The effectiveness and challenges implementing a formative assessment professional development program

References

• Alo, E., H. Slinn, B. Saqipi, and J. Vogrinc. 2018. “Effective Teacher Professional Development in the Process of Major School Reforms.” International Journal of Management in Education 12 (2): 114–131. doi:10.1504/IJMIE.2018.090732.
   Google Scholar
• Andersson, C., and T. Palm. 2017. “The Impact of Formative Assessment on Student Achievement: A Study of the Effects of Changes to Classroom Practice After a Comprehensive Professional Development Programme.” Learning and Instruction 49: 92–102. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.12.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrade, H. L., and S. M. Brookhart. 2020. “Classroom Assessment as the Co-Regulation of lLearning.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice 27 (4): 350–372. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2019.1571992.
   Google Scholar
• Berisha, F. 2020. “Chemistry Education in Kosovo: Issues, Challenges and Time for Action.” CEPS Journal 10 (1): 125–144. doi:10.26529/cepsj.728.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, B. 2003. Class Codes and Control. The Structuring of Pedagogic Discourse. Vol. 4. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., and D. Wiliam. 1998. “Assessment and Classroom Learning.” Assessment in Education, Policy and Practice 5 (1): 7–74. doi:10.1080/0969595980050102.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., and D. Wiliam. 2009. “Developing the Theory of Formative Assessment.” Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability 21 (1): 5–31. doi:10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Block, P. 2015. “Formative Assessment – An Optimistic but Incomplete Vision.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice 22 (1): 161–177. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2014.999643.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, B. S., J. T. Hastings, and G. F. Madaus. 1971. Handbook on Formative and Summative Evaluation of Student Learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Borko, H. 2004. “Professional Development and Teacher Learning: Mapping the Terrain.” Educational Researcher 33 (8): 3–15. doi:10.3102/0013189X033008003.
   Google Scholar
• Borko, H., J. Jacobs, and K. Koellner. 2010. “Contemporary Approaches to Teacher Professional Development.” International Encyclopaedia of Education 7 (2): 548–556. doi:10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.00654-0.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, G. L. 2004. “Teachers’ Conceptions of Assessment: Implications for Policy and Professional Development.” Assessment in Education 11 (3): 301–318. doi:10.1080/0969594042000304609.
   Google Scholar
• Cagasan, L., E. Care, P. Robertson, and R. Luo. 2020. “Developing a Formative Assessment Protocol to Examine Formative Assessment Practices in the Philippines.” Educational Assessment 25 (4): 259–275. doi:10.1080/10627197.2020.1766960.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, E., and L. Fisher. 2022. “A Dialogic Approach to Promoting Professional Development: Understanding Change in Hong Kong Language Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices Regarding Vocabulary Teaching and Learning.” System 110: 102901. doi:10.1016/j.system.2022.102901.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, S. 2008. Active Learning Through Formative Assessment. London: Hodder Education.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, B., and B. Cowie. 2010. “Collaborative Research for Assessment for Learning.” Teaching and Teacher Education 26 (4): 979–986. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2009.10.040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Correnti, R. 2007. “An Empirical Investigation of Professional Development Effects on Literacy Instruction Using Daily Logs.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 29 (4): 262–295. doi:10.3102/0162373707309074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowley, C. B. 2017. “Professional Development as Product Implementation Training.” Teaching and Teacher Education 67: 477–486. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2017.07.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. 2017. “Teacher Education Around the World: What Can We Learn from International Practice?” European Journal of Teacher Education 40 (3): 291–309. doi:10.1080/02619768.2017.1315399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., M. E. Hyler, and M. Gardner. 2017. Effective Teacher Professional Development. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L., R. C. Wei, A. Andree, N. Richardson, and S. Orphanos. 2009. Professional Learning in the Learning Profession: A Status Report on Teacher Development in the United States and Abroad. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University, National Staff Development Council and The School Redesign Network.
   Google Scholar
• Dekker, T., and E. Feijs. 2005. “Scaling up Strategies for Change: Change in Formative Assessment Practices.” Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice 12 (3): 237–254. doi:10.1080/09695940500337215.
   Google Scholar
• Desimone, L. M. 2002. “How Can Comprehensive School Reform Models Be Successfully Implemented?” Review of Educational Research 72 (3): 433–479. doi:10.3102/00346543072003433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desimone, L. M. 2009. “Improving Impact Studies of Teachers’ Professional Development: Toward Better Conceptualizations and Measures.” Educational Researcher 38 (3): 181–199. doi:10.3102/0013189X08331140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desimone, L. M., and M. S. Garet. 2015. “Best Practices in Teachers’ Professional Development in the United States.” Psychology, Society, & Education 7 (3): 252–263. doi:10.25115/psye.v7i3.515.
   Google Scholar
• Easton, L. B. 2008. “From Professional Development to Professional Learning.” Phi Delta Kappan 89 (10): 755–761. doi:10.1177/003172170808901014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, A. K. 2017. “Help-Seeking: Agentic Learners Initiating Feedback.” Educational Review 70 (4): 389–408. doi:10.1080/00131911.2017.1340871.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, A. K. 2022. “Self-Assessment as a Student-Agentic Zone of Proximate Competence Development.” Educational Review 1–23. doi:10.1080/00131911.2022.2103520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fore, A. G., C. R. Feldhaus, B. H. Sorge, M. Agarwal, and K. Varahramyan. 2015. “Learning at the Nano-Level: Accounting for Complexity in the Internalization of Secondary STEM Teacher Professional Development.” Teaching and Teacher Education 51: 101–112. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2015.06.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, S. E., and C. Brooks. 2012. “Teachers’ Perspectives on the Effectiveness of a Locally Planned Professional Development Program for Implementing New Curriculum.” Teacher Development 16 (1): 1–23. doi:10.1080/13664530.2012.667953.
   Google Scholar
• Guskey, T. R. 2000. Evaluating Professional Development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guskey, T. R. 2002. “Professional Development and Teacher Change.” Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice 8 (3): 381–391. doi:10.1080/135406002100000512.
   Google Scholar
• Guskey, T. R., and D. Sparks. 2004. “Linking Professional Development to Improvements in Student Learning.” Research Linking Teacher Preparation and Student Performance 12 (11): 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Guskey, T. R., and K. S. Yoon. 2009. “What Works in Professional Development?” Phi Delta Kapplan 90 (7): 495–500. doi:10.1177/003172170909000709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, E. 2005. “Assessment for Learning? Thinking Outside the (Black) Box.” Cambridge Journal of Education 35 (2): 213–224. doi:10.1080/03057640500146880.
   Google Scholar
• Harlen, W. 2005. “Teachers’ Summative Practices and Assessment for Learning – Tensions and Synergies.” The Curriculum Journal 16 (2): 207–223. doi:10.1080/09585170500136093.
   Google Scholar
• Harwell, S. H. 2003. Teacher Professional Development: It’s Not an Event, It’s a Process. Waco, TX: CORD.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, D. 2003. “Making Learning an Effect of Schooling: Aligning Curriculum, Assessment and Pedagogy.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 2 (2): 225–245. doi:10.1080/01596300303039.
   Google Scholar
• Heritage, M. 2007. “Formative Assessment: What Do Teachers Need to Know and Do?” Phi Delta Kappan 89 (2): 140–145. doi:10.1177/003172170708900210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, A. 2005. “Models of Continuing Professional Development (CPD): A Framework for Analysis.” Journal of In-Service Education 31 (2): 235–250.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, M. M. 2016. “How Does Professional Development Improve Teaching?” Review of Educational Research 86 (4): 945–980. doi:10.3102/0034654315626800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kippers, W. B., C. H. Wolterinck, K. Schildkamp, C. L. Poortman, and A. J. Visscher. 2018. “Teachers’ Views on the Use of Assessment for Learning and Data-Based Decision Making in Classroom Practice.” Teaching and Teacher Education 75: 199–213. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2018.06.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kisa, Z., and R. Correnti. 2015. “Examining Implementation Fidelity in America’s Choice Schools: A Longitudinal Analysis of Changes in Professional Development Associated with Changes in Teacher Practice.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 37 (4): 437–457. doi:10.3102/0162373714557519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraft, M. A., D. Blazar, and D. Hogan. 2018. “The Effect of Teacher Coaching on Instruction and Achievement: Meta-Analysis of the Causal Evidence.” Review of Educational Research 88 (4): 547–588. doi:10.3102/0034654318759268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawless, K. A., and J. W. Pellegrino. 2007. “Professional Development in Integrating Technology into Teaching and Learning: Knowns, Unknowns, and Ways to Pursue Better Questions and Answers.” Review of Educational Research 77: 575–614. doi:10.3102/0034654307309921.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMillan, J. H. 2000. “Fundamental Assessment Principles for Teachers and School Administrators.” Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation 7 (1): 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• McMillan, J. H. 2007. Formative Classroom Assessment. Theory into Practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• MEST (Ministry of Education, Science and Technology). 2016. Curriculum Framework on Pre-University Education of the Republic of Kosovo. Prishtina: BLENDI.
   Google Scholar
• MEST (Ministry of Education, Science and Technology). 2016. “Kosovo Education Strategic Plan 2017 – 2021.“ Retrieved May 2019, from Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (MEST): http://www.kryeministri-ks.net/repository/docs/KOSOVO_EDUCATION_STRATEGIC_PLAN.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M., and A. Huberman. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Nelles, W. 2005. “Education, Underdevelopment, Unnecessary War and Human Security in Kosovo.” International Journal of Educational Development 25 (1): 69–84. doi:10.1016/j.ijedudev.2004.07.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opfer, V. D., and D. Pedder. 2011. “Conceptualizing Teacher Professional Learning.” Review of Educational Research 81 (3): 376–407. doi:10.3102/0034654311413609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. 2002. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Penuel, W. R., L. P. Gallagher, and S. Moorthy. 2011. “Preparing Teachers to Design Sequences of Instruction in Earth Systems Science: A Comparison of Three Professional Development Programs.” American Educational Research Journal 48 (4): 996–1025. doi:10.3102/0002831211410864.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popham, W. J. 2009. “Assessment Literacy for Teachers: Faddish or Fundamental?” Theory into Practice 48 (1): 4–11. doi:10.1080/00405840802577536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proyr, J., and B. Crossouard. 2008. “A Sociocultural Theorization of Formative Assessment.” Oxford Review of Education 34 (1): 1–20. doi:10.1080/03054980701476386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pupovci, D. 2002. “Teacher Education System in Kosovo.” Metodika 3 (5): 125–145.
   Google Scholar
• Sandholtz, J. H., and C. Ringstaff. 2016. “The Influence of Contextual Factors on the Sustainability of Professional Development Outcomes.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 27 (2): 205–226. doi:10.1007/s10972-016-9451-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saqipi, B., T. Asunta, and E. Korpinen. 2014. “Understanding the Context of Teacher Professionalism in Education Systems Undergoing Transition – Kosovo Case.” Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 112: 635–646. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1211.
   Google Scholar
• Shepard, L. A. 2005. “Linking Formative Assessment to Scaffolding.” Educational Leadership 63 (3): 66–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiggins, R. 2005. “From Formative Assessment to Assessment for Learning: A Path to Success in Standards-Based Schools.” Phi Delta Kappa International 87 (4): 324–328. doi:10.1177/003172170508700414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tahirsylaj, A. 2021. “Placing Kosovo in the Didaktik-Curriculum Continuum: A Quantitative, International Comparative Perspective.” Issues in Educational Research 31 (1): 255–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volante, L., and D. Beckett. 2011. “Formative Assessment and the Contemporary Classroom: Synergies and Tensions Between Research and Practice.” Canadian Journal of Education Revue Canadienne de L’Éducation 34 (2): 239–255.
   Google Scholar
• Vula, E., F. Berisha, and B. Saqipi. 2015. “Introducing Teacher Mentoring in Kosovo Schools – Potential and Challenges for Sustainability.” CEPS Journal 5 (4): 109–124. doi:10.26529/cepsj.119.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. 1978. Mind and Society: The Development of Higher Mental Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Winstone, N. E., R. A. Nash, M. Parker, and J. Rowntree. 2016. “Supporting Learners’ Agentic Engagement with Feedback: A Systematic Review and a Taxonomy of Recipience Processes.” Educational Psychologist 52 (1): 17–37. doi:10.1080/00461520.2016.1207538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, Y., and G. T. Brown. 2016. “Teacher Assessment Literacy in Practice: A Reconceptualization.” Teaching and Teacher Education 58: 149–162. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2016.05.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yee, S. F. 2019. A Phenomenological Inquiry into Science Teachers’ Case Method Learning. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, Y., J. Olson, M. Olson, H. Solvin, and P. R. Brandon. 2015. “Comparing Two Versions of Professional Development for Teachers Using Formative Assessment in Networked Mathematics Classrooms.” Journal of Research on Technology in Education 47 (1): 41–70. doi:10.1080/15391523.2015.967560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar