Skull stripping on multimodal brain MRI scans using thresholding and morphology

References

• Lavini C. Do different MRI scanners produce different fMRI results?. Proceedings of the 9th annual meeting of ISMRM.;Glasgow:2001
   Google Scholar
• Isensee F, Schell M, Pflueger I, et al. Automated brain extraction of multisequence MRI using artificial neural networks. Hum Brain Mapp. 2019;40(17):4952–4964.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shattuck DW, Sandor-Leahy SR, Schaper KA, et al. Magnetic resonance image tissue classification using a partial volume model. Neuro Image. 2001;13(5):856–876.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swiebocka-Wiek J. Skull stripping for MRI images using morphological operators. In: Saeed, K., Homenda, W. (eds) Computer Information Systems and Industrial Management. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 9842. Cham: Springer; 2016. p. 172–182.
   Google Scholar
• Ezhilarasan K, Praveenkumar S, Somasundaram K, et al. Automatic brain extraction from MRI of human head scans using helmholtz free energy principle and morphological operations. Biomed Signal Process Control. 2021;64:102270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fatima A, Shahid AR, Raza B, et al. State-of-the-Art traditional to the machine-and deep-learning-based skull stripping techniques: models, and algorithms. J Digit Imaging. 2020;33(6):1443–1464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abd El-Kader S, Morse M, Abo-Elsoud MEA, et al. Improvement skull stripping algorithm of MRI brain images based on fuzzy morphological operation. Int J Sci Res. 2016;5(1):13–17.
   Google Scholar
• Somasundaram K, Kalaiselvi T. Automatic brain extraction methods for T1 magnetic resonance images using region labeling and morphological operations. Comput Biol Med. 2011;41(8):716–725.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muhammet Üsame ÖZİÇ, Özbay Y, Ekmekci AH, et al. Skull Stripping on Brain MR Images Using Priori Knowledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tchoketch Kebir S, Mekaoui S, Bouhedda M. A fully automatic methodology for MRI brain tumour detection and segmentation. Imaging Sci J. 2019;67(1):42–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tao X, Chang MC. A skull stripping method using deformable surface and tissue classification. In: Benoit M. Dawant and David R. Haynor (eds) Medical Imaging 2010: Image Processing: International Society for Optics and Photonics, vol. 7623; 2010. p. 76233L.
   Google Scholar
• Ségonne F, Dale AM, Busa E, et al. A hybrid approach to the skull stripping problem in MRI. Neuroimage. 2004;22(3):1060–1075.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith SM. Fast robust automated brain extraction. Hum Brain Mapp. 2002;17(3):143–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox RW. AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. Comput Biomed Res. 1996;29(3):162–173.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leung KK, Barnes J, Modat M, et al. Brain MAPS: an automated, accurate and robust brain extraction technique using a template library. Neuroimage. 2011;55(3):1091–1108. Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iglesias JE, Liu CY, Thompson PM, et al. Robust brain extraction across datasets and comparison with publicly available methods. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2011;30(9):1617–1634.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobashi S, Fujimoto Y, Ogawa M, et al. Fuzzy-ASM based automated skull stripping method from infantile brain MR images. In: 2007 IEEE international conference on granular computing (GRC 2007): IEEE; 2007. p. 632–632.
   Google Scholar
• Long J, Shelhamer E, Darrell T. Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition; 2015. p. 3431–3440.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley D, Roth G. Adaptive thresholding using the integral image. J Graph Tools. 2007;12(2):13–21.
   Google Scholar
• Zuiderveld K. Contrast limited adaptive histogram equalization. Graphics Gems. 1994: 474–485.
   Google Scholar
• Pedano N, Flanders AE, Scarpace L, et al. Radiology data from the cancer genome atlas low grade glioma [TCGA-LGG] collection. Cancer Imaging Arch. 2016;2.
   Google Scholar
• Commowick O, Istace A, Kain M, et al. Objective evaluation of multiple sclerosis lesion segmentation using a data management and processing infrastructure. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):1–17.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Puccio B, Pooley JP, Pellman JS, et al. The preprocessed connectomes project repository of manually corrected skull-stripped T1-weighted anatomical MRI data. Gigascience. 2016;5(1):s13742–s13016.
   Google Scholar
• Dale AM, Fischl B, Sereno MI. Cortical surface-based analysis: I. segmentation and surface reconstruction. Neuro Image. 1999;9(2):179–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eskildsen SF, Coupé P, Fonov V, et al. BEaST: brain extraction based on nonlocal segmentation technique. Neuro Image. 2012;59(3):2362–2373. Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith SM, Jenkinson M, Woolrich MW, et al. Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. Neuroimage. 2004;23:S208–S219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer S, Fejes T, Reyes M, et al. A skull-stripping filter for ITK”. Insight J. 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Tao X, Chang M-C. A skull stripping method using deformable surface and tissue classification. In: SPIE medical imaging. San Diego, CA: 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng J. Brain tumor dataset: figshare. Dataset. 2017. doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.1512427.v5.
   Google Scholar
• Kalavathi P, Prasath VS. Methods on skull stripping of MRI head scan images—a review. J Digil Imaging. 2016;29(3):365–379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roslan R, Jamil N, Mahmud R. Skull stripping of MRI brain images using mathematical morphology. In: 2010 IEEE EMBS conference on biomedical engineering and sciences (IECBES): IEEE; 2010. p. 26–31.
   Google Scholar
• Somasundaram K, Gayathri SP, Rajeswaran R, et al. Fetal brain extraction from magnetic resonance image (MRI) of human fetus. The Imaging Science Journal. 2018;66(3):133–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoopes A, Mora JS, Dalca AV, et al. Synthstrip: skull-stripping for any brain image. NeuroImage. 2022;260:119474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucena O, Souza R, Rittner L, et al. Convolutional neural networks for skull-stripping in brain MR imaging using silver standard masks. Artif Intell Med. 2019;98:48–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thakur SP, Doshi J, Pati S, et al. Skull-stripping of glioblastoma MRI scans using 3D deep learning. In: Brainlesion: glioma, multiple sclerosis, stroke and traumatic brain injuries: 5th international workshop, BrainLes 2019, held in conjunction with MICCAI 2019, Shenzhen, China, October 17, 2019, revised selected papers, part I. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2020 May. p. 57–68.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang H, Rehman HZU, Lee S. 3D U-Net for skull stripping in brain MRI. Appl Sci. 2019;9(3):569.
   Google Scholar
• Rehman HZU, Hwang H, Lee S. Conventional and deep learning methods for skull stripping in brain MRI. Appl Sci. 2020;10(5):1773.
   Google Scholar
• Pieper S, Halle M, Kikinis R. 3D slicer. In: 2004 2nd IEEE international symposium on biomedical imaging: nano to macro (IEEE Cat No. 04EX821): IEEE; 2004 April. p. 632–635.
   Google Scholar
• Walczak M, Nalepa J, Kawulok M, et al. Evolutionary cortical surface segmentation. In: Real-Time image and video processing 2018: SPIE; 2018. (Vol. 10670), p. 104–114.
   Google Scholar