698
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Data phronesis and the duality of care in the air quality data politics

Pages 758-773 | Received 18 Jul 2023, Accepted 15 Dec 2023, Published online: 18 Jan 2024

References

  • Aristotle. (2015). Nicomachean ethics (H. Rackham, Trans.; Rev). Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1926)
  • Blee, K., & Taylor, V. (2002). Semi-structured interviewing in social movement research. In B. Klandermans & S. Staggenborg (Eds.), Methods of social movement research (pp. 92–117). University of Minnesota Press.
  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Sage.
  • Calvillo, N. (2018). Political airs: From monitoring to attuned sensing air pollution. Social Studies of Science, 48(3), 372–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312718784656
  • Choy, T. (2011). Ecologies of comparison. Duke University Press.
  • Crooks, R., & Currie, M. (2021). Numbers will not save us: Agonistic data practices. The Information Society, 37(4), 201–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2021.1920081
  • de la Bellacasa, M. (2015). Making time for soil: Technoscientific futurity and the pace of care. Social Studies of Science, 45(5), 691–716. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312715599851
  • de la Bellacasa, M. (2017). Matters of care: Speculative ethics in more than human worlds. University of Minnesota Press.
  • Eubanks, V. (2012). Feminist phronesis and technologies of citizenship. In B. Flyvbjerg, T. Landman, & S. Schram (Eds.), Real social science. Applied phronesis (pp. 228–245). Cambridge University Press.
  • Flyvbjerg, B. (2013). Making social science matter: Why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again (15th printing). Cambridge University Press.
  • Fotopoulou, A. (2019). Understanding citizen data practices from a feminist perspective: Embodiment and the ethics of care. In H. C. Stephansen & E. Treré (Eds.), Citizen media and practice (pp. 552–588). Routledge.
  • Frankowski, J. (2020). Attention: Smog alert! Citizen engagement for clean air and its consequences for fuel poverty in Poland. Energy and Buildings, 207, 109525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.109525
  • Gabrys, J. (2022). Citizens of worlds: Open-air toolkits for environmental struggle. University of Minnesota Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749j.ctv28(29zv
  • Gabrys, J., Pritchard, H., & Barratt, B. (2016). Just good enough data: Figuring data citizenships through air pollution sensing and data stories. Big Data & Society, 3, 2053951716679677. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716679677
  • Garnett, E. (2016). Developing a feeling for error: Practices of monitoring and modelling air pollution data. Big Data & Society, 3(2), 2053951716658061. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951716658061
  • Gill, N. (2017). Caring for clean streets: Policies as world-making practices. The Sociological Review, 65(2_suppl), 71–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/0081176917710422
  • Gill, N., Singleton, V., & Waterton, C. (2017). The politics of policy practices. The Sociological Review, 65(2_suppl), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0081176917710429
  • Gray, J., & Witt, A. (2021). feminist data ethics of care for machine learning: The what, why, who and how. First Monday. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v26i12.11833
  • Gross, P. L., Buchanan, N., & Sané, S. (2019). Blue skies in the making: Air quality action plans and urban imaginaries in London, Hong Kong, and San Francisco. Energy Research & Social Science, 48, 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.09.019
  • Gutierrez, M. (2018). Data activism and social change. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Hess, D. (2016). Undone science. The MIT Press.
  • Kitchin, R. (2022). The data revolution: A critical analysis of big data, open data and data infrastructures (2nd ed.). Sage.
  • Kunz, Y., & Hornidge, A.-K. (2022). Governability of air: Beyond water and land in coastal urbanities. In Coastal urbanities (pp. 132–153). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004523340_008
  • Lavau, S., & Bingham, N. (2017). Practices of attention, possibilities for care: Making situations matter in food safety inspection. The Sociological Review, 65(2_suppl), 20–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0081176917710526
  • Lindén, L., & Lydahl, D. (2021). Editorial: Care in STS. Nordic Journal of Science and Technology Studies, 9(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.5324/njsts.v9i1.4000
  • Liu, X. (2017). Air quality index as the stuff of the political. Australian Feminist Studies, 32(94), 445–460. https://doi.org/10.1080/08164649.2017.1466650
  • Loukissas, Y. (2019). All data are local: Thinking critically in a data-driven society. MIT Press.
  • Marres, N. (2015). Material participation: Technology, the environment and everyday publics. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-48074-3
  • Marzecová, A., & Husberg, H. (2022). And then came this number PM2.5: Atmospheric particulate matter, sociotechnical imaginaries, and the politics of air quality data. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 40(3), 648–665. https://doi.org/10.1177/23996544221076734
  • Matczak, P., Frankowski, J., Putkowska-Smoter, R., Wróblewski, M., & Łoś, I. (2023). Tackling (not only) air pollution: Cross-sectional tensions behind state-led energy retrofit program in Poland. Society & Natural Resources, 36, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2023.2212286
  • Meng, A., DiSalvo, C., & Zegura, E. (2019). Collaborative data work towards a caring democracy. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 3(CSCW), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359144
  • Mol, A. (2008). The logic of care: Health and the problem of patient choice. Routledge.
  • Mol, A., Moser, I., & Pols, J. (2010). Care: Putting practice into theory. In A. Mol, I. Moser, & J. Pols (Eds.), Care in practice: On tinkering in clinics, homes and farms (pp. 7–25). Transcript.
  • Negi, R., & Srigyan, P. (2021). Atmosphere of collaboration: Air pollution science, politics and ecopreneurship in Delhi (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003015635
  • Pink, S. (2022). Emerging technologies / Life at the edge of the future (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003182528
  • Ruckenstein, M., & Trifuljesko, S. (2022). Algorithmic futures and the unsettled sense of Care. In D. Lanzeni, K. Waltorp, S. Pink, & R. C. Smith (Eds.), An anthropology of futures and technologies (pp. 79–92). Routledge.
  • Schrader, A. (2015). Abyssal intimacies and temporalities of care: How (not) to care about deformed leaf bugs in the aftermath of Chernobyl. Social Studies of Science, 45(5), 665–690. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312715603249
  • Ślosarski, B. (2023). Data arenas: The relational dynamics of data activism. Big Data & Society, 10(1), 20539517231177617. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517231177617
  • Slota, S. C., Fleischmann, K. R., & Greenberg, S. R. (2023). Caring for people, caring for their data: Data stewardship and collaborative care in social service provision for people experiencing homelessness. In I. Sserwanga, A. Goulding, H. Moulaison-Sandy, J. T. Du, A. L. Soares, V. Hessami, & R. D. Frank (Eds.), Information for a better world: Normality, virtuality, physicality, inclusivity (pp. 500–513). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28032-0_38
  • Sun, Y., & Huang, V. G. (2021). Embedded data activism: The institutionalization of a grassroots environmental data initiative in China. Chinese Journal of Communication, 15, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750.2021.1963997
  • Treré, E. (2019). Hybrid media activism: Ecologies, imaginaries, algorithms. Routledge.
  • Wróblewski, M., Suchomska, J., & Tamborska, K. (2021). Citizens or Consumers? Air quality sensor users and their involvement in sensor.Community. Results from qualitative case study. Sustainability, 13(20), 11406. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011406