References
- Jonsson FM, Edenfield AL, Pate V, et al. Trends in use of surgical mesh for pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013;208:79.e1–79.e7
- Fritel X, Varnoux N, Zins M, et al. Symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse at midlife, quality of life, and risk factors. Obstet Gynecol 2009;113:609–16
- Lee J, Dwyer PL. Age related trends in female stress urinary incontinence surgery in Australia: medicare data 1994-2009. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2010;50:543e9
- Haya N, Baessler K, Christmann-Schmid C, et al. Prolapse and continence surgery in countries of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development in 2012. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015;212:755.e1–755.e27
- Campbell P, Jha S, Cutner A. Vaginal mesh in prolapse surgery. Obstet Gynecol 2018;20:49–56
- Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, et al. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 1997;89:501–6
- EU Hernia Trialists Collaboration. Repair of groin hernia with synthetic mesh: meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Surg 2002;235:322–32
- Dallenbach P, Jungo NC, Eperon I, et al. Incidence and risk factors for reoperation of surgically treated pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 2012;23:35–41
- Abdel-Fattah M, Familusi A, Fielding S, et al. Primary and repeat surgical treatment for female pelvic organ prolapse and incontinence in parous women in the UK: a register linkage study. BMJ Open 2011;1:e000206
- Heneghan CJ, Goldacre B, Onakpoya I, et al. Trials of transvaginal mesh devices for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic database review of the US FDA approval process. BMJ Open 2017;7:e017125
- Iyer S, Botros SM. Transvaginal mesh: a historical review and update of the current state of affairs in the United States. Int Urogynecol J 2017;28:527–35
- Kelly M, Macdougall K, Olabisi O, McGuire N. In vivo response to polypropylene following implantation in animal models: a review of biocompatibility. Int Urogynecol J 2017;28:171–80
- Darzi S, Urbankova I, Su K, et al. Tissue response to collagen containing polypropylene meshes in an ovine vaginal repair model. Acta Biomater 2016;39:114–23
- Karmakar D, Hayward L, Smalldridge J, et al. Vaginal mesh for prolapse: a long-term prospective study of 218 mesh kits from a single centre. Int Urogynecol J 2015;26:1161–70
- FDA public health notification: serious complications associated with transvaginal placement of surgical mesh in repair of pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence issued: October 20, 2008. http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/safety/102008-surgicalmesh.html
- Abraham A, Tzartzeva K, Christie A, et al. Lessons learned from the MAUDE database on transvaginal synthetic mesh and sling reports. Urol Practice 2017;4:11–17
- Urogynecologic surgical mesh: update on the safety and effectiveness of transvaginal placement for pelvic organ prolapse. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/downloads/MedicalDevices/Safety/AlertsandNotices/UCM262760.pdf. [Last retrieved 24 February 2019]
- Effective date of requirement for premarket approval for surgical mesh for transvaginal pelvic organ prolapse repair. a proposed rule by the Food and Drug Administration on 05/01/2014. Available from: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2014-05-01/pdf/2014-09909.pdf. [Last retrieved 24 February 2019]
- Reclassification of surgical mesh for transvaginal pelvic organ prolapse repair and surgical instrumentation for urogynecologic surgical mesh procedures; designation of special controls for urogynecologic surgical mesh instrumentation. a proposed rule by the food and drug administration on 05/01/2014. Available from: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2014-05-01/pdf/2014-09907.pdf.[Last retrieved 24 February 2019]
- Results of review into urogynaecological surgical mesh implants. Available from: https://www.tga.gov.au/behind-news/results-review-urogynaecological-surgical-mesh-implants. [Last retrieved 24 February 2019]
- Report. Number of women in australia who have had transvaginal mesh implants and related matters. Available from: https://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Community_Affairs/MeshImplants/Report. [Last retrieved 24 February 2019]
- SCENIHR opinion on the safety of surgical meshes used in urogynecological surgery. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/consultations/public_consultations/scenihr_consultation_27_en. [Last retrieved 24 February 2019]
- The Scottish independent review of the use, safety and efficacy of transvaginal mesh implants in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse in women: final report. Available from: https://www.gov.scot/publications/scottish-independent-review-use-safety-efficacy-transvaginal-mesh-implants-treatment-9781786528711/. [Last retrieved 24 February 2019]
- Mesh oversight group report. Available from: https://www.england.nhs.uk/publication/mesh-oversight-group-report/. [Last retrieved 24 February 2019]
- Ghoniem G, Hammett J. Female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery practice patterns: IUGA member survey. Int Urogynecol J 2015;26:1489–94
- Mundy J. $5.5 million verdict sets transvaginal mesh lawsuit precedent [Internet]. Available from: https://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/lawsuit/transvaginal-mesh-tvt-sling.htmltransvaginalmesh-tvt-sling/tvt-sling-transvaginalmesh-5-17942.html. [Last retrieved 24 February 2019]
- Position statement. mesh midurethral slings for stress urinary incontinence. Available from: https://www.augs.org/assets/1/6/AUGS-SUFU_MUS_Position_Statement.pdf. [Last retrieved 24 February 2019]
- Barber M, Brubaker L, Nygaard I, et al. Defining success after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 2009;114:600–9
- Swift S, Woodman P, O'Boyle A, et al. Pelvic Organ Support Study (POSST): the distribution, clinical definition, and epidemiologic condition of pelvic organ support defects. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;192:795–806
- Karmakar D. Commentary to “Defining normal apical vaginal support: a relook at the POSST study”. Int Urogynecol J 2019;30:53–4.
- Trowbridge ER, Fultz NH, Patel DA, et al. Distribution of pelvic organ support measures in a population-based sample of middle-aged, community-dwelling African American and white women in southeastern Michigan. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;198:548.e1–548.e6
- Karmakar D, Dwyer PL, Thomas E, Schierlitz L, et al. Extraperitoneal uterosacral suspension technique for post hysterectomy apical prolapse in 472 women: results from a longitudinal clinical study. BJOG 2019;126:536–42
- Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, et al. Transvaginal mesh or grafts compared with native tissue repair for vaginal prolapse. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016;2:CD012079
- Ow LL, Lim YN, Dwyer PL, et al. Native tissue repair or transvaginal mesh for recurrent vaginal prolapse: what are the long-term outcomes?. Int Urogynecol J 2016;27:1313–20
- Morling JR, McAllister DA, Agur W, et al. Adverse events after first, single, mesh and non-mesh surgical procedures for stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse in Scotland, 1997–2016: a population-based cohort study. Lancet 2017;389:629–40
- Komesu Y, Rogers R. Sexual function in women with pelvic floor and lower urinary tract disorders. Available from: https://www.uptodate.com/contents/sexual-function-in-women-with-pelvic-floor-and-lower-urinary-tract-disorders. [Last retrieved 24 February 2019]
- Zielinski R, Low LK, Tumbarello J, Miller JM. Body image and sexuality in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Urol Nurs 2009;29:239–46
- Four geeky laws that rule our world. Available from: https://www.neatorama.com/2012/09/05/Four-Geeky-Laws-That-Rule-Our-World/. [Last retrieved 24 February 2019]
- Moen M, Noone M, Vassallo B. Anterior colporrhaphy: why surgeon performance is paramount. Int Urogynecol J 2014;25:857–62
- Polypropylene vaginal mesh implants for vaginal prolapse. Developed by Women's Health Committee and Endorsed by RANZCOG. Available from: https://www.ranzcog.edu.au/getattachment/Statements-Guidelines/Gynaecology/Polypropylene-Vaginal-Mesh-Implants-for-Vaginal-Pr/Polypropylene-vaginal-mesh-implants-for-vaginal-prolapse-(C-Gyn-20)-Jan18.pdf?lang=en-AU&ext=.pdf. [Last accessed 24 February 2019]
- Nilsson CG, Palva K, Aarnio R, et al. Seventeen years’ follow-up of the tension-free vaginal tape procedure for female stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 2013;24:1265–9
- Barber MD, Kleeman S, Karram MM, et al. Transobturator tape compared with tension-free vaginal tape for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2008;111:611–21
- Barry C, Lim YN, Muller R, et al. A multi-centre, randomised clinical control trial comparing the retropubic (RP) sling treatment of urodynamic stress incontinence: the TORP study. Int Urogynecol J 2008;19:171–8
- Karmakar D, Mostafa A, Abdel-Fattah M. Long-term outcomes of transobturator tapes in women with stress urinary incontinence: E-TOT randomised controlled trial. BJOG 2017;124:973–81
- Ford AA, Ogah JA. Retropubic or transobturator mid-urethral slings for intrinsic sphincter deficiency-related stress urinary incontinence in women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J 2016;27:19e28
- Karmakar D, Dwyer PL. Failure of expectations in vaginal surgery: lack of appropriate consent, goals and expectations of surgery. Curr Urol Rep 2016;17:87
- Dwyer PL, Karmakar D. Surgical management of urinary stress incontinence – where are we now?. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2019;54:31–40
- Procedures reported within Finished Consultant Episodes (FCEs) for treatment of urogynaecological prolapse or stress urinary incontinence. Available from: https://digital.nhs.uk/data-and-information/find-data-and-publications/supplementary-information/2018-supplementary-information-files/procedures-reported-within-finished-consultant-episodes-fces-for-treatmentof-urogynaecological-prolapse-or-stress-urinary-incontinence [Last retrieved 24 February 2019]