Current treatments for female primary stress urinary incontinence

References

• Garely AD, Noor N. Diagnosis and surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 2014;124:1011–27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heneghan C, Godlee F. Surgical mesh and patient safety. BMJ 2018;363:k4231
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dumoulin C, Cacciari LP, Hay-Smith EJC. Pelvic floor muscle training versus no treatment, or inactive control treatments, for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018;10:CD005654
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labrie J, Berghmans BLCM, Fischer K, et al. Surgery versus physiotherapy for stress urinary incontinence. N Engl J Med 2013;369:1124–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labrie J, Fischer K, van der Vaart CH. Health-related quality of life. The effect of pelvic floor muscle training and midurethral sling surgery: a systematic review. Int Urogynecol J 2012;23:1155–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sangsawang B, Sangsawang N. Is a 6-week supervised pelvic floor muscle exercise program effective in preventing stress urinary incontinence in late pregnancy in primigravid women?: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2016;197:103–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reilly ETC, Freeman RM, Waterfield MR, Waterfield AE, Steggles P, Pedlar F. Prevention of postpartum stress incontinence in primigravidae with increased bladder neck mobility: a randomised controlled trial of antenatal pelvic floor exercises. BJOG 2014;121:58–66
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labrie J, Lagro-Janssen ALM, Fischer K, Berghmans LCM, van der Vaart CH. Predicting who will undergo surgery after physiotherapy for female stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 2015;26:329–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayeleke RO, Hay-Smith EJC, Omar MI. Pelvic floor muscle training added to another active treatment versus the same active treatment alone for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015;CD010551
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Shaikh G, Syed S, Osman S, Bogis A, Al-Badr A. Pessary use in stress urinary incontinence: a review of advantages, complications, patient satisfaction, and quality of life. IJWH 2018;10:195–201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapitan MCM, Cody JD, Mashayekhi A. Open retropubic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017;7:CD002912
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Holdø B, Verelst M, Svenningsen R, Milsom I, Skjeldestad FE. Long-term clinical outcomes with the retropubic tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) procedure compared to Burch colposuspension for correcting stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Int Urogynecol J 2017;28:1739–46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laudano MA, Seklehner S, Chughtai B, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of tension-free vaginal tape vs burch colposuspension for female stress urinary incontinence in the USA. BJU Int 2013;112:E151–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean N, Ellis G, Herbison GP, Wilson D, Mashayekhi A. Laparoscopic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017;7:CD002239
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rehman H, Bezerra CA, Bruschini H, Cody JD, Aluko P. Traditional suburethral sling operations for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017;7:CD001754
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bailly GG, Carlson KV. The pubovaginal sling: reintroducing an old friend. CUAJ 2017;11:147–51
   Google Scholar
• Ghoniem GM, Rizk DEE. Renaissance of the autologous pubovaginal sling. Int Urogynecol J 2018;29:177–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brubaker L, Richter HE, Norton PA, et al. 5-Year continence rates, satisfaction and adverse events of burch urethropexy and fascial sling surgery for urinary incontinence. J Urol 2012;187:1324–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan ZA, Nambiar A, Morley R, Chapple CR, Emery SJ, Lucas MG. Long-term follow-up of a multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing tension-free vaginal tape, xenograft and autologous fascial slings for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women. BJU Int 2015;115:968–77
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerrero K, Emery S, Wareham K, Ismail S, Watkins A, Lucas M. A randomised controlled trial comparing TVTTM, PelvicolTM and autologous fascial slings for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women. BJOG 2010;117:1493–503
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulmsten U, Henriksson L, Johnson P, Varhos G. An ambulatory surgical procedure under local anesthesia for treatment of female urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 1996;7:81–5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ward K, Hilton P. United Kingdom and Ireland Tension-free Vaginal Tape Trial Group. Prospective multicentre randomised trial of tension-free vaginal tape and colposuspension as primary treatment for stress incontinence. BMJ 2002;325:67–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ankardal M, Ekerydh A, Crafoord K, et al. A randomised trial comparing open Burch colposuspension using sutures with laparoscopic colposuspension using mesh and staples in women with stress urinary incontinence. BJOG 2004;111:974–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey MP, Goh JT, Rosamilia A, et al. Laparoscopic versus open Burch colposuspension: a randomised controlled trial. BJOG 2006;113:999–1006
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang W, Zhu L, Lang J. Transobturator tape procedure versus tension-free vaginal tape for treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2009;104:113–16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter HE, Albo ME, Zyczynski HM, et al. Retropubic versus transobturator midurethral slings for stress incontinence. N Engl J Med 2010;362:2066–76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sokol ER, Karram MM, Dmochowski R. Efficacy and safety of polyacrylamide hydrogel for the treatment of female stress incontinence: a randomized, prospective, multicenter North American study. J Urol 2014;192:843–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fusco F, Abdel-Fattah M, Chapple CR, et al. Updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the comparative data on colposuspensions, pubovaginal slings, and midurethral tapes in the surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Eur Urol 2017;72:567–91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson CG, Palva K, Aarnio R, Morcos E, Falconer C. Seventeen years’ follow-up of the tension-free vaginal tape procedure for female stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 2013;24:1265–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakas P, Papadakis E, Karachalios C, Liapis I, Panagopoulos N, Liapis A. Assessment of the long-term outcome of TVT procedure for stress urinary incontinence in a female population: results at 17 years’ follow-up. Int Urogynecol J 2018. Epub ahead of print
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braga A, Caccia G, Sorice P, et al. Tension-free vaginal tape for treatment of pure urodynamic stress urinary incontinence: efficacy and adverse effects at 17-year follow-up. BJU Int 2018;122:113–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsson I, Abrahamsson AK, Kroon UB. Long-term efficacy of the tension-free vaginal tape procedure for the treatment of urinary incontinence: a retrospective follow-up 11.5 years post-operatively. Int Urogynecol J 2010;21:679–83
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhang Y, Song X, Mao M, Kang J, Ai F, Zhu L. Tension-free vaginal tape for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence: a 13-year prospective follow-up. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2018. pii: S1553–4650(18)30425-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serati M, Braga A, Athanasiou S, et al. Tension-free Vaginal tape–obturator for treatment of pure urodynamic stress urinary incontinence: efficacy and adverse effects at 10-year follow-up. Eur Urol 2017;71:674–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svenningsen R, Staff AC, Schiøtz HA, Western K, Kulseng-Hanssen S. Long-term follow-up of the retropubic tension-free vaginal tape procedure. Int Urogynecol J 2013;24:1271–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balachandran A, Duckett J. Does the diagnosis of detrusor overactivity affect the long-term prognosis of patients treated with a retropubic midurethral sling? Int Urogynecol J 2016;27:1913–18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakas P, Papadakis E, Karachalios C, Beta A, Liapis A. Long-term efficacy follow-up of tension-free vaginal tape obturator in patients with stress urinary incontinence with or without cystocele. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2018;143:339–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serdinšek T, But I. Long-term results of two different trans-obturator techniques for surgical treatment of women with stress and mixed urinary incontinence: a 10-year randomised controlled study follow-up. Int Urogynecol J 2018. Epub ahead of print
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Song X, Zhang Z, et al. Tension-free vaginal tape-obturator for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence: a 12-year prospective follow-up. BJU Int 2018. Epub ahead of print
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tommaselli GA, Di Carlo C, Formisano C, Fabozzi A, Nappi C. Medium-term and long-term outcomes following placement of midurethral slings for stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Int Urogynecol J 2015;26:1253–68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costantini E, Kocjancic E, Lazzeri M, et al. Long-term efficacy of the trans-obturator and retropubic mid-urethral slings for stress urinary incontinence: update from a randomized clinical trial. World J Urol 2016;34:585–93
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford AA, Rogerson L, Cody JD, Aluko P, Ogah JA. Mid-urethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017;7:CD006375
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goodall EJ, Cartwright R, Stratta EC, Jackson SR, Price N. Outcomes after laparoscopic removal of retropubic midurethral slings for chronic pain. Int Urogynecol J 2018. Epub ahead of print
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nambiar A, Cody JD, Jeffery ST, Aluko P. Single-incision sling operations for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017;7:CD008709
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Klarskov N, Lose G. Urethral injection therapy: what is the mechanism of action? Neurourol Urodyn 2008;27:789–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasi AD, Pergialiotis V, Perrea DN, Khunda A, Doumouchtsis SK. Polyacrylamide hydrogel (Bulkamid®) for stress urinary incontinence in women: a systematic review of the literature. Int Urogynecol J 2016;27:367–75
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siddiqui ZA, Abboudi H, Crawford R, Shah S. Intraurethral bulking agents for the management of female stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review. Int Urogynecol J 2017;28:1275–84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirchin V, Page T, Keegan PE, Atiemo K, Cody JD, McClinton S. Urethral injection therapy for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;CD003881
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pergialiotis V, Prodromidou A, Perrea DN, Doumouchtsis SK. A systematic review on vaginal laser therapy for treating stress urinary incontinence. Do we have enough evidence? Int Urogynecol J 2017;28:1445–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaganje M, Šćepanović D, Žgur L, Verdenik I, Pajk F, Lukanović A. Non-ablative Er:YAG laser therapy effect on stress urinary incontinence related to quality of life and sexual function: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2018;224:153–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conté C, Jauffret T, Vieillefosse S, Hermieu JF, Deffieux X. Laser procedure for female urinary stress incontinence: a review of the literature. Progrès en Urol 2017;27:1076–83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aragón IM, Imbroda BH, Lara MF. Cell therapy clinical trials for stress urinary incontinence: current status and perspectives. Int J Med Sci 2018;15:195–204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivalingam N, Teng YH, Chong XY, Low CH, Manocha SK, Intan Sabreena MS. Incidence of vaginal erosion with different synthetic materials for suburethral sling in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review. Med J Malaysia 2018;73:147–53
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee D, Chang J, Zimmern PE. Iatrogenic pelvic pain: surgical and mesh complications. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2017;28:603–19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souders CP, Eilber KS, McClelland L, et al. The truth behind transvaginal mesh litigation: devices, timelines, and provider characteristics. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 2017;24:21–5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FDA. Urogynecologic Surgical Mesh: Update on the Safety and Effectiveness of Transvaginal Placement for Pelvic Organ Prolapse. 2011. https://www.fda.gov/downloads/medicaldevices/safety/alertsandnotices/ucm262760.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ward K, Hilton P. Tension-free vaginal tape versus colposuspension for primary urodynamic stress incontinence: 5-year follow up. BJOG 2008;115:226–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobashi KC, Albo ME, Dmochowski RR, et al. Surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: AUA/SUFU guideline. J Urol 2017;198:875–83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson D, Anders K, Cardozo L, et al. What do women want? Interpretation of the concept of cure. J Pelvic Med Surg 2003;9:273–7
   Google Scholar