‘Think global, act local’: How #MeToo hybridized across borders and platforms for contextual relevance

References

• Afnan, T., Huang, H., Sclafani, M., & Bashir, M. (2019). Putting a price on social movements: A case study of #MeToo on Instagram. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 56(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.2
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, M., & Torr, S. (2018, October 11). How social media users have discussed sexual harassment since #MeToo went viral. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/10/11/how-social-media-users-have-discussed-sexual-harassment-since-metoo-went-viral/
   Google Scholar
• Arriaza Ibarra, K., & Berumen, R. (2019). #Metoo in Spain and France: Stopping the abuse towards ordinary women. Interactions: Studies in Communication & Culture, 10(3), 169–184. https://doi.org/10.1386/iscc.10.3.169_1
   Google Scholar
• Auxier & Anderson. (2021, April 7). Social media use in 2021. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2021/04/07/social-media-use-in-2021/
   Google Scholar
• Bachmann, I., & Proust, V. (2020). Old concerns, renewed focus and novel problems: Feminist communication theory and the global south. Annals of the International Communication Association, 44(1), 67–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2019.1647445
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, W., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–768. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, W. L. (2005). Social movements beyond borders: Organization, communication, and political capacity in two eras of transnational activism. In D. della Porta & S. Tarrow (Eds.), Transnational Protest and Global Activism (pp. 203–226). Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Berents, H. (2016). Hashtagging girlhood: #IAmMalala, #BringBackOurGirls and gendering representations of global politics. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 18(4), 513–527. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616742.2016.1207463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Box-Steffensmeier, J., Freeman, J., Hitt, M., & Pevehouse, J. (2014). Time-series analysis for the social sciences. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campillo, I. (2018). ‘If we stop, the world stops’: The 2018 Feminist Strike in Spain. Social Movement Studies, 28(2), 252–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2018.1556092
   Google Scholar
• Caravantes, P. (2021). Tensions between populist and feminist politics: The case of the Spanish left populist party Podemos. International Political Science Review, 42(5), 596–612. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512120931209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, S., & Park, H. (2012). Cross-national comparison of twitter use between South Korea and Japan: An exploratory study. International Journal of Contents, 8(4), 50–55. https://doi.org/10.5392/IJoC.2012.8.4.050
   Google Scholar
• Cole, K. (2015). “It's like she's eager to be verbally abused”: Twitter, trolls, and (en)gendering disciplinary rhetoric. Feminist Media Studies, 15(2), 356–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2015.1008750
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Correa, T., & Valenzuela, S. (2021). A trend study in the stratification of social media use among urban youth: Chile 2009–2019. Journal of Quantitative Description: Digital Media, 1. https://doi.org/10.51685/jqd.2021.009
   Google Scholar
• Davenport, S. W., Bergman, S. M., Bergman, J. Z., & Fearrington, M. E. (2014). Twitter versus Facebook: Exploring the role of narcissism in the motives and usage of different social media platforms. Computers in Human Behavior, 32, 212–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, J. (2020). How artifacts afford. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edmé, D. R. (2020). Mexico and Latin America: From #MeToo to #NiUnaMenos. In G. Chandra & I. Erlingsdóttir (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of the politics of the #MeToo movement (pp. 423–438). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gabrielatos, C. (2018). Keyness analysis: Nature, metrics and techniques. In C. Taylor & A. Marchi (Eds.), Corpus approaches to discourse: A critical review (pp. 225–258). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• García Canclini, N. (2005). Hybrid cultures: Strategies for entering and leaving modernity. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ghadery, F. (2019). #Metoo—has the ‘sisterhood’ finally become global or just another product of neoliberal feminism? Transnational Legal Theory, 10(2), 252–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/20414005.2019.1630169
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, M., Meese, J., Arnold, M., Nansen, B., & Carter, M. (2015). #Funeral and Instagram: Death, social media, and platform vernacular. Information, Communication & Society, 18(3), 255–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2014.987152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giugni, M. (2002). Explaining cross-national similarities among social movements. In J. Smith & H. Johnston (Eds.), Globalization and Resistance: Transnational Dimensions of Social Movements (pp. 13–29). Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
   Google Scholar
• González, A., & Brochner, G. (2019). The new cycle of women’s mobilizations between Latin America and Europe: A feminist geopolitical perspective on interregionalism. In H. Cairo, & B. Bringel (Eds.), Critical geopolitics and regional (re)configurations (pp. 178–196). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• González-Bailón, S., & Wang, N. (2016). Networked discontent: The anatomy of protest campaigns in social media. Social Networks, 44, 95–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2015.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greiner, C., & Sakdapolrak, P. (2013). Translocality: Concepts, applications and emerging research perspectives. Geography Compass, 7(5), 373–384. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12048
   Google Scholar
• Hasunuma, L., & Shin, K. (2019). #Metoo in Japan and South Korea: #WeToo, #WithYou. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 40(1), 97–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554477X.2019.1563416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, S., Bailey, M., & Welles, B. (2020). #Hashtagactivism: Networks of race and gender justice. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jeon, H. (2016). KoNLP: Korean NLP Package. R package.
   Google Scholar
• Jouët, J. (2018). Digital feminism: Questioning the renewal of activism. Journal of Research in Gender Studies, 8(1), 133–157. https://doi.org/10.22381/JRGS8120187
   Google Scholar
• Keller, J. (2019). “Oh, she’sa tumblr feminist”: Exploring the platform vernacular of girls’ social media feminisms. Social Media+Society, 5(3), 2056305119867442. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119867442
   Google Scholar
• Kraidy, M. (1999). The global, the local, and the hybrid: A native ethnography of glocalization. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 16(4), 456–476. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295039909367111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraidy, M. (2002). Hybridity in cultural globalization. Communication Theory, 12(3), 316–339. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2002.tb00272.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam, W., & Rosario-Ramos, E. (2009). Multilingual literacies in transnational digitally mediated contexts: An exploratory study of immigrant teens in the United States. Language and Education, 23(2), 171–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500780802152929
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latina, D., & Docherty, S. (2014). Trending participation, trending exclusion? Feminist Media Studies, 14(6), 1103–1105. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2014.975449
   Google Scholar
• Lim, M. (2012). Clicks, cabs, and coffee houses: Social media and oppositional movements in Egypt, 2004–2011. Journal of Communication, 62(2), 231–248. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01628.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez, I., Quillivic, R., Evans, H., & Arriaga, R. I. (2019). Denouncing sexual violence: A cross-language and cross-cultural analysis of #MeToo and #BalanceTonPorc. In D. Lamas, F. Loizides, L. Nacke, H. Petrie, M. Winckler, & P. Zaphiris (Eds.), Human-computer interaction–INTERACT 2019 (Vol. 11,747, pp. 733–743). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lu, J. H., & Steele, C. K. (2019). ‘Joy is resistance’: Cross-platform resilience and (re)invention of Black oral culture online. Information, Communication & Society, 22(6), 823–837. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1575449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manikonda, L., Beigi, G., Liu, H., & Kambhampati, S. (2018). Twitter for sparking a movement, Reddit for sharing the moment: #MeToo through the lens of social media. arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.08022.
   Google Scholar
• Matassi, M., & Boczkowski, P. (2021). An agenda for comparative social media studies: The value of understanding practices from cross-national, cross-media, and cross-platform perspectives. International Journal of Communication, 15(2021), 207–228.
   Google Scholar
• Mendes, K., Ringrose, J., & Keller, J. (2019). Digital feminist activism: Girls and women fight back against rape culture. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchelstein, E., Boczkowski, P., & Giuliano, C. (2021). Platform matters: Political opinion expression on social media. Weizenbaum Journal of the Digital Society, 1(1), w1–1. https://doi.org/10.34669/wi.wjds/1.1.5
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, R. (1984). Sisterhood is global. Anchor Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholls, W. (2009). Place, networks, space: Theorising the geographies of social movements. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 34(1), 78–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2009.00331.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özkula, S., Reilly, P., & Hayes, J. (2022). Easy data, same old platforms? A systematic review of digital activism methodologies. Information, Communication & Society, 26(7), 1470–1489. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.2013918
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papacharissi, Z. (2016). Affective publics and structures of storytelling: Sentiment, events and mediality. Information, Communication & Society, 19(3), 307–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1109697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, S. J., Lim, Y. S., & Park, H. W. (2015). Comparing Twitter and YouTube networks in information diffusion: The case of the “Occupy Wall Street” movement. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 95, 208–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearce, W., Özkula, S. M., Greene, A. K., Teeling, L., Bansard, J. S., Omena, J. J., & Rabello, E. T. (2020). Visual cross-platform analysis: Digital methods to research social media images. Information, Communication & Society, 23(2), 161–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1486871
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poell, T., & Van Dijck, J. (2015). Social media and activist communication. In C. Atton (Ed.), The Routledge Companion to Alternative and Community Media (pp. 527–537). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Poon, H., & Tse, T. (2022). Enacting cross-platform (buy/boy)cotts: Yellow economic circle and the new citizen-consumer politics in Hong Kong. New Media & Society, 14614448221097304. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221097305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poushter, J. (2017, April 20). Not everyone in advanced economies is using social media. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/04/20/not-everyone-in-advanced-economies-is-using-social-media/
   Google Scholar
• Qiu, L., Lin, H., & Leung, A. (2013). Cultural differences and switching of in-group sharing behavior between an American (Facebook) and a Chinese (Renren) social networking site. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44(1), 106–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022111434597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quan-Haase, A., Mendes, K., Ho, D., Lake, O., Nau, C., & Pieber, D. (2021). Mapping #MeToo: A synthesis review of digital feminist research across social media platforms. New Media & Society, 23(6), 1700–1720. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820984457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revilla Blanco, M. (2019). Del ¡Ni una más! Al #NiUnaMenos: Movimientos de mujeres y feminismos en américa latina. Política y Sociedad, 56(1), 47–67. https://doi.org/10.5209/poso.60792
   Google Scholar
• Rho, E., Mark, G., & Mazmanian, M. (2018). Fostering civil discourse online: Linguistic behavior in comments of #MeToo articles across political perspectives. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 2(CSCW), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274416
   Google Scholar
• Shahin, S., Nakahara, J., & Sánchez, M. (2021). Black Lives Matter goes global: Connective action meets cultural hybridity in Brazil, India, and Japan. New Media & Society, 14614448211057106. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211057106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J. (2005). Globalization and transnational social movement organizations. Social Movements and Organization Theory, 226–248. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791000.012
   Google Scholar
• Straubhaar, J. (2007). World television: From global to local. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Su, M., Suk, J., Ghosh, S., Kamath, K., Borah, P., Correa, T., Garlough, C., & Shah, D. (2020, August). How the left, center, and right covered the #MeToo movement: Structural topic modeling, thematic structure and language patterns. Paper presented at the 2020 AEJMC annual conference.
   Google Scholar
• Su, M., Suk, J., & Rojas, H. (2022). Social media expression, political extremity, and reduced network interaction: An imagined audience approach. Social Media+Society, 8(1), 20563051211069056. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211069056
   Google Scholar
• Suk, J., Abhishek, A., Zhang, Y., Ahn, S., Correa, T., Garlough, C., & Shah, D. (2021). #MeToo, networked acknowledgment, and connective action: How “empowerment through empathy” launched a social movement. Social Science Computer Review, 39(2), 276–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439319864882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taneja, H., & Webster, J. G. (2016). How do global audiences take shape? The role of institutions and culture in patterns of web use. Journal of Communication, 66(1), 161–182. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trepte, S., Reinecke, L., Ellison, N., Quiring, O., Yao, M., & Ziegele, M. (2017). A cross-cultural perspective on the privacy calculus. Social Media+Society, 3(1), 2056305116688035. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305116688035
   Google Scholar
• Tufekci, Z. (2017). Twitter and tear gas: The power and fragility of networked protest. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tufekci, Z., & Wilson, C. (2012). Social media and the decision to participate in political protest. Journal of Communication, 62(2), 363–379. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01629.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voorveld, H., Van Noort, G., Muntinga, D., & Bronner, F. (2018). Engagement with social media and social media advertising. Journal of Advertising, 47(1), 38–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2017.1405754
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar