Social media use and polarized redistributive attitudes: a comparative and causal perspective

References

• Abrams, D. E., & Hogg, M. A. (1990). Social identity theory: Constructive and critical advances. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Acemoglu, D., Naidu, S., Restrepo, P., & Robinson, J. A. (2015). Democracy, redistribution, and inequality. In A. B. Atkinson & F. Bourguignon (Eds.), Handbook of income distribution (Vol. 2, pp. 1885–1966). Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Alesina, A., & Fuchs-Schündeln, N. (2007). Good-bye Lenin (or not?): The effect of communism on people’s preferences. American Economic Review, 97(4), 1507–1528. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.97.4.1507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alesina, A., & Giuliano, P. (2011). Preferences for redistribution. In J. Benhabib, A. Bisin, & M. O. Jackson (Eds.), Handbook of social economics (Vol. 1, pp. 93–131). North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Alesina, A., & Glaeser, E. (2004). Fighting poverty in the US and Europe: A world of difference. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alesina, A., Glaeser, E., & Sacerdote, B. (2001). Why doesn’t the United States have a European-style welfare state? Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2001, 187–277. https://doi.org/10.1353/eca.2001.0014
   Google Scholar
• Alesina, A., & La Ferrara, E. (2005). Preferences for redistribution in the land of opportunities. Journal of Public Economics, 89(5–6), 897–931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J. S. (2009). Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist’s companion. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arceneaux, K., Johnson, M., & Cryderman, J. (2013). Communication, persuasion, and the conditioning value of selective exposure: Like minds may unite and divide but they mostly tune out. Political Communication, 30(2), 213–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2012.737424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auxier, B., & Anderson, M. (2021). Social media use in 2021. Pew Research Center, 1, 1–4. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2021/04/07/social-media-use-in-2021/
   Google Scholar
• Bail, C. A., Argyle, L. P., Brown, T. W., Bumpus, J. P., Chen, H., Hunzaker, M. F., Lee, J., Mann, M., Merhout, F., & Volfovsky, A. (2018). Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(37), 9216–9221. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1804840115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakshy, E., Messing, S., & Adamic, L. A. (2015). Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Science, 348(6239), 1130–1132. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa1160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barberá, P. (2014). How social media reduces mass political polarization. Evidence from Germany, Spain, and the US. Job Market Paper. New York University.
   Google Scholar
• Barberá, P., Jost, J. T., Nagler, J., Tucker, J. A., & Bonneau, R. (2015). Tweeting from left to right. Psychological Science, 26(10), 1531–1542. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615594620
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beam, M. A., Hutchens, M. J., & Hmielowski, J. D. (2018). Facebook news and (de)polarization: Reinforcing spirals in the 2016 US election. Information, Communication & Society, 21(7), 940–958. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1444783
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigley, I. P., & Leonhardt, J. M. (2018). Extremity bias in user-generated content creation and consumption in social media. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 18(2), 125–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2018.1491813
   Google Scholar
• Blekesaune, M., & Quadagno, J. (2003). Public attitudes toward welfare state policies: A comparative analysis of 24 nations. European Sociological Review, 19(5), 415–427. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/19.5.415
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boix, C. (2003). Democracy and redistribution. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boulianne, S. (2019). US dominance of research on political communication: A metaview. Political Communication, 36(4), 660–665.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruns, A. (2019). Are filter bubbles real? John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Bruns, A. (2021). Echo chambers? Filter bubbles? The misleading metaphors that obscure the real problem. In Hate speech and polarization in participatory society (pp. 33-48). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, M. (2019). The practicalities of a contextual approach in comparative political communication research. Political Communication, 36(4), 666–670. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2019.1670901
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corneo, G., & Grüner, H. P. (2002). Individual preferences for political redistribution. Journal of Public Economics, 83(1), 83–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(00)00172-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa-Font, J., & Cowell, F. (2015). Social identity and redistributive preferences: A survey. Journal of Economic Surveys, 29(2), 357–374. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimitrova, D. V., Shehata, A., Strömbäck, J., & Nord, L. W. (2014). The effects of digital media on political knowledge and participation in election campaigns. Communication Research, 41(1), 95–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650211426004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durante, R., Putterman, L., & Van der Weele, J. (2014). Preferences for redistribution and perception of fairness: An experimental study. Journal of the European Economic Association, 12(4), 1059–1086. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeea.12082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dylko, I. B. (2016). How technology encourages political selective exposure. Communication Theory, 26(4), 389–409. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esser, F. (2019). Advances in comparative political communication research through contextualization and cumulation of evidence. Political Communication, 36(4), 680–686. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2019.1670904
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flaxman, S., Goel, S., & Rao, J. M. (2016). Filter bubbles, echo chambers, and online news consumption. Public Opinion Quarterly, 80(S1), 298–320. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfw006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs-Schündeln, N., & Schündeln, M. (2015). On the endogeneity of political preferences: Evidence from individual experience with democracy. Science, 347(6226), 1145–1148. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa0880
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Rada, X., & Norton, M. I. (2020). Putting within-country political differences in (global) perspective. Plos one, 15(4), e0231794.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett, R. K. (2009). Echo chambers online?: Politically motivated selective exposure among Internet news users. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(2), 265–285. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01440.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gidron, N., Adams, J., & Horne, W. (2019). Toward a comparative research agenda on affective polarization in mass publics. APSA Comparative Politics Newsletter, 29, 30–36. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3391062
   Google Scholar
• Gidron, N., Adams, J., & Horne, W. (2020). American affective polarization in comparative perspective. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gil de Zúñiga, H., Molyneux, L., & Zheng, P. (2014). Social media, political expression, and political participation: Panel analysis of lagged and concurrent relationships. Journal of Communication, 64(4), 612–634. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giuliano, P., & Spilimbergo, A. (2014). Retracted: Growing up in a recession. The Review of Economic Studies, 81(2), 787–817. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdt040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halberstam, Y., & Knight, B. (2016). Homophily, group size, and the diffusion of political information in social networks: Evidence from Twitter. Journal of Public Economics, 143, 73–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2016.08.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S., & Hahn, K. S. (2009). Red media, blue media: Evidence of ideological selectivity in media use. Journal of Communication, 59(1), 19–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01402.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S., Lelkes, Y., Levendusky, M., Malhotra, N., & Westwood, S. J. (2019). The origins and consequences of affective polarization in the United States. Annual Review of Political Science, 22(1), 129–146. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051117-073034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jost, J. T., Baldassarri, D. S., & Druckman, J. N. (2022). Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts. Nature Reviews Psychology, 1(10), 560–576. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-022-00093-5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Koiranen, I., Keipi, T., Koivula, A., & Räsänen, P. (2020). Changing patterns of social media use? A population-level study of Finland. Universal Access in the Information Society, 19(3), 603–617. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-019-00654-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubin, E., Gray, K. J., & von Sikorski, C. (2023). Reducing political dehumanization by pairing facts with personal experiences. Political Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubin, E., & von Sikorski, C. (2021). The role of (social) media in political polarization: A systematic review. Annals of the International Communication Association, 45(3), 188–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2021.1976070
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S. (2020). Social media Use and social movements and protests. In J. van den Bulck, E. Scharrer, D. Ewoldsen, & M. L. Mares (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of media psychology (pp. 1745–1751). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S., Nanz, A., & Heiss, R. (2022). Platform-dependent effects of incidental exposure to political news on political knowledge and political participation. Computers in Human Behavior, 127, 107048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S., Rojas, H., & Yamamoto, M. (2022). Social media, messaging apps, and affective polarization in the United States and Japan. Mass Communication and Society, 25(5), 673–697. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2021.1953534
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levendusky, M. (2013). How partisan media polarize America. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Loader, B., & Mercea, D. (2011). Networking democracy? Information, Communication and Society, 14(6), 757–769. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2011.592648
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luttmer, E. F., & Singhal, M. (2011). Culture, context, and the taste for redistribution. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 3(1), 157–179. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.3.1.157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meltzer, A. H., & Richard, S. F. (1981). A rational theory of the size of government. Journal of Political Economy, 89(5), 914–927. https://doi.org/10.1086/261013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Möller, J. (2021). Filter bubbles and digital echo chambers. In H. Tumber, & S. Waisboard (Eds.), The Routledge companion to media disinformation and populism (pp. 92–100).
   Google Scholar
• Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Schulz, A., Andi, S., Robertson, C. T., & Nielsen, R. K. (2021). Reuters Institute digital news report.
   Google Scholar
• Paxton, P. (2002). Social capital and democracy: An interdependent relationship. American Sociological Review, 67(2), 254–277. https://doi.org/10.2307/3088895
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piketty, T. (2013). Capital in the 21st century. President and Fellows.
   Google Scholar
• Prior, M. (2013). Media and political polarization. Annual Review of Political Science, 16(1), 101–127. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-100711-135242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rojas, H., & Valenzuela, S. (2019). A call to contextualize public opinion-based research in political communication. Political Communication, 36(4), 652–659. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2019.1670897
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, C., & Wohlfart, J. (2018). Experienced inequality and preferences for redistribution. Journal of Public Economics, 167, 251–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2018.09.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saez, E., & Zucman, G. (2016). Wealth inequality in the United States since 1913: Evidence from capitalized income Tax data*. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131(2), 519–578. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjw004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Settle, J. (2018). Frenemies: How social media polarizes America. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shah, D. V., Rojas, H., & Cho, J. (2009). Media and civic participation: On understanding and misunderstanding communication effects. In J. Bryant, & M. B. Oliver (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (3rd ed., pp. 207–227). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. (2018). #Republic: Divided democracy in the age of social media. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Takikawa, H., & Nagayoshi, K. (2017, December). Political polarization in social media: Analysis of the “Twitter political field” in Japan [paper presentation]. The 2017 IEEE conference on Big data, Boston, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Thorson, K., Cotter, K., Medeiros, M., & Pak, C. (2021). Algorithmic inference, political interest, and exposure to news and politics on Facebook. Information, Communication & Society, 24(2), 183–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1642934
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker, J. A., Guess, A., Barberá, P., Vaccari, C., Siegel, A., Sanovich, S., Stukal, D., & Nyhan, B. (2018, March 19). Social media, political polarization, and political disinformation: A review of the scientific literature.
   Google Scholar
• Van Aelst, P., Strömbäck, J., Aalberg, T., Esser, F., de Vreese, C., Matthes, J., Hopmann, D., Salgado, S., Hubé, N., Stępińska, A., Papathanassopoulos, S., Berganza, R., Legnante, G., Reinemann, C., Sheafer, T., & Stanyer, J. (2017). Political communication in a high-choice media environment: A challenge for democracy? Annals of the International Communication Association, 41(1), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2017.1288551
   Google Scholar
• Vowe, G., & Henn, P. (2016). Political communication in the online world: Theoretical approaches and research designs. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wooldridge, J. M. (2015). Introductory econometrics: A modern approach. Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Xenos, M., Vromen, A., & Loader, B. D. (2014). The great equalizer? Patterns of social media use and youth political engagement in three advanced democracies. Information, Communication & Society, 17(2), 151–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.871318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhuravskaya, E., Petrova, M., & Enikolopov, R. (2020). Political effects of the internet and social media. Annual Review of Economics, 12(1), 415–438. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-081919-050239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar