Characterization of Site Amplification by a Parametric Study

References

• Andreotti, G., and G. M. Calvi. 2021. “Nonlinear Soil Effects on Observed and Simulated Response Spectra.” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 50 (1): 3831–3854. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.3535.
   Google Scholar
• Atakan, K. 1995. “A Review of the Type of Data and the Techniques Used in Empirical Estimation of Local Site Response.” In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Seismic Zonation, Vol. II, 1451–1460. Nice, France.
   Google Scholar
• Boore, D. M. 2004. “Estimating Vs30 (Or NEHRP Site Classes) from Shallow Velocity Models (Depths <30 M).” Bulletin of Seismological Society of America 94 (2): 591–597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BSSC (Building Seismic Safety Council). 1997. NEHRP Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings and Other Structures Part 1: Provisions (FEMA 302). Washington, D.C: BSSC.
   Google Scholar
• Cadet, H., P. Y. Bard, and A. M. Duval. 2008. “A New Proposal for Site Classification Based on Ambient Vibration Measurements and the KiK-Net Strong Motion Data Set.” In Proceedings of the 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China. Paper no: 03-01-0036.
   Google Scholar
• Cadet, H., P. Y. Bard, A. M. Duval, and E. Bertrand. 2012. “Erratum To: Site Effect Assessment Using KiK-Net Data: Part 2—Site Amplification Prediction Equation Based on F0 and Vsz.” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 10 (2): 451–489. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-011-9324-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvi, G. M., and G. Andreotti. 2022. “Effects of Local Soil, Magnitude and Distance on Empirical Response Spectra for Design.” Journal of Earthquake Engineering 26 (3): 1117–1144. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2019.1703847.
   Google Scholar
• Castellaro, S., F. Mulargia, and P. L. Rossi. 2008. “Vs30: Proxy for Seismic Amplification?” Seismological Research Letters 79 (4): 540–543. https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.79.4.540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CEN (European Committee for Standardization). 2004. Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance, Part 1: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings. Brussels: Eurocode 8: CEN.
   Google Scholar
• Derras, B., P. Y. Bard, and F. Cotton. 2017. “Vs30, Slope, H800 and f0: Performance of Various Site-Condition Proxies in Reducing Ground-Motion Aleatory Variability and Predicting Nonlinear Site Response.” Earth Planets & Space 69 (133). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-017-0718-z.
   Google Scholar
• Field, E. H., and K. H. Jacob. 1995. “A Comparison and Test of Various Site Response Estimation Techniques, Including Three That Are Non-Reference-Site Dependent.” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 85 (4): 1127–1143. https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0850041127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashash, Y. M. A., D. R. Groholski, C. A. Philips, and D. Park. 2008. DEEPSOIL v3.5beta: User Manual and Tutorial (U.C.: University of Illinois).
   Google Scholar
• Hassani, B., and G. M. Atkinson. 2016. “Applicability of the Site Fundamental Frequency as a Vs30 Proxy for Central and Eastern North America.” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 106 (2): 653–664. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120150259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ICBO (International Conference of Building Officials). 1997. Uniform Building Code. Vol. 1. California, U.S.A: ICBO.
   Google Scholar
• Kramer, S. L. 1996. Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Upper Saddle River.
   Google Scholar
• Kwak, D. Y., and E. Seyhan. 2020. “Two-Stage Nonlinear Site Amplification Modeling for Japan with VS30 and Fundamental Frequency Dependency.” Earthquake Spectra 36 (3): 1359–1385. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755293020907920.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lachet, C., and P. Y. Bard. 1994. “Numerical and Theoretical Investigations on the Possibilities and Limitations of Nakamura’s Technique.” Journal of Physics of the Earth 42 (5): 377–397. https://doi.org/10.4294/jpe1952.42.377.
   Google Scholar
• Laurendeau, A., F. Cotton, O. J. Ktenidou, L. F. Bonilla, and F. Hollender. 2013. “Rock and Stiff-Soil Site Amplification: Dependency on Vs30 and Kappa (κ0).” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 103 (6): 3131–3148. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120130020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, V. W., and M. D. Trifunac. 2010. “Should Average Shear-Wave Velocity in the Top 30 M of Soil Be Used to Describe Seismic Amplification?” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 30 (11): 1250–1258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2010.05.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luzi, L., R. Puglia, F. Pacor, M. R. Gallipoli, D. Bindi, and M. Mucciarelli. 2011. “Proposal for a Soil Classification Based on Parameters Alternative or Complementary to Vs30.” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 9 (6): 1877–1898. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-011-9274-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mucciarelli, M., and M. R. Gallipoli. 2006. “Comparison Between Vs30 and Other Estimates of Site Amplification in Italy.” In Proceedings of the 1st European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Geneva, Switzerland. Paper no:270.
   Google Scholar
• Park, D., and Y. M. A. Hashash. 2004. “Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis with Nonlinear Site Effects in the Mississippi Embayment.” In Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, Canada. Paper no:1549.
   Google Scholar
• Parolai, S. 2012. “Investigation of Site Response in Urban Areas by Using Earthquake Data and Seismic Noise.” In New Manual of Seismological Observatory Practice 2 (NMSOP-2), edited by P. Bormann, 1–38. Potsdam: Deutsches GeoForschungsZentrum, GFZ. https://doi.org/10.2312/GFZ.NMSOP-2.
   Google Scholar
• Regnier, J., L. F. Bonilla, E. Bertrand, and J. F. Semblat. 2014. “Influence of the Vs Profiles Beyond 30 M Depth on Linear Site Effects: Assessment from the KiK-Net Data.” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 104 (5): 2337–2348. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120140018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regnier, J., F. Bonilla, A. M. Duval, J. F. Semblat, and E. Bertrand. 2011. “Revisiting Vs30 as a Proxy Parameter for Site Effects: A Case Study Using KiK-Net Data.” In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering. Santiago, Chile.
   Google Scholar
• Regnier, J., H. Cadet, L. F. Bonilla, E. Bertrand, and J. F. Semblat. 2013. “Assessing Nonlinear Behavior of Soils in Seismic Site Response: Statistical Analysis on KiK‐net Strong‐Motion Data.” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 103 (3): 1750–1770. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120120240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safak, E. 1997. “Models and Methods to Characterize Site Amplification from a Pair of Records.” Earthquake Spectra 13 (1): 97–129. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585934.
   Google Scholar
• Seed, H. B., and I. M. Idriss. 1970. Soil Moduli and Damping Factors for Dynamic Response Analysis. Report No. UCB/EERC-70/10. Berkeley: University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Steidl, J. H. 2000. “Site Response in Southern California for Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis.” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 90 (6B): 149–169. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120000504.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, J. P., A. Liu, and Y. Choi. 2003. “Amplification Factors for Spectral Acceleration in Tectonically Active Regions.” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 93 (1): 332–352. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120020049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TBSC (Turkish Building Seismic Code). 2018. Ministry of Interior, Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency. Ankara, Turkey: TBSC.
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, C. C., T. Kishida, and W. C. Lin. 2021. “Adjustment of Site Factors for Basin Effects from Site Response Analysis and Deep Downhole Array Measurements in Taipei.” Engineering Geology 285:106071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2021.106071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao, M., J. Cui, Y. Li, and V. Nguyen. 2022. “Nonlinear Seismic Response Based on Different Site Types: Soft Soil and Rock Strata.” Advances in Civil Engineering 2022:10. Article ID 5370369. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5370369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, J. X., and H. Xu. 2013. “A Comparison of VS30 and Site Period as Site‐Effect Parameters in Response Spectral Ground‐Motion Prediction Equations.” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 103 (1): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120110251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, C., M. Pilz, and F. Cotton. 2020. “Which is a Better Proxy, Site Period or Depth to Bedrock, in Modelling Linear Site Response in Addition to the Average Shear-Wave Velocity?” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 18 (3): 797–820. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00738-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar