Non-Dimensional Probabilistic Analysis of Seismic Pounding Between Flexible Structures and Rigid Boundaries

References

• Altieri, D., E. Patelli, H. Kessler, M. Pellissetti, and E. Patelli. 2020. “Machine Learning Approaches for Performance Assessment of Nuclear Fuel Assemblies Subject to Seismic-Induced Impacts.” ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty: Part B 6 (4). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4046926.
   Google Scholar
• Altieri, D., E. Tubaldi, and E. Patelli 2018. “Probabilistic Seismic Assessment of Pounding Forces.” In 16th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Thessaloniki. http://papers.16ecee.org/files/Paper%20AD.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Anagnostopoulos, S. A. 1988. “Pounding of Buildings in Series During Earthquakes.” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 16 (3): 443–456. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290160311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anagnostopoulos, S. A., and K. V. Spiliopoulos. 1992. “An Investigation of Earthquake Induced Pounding Between Adjacent Buildings.” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 21 (4): 289–302. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290210402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson, G. M., and W. Silva. 2000. “Stochastic Modeling of California Ground Motions.” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 90 (2): 255–274. https://doi.org/10.1785/0119990064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Au, S., and J. Beck. 2003. “Subset Simulation and Its Application to Seismic Risk Based on Dynamic Analysis.” Journal of Engineering Mechanics 129 (8): 901–917. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2003)129:8(901).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, J. W. 2015. “Efficient Analytical Fragility Function Fitting Using Dynamic Structural Analysis.” Earthquake Spectra 31 (1): 579–599. https://doi.org/10.1193/021113EQS025M.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banerjee, A., A. Chanda, and R. Das. 2017. “Historical Origin and Recent Development on Normal Directional Impact Models for Rigid Body Contact Simulation: A Critical Review.” Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering 24 (2): 397–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-016-9164-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbato, M., and E. Tubaldi. 2013. “A Probabilistic Performance‐Based Approach for Mitigating the Seismic Pounding Risk Between Adjacent Buildings.” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 42 (8): 1203–1219. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernal, D., M. Döhler, S. M. Kojidi, K. Kwan, and Y. Liu. 2015. “First Mode Damping Ratios for Buildings.” Earthquake Spectra 31 (1): 367–381. https://doi.org/10.1193/101812EQS311M.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertero, V. V. 1987. “Observations on Structural Pounding.” In The Mexico Earthquakes, 1985: Factors Involved and Lessons Learned, 264–278. Mexico: ASCE.
   Google Scholar
• Bi, K., H. Hao, and N. Chouw. 2010. “Required Separation Distance Between Decks and at Abutments of a Bridge Crossing a Canyon Site to Avoid Seismic Pounding.” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 39 (3): 303–323. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.943.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogacki, P., and L. F. Shampine. 1989. “A 3 (2) Pair of Runge-Kutta Formulas.” Applied Mathematics Letters 2 (4): 321–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/0893-9659(89)90079-7.
   Google Scholar
• Boore, D. M. 2003. “Simulation of Ground Motion Using the Stochastic Method.” Pure and Applied Geophysics 160 (3): 635–676. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00012553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, T., and A. Elshaer. 2022. “Pounding of Structures at Proximity: A State-Of-The-Art Review.” Journal of Building Engineering 48:103991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.103991.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chouw, N., and H. Hao. 2012. “Pounding Damage to Buildings and Bridges in the 22 February 2011 Christchurch Earthquake.” International Journal of Protective Structures 3:123–139. https://doi.org/10.1260/2041-4196.3.2.123.
   Google Scholar
• Crozet, V., I. Politopoulos, M. Yang, J. M. Martinez, and S. Erlicher. 2018. “Sensitivity Analysis of Pounding Between Adjacent Structures.” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 47 (1): 219–235. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2949.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desroches, R., and S. Muthukumar. 2002. “Effect of Pounding and Restrainers on Seismic Response of Multiple-Frame Bridges.” Journal of Structural Engineering 128 (7): 860–869. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:7(860).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, W. 1960. Impact - The Theory and Physical Behaviour of Colliding Solids. London, UK: Edward Arnold LTD.
   Google Scholar
• Guo, A., L. Cui, and H. Li. 2012. “Impact Stiffness of the Contact-Element Models for the Pounding Analysis of Highway Bridges: Experimental Evaluation.” Journal of Earthquake Engineering 16 (8): 1132–1160. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2012.693243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hao, H., K. Bi, N. Chouw, and W. Ren. 2013. “State-Of-The-Art Review on Seismic Induced Pounding Response of Bridge Structures.” Journal of Earthquake and Tsunami 7 (3): 1350019. https://doi.org/10.1142/S179343111350019X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jalayer, F., and J. Beck. 2008. “Effects of Two Alternative Representations of Ground‐Motion Uncertainty on Probabilistic Seismic Demand Assessment of Structures.” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 37 (1): 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.745.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jankowski, R. 2005. “Non‐Linear Viscoelastic Modelling of Earthquake‐Induced Structural Pounding.” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 34 (6): 595–611. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jankowski, R. 2006. “Pounding Force Response Spectrum Under Earthquake Excitation.” Engineering Structures 28 (8): 1149–1161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.12.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jankowski, R. 2008. “Earthquake-Induced Pounding Between Equal Height Buildings with Substantially Different Dynamic Properties.” Engineering Structures 30 (10): 2818–2829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.03.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeng, V., and W. Tzeng. 2000. “Assessment of Seismic Pounding Hazard for Taipei City.” Engineering Structures 22 (5): 459–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(98)00123-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanai, K. 1957. “Semi-Empirical Formula for the Seismic Characteristics of the Ground.” Bulletin of the Earthquake Research Institute 35 (2): 309–325. https://repository.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp/record/33949/files/ji0352002.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, M. K., J. H. Kim, G. Mosqueda, and A. Sarebanhab. 2015. “Effects of Moat Wall Impact on the Seismic Response of Base Isolated Nuclear Power Plants.”
   Google Scholar
• Komodromos, P. 2008. “Simulation of the Earthquake-Induced Pounding of Seismically Isolated Buildings.” Computers & Structures 86 (7–8): 618–626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2007.08.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komodromos, P., P. C. Polycarpou, L. Papaloizou, and M. C. Phocas. 2007. “Response of Seismically Isolated Buildings Considering Poundings.” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 36 (12): 1605–1622. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, H., G. Sun, and Y. Ren. 2008. “A Note on the Stationary Model of Earthquake Induced Ground Motion with a Hu Spectrum.” In Proceedings of the14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 03-0050. Beijing:[sn].
   Google Scholar
• Lopez-Garcia, D., and T. Soong. 2009. “Assessment of the Separation Necessary to Prevent Seismic Pounding Between Linear Structural Systems.” Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics 24 (2): 210–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2008.06.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maison, B. F., and K. Kasai. 1992. “Dynamics of Pounding When Two Buildings Collide.” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 21 (9): 771–786. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290210903.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masroor, A., and G. Mosqueda. 2012. “Experimental Simulation of Base‐Isolated Buildings Pounding Against Moat Wall and Effects on Superstructure Response.” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 41 (14): 2093–2109. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mckay, M. D., R. J. Beckman, and W. J. Conover. 1979. “Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output from a Computer Code.” Technometrics 21 (2): 239–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1979.10489755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moehle, J. P., and S. A. Mahin. 1991. “Observations on the Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Buildings During Earthquakes.” Special Publication 127:67–90. https://doi.org/10.14359/3007.
   Google Scholar
• Moré, J. J. 1978. “The Levenberg-Marquardt Algorithm: Implementation and Theory.” In Numerical Analysis [Lecture Notes in Mathematics], Vol. 630. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0067700.
   Google Scholar
• Muthukumar, S., and R. Desroches. 2006. “A Hertz Contact Model with Non‐Linear Damping for Pounding Simulation.” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 35 (7): 811–828. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagarajaiah, S., and X. Sun. 2001. “Base-Isolated FCC Building: Impact Response in Northridge Earthquake.” Journal of Structural Engineering 127 (9): 1063–1075. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2001)127:9(1063).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otsuka, H., S. Unjoh, T. Terayama, J. Hoshikuma, and K. Kosa. 1996. “Damage to Highway Bridges by the 1995 Hyogoken Nanbu Earthquake and the Retrofit of Highway Bridges in Japan.” In Proceedings of the 3rd US Japan Workshop on Seismic Retrofit of Bridge. Osaka, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Pantelides, C., and X. Ma. 1998. “Linear and Nonlinear Pounding of Structural Systems.” Computers & Structures 66 (1): 79–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(97)00045-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patelli, E. 2016. “COSSAN: A Multidisciplinary Software Suite for Uncertainty Quantification and Risk Management.” In Handbook of Uncertainty Quantification, edited by Roger Ghanem, David Higdon, and Houman Owhadi, 1–69. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12385-1_59.
   Google Scholar
• Patelli, E., H. J. Pradlwarter, and G. I. Schuëller. 2010. “Global Sensitivity of Structural Variability by Random Sampling.” Computer Physics Communications 181 (12): 2072–2081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2010.08.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patelli, E., S. Tolo, H. George-Williams, J. Sadeghi, R. Rocchetta, M. De Angelis, and M. Broggi, 2018. “Opencossan 2.0: An Efficient Computational Toolbox for Risk, Reliability and Resilience Analysis.” In Proceedings of the Joint ICVRAM ISUMA UNCERTAINTIES conference. http://icvramisuma2018.org/cd/web/PDF/ICVRAMISUMA2018-0022.PDF.
   Google Scholar
• Pellissetti, M., H. Keßler, F. Laudarin, D. Altieri, A. Nykyforchyn, E. Patelli, and J.-U. Klügel. 2017. “Statistical Analysis of Impact Forces and Permanent Deformations of Fuel Assembly Spacer Grids in the Context of Seismic Fragility.” 24th Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology, Busan, South Korea.
   Google Scholar
• Penzien, J. 1997. “Evaluation of Building Separation Distance Required to Prevent Pounding During Strong Earthquakes.” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 26 (8): 849–858. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199708)26:8<849:AID-EQE680>3.0.CO;2-M.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saltelli, A., M. Ratto, T. Andres, F. Campolongo, J. Cariboni, D. Gatelli, M. Saisana, and S. Tarantola. 2008. Global Sensitivity Analysis: The Primer. Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470725184.
   Google Scholar
• Sobol, I. M. 1993. “Sensitivity Estimates for Nonlinear Mathematical Models.” Mathematical Modelling and Computational Experiments 1:407–414. http://www.andreasaltelli.eu/file/repository/sobol1993.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Tajimi, H. 1960. “A Statistical Method of Determining the Maximum Response of a Building Structure During an Earthquake.” In Proceedings of the 2nd World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 781–797. Tokyo and Kyoto, Japan.
   Google Scholar
• Tubaldi, E., M. Barbato, and S. Ghazizadeh. 2012. “A Probabilistic Performance-Based Risk Assessment Approach for Seismic Pounding with Efficient Application to Linear Systems.” Structural Safety 36:14–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2012.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tubaldi, E., F. Freddi, and M. Barbato. 2016. “Probabilistic Seismic Demand Model for Pounding Risk Assessment.” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 45 (11): 1743–1758. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Mier, J. G., A. F. Pruijssers, H. W. Reinhardt, and T. Monnier. 1991. “Load-Time Response of Colliding Concrete Bodies.” Journal of Structural Engineering 117 (2): 354–374. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1991)117:2(354).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vega, J., I. Del Rey, and E. Alarcon. 2009. “Pounding Force Assessment in Performance‐Based Design of Bridges.” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 38 (13): 1525–1544. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.916.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, Q., T. Wang, H. Ge, and H. Zhu. 2019. “Dimensional Analysis of Pounding Response of an Oscillator Based on Modified Kelvin Pounding Model.” Journal of Aerospace Engineering 32 (4): 04019039. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0001018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaghmaei-Sabegh, S., and N. Jalali-Milani. 2012. “Pounding Force Response Spectrum for Near-Field and Far-Field Earthquakes.” Scientia Iranica 19 (5): 1236–1250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scient.2012.07.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhai, C., S. Jiang, and Z. Chen. 2014. “Dimensional Analysis of the Pounding Response of an Oscillator Considering Contact Duration.” Journal of Engineering Mechanics 141 (4): 04014138. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000858.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng, Y., X. Xiao, L. Zhi, and G. Wang. 2015. “Evaluation on Impact Interaction Between Abutment and Steel Girder Subjected to Nonuniform Seismic Excitation.” Shock and Vibration 2015:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/981804.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zito, M., R. Nascimbene, P. Dubini, D. D’angela, and G. Magliulo. 2022. “Experimental Seismic Assessment of Nonstructural Elements: Testing Protocols and Novel Perspectives.” Buildings 12 (11): 1871. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12111871.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar