Deciding on asylum dilemmas: a conflict between role and person identities for asylum judges

References

• Affolter, L.. 2021a. Asylum Matters: On the Front Line of Administrative Decision-Making. Palgrave Socio-Legal Studies. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61512-3_6
   Google Scholar
• Affolter, L. 2021b. “Regular Matters: Credibility Determination and the Institutional Habitus in a Swiss Asylum Office.” Comparative Migration Studies 9 (1): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-020-00215-z.
   Google Scholar
• Arbel, E., C. Dauvergne, and J. Millbank, eds. 2015. Gender in Refugee Law: From the Margins to the Centre. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Belabas, W., and L. Gerrits. 2017. “Going the Extra Mile? How Street-level Bureaucrats Deal with the Integration of Immigrants.” Social Policy & Administration 51 (1): 133–150. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, E., A. Ter-Mkrtchyan, W. Wehde, and K. Smith. 2021. “Just or Unjust? How Ideological Beliefs Shape Street-Level Bureaucrats’ Perceptions of Administrative Burden.” Public Administration Review 81 (4): 610–624. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billand, E., and H. Steinmetz. 2017. “Are Judges Street-Level Bureaucrats? Evidence from French and Canadian Family Courts.” Law & Society Inquiry 42 (2): 289–618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clark. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, P. J., and J. E. Stets. 2009. Identity Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, D. L., T. J. Moskowitz, and K. Shue. 2016. “Decision Making Under the Gambler’s Fallacy: Evidence from Asylum Judges, Loan Officers, and Baseball Umpires.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 131 (3): 1181–1242. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjw017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlvik, J. 2017. “Asylum as Construction Work: Theorizing Administrative Practices.” Migration Studies 5 (3): 369–388. https://doi.org/10.1093/migration/mnx043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dallara, C., and A. Lacchei. 2021. “Street-level Bureaucrats and Coping Mechanisms. The Unexpected Role of Italian Judges in Asylum Policy Implementation.” South European Society and Politics 26 (1): 83–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/13608746.2021.1956161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EASO. 2016. “Latest Asylum Trends – 2015 Overview.” European Asylum Support Office. Retrieved on 28/10/2023 from https://euaa.europa.eu/sites/default/files/public/LatestAsylumTrends20151.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Freedman, J. 2015. Gendering the International Asylum and Refugee Debate. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Giametta, C. 2020. “New Asylum Protection Categories and Elusive Filtering Devices: The Case of ‘Queer Asylum’ in France and the UK.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 46 (1): 142–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill, N., N. Hoellerer, J. Allsopp, A. Burridge, D. Fisher, M. Griffiths, J. Hambly, N. Paszkiewicz, R. Rotter, and L. Vianelli. 2022. “Rethinking commonality in refugee status determination in Europe: Legal geographies of asylum appeals.” Political Geography 98: 102686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2022.102686.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glyniadaki, K. 2021. “Toward Street-Level Communities of Practice? The Implications of Actor Diversification in Migration Management in Athens and Berlin.” Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies 19 (3): 258–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/15562948.2021.1954740.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glyniadaki, K. 2022. “Street-Level Actors, Migrants, and Gender: Dealing With Divergent Perspectives.” Administration & Society 54 (3): 451–478. https://doi.org/10.1177/00953997211031464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedlund, D., and L. Johannesson. 2023. “Editorial Introduction: The Role of Language and Communication in Asylum Procedures.” Journal of International Migration and Integration 24 (4): 717–726. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12134-023-01032-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, I., and R. Julian. 2021. “Policy Implementation and Refugee Settlement: The Perceptions and Experiences of Street-level Bureaucrats in Launceston, Tasmania.” Journal of Sociology 57 (3): 522–540. https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783320931585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, K. 2023. “From the Asylum Official's Point of View: Frames of Perception and Evaluation in Refugee Status Determination.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 49 (13): 3455–3472. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2023.2179460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, D. C., and M. M. Pedersen. 2023. “A Cross-Sectional Study on the Relationship Between Street-Level Bureaucrats’ Role Identity and Their Discretionary Decision-Making Practice Toward Citizen-Clients.” Administration & Society 55 (5): 868–891. https://doi.org/10.1177/00953997231157752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jilke, S., and L. Tummers. 2018. “Which Clients are Deserving of Help? A Theoretical Model and Experimental Test.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 28 (2): 226–238. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muy002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johannesson, L. 2018. “Exploring the “Liberal Paradox” from the Inside: Evidence from the Swedish Migration Courts.” International Migration Review 52 (4): 1162–1185. https://doi.org/10.1177/0197918318767928.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keith, L. C., J. Holmes, and B. Miller. 2013. “Explaining Divergence in Asylum Grant Rates Among Immigration Judges. An Attitudinal and Cognitive Approach.” Law & Policy 35: 261–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobelinsky, C. 2019. “The “Inner Belief” of French Asylum Judges.” In Asylum Determination in Europe, edited by N. Gill and A. Good, 53–68. Cham: Palgrave Socio-Legal Studies, Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94749-5_3.
   Google Scholar
• Lens, V. 2012. “Judge or Bureaucrat? How Administrative Law Judges Exercise Discretion in Welfare Bureaucracies.” Social Service Review 86 (2): 269–293. https://doi.org/10.1086/666375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsky, M. 1980. Street-level Bureaucracy. Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Magalhães, B. 2016. “The Politics of Credibility: Assembling Decisions on Asylum Applications in Brazil.” International Political Sociology 10 (2): 133–149. https://doi.org/10.1093/ips/olw005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magalhães, B. 2018. “Obviously Without Foundation: Discretion and the Identification of Clearly Abusive Asylum Applicants.” Security Dialogue 49 (5): 382–399. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010618783640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maynard-Moody, S., and M. Musheno. 2003. Cops, Teachers, Counselors: Stories from the Front Lines of Public Service. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maynard-Moody, S., and M. Musheno. 2012. “Social Equities and Inequities in Practice: Street-Level Workers as Agents and Pragmatists.” Public Administration Review 72 (s1): 16–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02633.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miaz, J. 2017. “From the Law to the Decision: The Social and Legal Conditions of Asylum Adjudication in Switzerland.” European Policy Analysis 3 (2): 372–396. https://doi.org/10.1002/epa2.1018.
   Google Scholar
• Ramji-Nogales, J., A. Schoenholtz, and P. Schrag. 2007. “Refugee Roulette: Disparities in Asylum Adjudication.” Stanford Law Review 60 (2): 295–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rehaag, S. 2011. “Do Women Refugee Judges Really Make a Difference? An Empirical Analysis of Gender and Outcomes in Canadian Refugee Determinations.” Canadian Journal of Women and the Law 23 (2): 627–660. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjwl.23.2.627.
   Google Scholar
• Schittenhelm, K. & Schneider, S. (2017). Official Standards and Local Knowledge in Asylum Procedures: Decision-Making in Germany’s Asylum System. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 43(10), 1696–1713. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2017.1293592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, S. 2019. “Becoming a Decision-Maker, or: “Don’t Turn Your Heart Into a Den of Thieves and Murderers”.” In Asylum Determination in Europe, edited by N. Gill and A. Good, 285–306. Bristol: Palgrave Socio-Legal Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Schuster, L. 2018. “The Common European Asylum System: Inconsistent, Incoherent and Lacking Credibility. This Century's Review.” Journal for Rational Legal Debate 1: 40–44.
   Google Scholar
• Shiff, T. 2021. “A Sociology of Discordance: Negotiating Schemas of Deservingness and Codified Law in U.S. Asylum Status Determinations.” American Journal of Sociology 127 (2): 337–375. https://doi.org/10.1086/716485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorgoni, B. 2019. “What do we Talk About When we Talk About Credibility? Refugee Appeals in Italy.” In Asylum Determination in Europe, edited by N. Gill and A. Good, 221–240. Bristol: Palgrave Socio-Legal Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Spirig, J. 2023. “When Issue Salience Affects Adjudication: Evidence from Swiss Asylum Appeal Decisions.” American Journal of Political Science 67 (1): 55–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomkinson, S. 2018. “Who are you Afraid of and why? Inside the Black box of Refugee Tribunals.” Canadian Public Administration 61 (2): 184–204. https://doi.org/10.1111/capa.12275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tummers, L. G., B. Vermeeren, A. J. Steijn, and V. J. J. M. Bekkers. 2012. “Public Professionals and Policy Implementation.” Public Management Review 14 (8): 1041–1059. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2012.662443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNHCR. 2013. “Beyond Proof - Credibility Assessment in EU Asylum Systems.” Retrieved from: https://www.unhcr.org/ protection/operations/51a8a08a9/full-report-beyond-proof-credibility-assessment-eu-asylum-systems.html.
   Google Scholar
• Verhaeghe, L., M. Jacobs, and K. Maryns. 2023. “Discursive Tensions of Credibility and Performance in Assessing Lesbian Refugee Claims for International Protection.” Journal of International Migration and Integration 24 (4): 769–790. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12134-023-01009-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vetters, L. 2022. “Making Sense of Noncitizens’ Rights Claims in Asylum Appeal Hearings: Practices and Sentiments of Procedural Justice among German Administrative Judges.” Citizenship Studies 26 (7): 927–943. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2022.2137940.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vianelli, L., N. Gill, and N. Hoellerer. 2022. “Waiting as Probation: Selecting Self-Disciplining Asylum Seekers.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 48 (5): 1013–1032. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2021.1926942.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vink, E., L. G. Tummers, V. J. J. M. Bekkers, and M. Musheno. 2015. “Decision-Making at the Frontline: Exploring Coping with Moral Conflicts During Public Service Delivery.” In Making Public Policy Decisions, edited by J. Lewis and M. Considine, 112–128. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zacka, B. 2017. When the State Meets the Street. Public Service and Moral Agency. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar