Care, collaboration, and service in academic data work: biocuration as ‘academia otherwise’

References

• Arnaboldi, V., Raciti, D., Van Auken, K., Chan, J. N., Müller, H.-M., & Sternberg, P. W. (2020). Text mining meets community curation: A newly designed curation platform to improve author experience and participation at WormBase. Database, 2020, baaa006. https://doi.org/10.1093/database/baaa006
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baker, K. S., & Karasti, H. (2018). Data care and its politics: Designing for local collective data management as a neglected thing. In Proceedings of the 15th Participatory Design Conference: Full Papers (Vol. 1, pp. 1–12). https://doi.org/10.1145/3210586.3210587
   Google Scholar
• Bamber, M., Allen-Collinson, J., & McCormack, J. (2017). Occupational limbo, transitional liminality and permanent liminality: New conceptual distinctions. Human Relations, 70, 1514–1537. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726717706535
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaulieu, A., & Leonelli, S. (2021). Data and society: A critical introduction. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Bellen, H. J., Hubbard, E. J. A., Lehmann, R., Madhani, H. D., Solnica-Krezel, L., & Southard-Smith, E. M. (2021). Model organism databases are in jeopardy. Development, 148(19), dev200193. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.200193
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bossen, C., Chen, Y., & Pine, K. H. (2019). The emergence of new data work occupations in healthcare: The case of medical scribes. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 123, 76–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.01.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bossen, C., Pine, K. H., Cabitza, F., Ellingsen, G., & Piras, E. M. (2019). Data work in healthcare: An Introduction. Health Informatics Journal, 25(3), 465–474. https://doi.org/10.1177/1460458219864730
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Check Hayden, E. (2016). Funding for model-organism databases in trouble. Nature, nature.2016.20134. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature.2016.20134
   Google Scholar
• Courtois, A., & O’Keefe, T. (2015). Precarity in the ivory cage: Neoliberalism and casualisation of work in the Irish higher education sector. Journal for Critical Education Policy Studies, 13(1), 43–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, K. (2021). Atlas of AI: Power, politics, and the planetary costs of artificial intelligence. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• de la Bellacasa, M. P. (2011). Matters of care in technoscience: Assembling neglected things. Social Studies of Science, 41(1), 85–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312710380301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doing, P. (2009). Velvet revolution at the synchrotron: Biology, physics, and change in science. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Egbert, S., & Leese, M. (2020). Criminal futures: Predictive policing and everyday police work (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429328732
   Google Scholar
• Eubanks, V. (2017). Automating inequality: How high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor (1st ed.). St. Martin’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Felt, U., & Fochler, M. (2012). Re-ordering epistemic living spaces: On the tacit governance effects of the public communication of science. In S. Rödder, M. Franzen, & P. Weingart (Eds.), The sciences’ media connection –public communication and its repercussions (pp. 133–154). Springer Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, J., Mcleod, J., Nolin, J., & Greifeneder, E. (2018). Data work in context: Value, risks, and governance. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 69(12), 1414–1427. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabrielsen, A. M. (2023). Gendering data care: Curators, care, and computers in data-centric biology. Science as Culture, 0(0), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2023.2260830
   Google Scholar
• Gorman, M. E., & Spohrer, J. (2010). Service science: A new expertise for managing sociotechnical systems. In M. E. Gorman (Ed.), Trading zones and interactional expertise: Creating new kinds of collaboration. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/8351.003.0007
   Google Scholar
• Gray, M. L., & Suri, S. (2019). Ghost work: How to stop Silicon Valley from building a new global underclass. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
   Google Scholar
• Green, S., Hillersdal, L., Holt, J., Hoeyer, K., & Wadmann, S. (2023). The practical ethics of repurposing health data: How to acknowledge invisible data work and the need for prioritization. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 26(1), 119–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-022-10128-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grohmann, R., Govari Nunes, C., & Da Rosa Amaral, A. (2022). Click farm platforms and informal work in Brazil (34th ed.). Southern Centre for Inequality Studies. https://doi.org/10.54223/uniwitwatersrand-10539-33453.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575. https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herschberg, C., Benschop, Y., & van den Brink, M. (2018). Selecting early-career researchers: The influence of discourses of internationalisation and excellence on formal and applied selection criteria in academia. Higher Education, 76(5), 807–825. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-018-0237-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imker, H. J. (2020). Who bears the burden of long-lived molecular biology databases?. Data Science Journal, 19(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2020-008
   Google Scholar
• Irani, L. (2015). The cultural work of microwork. New Media & Society, 17(5), 720–739. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813511926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irani, L. (2019). Justice for data janitors. In S. Marcus & C. Zaloom (Eds.), Think in public (pp. 23–40). Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/marc19008-003.
   Google Scholar
• Kost, D., Fieseler, C., & Wong, S. I. (2018). Finding meaning in a hopeless place? The construction of meaningfulness in digital microwork. Computers in Human Behavior, 82, 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law, J. (2017). STS as method. In U. Felt, R. Fouché, C. Miller, & L. Smith-Doerr (Eds.), The handbook of science and technology studies (pp. 31–57). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Law, J. (2021). From after method to care-ful research. http://heterogeneities.net/publications/Law2021FromAfterMethodToCare-fulResearch.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Le Ludec, C., Cornet, M., & Casilli, A. (2023). The problem with annotation. Human labour and outsourcing between France and Madagascar. Big Data & Society, 10(2), 20539517231188723. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517231188723
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonelli, S. (2016). Data-centric biology: A philosophical study. The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leonelli, S., & Tempini, N. (Eds.). (2020). Data journeys in the sciences. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37177-7
   Google Scholar
• Leurs, K. (2017). Feminist data studies: Using digital methods for ethical, reflexive and situated socio-cultural research. Feminist Review, 115(1), 130–154. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41305-017-0043-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund, R. W. B. (2015). Doing the ideal academic—gender, excellence and changing academia. Aalto University. https://aaltodoc.aalto.fi:443/handle/123456789/17846.
   Google Scholar
• Markham, A. N., & Gammelby, A. K. (2018). Moving through digital flows: An epistemological and practical approach. In U. Flick (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative data collection (pp. 451–465). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526416070.n29
   Google Scholar
• Martin, A., Myers, N., & Viseu, A. (2015). The politics of care in technoscience. Social Studies of Science, 45(5), 625–641. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312715602073
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meisner, C., Duffy, B. E., & Ziewitz, M. (2022). The labor of search engine evaluation: Making algorithms more human or humans more algorithmic? New Media & Society, 26, 1018–1033. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211063860
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng, A., DiSalvo, C., & Zegura, E. (2019). Collaborative data work towards a caring democracy. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 3(CSCW), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359144
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miceli, M., Schuessler, M., & Yang, T. (2020). Between subjectivity and imposition: Power dynamics in data annotation for computer vision. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 4(CSCW2), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1145/3415186
   Google Scholar
• Milan, S., & Treré, E. (2019). Big data from the south(s): Beyond data universalism. Television & New Media, 20(4), 319–335. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476419837739
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, V. (2015). Resonance as a social phenomenon. Sociological Research Online, 20(2), 58–70. https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.3557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mol, A. M., Moser, I., & Pols, J. (2010). Care in practice: On tinkering in clinics, homes and farms. Transcript Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Møller, N. H., Shklovski, I., & Hildebrandt, T. T. (2020). Shifting concepts of value: Designing algorithmic decision-support systems for public services. In Proceedings of the 11th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Shaping Experiences, Shaping Society (pp. 1–12). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3419249.3420149
   Google Scholar
• Muldoon, J., & Apostolidis, P. (2023). ‘Neither work nor leisure’: Motivations of microworkers in the United Kingdom on three digital platforms. New Media & Society, 14614448231183942. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448231183942
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadim, T. (2016). Data labours: How the sequence databases GenBank and EMBL-bank make data. Science as Culture, 25(4), 496–519. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2016.1189894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norkus, M., Besio, C., & Baur, N. (2016). Effects of project-based research work on the career paths of young academics. Work Organisation, Labour and Globalisation, 10(2), 9–26. https://doi.org/10.13169/workorgalaboglob.10.2.0009
   Google Scholar
• Ottinger, G. (2023). Responsible epistemic innovation: How combatting epistemic injustice advances responsible innovation (and vice versa). Journal of Responsible Innovation, 10(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2022.2054306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrigo, B. (2023, January 18). Exclusive: The $2 Per Hour Workers Who Made ChatGPT Safer. Time. https://time.com/6247678/openai-chatgpt-kenya-workers/.
   Google Scholar
• Pine, K., Bossen, C., Holten Møller, N., Miceli, M., Lu, A. J., Chen, Y., Horgan, L., Su, Z., Neff, G., & Mazmanian, M. (2022). Investigating data work across domains. In New Perspectives on the Work of Creating Data. Extended Abstracts of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–6). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491101.3503724
   Google Scholar
• Pinel, C., Prainsack, B., & McKevitt, C. (2020). Caring for data: Value creation in a data-intensive research laboratory. Social Studies of Science, 50(2), 175–197. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312720906567
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piras, E. M. (2019). Beyond self-tracking: Exploring and unpacking four emerging labels of patient data work. Health Informatics Journal, 25(3), 598–607. https://doi.org/10.1177/1460458219833121
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plantin, J.-C. (2019). Data cleaners for pristine datasets: Visibility and invisibility of data processors in social science. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 44(1), 52–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243918781268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plantin, J.-C. (2021). The data archive as factory: Alienation and resistance of data processors. Big Data & Society, 8(1), 205395172110075. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211007510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puig de la Bellacasa, M. (2011). Matters of care in technoscience: Assembling neglected things. Social Studies of Science, 41(1), 85–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312710380301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quaglia, F., Balakrishnan, R., Bello, S. M., & Vasilevsky, N. (2022). Conference report: Biocuration 2021 virtual conference. Database, 2022, baac027. https://doi.org/10.1093/database/baac027
   Google Scholar
• Ribeiro, B., Meckin, R., Balmer, A., & Shapira, P. (2023). The digitalisation paradox of everyday scientific labour: How mundane knowledge work is amplified and diversified in the biosciences. Research Policy, 52(1), 104607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2022.104607
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sambasivan, N., Kapania, S., Highfill, H., Akrong, D., Paritosh, P., & Aroyo, L. M. (2021). “Everyone wants to do the model work, not the data work”: Data Cascades in High-Stakes AI. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–15). Publisher is Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445518
   Google Scholar
• Scroggins, M. J., & Pasquetto, I. V. (2020). Labor out of place: On the varieties and valences of (In)visible labor in data-intensive science. Engaging Science, Technology, and Society, 6, 111–132. https://doi.org/10.17351/ests2020.341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapin, S. (1989). The invisible technician. American Scientist, 77(6), 554–563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, H. (2013). Life out of sequence: A data-driven history of bioinformatics. The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strasser, B. J. (2019). Collecting experiments: Making big data biology. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tacheva, Z. (2022). Taking a critical look at the critical turn in data science: From “data feminism” to transnational feminist data science. Big Data & Society, 9(2), 205395172211129. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517221112901
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, Y. A., Pichler, K., Füllgrabe, A., Lomax, J., Malone, J., Munoz-Torres, M. C., Vasant, D. V., Williams, E., & Haendel, M. (2019). Ten quick tips for biocuration. PLoS Computational Biology, 15(5), https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tansey, E. M. (2008). Keeping the culture alive: The laboratory technician in mid-twentieth-century British medical research. Notes and Records of the Royal Society, 62(1), 77–95. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsnr.2007.0035
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Taylor, A. (2018). The automation charade. Logic(s) Magazine. https://logicmag.io/failure/the-automation-charade/.
   Google Scholar
• Timmermans, S., & Tavory, I. (2012). Theory construction in qualitative research: From grounded theory to abductive analysis. Sociological Theory, 30(3), 167–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275112457914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tronto, J. (1998). An ethic of care. Generations: Journal of the American Society on Aging, 22(3), 15–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tubaro, P., Casilli, A. A., & Coville, M. (2020). The trainer, the verifier, the imitator: Three ways in which human platform workers support artificial intelligence. Big Data & Society, 7(1), 205395172091977. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720919776
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turkopticon. (2023). Beware the hype: ChatGPT didn’t replace human data annotators. https://4sonline.org/news_manager.php?page=31554
   Google Scholar
• Ullrich, P. (2019). In itself but not yet for itself—organising the new academic precariat. In W. Baier, E. Canepa, & H. Golemis (Eds.), The radical left in Europe: Rediscovering hope (pp. 155–168). Merlin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vita, R., Aspromonte, M. C., Bello, S. M., Harris, N. L., Caufield, J. H., Haendel, M., Hoyt, C. T., Quaglia, F., Mujambere, J., Panossian, S. P., Reddy, T. B. K., Tuli, M. A., Khodiyar, V. K., Vasilevsky, N. (2023). Careers in biocuration: 2023 workshop report. https://zenodo.org/records/10246586
   Google Scholar
• Wang, D., Prabhat, S., & Sambasivan, N. (2022). Whose AI dream? In search of the aspiration in data annotation. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–16). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3502121
   Google Scholar
• Wood, A. J., Graham, M., Lehdonvirta, V., & Hjorth, I. (2019). Networked but commodified: The (Dis)Embeddedness of digital labour in the Gig economy. Sociology, 53(5), 931–950. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038519828906
   Google Scholar
• Wu, C.-L., Ha, J.-O., & Tsuge, A. (2020). Data reporting as care infrastructure: Assembling ART registries in Japan, Taiwan, and South Korea. East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal, 14(1), 35–59. https://doi.org/10.1215/18752160-8233676
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar