Making workable knowledge for asylum decisions: on tinkering with country of origin information

References

• ACCORD. 2013. “Researching Country of Origin Information: Training Manual.” http://www.coi-training.net/handbook/Researching-Country-of-Origin-Information-2013-edition-ACCORD-COI-Training-manual.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Amelung, Nina, Cristiano Gianolla, Olga Solovova, and Joana Sousa Ribeiro. 2020. “Technologies, Infrastructures and Migrations: Material Citizenship Politics.” Citizenship Studies 24 (5): 587–606. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2020.1784636. Routledge.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amelung, Nina, Stephan Scheel, and Rogier van Reekum. 2024. “Reinventing the Politics of Knowledge Production in Migration Studies: Introduction to the Special Issue.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 50 (9): 2163–2187. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2024.2307766.
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin-Edwards, Martin, Brad K. Blitz, and Heaven Crawley. 2018. “The Politics of Evidence-Based Policy in Europe’s ‘Migration Crisis’.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 0 (12): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2018.1468307.
   Google Scholar
• Bodström, Erna. 2023. ““Illusions of Objectivity: The Two Functions of Country of Origin Information in Asylum Assessment.” Migration Studies 11 (1): 197–217. https://doi.org/10.1093/migration/mnac033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boswell, Christina. 2009. The Political Uses of Expert Knowledge: Immigration Policy and Social Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, Rosemary. 2015. “The Protection Paradox: Why Hasn’t the Arrival of New Media Transformed Refugee Status Determination?” International Journal of Refugee Law 27 (4): 625–648. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijrl/eev048.
   Google Scholar
• de Laet, Marianne, Annelieke Driessen, and Else Vogel. 2021. ““Thinking with Attachments: Appreciating a Generative Analytic.” Social Studies of Science 51 (6): 799–819. https://doi.org/10.1177/03063127211048804. London, England: SAGE.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EASO. 2019. “EASO Country of Origin Information (COI) Report Methodology.” https://coi.easo.europa.eu/administration/easo/PLib/2019_EASO_COI_Report_Methodology.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Engelmann, Claudia. 2015. “Common Standards via the Backdoor: The Domestic Impact of Asylum Policy Coordination in the European Union.” Maastricht University.
   Google Scholar
• Eule, Tobias G. 2018. “The (Surprising?) Nonchalance of Migration Control Agents.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 44 (16): 2780–2795. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2017.1401516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eule, Tobias G., Lisa Marie Borrelli, Annika Lindberg, and Anna Wyss. 2018. Migrants Before the Law: Contested Migration Control in Europe. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Eule, Tobias G., Lisa Marie Borrelli, Annika Lindberg, and Anna Wyss. 2019. “Decision-Making and the Role of Law.” In Migrants Before the Law: Contested Migration Control in Europe, edited by Tobias G. Eule, Lisa Marie Borrelli, Annika Lindberg, and Anna Wyss, 81–110. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98749-1_3.
   Google Scholar
• Eule, Tobias G., David Loher, and Anna Wyss. 2018. “Contested Control at the Margins of the State.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 44 (16): 2717–2729. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2017.1401511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fassin, Didier. 2013. “The Precarious Truth of Asylum.” Public Culture 25 (1): 39–63. https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-1890459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, Richard. 2007. “Epistemological Bricolage: How Practitioners Make Sense of Learning.” Administration & Society 39 (4): 476–496. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399707301857.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geiger, Martin, and Antoine Pécoud. 2010. “The Politics of International Migration Management.” In The Politics of International Migration Management: Migration, Minorities and Citizenship, edited by Martin Geiger, and Antoine Pécoud, 1–20. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Gibb, Robert, and Anthony Good. 2013. “Do the Facts Speak for Themselves? Country of Origin Information in French and British Refugee Status Determination Procedures.” International Journal of Refugee Law 25 (2): 291–322. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijrl/eet015.
   Google Scholar
• Graves, Lucas. 2017. “Anatomy of a Fact Check: Objective Practice and the Contested Epistemology of Fact Checking.” Communication, Culture and Critique 10 (3): 518–537. https://doi.org/10.1111/cccr.12163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grommé, Francisca. 2015. “Turning Aggression Into an Object of Intervention: Tinkering in a Crime Control Pilot Study.” Science as Culture 24 (2): 227–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2014.992331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gyulai, Gábor. 2011. Country Information in Asylum Procedures - Quality as a Legal Requirement in the EU. Budapest: Hungarian Helsinki Committee. http://www.refworld.org/docid/4f13c5f02.html.
   Google Scholar
• Hambly, Jessica, and Nick Gill. 2020. “Law and Speed: Asylum Appeals and the Techniques and Consequences of Legal Quickening.” Journal of Law and Society 47 (1): 3–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/jols.12220. Wiley Online Library.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haraway, Donna. 1988. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective.” Feminist Studies 14 (3): 575–599. https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haraway, Donna J. 2016. Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harper, Richard H. R. 1998. Inside the IMF: An Ethnography of Documents, Technology and Organisational Action. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jacob, François. 1977. “Evolution and Tinkering.” Science 196 (4295): 1161–1166. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.860134
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knorr-Cetina, Karin D. 1983. “The Ethnographic Study of Scientific Work: Towards a Constructivist Interpretation of Science.” In Science Observed: Perspectives on the Social Study of Science”, edited by Karin Knorr-Cetina, and Michael Mulkay, 115–140. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Knorr, Karin D. 1979. “Tinkering Toward Success.” Theory and Society 8 (3): 347–376. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00167894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latimer, Joanna, and María Puig de La Bellacasa. 2013. “Re-Thinking the Ethical: Everyday Shifts of Care in Biogerontology.” Ethics, Law and Society 5:153–174. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315094342-11.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno. 1981. “Is It Possible to Reconstruct the Research Process?: Sociology of a Brain Peptide.” In The Social Process of Scientific Investigation, edited by K. D. Knorr, R. Krohn, and R. Whitley, 53–73. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno. 1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno. 2010. The Making of Law: An Ethnography of the Conseil D’Etat. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Leonelli, Sabina. 2014. “Data Interpretation in the Digital Age.” Perspectives on Science 22 (3): 397–417. https://doi.org/10.1162/POSC_a_00140.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Levi-Strauss, Claude. 1966. The Savage Mind. Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liodden, Tone Maia. 2022. “The Map and the Territory: The Use of Country Information in Asylum Assessments.” International Migration Review 56 (1): 296–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/01979183211028848. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magalhães, Bruno. 2016. “The Politics of Credibility: Assembling Decisions on Asylum Applications in Brazil.” International Political Sociology 10 (2): 133–149. https://doi.org/10.1093/ips/olw005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malkki, Liisa H. 1995. “Refugees and Exile: From ‘Refugee Studies’ to the National Order of Things.” Annual Review of Anthropology 24 (1): 495–523. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.24.100195.002431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayblin, Lucy. 2017. Asylum After Empire: Colonial Legacies in the Politics of Asylum Seeking. London: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Mol, Annemarie. 2002. The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mol, Annemarie. 2006. “Proving or Improving: On Health Care Research as a Form of Self-Reflection.” Qualitative Health Research 16 (3): 405–414. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305285856.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mol, Annemarie. 2010. “Actor-Network Theory: Sensitive Terms and Enduring Tensions.” Kölner Zeitschrift Für Soziologie Und Sozialpsychologie. Sonderheft 50:253–269.
   Google Scholar
• Mol, Annemarie, Ingunn Moser, and Jeannette Pols. 2015. Care in Practice: On Tinkering in Clinics, Homes and Farms. Bielefeld: transcript Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, Bjørnar. 2012. Archaeology: The Discipline of Things. London: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pelizza, Annalisa. 2020. “Processing Alterity, Enacting Europe: Migrant Registration and Identification as Co-Construction of Individuals and Polities.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 45 (2): 262–288. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243919827927.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollozek, S., and J. Passoth. 2024. “Devices of Suspicion. An Analysis of Frontex Screening Materials at the Registration and Identification Center in Moria.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 50 (9): 2327–2345. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2024.2307786.
   Google Scholar
• Pols, Jeannette. 2006. “Accounting and Washing: Good Care in Long-Term Psychiatry.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 31 (4): 409–430. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243906287544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pols, J. 2012. Care at a Distance: On the Closeness of Technology. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pols, Jeannette. 2013. “Pols: The Patient 2. Many: About Diseases That Remain and the Different Forms of Knowledge to Live with Them.” Science & Technology Studies 26 (2): 80–97. https://doi.org/10.23987/sts.55300.
   Google Scholar
• Puig de La Bellacasa, María. 2011. “Matters of Care in Technoscience: Assembling Neglected Things.” Social Studies of Science 41 (1): 85–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312710380301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puig de La Bellacasa, María. 2017. Matters of Care: Speculative Ethics in More Than Human Worlds. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, Richard, and Noortje Marres. 2000. “Landscaping Climate Change: A Mapping Technique for Understanding Science and Technology Debates on the World Wide Web.” Public Understanding of Science 9 (2): 141. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/9/2/304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosset, Damian.. 2018. "Legitimacy, Distantiation and the Ecology of Knowledge Production in the Norwegian Asylum Procedure." Phd thesis, Université de Neuchâtel.
   Google Scholar
• Scheel, S. 2024. “Epistemic Domination by Data Extraction: Questioning the Use of Biometrics and Mobile Phone Data Analysis in Asylum Procedures.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 50 (9): 2289–2308. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2024.2307782.
   Google Scholar
• Scheel, Stephan, Evelyn Ruppert, and Funda Ustek-Spilda. 2019. “Enacting Migration Through Data Practices.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 37 (4): 579–588. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775819865791.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheel, Stephan, and Funda Ustek-Spilda. 2019. “The Politics of Expertise and Ignorance in the Field of Migration Management.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 37 (4): 663–681. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775819843677.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schittenhelm, Karin, and Stephanie Schneider. 2017. “Official Standards and Local Knowledge in Asylum Procedures: Decision-Making in Germany’s Asylum System.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 43 (10): 1696–1713. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2017.1293592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sellen, Abigail J., and Richard H. R. Harper. 2003. The Myth of the Paperless Office. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Singleton, Vicky. 1998. “Stabilizing Instabilities: The Role of the Laboratory in the United Kingdom Cervical Screening Programme’.” In Differences in Medicine: Unravelling Practices, Techniques and Bodies, edited by Marc Berg, and A. M. Mol, 86–104. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Staatendokumentation. 2020. “Methodologie der Staatendokumentation.” https://www.staatendokumentation.at/site/assets/files/1/2020-12-12_methodologie-staatendokumentation_2020.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Stengers, Isabelle. 2005. “The Cosmopolitical Proposal.” In Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy, edited by Bruno Latour, and Peter Weibel, 994–1003. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strathern, Marilyn. 2000a. “The Tyranny of Transparency.” British Educational Research Journal 26 (3): 309–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/713651562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strathern, Marilyn. 2000b. Audit Cultures: Anthropological Studies in Accountability, Ethics, and the Academy. London and New York: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, Lucy. 1987. Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tazzioli, Martina. 2019. The Making of Migration: The Biopolitics of Mobility at Europe’s Borders. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, Robert. 2006. “Assessing the Credibility of Asylum Claims: EU and UK Approaches Examined.” European Journal of Migration and Law 8 (1): 79–96. https://doi.org/10.1163/157181606776911969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, Robert. 2008. “Consistency in Asylum Adjudication: Country Guidance and the Asylum Process in the United Kingdom.” International Journal of Refugee Law 20 (4): 489–532. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijrl/een034.
   Google Scholar
• Tsangarides, Natasha. 2010. The Refugee Roulette: The Role of Country Information in Refugee Status Determination. Immigration Advisory Service.
   Google Scholar
• van der Kist, Jasper R., Huub Dijstelbloem, and Marieke de Goede. 2019. “In the Shadow of Asylum Decision-Making: The Knowledge Politics of Country-of-Origin Information.” International Political Sociology 13 (1): 68–85. https://doi.org/10.1093/ips/oly029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Kist, Jasper R., and Damian Rosset. 2020. “Knowledge and Legitimacy in Asylum Decision-Making: The Politics of Country of Origin Information.” Citizenship Studies 24 (5): 663–679. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2020.1784645. Routledge.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogelaar, Femke. 2021. “The Presumption of Safety Tested: The Use of Country of Origin Information in the National Designation of Safe Countries of Origin.” Refugee Survey Quarterly 40 (1): 106–137. https://doi.org/10.1093/rsq/hdaa030. Oxford University Press.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winance, Myriam. 2015. “Care and Disability. Practices of Experimenting, Tinkering with, and Arranging People and Technical Aids.” In Care in Practice: On Tinkering in Clinics, Homes and Farms, edited by Annemarie Mol, Ingunn Moser, and Jeannette Pols, 93–117. Bielefeld: transcript Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Wissink, Lieke, and Irene van Oorschot. 2021. “Affective Bureaucratic Relations: File Practices in a European Deportation Unit and Criminal Court.” Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 39 (5): 1049–1065. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399654420977475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar