954
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Caring for data in later life – the datafication of ageing as a matter of care

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 774-789 | Received 31 May 2023, Accepted 26 Oct 2023, Published online: 07 Nov 2023

References

  • Ariztía, T. (2018). Consumer databases as practical accomplishments: The making of digital objects in three movements. Journal of Cultural Economy, 11(3), 209–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2018.1435421.
  • Ball, K. (2009). EXPOSURE: Exploring the subject of surveillance. Information, Communication & Society, 12(5), 639–657. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180802270386
  • Ball, K., Di Domenico, M., & Nunan, D. (2016). Big data surveillance and the body-subject. Body & Society, 22(2), 58–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X15624973
  • Chan, M., Bocquet, H., Campo, E., Val, T., Estève, D., & Pous, J. (1998). Multisensor system and artificial intelligence in housing for the elderly. In J. Graafmans, V. Taipale, & N. Charness (Eds.), Gerontechnology (pp. 145–149). IOS Press.
  • Chen, L.-K. (2018). Artificial intelligence in medicine and healthcare. Journal of Clinical Gerontology and Geriatrics, 9(3), 77–78.
  • Chu, C. H., Nyrup, R., Leslie, K., Shi, J., Bianchi, A., Lyn, A., McNicholl, M., Khan, S., Rahimi, S., & Grenier, A. (2022). Digital ageism: Challenges and opportunities in artificial intelligence for older adults. The Gerontologist, 62(7), 947–955. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnab167
  • Clarke, A. E., Friese, C., & Washburn, R. (2015). Situational analysis in practice: Mapping research with grounded theory (Bd. 1). Left Coast Press.
  • Dalmer, N., Ellison, K., Katz, S., & Marshall, B. (2022). Ageing, embodiment and datafication: Dynamics of power in digital health and care technologies. International Journal of Ageing and Later Life, 15(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.3384/ijal.1652-8670.3499
  • de La Bellacasa, M. P. (2011). Matters of care in technoscience: Assembling neglected things. SSS, 41(1), 85–106.
  • Ellison, K. L., Martin, W., Pedersen, I., & Marshall, B. L. (2022). Visualizing the datasphere: Representations of old bodies and their data in promotional images of smart sensor technologies for aging at home. Frontiers in Sociology, 218, 1–12.
  • Estes, C. (2014). The future of aging services in a neoliberal political economy. Generations (San Francisco, Calif), 38(2), 94–100.
  • Estes, C. L. (1979). The aging enterprise. Jossey-Bass San Francisco.
  • Estes, C. L. (1993). The aging enterprise revisited. The Gerontologist, 33(3), 292–298. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/33.3.292
  • Fernández-Ardèvol, M., & Grenier, L. (2022). Exploring data ageism: What good data can(’t) tell us about the digital practices of older people? NM&S, 14614448221127260.
  • Flensburg, S., & Lomborg, S. (2021). Datafication research: Mapping the field for a future agenda. NM&S, 14614448211046616.
  • Gallistl, V., Katz, S., Kolland, F., & Peine, A. (2023). Editorial: Socio-gerontechnology—New perspectives on the digital transformation of later life. Frontiers in Sociology, 8, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2023.1183572.
  • Gallistl, V., Rohner, R., Hengl, L., & Kolland, F. (2021). Doing digital exclusion – technology practices of older internet non-users. Journal of Aging Studies, 59, 100973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2021.100973
  • Gallistl, V., Seifert, A., & Kolland, F. (2021). COVID-19 as a “Digital Push?” Research experiences from long-term care and recommendations for the post-pandemic era. Frontiers in Public Health, 531, 1–4.
  • Gallistl, V., & Wanka, A. (2022). The internet multiple: How internet practices are valued in later life. International Journal of Ageing and Later Life, 15(2), 103–126. https://doi.org/10.3384/ijal.1652-8670.3563
  • Gillespie, T. (2016). Algorithm. In B. Peters (Ed.), Princeton studies in culture and technology. Digital keywords: A vocabulary of information society and culture (pp. 18–30). Princeton University Press.
  • Heuts, F, & Mol, A. (2013). What is a good tomato? A case of valuing in practice. Valuation Studies, 1(2), 125–146.
  • Higgs, P., & Gilleard, C. (2014). Frailty, abjection and the ‘othering’ of the fourth age. Health Sociology Review, 23(1), 10–19. https://doi.org/10.5172/hesr.2014.23.1.10
  • Higgs, P., & Gilleard, C. (2022). Techno-fixes for an ageing society. Aging & Mental Health, 26(7), 1303–1305. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2021.2008308
  • Jaton, F. (2021). The constitution of algorithms: Ground-truthing, programming, formulating. MIT Press.
  • Katz, S., & Marshall, B. L. (2018). Tracked and fit: FitBits, brain games, and the quantified aging body. Journal of Aging Studies, 45, 63–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2018.01.009
  • Kia, H. (2016). Hypervisibility: Toward a conceptualization of LGBTQ aging. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 13(1), 46–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-015-0194-9
  • Lindén, L., & Lydahl, D. (2021). Editorial: Care in STS. Nordic Journal of Science and Technology Studies, 3–12. https://doi.org/10.5324/njsts.v9i1.4000
  • Lukkien, D. R., Nap, H. H., Buimer, H. P., Peine, A., Boon, W. P., Ket, J. C., Minkman, M., & Moors, E. H. (2021). Toward responsible artificial intelligence in long-term care: A scoping review on practical approaches. The Gerontologist.
  • Mannheim, I., Wouters, E. J., Köttl, H., Van Boekel, L. C., Brankaert, R., & Van Zaalen, Y. (2022). Ageism in the discourse and practice of designing digital technology for older persons: A scoping review. The Gerontologist, gnac144.
  • Manzeschke, A., Assadi, G., & Viehöver, W. (2016). The role of big data in ambient assisted living. The International Review of Information Ethics, 24, 22–31. https://doi.org/10.29173/irie149.
  • Mejias, U. A., & Couldry, N. (2019). Datafication. Internet Policy Review, 8(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.14763/2019.4.1428.
  • Metzler, I., Ferent, L.-M., & Felt, U. (2023). On samples, data, and their mobility in biobanking: How imagined travels help to relate samples and data. Big Data & Society, 10(1), 205395172311586. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517231158635
  • Mol, A. (2008). The logic of care: Health and the problem of patient choice. Routledge.
  • Mol, A. (2021). Eating in theory. Durham: Duke University Press.
  • Mol, A., Moser, I., Piras, E. M., Turrini, M., Pols, J., & Zanutto, A. (2011). Care in practice. On normativity, concepts, and boundaries. Tecnoscienza: Italian Journal of Science & Technology Studies, 2(1), 73–86.
  • Mol, A., Moser, I., & Pols, J. (2010). Care in practice: On tinkering in clinics, homes and farms. transcript Verlag.
  • Neyland, D. (2015). On organizing algorithms. Theory, Culture & Society, 32(1), 119–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276414530477
  • O’Connor, S. (2022). Artificial intelligence for older adult health: Opportunities for advancing gerontological nursing practice. Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 48(12), 3–5. https://doi.org/10.3928/00989134-20221107-01
  • Peine, A., & Neven, L. (2019). From intervention to co-constitution: New directions in theorizing about aging and technology. The Gerontologist, 59(1), 15–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gny050
  • Pilotto, A., Boi, R., & Petermans, J. (2018). Technology in geriatrics. Age and Ageing, 47(6), 771–774. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afy026
  • Pinel, C., Prainsack, B., & McKevitt, C. (2020). Caring for data: Value creation in a data-intensive research laboratory. SSS, 50(2), 175–197.
  • Rosales, A., & Fernández-Ardèvol, M. (2019). Structural ageism in big data approaches. Nordicom Review, 40(s1), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.2478/nor-2019-0013
  • Rosales, A., & Fernández-Ardèvol, M. (2020). Ageism in the era of digital platforms. Convergence: The International Journal of Research Into New Media Technologies, 26(5-6), 1074–1087. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856520930905
  • Rubeis, G. (2020). The disruptive power of Artificial Intelligence. Ethical aspects of gerontechnology in elderly care. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 91, 104186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2020.104186
  • Sadowski, J. (2019). When data is capital: Datafication, accumulation, and extraction. Big Data & Society, 6(1), 205395171882054. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951718820549
  • Sapci, A. H., & Sapci, H. A. (2019). Innovative assisted living tools, remote monitoring technologies, artificial intelligence-driven solutions, and robotic systems for aging societies: Systematic review. JMIR Aging, 2(2), e15429. https://doi.org/10.2196/15429
  • Seaver, N. (2021). Care and scale: Decorrelative ethics in algorithmic recommendation. Cultural Anthropology, 36(3), 509–537. https://doi.org/10.14506/ca36.3.11.
  • Stypinska, J. (2021). Ageism in AI: new forms of age discrimination in the era of algorithms and artificial intelligence. 39.
  • Stypinska, J. (2022). AI ageism: A critical roadmap for studying age discrimination and exclusion in digitalized societies. AI & Society, 1–13.
  • Twigg, J., & Martin, W. (2015). The challenge of cultural gerontology. The Gerontologist, 55(3), 353–359. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnu061
  • Vogl, S., Zartler, U., Schmidt, E.-M., & Rieder, I. (2018). Developing an analytical framework for multiple perspective, qualitative longitudinal interviews (MPQLI). International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 21(2), 177–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2017.1345149
  • Winner, L. (2014). Technologies as forms of life. In R. L. Sandler (Ed.), Ethics and emerging technologies (pp. 249–263). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137349088_4.
  • Zakharova, I., & Jarke, J. (2022). Educational technologies as matters of care. Learning, Media and Technology, 47(1), 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2021.2018605
  • Zuboff, S. (2015). Big other: Surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilization. Journal of Information Technology, 30(1), 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2015.5