Removal of uterine polyps: clinical management and surgical approach

References

• Kim KR, Peng R, Ro JY, Robboy SJ. A diagnostically useful histopathologic feature of endometrial polyp: the long axis of endometrial glands arranged parallel to surface epithelium. Am J Surg Pathol 2004;28:1057–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Hanegem N, Breijer MC, Slockers SA, et al. Diagnostic workup for postmenopausal bleeding: a randomised controlled trial. BJOG 2017;124:231–40
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clark TJ, Stevenson H. Endometrial polyps and abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB-P): what is the relationship, how are they diagnosed and how are they treated? Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2017;40:89–104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreisler E, Poulsen LG, Antonsen SL, et al.; European Menopause and Andropause Society. EMAS clinical guide: assessment of the endometrium in peri and postmenopausal women. Maturitas 2013;75:181–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasius JC, Broekmans FJ, Veersema S, et al. Observer agreement in the evaluation of the uterine cavity by hysteroscopy prior to in vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 2011;26:801–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dueholm M, Hjorth IM, Secher P, Jørgensen A, Ørtoft G. Structured hysteroscopic evaluation of endometrium in women with postmenopausal bleeding. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2015;22:1215–24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreisler E, Stampe Sorensen S, Ibsen PH, Lose G. Prevalence of endometrial polyps and abnormal uterine bleeding in a Danish population aged 20-74 years. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009;33:102–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists. AAGL practice report: practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of endometrial polyps. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2012;19:3–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanos V, Berry KE, Seikkula J, et al. The management of polyps in female reproductive organs. Int J Surg 2017;43:7–16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong M, Crnobrnja B, Liberale V, Dharmarajah K, Widschwendter M, Jurkovic D. The natural history of endometrial polyps. Hum Reprod 2017;32:340–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lieng M, Istre O, Sandvik L, Qvigstad E. Prevalence, 1-year regression rate, and clinical significance of asymptomatic endometrial polyps: cross-sectional study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2009;16:465–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassa H, Tekin B, Senses T, Kaya M, Karatas A. Are the site, diameter, and number of endometrial polyps related with symptomatology. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006;194:718–21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munro MG, Critchley HO, Broder MS, Fraser IS; FIGO Working Group on Menstrual Disorders. FIGO classification system (PALM-COEIN) for causes of abnormal uterine bleeding in nongravid women of reproductive age. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2011;113:3–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munro MG, Critchley HOD, Fraser IS; FIGO Menstrual Disorders Committee. The two FIGO systems for normal and abnormal uterine bleeding symptoms and classification of causes of abnormal uterine bleeding in the reproductive years: 2018 revisions. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2018;143:393–408
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vroom AJ, Timmermans A, Bongers MY, van den Heuvel ER, Geomini PMAJ, van Hanegem N. Diagnostic accuracy of saline contrast sonohysterography in detecting endometrial polyps in women with postmenopausal bleeding: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2019;54:28–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghoubara A, Sundar S, Ewies AAA. Endometrial pathology in recurrent postmenopausal bleeding: observational study of 385 women. Climacteric 2018;21:391–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Spiezio Sardo A, Di Carlo C, Minozzi S, et al. Efficacy of hysteroscopy in improving reproductive outcomes of infertile couples: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 2016;22:479–96
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parry JP, Isaacson KB. Hysteroscopy and why macroscopic uterine factors matter for fertility. Fertil Steril 2019;112:203–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasmar RB, Barrozo PR, de Oliveira MA, Coutinho ES, Dias R. Validation of hysteroscopic view in cases of endometrial hyperplasia and cancer in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2006;13:409–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dueholm M, Hjorth IM, Secher P, Jørgensen A, Ørtoft G. Reproducibility of endometrial pathologic findings obtained on hysteroscopy, transvaginal sonography, and gel infusion sonography in women with postmenopausal bleeding. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2015;22:1036–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balcacer P, Cooper KA, Huber S, Spektor M, Pahade JK, Israel GM. Magnetic resonance imaging features of endometrial polyps: frequency of occurrence and interobserver reliability. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2018;42:721–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdel N, Modaffari P, Tognazza E, et al. Does experience in hysteroscopy improve accuracy and inter-observer agreement in the management of abnormal uterine bleeding? Surg Endosc 2016;30:5558–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dijk MM, van Hanegem N, de Lange ME, Timmermans A. Treatment of women with an endometrial polyp and heavy menstrual bleeding: a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device or hysteroscopic polypectomy? J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2015;22:1153–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Suspected cancer: recognition and referral. London: NICE; 2015. NG12
   Google Scholar
• Uglietti A, Buggio L, Farella M, et al. The risk of malignancy in uterine polyps: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2019;237:48–56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sasaki LMP, Andrade KRC, Figueiredo ACMG, Wanderley MDS, Pereira MG. Factors associated with malignancy in hysteroscopically resected endometrial polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2018;25:777–85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee SC, Kaunitz AM, Sanchez-Ramos L, Rhatigan RM. The oncogenic potential of endometrial polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2010;116:1197–205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colombo N, Creutzberg C, Amant F, et al.; ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO Endometrial Consensus Conference Working Group. ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO Consensus Conference on Endometrial Cancer: diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2016;27:16–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ACOG Committee Opinion No. 754: The Utility of and Indications for Routine Pelvic Examination. Obstet Gynecol 2018;132:e174–e180
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfman W, Leyland N, Heywood M, et al.; Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. Asymptomatic endometrial thickening. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2010;32:990–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wolfman W. No. 249. Asymptomatic Endometrial Thickening. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2018;40:e367–e377
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ACOG Committee Opinion No. 734: The Role of Transvaginal Ultrasonography in Evaluating the Endometrium of Women With Postmenopausal Bleeding. Obstet Gynecol 2018;131:e124–e129
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segev Y, Dain-Sagi L, Lavie O, Sagi S, Gemer O. Is there a survival advantage in diagnosing endometrial cancer in asymptomatic patients? A systemic review and meta-analysis. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2020;42:481–7.e2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayaprakasan K, Polanski L, Sahu B, Thornton JG, Raine-Fenning N. Surgical intervention versus expectant management for endometrial polyps in subfertile women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014;(8):CD009592
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosteels J, van Wessel S, Weyers S, et al. Hysteroscopy for treating subfertility associated with suspected major uterine cavity abnormalities. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018;12:CD009461
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yanaihara A, Yorimitsu T, Motoyama H, Iwasaki S, Kawamura T. Location of endometrial polyp and pregnancy rate in infertility patients. Fertil Steril 2008;90:180–2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-Nagi J, Miell J, Yazbek J, Holland T, Jurkovic D. The effect of hysteroscopic polypectomy on the concentrations of endometrial implantation factors in uterine flushings. Reprod Biomed Online 2009;19:737–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Medina T, Bajo-Arenas J, Salazar F, et al. Endometrial polyps and their implication in the pregnancy rates of patients undergoing intrauterine insemination: a prospective, randomized study. Hum Reprod 2005;20:1632–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elias RT, Pereira N, Karipcin FS, Rosenwaks Z, Spandorfer SD. Impact of newly diagnosed endometrial polyps during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation on in vitro fertilization outcomes. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2015:590–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lieng M, Istre O, Qvigstad E. Treatment of endometrial polyps: a systematic review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2010;89:992–1002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munro MG. Uterine polyps, adenomyosis, leiomyomas, and endometrial receptivity. Fertil Steril 2019;111:629–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang H, He X, Tian W, Song X, Zhang H. Hysteroscopic resection of endometrial polyps and assisted reproductive technology pregnancy outcomes compared with no treatment: a systematic review. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2019;26:618–27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nathani F, Clark TJ. Uterine polypectomy in the management of abnormal uterine bleeding: a systematic review. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2006;13:260–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lieng M, Istre O, Sandvik L, Engh V, Qvigstad E. Clinical effectiveness of transcervical polyp resection in women with endometrial polyps: randomized controlled trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2010;17:351–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timmermans A, Veersema S, van Kerkvoorde TC, et al. Should endometrial polyps be removed in patients with postmenopausal bleeding? An assessment of study designs and report of a failed randomised controlled trial (ISRCTN73825127). BJOG 2009;116:1391–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bittencourt CA, Dos Santos Simões R, Bernardo WM, et al. Accuracy of saline contrast sonohysterography in detection of endometrial polyps and submucosal leiomyomas in women of reproductive age with abnormal uterine bleeding: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2017;50:32–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seshadri S, El-Toukhy T, Douiri A, Jayaprakasan K, Khalaf Y. Diagnostic accuracy of saline infusion sonography in the evaluation of uterine cavity abnormalities prior to assisted reproductive techniques: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Hum Reprod Update 2015;21:262–74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieuwenhuis LL, Hermans FJ, Bij de Vaate AJM, et al. Three-dimensional saline infusion sonography compared to two-dimensional saline infusion sonography for the diagnosis of focal intracavitary lesions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017;5:CD011126
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Svirsky R, Smorgick N, Rozowski U, et al. Can we rely on blind endometrial biopsy for detection of focal intrauterine pathology? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;199:115.e1–115.e3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark TJ, Khan KS, Gupta JK. Current practice for the treatment of benign intrauterine polyps: a national questionnaire survey of consultant gynaecologists in UK. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2002;103:65–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timmermans A, van Dongen H, Mol BW, Veersema S, Jansen FW. Hysteroscopy and removal of endometrial polyps: a Dutch survey. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2008;138:76–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dijk LJ, Breijer MC, Veersema S, Mol BW, Timmermans A. Current practice in the removal of benign endometrial polyps: a Dutch survey. Gynecol Surg 2012;9:163–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Luerti M, Vitagliano A, Di Spiezio Sardo A, Angioni S, Garuti G, De Angelis C; Italian School of Minimally Invasive Gynecological Surgery Hysteroscopists Group. Effectiveness of hysteroscopic techniques for endometrial polyp removal: the Italian multicenter trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2019;26:1169–76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitale SG, Haimovich S, Riemma G, et al. Innovations in hysteroscopic surgery: expanding the meaning of "in-office". Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 2020 Jan 23:1–8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noventa M, Ancona E, Quaranta M, et al. Intrauterine morcellator devices: the icon of hysteroscopic future or merely a marketing image? A systematic review regarding safety, efficacy, advantages, and contraindications. Reprod Sci 2015;22:1289–96
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remondi C, Sesti F, Sorrenti G, et al. Hysteroscopic polypectomy: a comparison between 22 Fr and 26 Fr resectoscopes under paracervical block anesthesia, a randomized controlled study. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 2018;27:339–46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulo AAS, Solheiro MHR, Paulo COS, Afreixo VMA. What proportion of women refers moderate to severe pain during office hysteroscopy with a mini-hysteroscope? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2016;293:37–46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper NA, Smith P, Khan KS, Clark TJ. Vaginoscopic approach to outpatient hysteroscopy: a systematic review of the effect on pain. BJOG 2010;117:532–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bennett A, Lepage C, Thavorn K, et al. Effectiveness of outpatient versus operating room hysteroscopy for the diagnosis and treatment of uterine conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2019;41:930–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gambadauro P, Martínez-Maestre MA, Torrejón R. When is see-and-treat hysteroscopic polypectomy successful? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2014;178:70–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franchini M, Lippi G, Calzolari S, et al. Hysteroscopic endometrial polypectomy: clinical and economic data in decision making. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2018;25:418–25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood MA, Kerrigan KL, Burns MK, et al. Overcoming the challenging cervix: identification and techniques to access the uterine cavity. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2018;73:641–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polyzos NP, Mauri D, Tsioras S, Messini CI, Valachis A, Messinis IE. Intraperitoneal dissemination of endometrial cancer cells after hysteroscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2010;20:261–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gawron I, Ludwin A. Unexpected malignancy diagnosed in presumed symptomatic and asymptomatic endometrial polyps and submucosal myomas after hysteroscopic resection. Curr Gynecol Oncol 2018;16:143–9
   Google Scholar
• Kelly P, Dobbs SP, McCluggage WG. Endometrial hyperplasia involving endometrial polyps: report of a series and discussion of the significance in an endometrial biopsy specimen. BJOG 2007;114:944–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists. Endometrial Hyperplasia, Management of (Green-Top Guideline No. 67). https://www.rcog.org.uk/en/guidelines-research-services/guidelines/gtg67/. Last accessed June 16, 2020
   Google Scholar
• Jansen FW, Vredevoogd CB, van Ulzen K, Hermans J, Trimbos JB, Trimbos-Kemper TC. Complications of hysteroscopy: a prospective, multicenter study. Obstet Gynecol 2000;96:266–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aydeniz B, Gruber IV, Schauf B, Kurek R, Meyer A, Wallwiener D. A multicenter survey of complications associated with 21 676 operative hysteroscopies. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2002;104:160–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludwin A, Ludwin I, Pityński K, et al. Transrectal ultrasound-guided hysteroscopic myomectomy of submucosal myomas with a varying degree of myometrial penetration. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2013;20:672–85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laganà AS, Vitale SG, Muscia V, et al. Endometrial preparation with Dienogest before hysteroscopic surgery: a systematic review. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2017;295:661–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grow DR, Iromloo K. Oral contraceptives maintain a very thin endometrium before operative hysteroscopy. Fertil Steril 2006;85:204–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang JH, Chen CD, Chen SU, Yang YS, Chen MJ. Factors influencing the recurrence potential of benign endometrial polyps after hysteroscopic polypectomy. PLoS One 2015;10:e0144857
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guida M, Acunzo G, Di Spiezio Sardo A, et al. Effectiveness of auto-crosslinked hyaluronic acid gel in the prevention of intrauterine adhesions after hysteroscopic surgery: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Hum Reprod 2004;19:1461–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healy MW, Schexnayder B, Connell MT, et al. Intrauterine adhesion prevention after hysteroscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016;215:267–75.e7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludwin A, Martins WP, Ludwin I. Ultrasound-guided repeat intrauterine balloon dilatation for prevention of adhesions. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2019;54:566–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi X, Saravelos SH, Zhou Q, Huang X, Xia E, Li TC. Prevention of postoperative adhesion reformation by intermittent intrauterine balloon therapy: a randomised controlled trial. BJOG 2019;126:1259–66
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu F, Zhang H, Ruan S, et al. High number of endometrial polyps is a strong predictor of recurrence: findings of a prospective cohort study in reproductive-age women. Fertil Steril 2018;109:493–500
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henriquez DD, van Dongen H, Wolterbeek R, Jansen FW. Polypectomy in premenopausal women with abnormal uterine bleeding: effectiveness of hysteroscopic removal. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2007;14:59–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar