Memecry: tracing the repetition-with-variation of formulas on 4chan/pol/

References

• Acker, A., Loos, A. C., & Sufrin, J. (2020). The Neil deGrasse Tyson Problem: Methods for Exploring Base Memes in Web Archives. ACM International Conference, 255–264. https://doi.org/10.1145/3400806.3400836
   Google Scholar
• Adamic, L. A., Lento, T. M., Adar, E., & Ng, P. C. (2016). Information evolution in social networks. WSDM 2016 - 9th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, 473–482. https://doi.org/10.1145/2835776.2835827
   Google Scholar
• Asprem, E. (2020). The magical theory of politics. Nova Religio, 23(4), 15–42. https://doi.org/10.1525/nr.2020.23.4.15
   Google Scholar
• Auerbach, D. (2012). Anonymity as culture: Treatise. Triple Canopy, 15.
   Google Scholar
• Bastian, M., Heymann, S., & Jacomy, M. (2009). Gephi: An open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, 361–362.
   Google Scholar
• Benkler, Y, Faris, R, & Roberts, H. (2018). Network propaganda: Manipulation, disinformation, and radicalization in American politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beran, D. (2019). It came from something awful: How a toxic troll army accidentally memed donald trump into office. New York: All Points Books.
   Google Scholar
• Berners-Lee, T., Cailliau, R., Groff, J. F., & Pollermann, B. (1992). World-Wide Web: The information universe. Internet Research, 2(1), 52–58. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb047254
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, M., Monroy-Hernández, A., Harry, D., André, P., Panovich, K., & Vargas, G. (2011). 4chan and /b/: An analysis of anonymity and ephemerality in a large online community. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 5(1), 50–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v5i1.14134
   Google Scholar
• Beskow, D. M., Kumar, S., & Carley, K. M. (2020). The evolution of political memes: Detecting and characterizing internet memes with multi-modal deep learning. Information Processing and Management, 57(2), 102170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2019.102170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boullier, D. (2018). Médialab stories: How to align actor network theory and digital methods. Big Data & Society, 5(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951718816722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouma, G. (2009). Normalized (pointwise) mutual information in collocation extraction. In the Biennial GSCL Conference (31–40). Potsdam.
   Google Scholar
• Burgess, J. (2006). Hearing ordinary voices: Cultural studies, vernacular creativity and digital storytelling. Continuum, 20(2), 201–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/10304310600641737
   Google Scholar
• Camic, C. (2011). Repetition with variation: A mertonian inquiry. In Y. Elkana, A. Szigeti, & G. Lissauer (Eds.), Concepts and the social order (pp. 165–188). CEU.
   Google Scholar
• Castaldo, M., Venturini, T., Frasca, P., & Gargiulo, F. (2021). Junk news bubbles modelling the rise and fall of attention in online arenas. New Media & Society, 24(9), 2027–2045. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820978640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chavalarias, D., & Cointet, J. P. (2013). Phylomemetic patterns in science evolution-the rise and fall of scientific fields. PLoS ONE, 8(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054847.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, G., & Brunton, F. (2010). A user’s guide to lulzy media, the pleasure of trickery, and the politics of the spectacle: from luddites to anonymous. The Next Hope. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v = _ywypPjPVDM
   Google Scholar
• Crogan, P., & Kinsley, S. (2012). Paying attention: Toward a critique of the attention economy. Culture Machine, 13, 1–29.
   Google Scholar
• Dawkins, R. (1976). The selfish gene. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. (1968). Différence et Répétition. PUF.
   Google Scholar
• De Seta, G. (2016). Neither meme nor viral: The circulationist semiotics of vernacular content. Lexia, 25(26), 463–486. https://doi.org/10.4399/978882550315926
   Google Scholar
• De Zeeuw, D., Hagen, S., Peeters, S., & Jokubauskaitė, E. (2020). Tracing normiefication: A cross-platform study of the QAnon conspiracy theory. First Monday, 25(11). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v25i11.10643
   Google Scholar
• De Zeeuw, D., & Tuters, M. (2020). Teh internet is serious business: On the deep vernacular web and its discontents. Cultural Politics, 16(2), 214–232. https://doi.org/10.1215/17432197-8233406
   Google Scholar
• Donovan, J., Dreyfuss, E., & Friedberg, B. (2022). Meme wars: The untold story of the online battles upending democracy in America. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, N. (2014). It’s supposed to look like shit: The internet ugly aesthetic. Journal of Visual Culture, 13(3), 314–339. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470412914544516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenstein, E. L. (1980). The printing press as an agent of change. University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fathallah, J. M. (2021). 'Getting by’ on 4chan: Feminine self-presentation and capital-claiming in antifeminist Web space. First Monday, 26(6). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v26i7.10449
   Google Scholar
• Gal, N. (2018). Internet memes. In B. Warf (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of the Internet (pp. 528–530). Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gal, N., Shifman, L., & Kampf, Z. (2016). It gets better”: Internet memes and the construction of collective identity. New Media & Society, 18(8), 1698–1714. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814568784
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelder, K., & Thornton, S. (1997). The subcultures reader. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.2307/3341736
   Google Scholar
• Gieryn, T. F. (1983). Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review, 48(6), 781–795. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, BG, & Strauss, AL. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Goody, J. (1977). The domestication of the savage mind. University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goody, J., & Watt, I. (1963). The consequences of literacy. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 5(3), 304–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150500431239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagen, S. (2018, April 12). Rendering legible the ephemerality of 4chan/pol/. Open Intelligence Lab, Retrieved from oilab.eu/rendering-legible-the-ephemerality-of-4chanpol/.
   Google Scholar
• Hagen, S. (2022). ‘Who is /ourguy/?’: Tracing panoramic memes to study the collectivity of 4chan/pol/. New Media & Society, OnlineFirst, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221078274.
   Google Scholar
• Hagen, S, & De Zeeuw, D. (2023). Based and confused : Tracing the political connotations of a memetic phrase across the web. Big Data & Society, 10(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v5i1.14134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebdige, D. (1979). Subcultures: The meaning of style. Methuen & Co. Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H., Ford, S., & Green, J. B. (2013). Spreadable media. New York University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
   Google Scholar
• Knuttila, L. (2011). User unknown: 4chan, anonymity and contingency. First Monday, 16(10), https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v16i10.3665
   Google Scholar
• Kohavi, R., & Longbotham, R. (2017). Online controlled experiments and A/B testing. Encyclopedia of Machine Learning and Data Mining, 7(8), 922–929. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7687-1_891
   Google Scholar
• Lanham, R. A. (2006). The economics of attention: Style and substance in the age of information. University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leskovec, J., Backstrom, L., & Kleinberg, J. (2009). Meme-tracking and the dynamics of the news cycle. In ACM SIGKDD conference on Knowledge discovery (497–506). Paris. https://doi.org/10.1145/1557019.1557077
   Google Scholar
• Ling, C., AbuHilal, I., Blackburn, J., De Cristofaro, E., Zannettou, S., & Stringhini, G. (2021). Dissecting the meme magic: Understanding indicators of virality in image memes. ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 5(CSCW1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1145/3449155
   Google Scholar
• Lord, A. (1960). The singer of tales. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Massanari, A. (2015). Participatory culture, community, and play: Learning from reddit. Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Massanari, A. (2017). #Gamergate and the fappening: How Reddit’s algorithm, governance, and culture support toxic technocultures. New Media & Society, 19(3), 329–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815608807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miliani, M., Giorgi, G., Rama, I., Anselmi, G., & Lebani, G. E. (2020). DANKMEMES @ EVALITA 2020: The memeing of life: Memes, multimodality and politics. CEUR Workshop, 2765. https://doi.org/10.4000/books.aaccademia.7330
   Google Scholar
• Milner, R. M. (2013). Media Lingua Franca: Fixity, novelty, and vernacular creativity in Internet memes. Selected Papers of Internet Research, 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Milner, R. M. (2016). The world made meme: Discourse and identity in participatory media. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miltner, K. (2018). Internet memes timeline. In B. Warf (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of social media (pp. 412–428).
   Google Scholar
• Moulton, J. (2003). A paradigm of philosophy: The adversary method. In S. Harding & M. B. Hintikka (Eds.), Discovering reality (pp. 149–164). Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48017-4_9
   Google Scholar
• Muggleton, D., & Weinzierl, R. (2003). The post-subcultures reader. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nissenbaum, A., & Shifman, L. (2017). Internet memes as contested cultural capital: The case of 4chan’s /b/ board. New Media and Society, 19(4), 483–501. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815609313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nissenbaum, A., & Shifman, L. (2018). Meme templates as expressive repertoires in a globalizing world: A cross-linguistic study. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 23(5), 294–310. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmy016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norrick, N. R. (1993). Repetition in canned jokes and spontaneous conversational joking. International Journal of Humor Research, 6(4), 385–402. https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.1993.6.4.385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong, W. S. J. (1982). Orality and literacy - The technologizing of the word. Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Papasavva, A., Zannettou, S., De Cristofaro, E., Stringhini, G., & Blackburn, J. (2020). Raiders of the lost Kek: 3.5 years of augmented 4chan posts from the politically incorrect board. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 14, 885–894. http://dx.doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v14i1.7354
   Google Scholar
• Parry, M. (1930). Studies in the epic technique of oral verse-making. I. Homer and Homeric style. Harvard Studies in Classical Philology, 41, 73–147. https://doi.org/10.2307/310626
   Google Scholar
• Parry, M. (1932). Studies in the epic technique of oral verse-making: II. The Homeric language as the language of an oral poetry. Harvard Studies in Classical Philology, 43, 1–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/310666
   Google Scholar
• Parry, M. (1971). The making of homeric verse. Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peeters, S., & Hagen, S. (2022). The 4CAT capture and analysis toolkit: A modular tool for transparent and traceable social media research. Computational Communication Research, 4(2), 571–589. https://doi.org/10.5117/CCR2022.2.007.HAGE
   Google Scholar
• Peeters, S., Tuters, M., Willaert, T., & de Zeeuw, D. (2021). On the vernacular language games of an antagonistic online subculture. Frontiers in Big Data, 4(August), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdata.2021.718368
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, W. (2015). This is why we can’t have nice things: Mapping the relationship between online trolling and mainstream culture. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, W. (2018). The oxygen of amplification: Better practices for reporting on extremists, antagonists, and manipulators. Data & Society. Available at: https://datasociety.net/library/oxygen-of-amplification/
   Google Scholar
• Poole, C. (2015). moot's final 4chan Q&A. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v = XYUKJBZuUig
   Google Scholar
• Rieder, B. (2015). Rankflow. Computer Software. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam. https://github.com/bernorieder/RankFlow
   Google Scholar
• Russo, J (2011). The formula. In I. Morris & B. B. Powell (Eds.), A New companion to Homer (pp. 238–260). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004217607_011
   Google Scholar
• Sampson, T. D. (2012). Virality: Contagion theory in the age of networks. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shifman, L. (2013). Memes in digital culture. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. (1971). Designing organizations for an information rich world. In M. Greenberger (Ed.), Computers, communications, and the public interest (pp. 37–72). Johns Hopkins.
   Google Scholar
• Siroker, D., & Koomen, P. (2013). A/B testing: The most powerful way to turn clicks into customers. Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Steele, C. N. (2016). The digital barbershop: Blogs and online oral culture within the African American community. Social Media + Society, 2(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305116683205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarde, G. (1895). Essais et mélanges sociologiques. Essais et mélanges sociologiques. A. Maloine.
   Google Scholar
• Tarde, G. (1903). The laws of imitation. Henry Holt.
   Google Scholar
• Terranova, T. (2012). Attention, economy and the brain. Culture Machine, 13, 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, S. (1995). Club cultures: Music, media and subcultural capital. Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Topinka, R, Finlayson, A, & Osborne-Carey, C. (2021). The trap of tracking: Digital methods, surveillance, and the far right. Surveillance & Society, 19(3), 384–388. http://dx.doi.org/10.24908/ss.v19i3.15018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuters, M., & Hagen, S. (2020). (((They))) rule: Memetic antagonism and nebulous othering on 4chan. New Media and Society, 22(12), 2218–2237. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819888746
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuters, M., Jokubauskaitė, E., & Bach, D. (2018). Post-truth protest: How 4chan cooked-up the Pizzagate Bullshit introduction. M/C Journal, 21(3). https://doi.org/10.5204/mcj.1422
   Google Scholar
• Van der Nagel, E., & Frith, J. (2015). Anonymity, pseudonymity, and the agency of online identity: Examining the social practices of r/Gonewild. First Monday, 20(3). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v20i3.5615.
   Google Scholar
• Venturini, T. (2019). From fake to junk news, the data politics of online virality. In D. Bigo, E. Isin, & E. Ruppert (Eds.), Data politics: Worlds, subjects, rights (pp. 123–144). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Venturini, T. (2022). Online conspiracy theories, digital platforms and secondary orality: Toward a sociology of online monsters. Theory, Culture & Society, 39(5), 61–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/02632764211070962
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zannettou, S., Caulfield, T., Blackburn, J., De Cristofaro, E., Sirivianos, M., Stringhini, G., & Suarez-Tangil, G. (2018). On the origins of memes by means of fringe web communities. ACM SIGCOMM Internet Measurement Conference, IMC, 188–202. https://doi.org/10.1145/3278532.3278550
   Google Scholar
• Zulli, D., & Zulli, D. J. (2022). Extending the Internet meme: Conceptualizing technological mimesis and imitation publics on the TikTok platform. New Media & Society, 24(8), 1872–1890. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820983603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar