragility-based assessment of typical mid-rise and low-rise RC buildings in Turkey. Engineering Structures 30:1360–74. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.07.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdik, M. 2001. Report on 1999 Kocaeli and Düzce (Turkey) earthquakes. Structural Control for Civil and Infrastructure Engineering :149–186 doi:10.1142/9789812811707_0018.
   Google Scholar
• Erdik, M., M. N. Aydinoglu, Y. Fahjan, K. Sesetyan, M. Demircioglu, B. Siyahi, E. Cakti, C. Ozbey, Y. Biro, H. Akman, et al. 2003. Earthquake risk assessment for the Istanbul metropolitan area final report. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration 2 (1):1–23. doi:10.1007/BF02857534.
   Google Scholar
• FEMA. 2015. Rapid visual screening of buildings for potential seismic hazards: a handbook, third edition, FEMA 154. Washington, D.C: Applied Technology Council for the Federal Emergency Management Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Gentile, R., C. Del Vecchio, S. Pampanin, D. Raffaele, and G. Uva. 2019. Refinement and validation of the simple lateral mechanism analysis (SLaMA) procedure for RC frames. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 25 (7):1227–55. doi:10.1080/13632469.2018.1560377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goksu, C., and A. Ilki. 2014. Seismic behavior of reinforced concrete columns with corroded deformed reinforcing bars. ACI Structural Journal 113:1053–64. doi:10.14359/51689030.
   Google Scholar
• Goksu, C., H. Yilmaz, S. R. Chowdhury, K. Orakcal, and A. Ilki. 2014. The effect of lap splice length on the cyclic lateral load behavior of RC members with low-strength concrete and plain bars. Advances in Structural Engineering 17 (5):639–58. doi:10.1260/1369-4332.17.5.639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurbuz, T., A. Cengiz, S. Kolemenoglu, C. Demir, and A. Ilki. 2022. Damages and failures of structures in Izmir (Turkey) during the October 30, 2020 Aegean Sea earthquake. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 27 (6):1565–606. doi:10.1080/13632469.2022.2086186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassan, A. F., and M. A. Sozen. 1997. Seismic vulnerability assessment of low-rise buildings in regions with infrequent earthquakes. ACI Structural Journal 94 (1):31–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holzer, T. L., A. A. Barka, D. Carver, M. Celebi, E. Cranswick, T. Dawson, J. H. Dieterich, W. L. Ellsworth, T. Fumal, J. L. Gross, et al. 2000. Implications for earthquake risk reduction in the United States from the Kocaeli, Turkey, earthquake of August 17, 1999, Vol. 1193, 1–64. Reston, VA: US Geological Survey Circular.
   Google Scholar
• IEMP. 2003. Istanbul Earthquake Master Plan, Istanbul, Turkey: Istanbul metropolitan municipality.
   Google Scholar
• Ilki, A., and Z. Celep. 2012. Earthquakes, existing buildings and seismic design codes in Turkey. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering 37 (2):365–80. doi:10.1007/s13369-012-0183-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilki, A., M. Comert, C. Demir, K. Orakcal, D. Ulugtekin, M. Tapan, and N. Kumbasar. 2014. Performance based rapid seismic assessment method (PERA) for reinforced concrete frame buildings. Advances in Structural Engineering 17 (3):439–59. doi:10.1260/1369-4332.17.3.439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilki, A., T. Kahraman, S. Ozkan, H. H. Aydogdu, C. Demir, and M. Comert. 2021. Seismic risk assessment of building stock in Istanbul. ACE2020 14th International Congress on Advances in Civil Engineering, Istanbul, Turkey September 6-8.
   Google Scholar
• Ilki, A., and N. Kumbasar. 2000. Marmara and Duzce earthquakes in Turkey-structural damage. ASCE 14th Engineering Mechanics Conference, on CD, Austin, Texas, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Ilki, A., U. Yazgan, C. Demir, A. Ates, U. Demir, E. Küpçü, G. Unal, M. A. Altınok, B. Karakaya, and F. Narlıtepe. 2019. Development of a framework for rapid earthquake risk assessment for substandard buildings in Turkey. 2nd International Workshop on Advanced Materials and Innovative Systems in Structural Engineering, Istanbul, Turkey, September 20.
   Google Scholar
• IMM. 2009a. Probable earthquake loss estimates for Istanbul province. Department of Earthquake Risk Management and Urban Improvement.
   Google Scholar
• IMM. 2009b. Production of microzonation maps and reports (Anatolian side). Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality, Department of Earthquake Risk Management and Urban Improvement, November.
   Google Scholar
• IMM. 2009c. Production of microzonation maps and reports (European side), Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality, Department of Earthquake Risk Management and Urban Improvement, October.
   Google Scholar
• Inci, P., C. Goksu, A. Ilki, and N. Kumbasar. 2013. Effects of reinforcement corrosion on the performance of RC Frame buildings subjected to seismic actions. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities 27:683–96. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JBDPA. 1990. Standard for Seismic Evaluation of (Existing Reinforced Concrete Buildings (in Japanese). The Japan Building Disaster Prevention Association.
   Google Scholar
• Karaman, H., M. Sahin, A. Elnashai, and O. Pineda. 2008. Loss assessment study for the Zeytinburnu district of Istanbul using Maeviz-Istanbul (HAZTURK). Journal of Earthquake Engineering 12:187–98. doi:10.1080/13632460802014030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohrangi, M., P. Bazzurro, and D. Vamvatsikos. 2021. Seismic risk and loss estimation for the building stock in Isfahan. Part I: Exposure and vulnerability. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 19 (4):1709–37. doi:10.1007/s10518-020-01036-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makra, K., E. Rovithis, E. Riga, D. Raptakis, and K. Pitilakis. 2021. Amplification features and observed damages in İzmir (Turkey) due to 2020 Samos (Aegean Sea) earthquake: Identifying basin effects and design requirements. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 19: 4773–804. doi:10.1007/s10518-021-01148-3. 2021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mavroeidis, G., and A. S. Papageorgiou. 2003. A mathematical representation of near-fault ground motions. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 93 (3):1099–131. 93. doi:10.1785/0120020100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maziligüney, L., I. Yaman, and F. Azılı. 2008. In-situ concrete compressive strength of residential, public and military structures, 8th International Congress on Advances in Civil Engineering, Eastern Mediterranean University, Famagusta, North Cyprus: Eastern Mediterranean University, Famagusta, North Cyprus.
   Google Scholar
• Meda, A., M. Serena, Z. Rinaldi, and P. Riva. 2014. Experimental evaluation of the corrosion influence on the cyclic behaviour of RC columns. Engineering Structures 76:112–23. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.06.043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mircevska, V., A. Abo El Ezz, I. Gjorgjeska, A. Smirnoff, and M. Nastev. 2019. First-order seismic loss assessment at urban scale: A case study of Skopje, North Macedonia. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 26 (1):1–19. doi:10.1080/13632469.2019.1662342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering (NZSEE). 2017. The seismic assessment of existing buildings – technical guidelines for engineering assessments. Wellington, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Ozdemir, P., B. Taskin, C. Vatansever, A. Sezen, A. Ilki, and H. Boduroglu. 2002. November 12, 1999 Duzce earthquake: Reconnaissance report for the town of Kaynasli. 12th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, on CD, London, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Ozmen, B. 2000. The damage state of the Izmit bay on 17 August 1999. TDV/DR 010-53, Turkish Earthquake Foundation, 132 pg.
   Google Scholar
• Pantazopoulou, S., J. Bonacci, S. Sheikh, M. Thomas, and N. Hearn. 2001. Repair of corrosion-damaged columns with FRP wraps. Journal of Composites for Construction 5 (1):3–11. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2001)5:1(3).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons, T., S. Toda, R. S. Stein, A. Barka, and J. H. Dieterich. 2000. Heightened odds of large earthquakes near Istanbul: An interaction-based probability calculation. Science 288: 661–65. 2000. doi:10.1126/science.288.5466.661.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polese, M., M. Gaetani d’Aragona, M. Di Ludovico, and A. Prota. 2018. Sustainable selective mitigation interventions towards effective earthquake risk reduction at the community scale. Sustainability 10 (8):2894. doi:10.3390/su10082894.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provisions for the Seismic Risk Evaluation of Existing RC Buildings under Urban Renewal Law. 2019. Ministry of environment and urbanization, Ankara, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• The report on determining measures to be taken to minimize seismic losses. 2021. Grand National Assembly of Turkey, Ankara, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Ruggieri, S., M. Calò, A. Cardellicchio, and G. Uva. 2022. Analytical‑mechanical based framework for seismic overall fragility analysis of existing RC buildings in town compartments. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 20 (15). doi:10.1007/s10518-022-01516-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scawthorn, C., and G. S. Johnson. 2000. Preliminary report: Kocaeli (Izmit) earthquake of 17 August 1999. Engineering Structures 22:727–45. doi:10.1016/S0141-0296(99)00106-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah, F., A. Ahmed, K. Kegyes-B, A. Al-Ghamadi, and R. P. Ray. 2016. A case study using rapid visual screening method to determine the vulnerability of buildings in two districts of Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. 12th New Technologies for Urban Safety of Mega Cities in Asia, November, Tacloban, Philippines.
   Google Scholar
• Silva, V., D. Amo-Oduro, A. Calderon, J. Dabbeek, V. Despotaki, L. Martins, A. Rao, M. Simionato, D. Viganò, C. Yepes, et al. 2018. Global earthquake model (GEM) exposure map (version 2018.1). doi:10.13117/GEM-GLOBAL-EXPOSURE-MAP-2018.1.
   Google Scholar
• Sucuoglu, H., U. Yazgan, and A. Yakut. 2007. A screening procedure for seismic risk assessment in urban building stocks. Earthquake Spectra 23 (2):441–58. doi:10.1193/1.2720931.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temur, R. 2006. Hızlı durum tespit (DURTES) yöntemi ve bilgisayar programının geliştirilmesi. Master Thesis (In Turkish), Istanbul University, İstanbul, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• TSDC. 1975. Specification for Structures to be Built in Disaster Areas, Ankara, Turkey: Turkish ministry of public works and settlement.
   Google Scholar
• TSDC. 1998. Specification for Structures to be Built in Disaster Areas, Ankara, Turkey: Turkish ministry of public works and settlement.
   Google Scholar
• Turkish Building Earthquake Code. 2018. Disaster and emergency presidency, Ankara.
   Google Scholar
• Yakut, A. 2004. Preliminary seismic performance assessment procedure for existing RC buildings. Engineering Structures 26 (10):1447–61. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.05.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yakut, A., H. Sucuoglu, and S. Akkar. 2012. Seismic risk prioritization of residential buildings in Istanbul. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 41 (11):1533–47. doi:10.1002/eqe.2215.Yakut.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yakut, A., H. Sucuoglu, B. Binici, E. Canbay, C. Donmez, A. İ̇lki, A. Caner, O. C. Celik, and B. Ö. Ay. 2021. Performance of structures in İzmir after the Samos Island Earthquake. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering. doi:10.1007/s10518-021-01226-6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yazgan, U., A. Ilki, C. Demir, U. Demir, A. Ates, E. Küpçü, G. Ünal, M. A. Altınok, B. Karakaya, and F. Narlıtepe. (2019). Challenges in developing seismic vulnerability models for substandard building stocks in Turkey. 2nd International Workshop on Advanced Materials and Innovative Systems in Structural Engineering, Istanbul, Turkey, September 20.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, Y., B. Gencturk, K. Willam, and A. Attar. 2014. Carbonation-induced and chloride-induced corrosion in reinforced concrete structures. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering 27 (9). doi:10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar