Migration information infrastructures: power, control and responsibility at a new frontier of migration research

References

• Achiume, T. E. 2020. “Racial and Xenophobic Discrimination, Emerging Digital Technologies in Border and Immigration Enforcement”.
   Google Scholar
• Achiume, E. T. 2021. “Digital Racial Borders.” AJIL Unbound 115: 333–338. https://doi.org/10.1017/aju.2021.52.
   Google Scholar
• Ajana, B. 2020. “Digital Biopolitics.” In Refugee Imaginaries. Research Across the Humanities, edited by E. Cox, S. Durrant, D. Farrier, L. Stonebridge, and A. Woolley, 463–479. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Amelina, A. 2021. “After the Reflexive Turn in Migration Studies: Towards the Doing Migration Approach.” Population Space Place 27 (e2368): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.2368.
   Google Scholar
• Amelung, N., S. Scheel, and R. van Reekum. 2024. “Reinventing the Politics of Knowledge Production in Migration Studies: Introduction to the Special Issue.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 50 (9): 2163–2187. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2024.2307766.
   Google Scholar
• Amoore, Louise. 2020. Cloud Ethics. Algorithms and the Attributes of Ourselves and Others. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, Bridget. 2017. “Towards a New Politics of Migration?” Ethnic and Racial Studies 40 (9): 1527–1537. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2017.1300297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aradau, C. 2022. “Experimentality, Surplus Data and the Politics of Debilitation in Borderzones.” Geopolitics 27 (1): 26–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2020.1853103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aradau, C. 2023. “Borders Have Always Been Artificial: Migration, Data and AI.” International Migration 61 (5): 303–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/imig.13186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ash, J., R. Kitchin, and A. Leszczynski, eds. 2018. Digital Geographies. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Badger, E. 2013. “Facebook is Using Your Profile to Track Global Urban Migration Trends.” Bloomberg.
   Google Scholar
• Bauböck, R., J. Mourão Permoser, and M. Ruhs. 2022. “The Ethics of Migration Policy Dilemmas.” Migration Studies 10 (3): 427–441. https://doi.org/10.1093/migration/mnac029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellanova, R., and M. de Goede. 2020. “The Algorithmic Regulation of Security: An Infrastructural perspective.” Regulation & Governance 46 (4): 102–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12338.
   Google Scholar
• Bigo, D. 2014. “The (in)Securitization Practices of the Three Universes of EU Border Control: Military/Navy – Border Guards/Police – Database Analysts.” Security Dialogue 45 (3): 209–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010614530459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1990. In Other Words. Essays Towards a Reflexive Sociology. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bowker, G. C. 1994. Science on the run. Information Management and Industrial Geophysics at Schlumberger, 1920–1940. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bowker, G. C., K. Baker, F. Millerand, and D. Ribes. 2010. “Toward Information Infrastructure Studies: Ways of Knowing in a Networked Environment.” In The International Handbook of Internet Research, edited by J. Hunsinger, L. Klastrup, and M. Allen, 97–117. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bowker, Geoffrey C., and Susan Leigh Star. 2000. Sorting Things Out. Classification and its Consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Broeders, D., and J. Hampshire. 2010. The Digitalization of European Borders and Migration Controls’, Migration to Europe in the Digital Age (MEDiA). Report on Work Package 2.
   Google Scholar
• Castells, M. 2010. The Rise of the Network Society. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. E. 2018. “The Biopolitical Public Domain: The Legal Construction of the Surveillance Economy.” Philosophy & Technology 31 (2): 213–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-017-0258-2.
   Google Scholar
• Dahinden, Janine. 2016. “A Plea for the ‘De-migranticization’ of Research on Migration and Integration.” Ethnic and Racial Studies. 39 (13): 2207–2225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahinden, Janine, Carolin Fischer, and Joana Menet. 2021. “Knowledge Production, Reflexivity, and the Use of Categories in Migration Studies: Tackling Challenges in the Field.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 44 (4): 535–554. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2020.1752926.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EDPS. 2019. Formal consultation on EASO’s social media monitoring reports (case 2018-1083). Brussels: European Data Protection Supervisor.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2010. “Migration between Africa and Europe (MAFE) Survey”.
   Google Scholar
• Georgetown Center on Privacy & Technology. 2022. “American Dragnet. Data-driven Deportation in the 21st Century”.
   Google Scholar
• Glouftsios, G., and S. Scheel. 2020. “An Inquiry into the Digitisation of Border and Migration Management: Performativity, Contestation and Heterogeneous Engineering.” Third World Quarterly 17 (1): 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez-Bailon, S., N. Wang, A. Rivero, J. Borge-Holthoefer, and Y. Moreno. 2014. “Assessing the bias in samples of large online networks.” Social Networks 38: 16–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2014.01.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gürses, S., R. Overdorf, and E. Balsa. 2018. “POTs: The Revolution Will not Be Optimized?” 11th Hot Topics in Privacy Enhancing Technologies (HotPETs).
   Google Scholar
• Gurses, S., J. van Hoboken, and J. Vredy. 2018. “Privacy after the Agile Turn".” In The Cambridge Handbook of Consumer Privacy, edited by Evan Selinger, Jules Polonetsky, and Omer Tene, 579–601. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• HumMingBird. 2020. “About Us.” https://hummingbird-h2020.eu/about.
   Google Scholar
• iBorderCtrl. 2016. “Technical Framework.” https://www.iborderctrl.eu/Technical-Framework.
   Google Scholar
• Mijente, Immigrant Defense Project, and National Immigration Project of the National Lawyers Guild. 2019. Who's Behind ICE? The Tech and Data Companies Fueling Deportations. https://mijente.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/WHO%E2%80%99S-BEHIND-ICE_-The-Tech-and-Data-Companies-Fueling-Deportations-_v1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• IOM; European Commission. 2017. “Big Data for Migration Alliance (BD4M): Harnessing the Potential of New Data Sources and Innovative Methodologies for Migration.” Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• IOM; McKinsey & Company. 2018. More Than Numbers. How Migration Data Can Deliver Real-life Benefits for Migrants and Governments: Final Version for World Economic Forum in Davos on 24 January 2018. Berlin: International Organization for Migration, Global Migration Data Analysis Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobsen, K., and L. B. Landau. 2003. “The Dual Imperative in Refugee Research: Some Methodological and Ethical Considerations in Social Science Research on Forced Migration.” Disasters 27 (3): 185–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7717.00228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khosravi, S. 2024. “Doing Migration Studies with an Accent.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 50 (9): 2346–2358. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2024.2307787.
   Google Scholar
• Kinstler, L. 2019. Big Tech Firms are Racing to Track Climate Refugees. MIT Technology Review. May 17th. Accessed January 23, 2024. https://www.technologyreview.com/2019/05/17/103059/big-tech-firms-are-racing-to-track-climate-refugees/.
   Google Scholar
• Kitchin, R., and T. P. Lauriault. 2018. “Toward Critical Data Studies: Charting and Unpacking Data Assemblages and Their Work.” In Thinking Big Data in Geography: New Regimes, New Research, edited by Jim Thatcher, Josef Eckert, and Andrew Shears. Lincoln: The University of Nebraska Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, E., and A. Gekker. 2020. “Mapping Interfacial Regimes of Control: A Qualitative Analysis of America’s Post-9/11 Security Technology Infrastructure.” Surveillance & Society 18 (2): 231–243. https://doi.org/10.24908/ss.v18i2.13268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leese, M., S. Noori, and S. Scheel. 2021. “Unravelling Local Dynamics in the Sino-North Korean Border Region.” Geopolitics 11 (3): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2021.1992388.
   Google Scholar
• Mak, V., T. Tjong Tjin, E. Then Foek, and A. Berlee. 2018. Research Handbook in Data Science and Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, H. 2020. "‘Home Office to scrap ‘racist’ algorithm’ for UK Visa Applications". The Guardian. Aug 4th.
   Google Scholar
• Meissner, F. 2018. “Legal Status Diversity: Regulating to Control and Everyday Contingencies.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 44 (2): 287–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2017.1341718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metcalf, J., E. Moss, and d. boyd. 2019. “Owning Ethics: Corporate Logics, Silicon Valley, and the Institutionalization of Ethics.” Social Research: An International Quarterly 86 (2): 449–476. https://doi.org/10.1353/sor.2019.0022.
   Google Scholar
• Molnar, P. 2020. Technological Testing Grounds. Migration Management Experiments and Reflections from the Ground Up.
   Google Scholar
• Musser, P., and S. Kapadia. 2017. “Mastercard Experiences During the Humanitarian Response in Southern Europe.” Field Exchange 54: 108.
   Google Scholar
• NL Times. 2021. “Dutch Policing Force in Court for Ethnic Profiling at Border Controls.” NL Times, June 15.
   Google Scholar
• Pelizza, A. 2016. “Developing the Vectorial Glance.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 41 (2): 298–321. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243915597478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peña Gangadharan, S., and J. Niklas. 2019. “Decentering Technology in Discourse on Discrimination.” Information, Communication & Society 22 (7): 882–899.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perceptions. 2020. https://project.perceptions.eu/2020/06/30/technical-review/.
   Google Scholar
• Petzke, Martin. 2023. “Constructing a ‘Staying’ Problem. On the Role of Statistical Indicators in Consolidating an Enduring Bureaucratic Jurisdiction for Immigrant Integration.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 49 (19): 5081–5098. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2022.2044766.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollozek, S., and J. H. Passoth. 2024. “Devices of Suspicion. An Analysis of Frontex Screening Materials at the Registration and Identification Center in Moria.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 50 (9): 2327–2345. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2024.2307786.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, A. B. 2021. Undoing Optimization. Civic Action in Smart Cities. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rango, M., and M. Vespe. 2017. Summary Report. Big Data and Alternative Data Sources on Migration. From Case-Studies to Policy Support, Ispra, Italy.Nov 30th.
   Google Scholar
• Raymond, N. A. 2017. “Beyond “Do No Harm” and Individual Consent: Reckoning with the Emerging Ethical Challenges of Civil Society’s Use of Data.” In Group Privacy. New Challenges of Data Technologies, edited by L. Taylor, L. Floridi, and B. van der Sloot, 67–82. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Reece, S., F. Düvell, C. Vargas-Silva, and Z. Kone. 2019. “New Approaches to the Study of Spatial Mobility and Economic Integration of Refugees in Turkey". Data for refugees challenge workshop. D4R, Istanbul, Turkey, January 21.
   Google Scholar
• Ruppert, E., and S. Scheel, eds. 2021. Data Practices. Making Up a European People. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Salah, A. A., A. Pentland, B. Lepri, and E. Letouzé, eds. 2019. Guide to Mobile Data Analytics in Refugee Scenarios. The ‘Data for Refugees Challenge’ Study. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Monedero, J., and L. Dencik. 2020. “The Politics of Deceptive Borders: ‘Biomarkers of Deceit’ and the Case of iBorderCtrl.” Information, Communication & Society 16 (3): 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Sandvik, K. B., K. L. Jacobsen, and S. M. McDonald. 2017. “Do No Harm: A Taxonomy of the Challenges of Humanitarian Experimentation.” International Review of the Red Cross 99 (904): 319–344. https://doi.org/10.1017/S181638311700042X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandvik, K., and N. Raymond. 2017. “Beyond the Protective Effect: Towards a Theory of Harm for Information Communication Technologies in Mass Atrocity Response.” Genocide Studies and Prevention 11 (1): 9–24. https://doi.org/10.5038/1911-9933.11.1.1454.
   Google Scholar
• Savage, M., and R. Burrows. 2007. “The Coming Crisis of Empirical Sociology.” Sociology 41 (5): 885–899. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038507080443.
   Google Scholar
• Scheel, S. 2021. “The Politics of (Non)Knowledge in the (Un)Making of Migration.” Zeitschrift für Migrationsforschung / Journal of Migration Research 1 (2): 39–71. https://doi.org/10.48439/zmf.v1i2.113.
   Google Scholar
• Scheel, S. 2024. “Epistemic Domination by Data Extraction: Questioning the Use of Biometrics and Mobile Phone Data Analysis in Asylum Procedures.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 50 (9): 2289–2308. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2024.2307782.
   Google Scholar
• Scheel, S., and M. Tazzioli. 2022. “Who is a Migrant? Abandoning the Nation-state Point of View in the Study of Migration.” Migration Politics 1 (002): 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Schinkel, W., and R. van Reekum. 2024. “The Economy of Migration. Knowledge, Accounting, and Debt.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 50 (9): 2188–2206. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2024.2307769.
   Google Scholar
• Sharon, T. 2021. “Blind-sided by Privacy? Digital Contact Tracing, the Apple/Google API and Big Tech’s Newfound Role as Global Health Policy Makers.” Ethics and Information Technology 23 (Suppl 1): 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-020-09547-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sibru, Alina;, Laura; Pollacci, Jisu Kim, and Guilio Rosetti. 2021. “Deliverable 5.1.” Report on the Developed Indicators for Nowcasting Migration Stocks by Twitter.
   Google Scholar
• Spyratos, S., M. Vespe, F. Natale, W. Ingmar, E. Zagheni, and M. Rango. 2018. Migration Data Using Social Media. A European Perspective. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Star, S. L. 1999. “The Ethnography of Infrastructure.” American Behavioral Scientist 43 (3): 377–391. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027649921955326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takle, M. 2017. “Migration and Asylum Statistics as a Basis for European Border Control.” Migration Studies 5 (2): 267–285. https://doi.org/10.1093/migration/mnx028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, L. 2016a. “No Place to Hide? The Ethics and Analytics of Tracking Mobility Using Mobile Phone Data.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 34 (2): 319–336. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775815608851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, L. 2016b. “The Ethics of Big Data as a Public Good: Which Public? Whose Good?” Philosophical Transactions. Series A, Mathematical, Physical, and Engineering Sciences 374 (20160126): 1–13. http://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2016.0126.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, L. 2017. “What is Data Justice? The Case for Connecting Digital Rights and Freedoms Globally.” Big Data & Society 4 (2): 205395171773633. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951717736335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, L., L. Floridi, and B. van der Sloot, eds. 2017. Group Privacy. New Challenges of Data Technologies. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, L., and F. Meissner. 2020. “A Crisis of Opportunity: Market-Making, Big Data, and the Consolidation of Migration as Risk.” Antipode 52 (1): 270–290. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, L., R. Schroeder, and E. Meyer. 2014. “Emerging Practices and Perspectives on Big Data Analysis in Economics: Bigger and Better or More of the Same?” Big Data & Society 1 (2): 205395171453687. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714536877.
   Google Scholar
• UN Global Pulse. 2014. “The Second “Data for Development” (D4D) Challenge in Africa.” https://www.unglobalpulse.org/2014/06/the-second-data-for-development-d4d-challenge-in-africa/.
   Google Scholar
• Vallor, S., and W. J. Rewark. 2018. An Introduction to Data Ethics. https://www.scu.edu/media/ethics-center/technology-ethics/READFIRSTNotesForInstructorsDataEthics2017.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• van der Kist, J. 2024. “Making Workable Knowledge for Asylum Decisions: On Tinkering with Country of Origin Information.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 50 (9): 2309–2326. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2024.2307784.
   Google Scholar
• van Liempt, I., and V. Bilger. 2009. The Ethics of Migration Research Methodology: Dealing with Vulnerable Immigrants. Brighton: Sussex Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Van Rossem, W., and A. Pelizza. 2022. “The Ontology Explorer: A Method to Make Visible Data Infrastructures for Population Management.” Big Data & Society 9 (1): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517221104087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbeek, P., and D. Tijink. 2020. Guidance Ethics Approach. An Ethical Dialogue About Technology with Perspective on Actions. Enschede: Platform voor de InformatieSamenleving.
   Google Scholar
• Wimmer, A., and N. Glick Schiller. 2002. “Methodological Nationalism and Beyond: Nation-State Building, Migration and the Social sciences.” Global Networks 2 (4): 301–334. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0374.00043.
   Google Scholar