References
- Framingham Heart Study. https://www.framinghamheartstudy.org/. Accessed April 20, 2020
- Nurses’ Health Study. https://www.nurseshealthstudy.org/. Accessed April 20, 2020
- The Million Women Study. http://www.millionwomenstudy.org/introduction/. Accessed April 20, 2020
- Ewald H, Ioannidis JPA, Ladanie A, et al. Nonrandomized studies using causal-modeling may give different answers than RCTs: a meta-epidemiological study. J Clin Epidemiol 2020;118:29–41
- Hemkens LG, Ewald H, Naudet F, et al. Interpretation of epidemiologic studies very often lacked adequate consideration of confounding. J Clin Epidemiol 2018;93:94–102
- VanderWeele TJ, Ding P. Sensitivity analysis in observational research: introducing the E-value. Ann Intern Med 2017;167:268–74
- Serghiou S, Patel CJ, Tan YY, et al. Field-wide meta-analyses of observational associations can map selective availability of risk factors and the impact of model specifications. J Clin Epidemiol 2016;71:58–67
- Patel CJ, Burford B, Ioannidis JP. Assessment of vibration of effects due to model specification can demonstrate the instability of observational associations. J Clin Epidemiol 2015;68:1046–58
- STROBE Statement. https://www.strobe-statement.org/index.php?id=strobe-home. Accessed April 20, 2020