Optimal Properties of Nonlinear Viscous Dampers in Steel Structures Considering the Life Cycle Cost

References

• Aguirre, J. J., J. L. Almazán, and C. J. Paul. 2013. Optimal control of linear and nonlinear asymmetric structures by means of passive energy dampers. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 42 (3):377–95. doi:10.1002/eqe.2211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmadie Amiri, H., M. Hosseini, and H. E. Estekanchi. 2021. Efficient seismic risk assessment of irregular steel‐framed buildings through endurance time analysis of consistent fish‐bone model. The Structural Design of Tall & Special Buildings 31 (2). doi:10.1002/tal.1901.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akehashi, H., and I. Takewaki. 2022. Inverse optimal damper placement via shear model for elastic–plastic moment-resisting frames under large-amplitude ground motions. Engineering Structures 250:113457. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASCE41-17. 2017. Seismic evaluation and retrofit of existing buildings. Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings. doi:10.1061/9780784414859.
   Google Scholar
• ASCE7-16 Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures. 2016. Asce7-16.
   Google Scholar
• Aydin, E. 2012. Optimal damper placement based on base moment in steel building frames. Journal of Constructional Steel Research 79:216–25. doi:10.1016/j.jcsr.2012.07.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aydin, E., M. H. Boduroglu, and D. Guney. 2007. Optimal damper distribution for seismic rehabilitation of planar building structures. Engineering Structures 29 (2):176–85. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.04.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berquist, M., R. De Pasquale, S. Frye, A. Gilani, A. Klembczyk, D. Lee, and C. Winters . 2019. Fluid viscous dampers-general guidelines for engineers including a brief history. USA: Taylor Devices Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, P.-T., and Q. T. M. Ma. 2022. Optimising viscous damper placement in frame buildings with element exchange method for multiple seismic hazard levels. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 27 (12):3536–63. doi:10.1080/13632469.2022.2139782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CityFeet. 2020. Commercial real estate for sale, lease & coworking space. 2020. Accessed March 14, 2020. www.cityfeet.com.
   Google Scholar
• Clough, R. W., and J. Penzien. 1975. Of structures. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Constantinou, M. C., and M. D. Symans. 1993. Experimental study of seismic response of buildings with supplemental fluid dampers. The Structural Design of Tall Buildings 2 (2):93–132. doi:10.1002/tal.4320020203.
   Google Scholar
• Dall′ Asta, A., E. Tubaldi, and L. Ragni. 2016. Influence of the nonlinear behavior of viscous dampers on the seismic demand hazard of building frames. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 45 (1):149–69. doi:10.1002/eqe.2623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Domenico, D., and I. Hajirasouliha. 2021. Multi-level performance-based design optimisation of steel frames with nonlinear viscous dampers. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 19 (12):5015–49. doi:10.1007/s10518-021-01152-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del Gobbo, G. M., A. Blakeborough, and M. S. Williams. 2018. Improving total-building seismic performance using linear fluid viscous dampers. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 16 (9):4249–72. doi:10.1007/s10518-018-0338-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Paola, M., and G. Navarra. 2009. Stochastic seismic analysis of MDOF structures with nonlinear viscous dampers. Structural Control and Health Monitoring: The Official Journal of the International Association for Structural Control and Monitoring and of the European Association for the Control of Structures 16 (3):303–18. doi:10.1002/stc.254.
   Google Scholar
• Dolce, M., D. Cardone, F. C. Ponzo, and C. Valente. 2005. Shaking table tests on reinforced concrete frames without and with passive control systems. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 34 (14):1687–717. doi:10.1002/eqe.501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, P. T. 2013. History, design, and applications of fluid dampers in structural engineering. USA: Taylor Devices, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Estekanchi, H. E., V. Valamanesh, and A. Vafai. 2007. Application of endurance time method in linear seismic analysis. Engineering Structures 29 (10):2551–62. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.01.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ETABS, Berkeley, CA, U. S. A. 2020. Computer and structures Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Fema P695. 2009. Quantification of building seismic performance factors. Fema P695 (June).
   Google Scholar
• Garcia, D. L. 2001. A simple method for the design of optimal damper configurations in MDOF structures. Earthquake Spectra 17 (3):387–98. doi:10.1193/1.1586180.
   Google Scholar
• Garc, A. B., J. Jos, and D. Coz. 2006. Design optimization of 3D steel structures: Genetic algorithms vs. classical techniques. Journal of Constructional Steel Research 62 (12):1303–09. doi:10.1016/j.jcsr.2006.02.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gidaris, I., and A. A. Taflanidis. 2015. Performance assessment and optimization of fluid viscous dampers through life-cycle cost criteria and comparison to alternative design approaches. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 13 (4):1003–28. doi:10.1007/s10518-014-9646-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gidaris, I., A. A. Taflanidis, and G. P. Mavroeidis. 2018. Multiobjective design of supplemental seismic protective devices utilizing lifecycle performance criteria. Journal of Structural Engineering 144 (3):4017225. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goulet, C. A., C. B. Haselton, J. Mitrani‐Reiser, J. L. Beck, G. G. Deierlein, K. A. Porter, and J. P. Stewart. 2007. Evaluation of the seismic performance of a code‐conforming reinforced‐concrete frame building—from seismic hazard to collapse safety and economic losses. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 36 (13):1973–97. doi:10.1002/eqe.694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, A. 1999. Seismic demands for performance evaluation of steel moment resisting frame structures. USA: Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• Horton, T. A., I. Hajirasouliha, B. Davison, and Z. Ozdemir. 2021a. More efficient design of reduced beam sections (RBS) for maximum seismic performance. Journal of Constructional Steel Research 183:106728. doi:10.1016/j.jcsr.2021.106728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horton, T. A., I. Hajirasouliha, B. Davison, Z. Ozdemir, and I. Abuzayed. 2021b. Development of more accurate cyclic hysteretic models to represent RBS connections. Engineering Structures 245:112899. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112899.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, S.-H., J.-S. Jeon, and K. Lee. 2019. Evaluation of economic losses and collapse safety of steel moment frame buildings designed for risk categories II and IV. Engineering Structures 201:109830. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, J.-S., W.-C. Lin, and N.-J. Wu. 2013. Comparison of distribution methods for viscous damping coefficients to buildings. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering 9 (1):28–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karami, M., H. E. Estekanchi, I. Hajirasouliha, and S. A. Mirfarhadi. 2022. Value-based seismic performance optimization of steel frames equipped with viscous dampers. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 1–27. doi:10.1080/13632469.2022.2155733.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasai, K., Y. Fu, and A. Watanabe. 1998. Passive control systems for seismic damage mitigation. Journal of Structural Engineering 124 (5):501–12. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1998)124:5(501).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolour, N. A., M. C. Basim, and M. Chenaghlou. 2021. Multi-objective optimum design of nonlinear viscous dampers in steel structures based on life cycle cost. Structures 34:3776–88. doi:10.1016/j.istruc.2021.09.100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, D., and D. P. Taylor. 2001. Viscous damper development and future trends. The Structural Design of Tall Buildings 10 (5):311–20. doi:10.1002/tal.188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lignos, D. G., and H. Krawinkler. 2011. Deterioration modeling of steel components in support of collapse prediction of steel moment frames under earthquake loading. Journal of Structural Engineering 137 (11):1291–302. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, S., K. Liu, X. Liu, C. Zhai, and F. Xie. 2019. Efficient structural seismic performance evaluation method using improved endurance time analysis. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration 18 (4):795–809. doi:10.1007/s11803-019-0485-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, W., and A. K. Chopra. 2002. Earthquake response of elastic SDF systems with non‐linear fluid viscous dampers. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 31 (9):1623–42. doi:10.1002/eqe.179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, W., and A. K. Chopra. 2003. Asymmetric one‐storey elastic systems with non‐linear viscous and viscoelastic dampers: Earthquake response. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 32 (4):555–77. doi:10.1002/eqe.237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, J.-L., T.-H. Liu, and K.-C. Tsai. 2015. Real-valued modal response history analysis for asymmetric-plan buildings with nonlinear viscous dampers. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 77:97–110. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.05.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, W., M. Tong, and G. C. Lee. 2005. Optimization methodology for damper configuration based on building performance indices. Journal of Structural Engineering 131 (11):1746–56. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:11(1746).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez Garcia, D., and T. T. Soong. 2002. Efficiency of a simple approach to damper allocation in MDOF structures. Journal of Structural Control 9 (1):19–30. doi:10.1002/stc.3.
   Google Scholar
• Lu, Y. X., Y. Q. Cai, Q. F. Qu, and Q. H. Zhan. 2012. Study on the effect of supporting stiffness on energy dissipation efficiency of viscous dampers. Applied Mechanics and Materials 105:96–101. doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.105-107.96.
   Google Scholar
• Martinez-Rodrigo, M., and M. L. Romero. 2003. An optimum retrofit strategy for moment resisting frames with nonlinear viscous dampers for seismic applications. Engineering Structures 25 (7):913–25. doi:10.1016/S0141-0296(03)00025-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mashayekhi, M., H. E. Estekanchi, A. Vafai, and S. A. Mirfarhadi. 2021. Simulation of cumulative absolute velocity consistent endurance time excitations. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 25 (5):892–917. doi:10.1080/13632469.2018.1540371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mashayekhi, M., H. E. Estekanchi, H. Vafai, S. A. Mirfarhadi, C. Engineering, A. Ave, and P. O. Box. 2018. Development of hysteretic energy compatible endurance time excitations and its application. Engineering Structures 177 (September):753–69. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.09.089.
   Google Scholar
• Mayes, R., N. Wetzel, B. Weaver, K. Tam, W. Parker, A. Brown, and D. Pietra. 2013. Performance based design of buildings to assess damage and downtime and implement a rating system. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering 46 (1):40–55. doi:10.5459/bnzsee.46.1.40-55.
   Google Scholar
• McGuire, R. K. 2008. Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis: Early history. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 37 (3):329–38. doi:10.1002/eqe.765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirfarhadi, S. A., and H. E. Estekanchi. 2020. Value based seismic design of structures using performance assessment by the endurance time method. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering 16 (10):1397–415. doi:10.1080/15732479.2020.1712436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirfarhadi, S. A., H. E. Estekanchi, and M. Sarcheshmehpour. 2021. On optimal proportions of structural member cross-sections to achieve best seismic performance using value based seismic design approach. Engineering Structures 231:111751. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111751.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyamoto, H. K., M. Eeri, J. P. Singh, and M. Eeri. 2002. Performance of structures with passive energy dissipators. Earthquake Spectra 18 (1):105–19. doi:10.1193/1.1468650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Movaffaghi, H., and O. Friberg. 2006. Optimal placement of dampers in structures using genetic algorithm. Engineering Computations 23 (6):597–606. doi:10.1108/02644400610680324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narkhede, D. I., and R. Sinha. 2014. Behavior of nonlinear fluid viscous dampers for control of shock vibrations. Journal of Sound and Vibration 333 (1):80–98. doi:10.1016/j.jsv.2013.08.041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NEHRP Consultants Joint Venture. 2010. Evaluation of the FEMA P-695 methodology for quantification of building seismic performance factors (NIST GCR 10-917-8). Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology.
   Google Scholar
• OpenSees. 2018. Open system for earthquake engineering simulation Version 2.4.5 [Software]. Berkeley, CA: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• P-58, F. 2018. FEMA P-58-1: Seismic performance assessment of buildings. Volume 1 – Methodology. Fema P-58 1 (December 2018):340.
   Google Scholar
• Park, K.-S., H.-M. Koh, and D. Hahm. 2004. Integrated optimum design of viscoelastically damped structural systems. Engineering Structures 26 (5):581–91. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2003.12.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavlou, E., and M. C. Constantinou. 2006. Response of nonstructural components in structures with damping systems. Journal of Structural Engineering 132 (7):1108–17. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2006)132:7(1108).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekcan, G., J. B. Mander, and S. S. Chen. 1999. Fundamental considerations for the design of non‐linear viscous dampers. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 28 (11):1405–25. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199911)28:11<1405:AID-EQE875>3.0.CO;2-A.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahgozar, A., H. E. Estekanchi, and S. A. Mirfarhadi. 2023. On optimal lead rubber base-isolation design for steel moment frames using value-based seismic design approach. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 164:107520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahimi, E., and H. E. Estekanchi. 2015. Collapse assessment of steel moment frames using endurance time method. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration 14 (2):347–60. doi:10.1007/s11803-015-0027-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RS Means. 2021. Construction cost indexes with RSMeans data January 2021 (means construction cost indexes).
   Google Scholar
• Shin, H., and M. P. Singh. 2014. Minimum failure cost-based energy dissipation system designs for buildings in three seismic regions – Part I: Elements of failure cost analysis. Engineering Structures 74:266–74. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.04.054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, H., and M. P. Singh. 2017. Minimum life-cycle cost-based optimal design of yielding metallic devices for seismic loads. Engineering Structures 144:174–84. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.04.054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, M. P., and L. M. Moreschi. 2002. Optimal placement of dampers for passive response control. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 31 (4):955–76. doi:10.1002/eqe.132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Symans, M. D., and M. C. Constantinou. 1998. Passive fluid viscous damping systems for seismic energy dissipation. ISET Journal of Earthquake Technology 35 (4):185–206.
   Google Scholar
• Tafakori, E., S. Pourzeynali, and H. E. Estekanchi. 2017. Probabilistic seismic loss estimation via endurance time method. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration 16 (1):233–45. doi:10.1007/s11803-017-0379-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taflanidis, A. A., and J. L. Beck. 2009. Life-cycle cost optimal design of passive dissipative devices. Structural Safety 31 (6):508–22. doi:10.1016/j.strusafe.2009.06.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takewaki, I. 1997. Optimal damper placement for minimum transfer functions. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 26 (11):1113–24. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199711)26:11<1113:AID-EQE696>3.0.CO;2-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vamvatsikos, D., and C. Allin Cornell. 2002. Incremental dynamic analysis. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 31 (3):491–514. doi:10.1002/eqe.141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen, Y.-K., and Y. J. Kang. 2001. Minimum building life-cycle cost design criteria. I: Methodology. Journal of Structural Engineering 127 (3):330–37. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2001)127:3(330).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, K. K. F. 2011. Seismic energy analysis of structures with nonlinear fluid viscous dampers—algorithm and numerical verification. The Structural Design of Tall & Special Buildings 20 (4):482–96. doi:10.1002/tal.602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wongprasert, N., and M. D. Symans. 2004. Application of a genetic algorithm for optimal damper distribution within the nonlinear seismic benchmark building. Journal of Engineering Mechanics 130 (4):401–06. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2004)130:4(401).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, T. Y., J. Moehle, B. Stojadinovic, and A. Der Kiureghian. 2009. Seismic performance evaluation of facilities: Methodology and implementation. Journal of Structural Engineering 135 (10):1146–54. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2009)135:10(1146).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar