679
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

A careful approach to artificial intelligence: the struggles with epistemic responsibility of healthcare professionals

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 719-734 | Received 14 Apr 2023, Accepted 16 Nov 2023, Published online: 15 Dec 2023

References

  • Beaulieu, A. (2004). Mediating ethnography: Objectivity and the making of ethnographies of the internet. Social Epistemology, 18(2–3), 139–163. doi:10.1080/0269172042000249264
  • Beaulieu, A., & Leonelli, S. (2021). Data and society: A critical introduction. SAGE Publications Ltd.
  • Bellacasa, M. P. de la. (2017). Matters of care: Speculative ethics in more than human worlds (3rd ed.). University of Minnesota Press.
  • Callon, M., & Law, J. (1997). After the individual in society: Lessons on collectivity from science, technology and society. Canadian Journal of Sociology/Cahiers Canadiens de Sociologie, 22(2), 165–182. https://doi.org/10.2307/3341747
  • Conradie, N., Kempt, H., & Königs, P. (2022). Introduction to the topical collection on AI and responsibility. Philosophy & Technology, 35(4), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-022-00583-7
  • Dwyer, D. B., Falkai, P., & Koutsouleris, N. (2018). Machine learning approaches for clinical psychology and psychiatry. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 14(1), 91–118. doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032816-045037
  • Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., Luetge, C., Madelin, R., Pagallo, U., Rossi, F., Schafer, B., Valcke, P., & Vayena, E. (2018). Ai4people—an ethical framework for a good AI society: Opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations. Minds and Machines, 28(4), 689–707. doi:10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5
  • Floridi, L., & Sanders, J. W. (2004). On the morality of artificial agents. Minds and Machines, 14(3), 349–379. doi:10.1023/B:MIND.0000035461.63578.9d
  • Haraway, D. J. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the chthulucene. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822373780
  • Introna, L. D. (2014). Towards a post-human intra-actional account of sociomaterial agency (and morality). In P. Kroes & P.-P. Verbeek (Eds.), The moral status of technical artefacts (pp. 31–53). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7914-3_3
  • Jiang, F., Jiang, Y., Zhi, H., Dong, Y., Li, H., Ma, S., Wang, Y., Dong, Q., Shen, H., & Wang, Y. (2017). Artificial intelligence in healthcare: Past, present and future. Stroke and Vascular Neurology, 2(4), 230–243. https://doi.org/10.1136/svn-2017-000101
  • Jobin, A., Ienca, M., & Vayena, E. (2019). The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(9), 389–399. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0088-2
  • Knorr-Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Harvard University Press.
  • Kroes, P., & Verbeek, P. P. C. C. (2014). Introduction. In The moral status of technical artefacts (pp. 1–9). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7914-3_1
  • Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Open University Press.
  • Lee, F., & Helgesson, C.-F. (2020). Styles of valuation: Algorithms and agency in high throughput bioscience. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 45(4), 659–685. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243919866898
  • Leonelli, S. (2014). What difference does quantity make? On the epistemology of big data in biology. Big Data & Society, 1(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714534395
  • Mittelstadt, B. D., Allo, P., Taddeo, M., Wachter, S., & Floridi, L. (2016). The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate. Big Data & Society, 3(2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716679679
  • OECD. (2019). AI-Principles Overview. Retrieved September 7, 2023, from https://oecd.ai/en/principles
  • Pols, J. (2015). Towards an empirical ethics in care: Relations with technologies in health care. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 18(1), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-014-9582-9
  • Rijcke, S. de, & Beaulieu, A. (2014). Networked neuroscience: Brain scans and visual knowing at the intersection of atlases and databases. In C. Coopmans, M. Lynch, J. Vertesi, & S. Woolgar (Eds.), Representation in scientific practice revisited (pp. 131–152). MIT Press.
  • Simon, J. (2015). Distributed epistemic responsibility in a hyperconnected Era. In L. Floridi (Ed.), The onlife manifesto: Being human in a hyperconnected Era (pp. 145–159). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04093-6_17
  • Stevens, M. (2021). Dreaming with data: Assembling responsible knowledge practices in data-driven healthcare. https://repub.eur.nl/pub/135505
  • Stevens, M., Wehrens, R., & de Bont, A. (2020). Epistemic virtues and data-driven dreams: On sameness and difference in the epistemic cultures of data science and psychiatry. Social Science & Medicine, 258, 113116, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113116
  • Suchman, L. (2009). Human-machine configurations. Plans and situated actions. Cambridge University Press.
  • The institute for ethical Ai & Machine Learning. (2023). The institute for ethical AI & machine learning. Retrieved September 7, 2023, from https://ethical.institute
  • Verbeek, P.-P. (2014). Some misunderstandings about the moral significance of technology. In P. Kroes & P.-P. Verbeek (Eds.), The moral status of technical artefacts (pp. 75–88). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1145/2751314
  • Verbeek, P. P. C. C. (2015). Cover story beyond interaction. Interactions (ACM), 22(3), 26–31. https://doi.org/10.1145/2751314
  • Verran, H. (2001). Science and an African logic. University of Chicago Press. https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/S/bo3631540.html.