505
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Populist views of science: how social media, political affiliation, and Alt-Right support affect scientific attitudes in the United States

& ORCID Icon
Pages 520-537 | Received 17 Oct 2022, Accepted 27 Apr 2023, Published online: 06 Jun 2023

References

  • Allcott, H., Boxell, L., Conway, J., Gentzkow, M., Thaler, M., & Yang, D. (2020). Polarization and public health: Partisan differences in social distancing during the coronavirus pandemic. Journal of Public Economics, 191, 104254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104254
  • Allgaier, J. (2019). Science and environmental communication on YouTube: Strategically distorted communications in online videos on climate change and climate engineering. Frontiers in Communication, 4, 36. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2019.00036
  • Annenberg Public Policy Center. (2021). Public trust in CDC, FDA, and fauci holds steady, survey shows. https://www.annenbergpublicpolicycenter.org/public-trust-in-cdc-fda-and-fauci-holds-steady-survey-shows/.
  • Anti-Defamation League. (2021). White supremacist propaganda spikes in 2020. https://www.adl.org/white-supremacist-propaganda-spikes-2020.
  • Bakker, B. N., Rooduijn, M., & Schumacher, G. (2016). The psychological roots of populist voting: Evidence from the United States, The Netherlands and Germany. European Journal of Political Research, 55(2), 302–320. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12121
  • Ballantyne, N., & Dunning, D. (2022, January 3). Opinion | skeptics say, ‘Do your Own research.’ it’s not that simple. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/01/03/opinion/dyor-do-your-own-research.html.
  • Bergan, D. E., Lapinski, M. K., & Turner, S. (2022). Do populists really reject expert judgment?: Expert consensus and support for clean water Act protections. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 34(2), edac016. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edac016
  • Bolsen, T., & Druckman, J. N. (2018). Do partisanship and politicization undermine the impact of a scientific consensus message about climate change? Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 21(3), 389–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430217737855
  • Boulianne, S., & Lee, S. (2022). Conspiracy beliefs, misinformation, social media platforms, and protest participation. Media and Communication, 10(4), https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v10i4.5667
  • Brubaker, R. (2021). Paradoxes of populism during the pandemic. Thesis Eleven, 164(1), https://doi.org/10.1177/0725513620970804
  • Bunch, E. (2021, March 2). The venn diagram of wellness and COVID-19 conspiracy theories has a dangerous amount of overlap. Well + Good. https://www.wellandgood.com/covid-19-conspiracy-theories-wellness-influencers/.
  • Callaghan, T., Moghtaderi, A., Lueck, J. A., Hotez, P., Strych, U., Dor, A., Fowler, E. F., & Motta, M. (2021). Correlates and disparities of intention to vaccinate against COVID-19. Social Science & Medicine (1982), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113638
  • Cellan-Jones, R. (2021, January, 8). Tech Tent: Did social media inspire Congress riot? https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-55592752.
  • Chan, H. W., Chiu, C. P. Y., Zuo, S., Wang, X., Liu, L., & Hong, Y. Y. (2021). Emotional conflict and trauma: The recovery of stolen memory using a mixed-methods approach. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-00684-8
  • Chinn, S., Hart, P. S., & Soroka, S. (2020). Politicization and polarization in climate change news content, 1985–2017. Science Communication, 42(1), 112–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547019900290
  • Cohen, A. (2020, September 14). A conversation divided: Traditional media and anti-science sources polarized over COVID-19 vaccine. IPPI. https://www.ippi.org.il/a-conversation-divided/.
  • de Leon, R. P., Wingrove, S., & Kay, A. C. (2020). Scientific skepticism and inequality: Political and ideological roots. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 91, 104045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104045
  • Dehghan, E., & Nagappa, A. (2022). Politicization and radicalization of discourses in the Alt-tech ecosystem: A case study on Gab social. Social Media + Society, 8(3), https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051221113075
  • Doroshenko, L. (2018). Far-right parties in the European Union and media populism: A comparative analysis of 10 countries during European Parliament elections. International Journal of Communication, 12, 21.
  • Druckman, J. N., & Levendusky, M. S. (2019). What do we measure when we measure affective polarization? Public Opinion Quarterly, 83(1), 114–122. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfz003
  • Eberl, J.-M., Huber, R. A., & Greussing, E. (2021). From populism to the ‘plandemic’: Why populists believe in COVID-19 conspiracies. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 31(Suppl. 1), 272–284. doi:10.1080/17457289.2021.1924730
  • Forscher, P. S., & Kteily, N. S. (2020). A psychological profile of the alt-right. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(1), 90–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619868208
  • Gaston, S. (2017). Far-right extremism in the populist Age. Demos & Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.
  • Gerbaudo, P. (2018). Social media and populism: an elective affinity? Media, Culture & Society, 40(5), 745–753. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443718772192
  • Grace, A. (2021, October 21). COVID-19 anti-vaxxers mocked in shady Halloween home displays. https://nypost.com/2021/10/12/covid-19-anti-vaxxers-mocked-in-shady-halloween-home-displays/.
  • Hameleers, M., & Schmuck, D. (2017). It’s US against them: A comparative experiment on the effects of populist messages communicated via social media. Information, Communication & Society, 20(9), 1425–1444. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1328523
  • Hasell, A., & Weeks, B. E. (2016). Partisan provocation: The role of partisan news Use and emotional responses in political information sharing in social media. Human Communication Research, 42(4), 641–661. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12092
  • Hawkins, I., & Saleem, M. (2021). Rise UP!: A content analytic study of how collective action is discussed within White nationalist videos on YouTube. Society.
  • Hawley, G. (2018). Making sense of the alt-right. In making sense of the Alt-right. Columbia University Press.
  • Hiaeshutter-Rice, D., Chinn, S., & Chen, K. (2021). Platform effects on alternative influencer content: Understanding How audiences and channels shape misinformation online. Frontiers in Political Science, 3, 53. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2021.642394
  • Hiaeshutter-Rice, D., & Hawkins, I. (2022). The language of extremism on social media: An examination of posts, comments, and themes on reddit. Frontiers in Political Science, 4, 805008. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2022.805008
  • Hopster, J. (2021). Mutual affordances: The dynamics between social media and populism. Media, Culture & Society, 43(3), 551–560. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443720957889
  • Hume, T. (2020, December 16). New agers and wellness influencers Are falling for Far-right COVID conspiracies. Vice. https://www.vice.com/en/article/5dpywq/the-new-agers-and-wellness-influencers-lost-to-far-right-covid-conspiracies.
  • Jiang, S. (2022). The roles of worry, social media information overload, and social media fatigue in hindering health fact-checking. Social Media + Society, 8(3), https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051221113070
  • Kata, A. (2012). Anti-vaccine activists, Web 2.0, and the postmodern paradigm – An overview of tactics and tropes used online by the anti-vaccination movement. Vaccine, 30(25), 3778–3789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.11.112
  • Keneally, M. (2018, August 8). What to know about the violent Charlottesville protests and anniversary rallies. https://abcnews.go.com/US/happen-charlottesville-protest-anniversary-weekend/story?id=57107500.
  • Kohler, S., & Koinig, I. (2023). The effect of science-related populism on vaccination attitudes and decisions. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 46(1-2), 229–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-022-00333-2
  • Lewis, R. (2018). Alternative influence: Broadcasting the reactionary right on YouTube. Data & Society Research Institute.
  • Mede, N. G. (2022). The production of social science research in Nigeria: status and systemic determinants. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-01017-z
  • Mede, N. G., & Schäfer, M. S. (2020). Science-related populism: Conceptualizing populist demands toward science. Public Understanding of Science, 29(5), 473–491. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662520924259
  • Mede, N. G., Schäfer, M. S., & Füchslin, T. (2021). The SciPop scale for measuring science-related populist attitudes in surveys: Development, test, and validation. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 33(2), 273–293. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edaa026
  • Mede, N. G., Schäfer, M. S., Metag, J., & Klinger, K. (2022). Who supports science-related populism? A nationally representative survey on the prevalence and explanatory factors of populist attitudes toward science in Switzerland. Plos One, 17(8), e0271204. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0271204
  • Mudde, C. (2017). Populism: An ideational approach. In C. Rovira Kaltwasser, P. A. Taggart, P. Ochoa Espejo, & P. Ostiguy (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of populism (pp. 27–47). Oxford University Press.
  • Munn, L. (2021). More than a mob: Parler as preparatory media for the U.S. Capitol storming. First Monday, 26(3), https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v26i3.11574
  • Nelson, L. (2021, June 28). California’s yoga, wellness and spirituality community has a QAnon problem. The Seattle Times. https://www.seattletimes.com/nation-world/californias-yoga-wellness-and-spirituality-community-has-a-qanon-problem/.
  • Pew Research Center. (2019, August 2). Trust and mistrust in Americans’ views of scientific experts. https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2019/08/02/trust-and-mistrust-in-americans-views-of-scientific-experts/.
  • Pew Research Center. (2020, May 21). Trust in medical scientists has grown in U.S., but mainly among democrats. https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2020/05/21/trust-in-medical-scientists-has-grown-in-u-s-but-mainly-among-democrats/.
  • Pew Research Center. (2021a, March 5). Growing share of Americans say they plan to get a COVID-19 vaccine – or already have. https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2021/03/05/growing-share-of-americans-say-they-plan-to-get-a-covid-19-vaccine-or-already-have/.
  • Pew Research Center. (2021b, May 17). Public trust in government:1958–2021. https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2021/05/17/public-trust-in-government-1958-2021/.
  • Reinemann, C., Haas, A., & Rieger, D. (2022). “I don’t care,’cause I don’t trust them!” The impact of information sources, institutional trust, and right-wing populist attitudes on the perception of the COVID-19 pandemic during the first lockdown in Germany. Studies in Communication and Media, 11(1), 132–168. doi:10.5771/2192-4007-2022-1-132
  • Schumann, S., Boer, D., Hanke, K., & Liu, J. (2021). Social media use and support for populist radical right parties: assessing exposure and selection effects in a two-wave panel study. Information, Communication & Society, 24(7), 921–940. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1668455
  • Schumann, S., Thomas, F., Ehrke, F., Bertlich, T., & Dupont, J. C. (2022). Maintenance or change? Examining the reinforcing spiral between social media news use and populist attitudes. Information, Communication & Society, 25(13), 1934–1951. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.1907435
  • Southern Poverty Law Center. (2020, March, 18). The year in hate 2019: White nationalist groups rise for a second year in a Row – up 55% since 2017. https://www.splcenter.org/presscenter/year-hate-2019-white-nationalist-groups-rise-second-year-row-55-2017.
  • Stephan, W. G., & Stephan, C. W. (2000). An integrated threat theory of prejudice. In S. Oskamp (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 23–45). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
  • Stier, S., Kirkizh, N., Froio, C., & Schroeder, R. (2020). Populist attitudes and selective exposure to online news: A cross-country analysis combining web tracking and surveys. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 25(3), 426–446. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161220907018
  • Stuckler, D. (2017). The dispossessed: a public health response to the rise of the far-right in Europe and North America. European Journal of Public Health, 27(1), 5–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckw244
  • Thompson, J., & Hawley, G. (2021). Does the Alt-Right still matter? An examination of Alt-Right influence between 2016 and 2018. Nations and Nationalism, 27(4), 1165–1180. https://doi.org/10.1111/nana.12736
  • Yan, P., Schroeder, R., & Stier, S. (2022). Is there a link between climate change scepticism and populism? An analysis of web tracking and survey data from Europe and the US. Information, Communication & Society, 25(10), 1400–1439. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1864005
  • Yilmaz, F. (2012). Right-wing hegemony and immigration: How the populist far-right achieved hegemony through the immigration debate in Europe. Current Sociology, 60(3), 368–381. doi:10.1177/0011392111426192

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.