The Impact of Host-State Consent on the Protection of Civilians in UN Peacekeeping

References

• AfricaNews, 20 May 2022. MINUSMA cites restrictions on movement by Malian army.
   Google Scholar
• Bellamy, A.J. and Hunt, C.T., 2021. Using force to protect civilians in UN peacekeeping. Survival, 63 (3), 143–170. doi:10.1080/00396338.2021.1930411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellamy, A.J. and Williams, P.W., 2010. Understanding peacekeeping. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Briggs, C., 2017. Protection of civilians (POC) sites and their impact on the broader protection environment in South Sudan. Humanitarian Practice Network, January (68), 17–20.
   Google Scholar
• Day, A., et al., 2019. Assessing the effectiveness of the United Nations Mission in South Sudan (UNMISS). Oslo: Norwegian Institute of International Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Day, A. and Hunt, C.T., 2021. Distractions, distortions and dilemmas: the externalities of protecting civilians in United Nations Peacekeeping. Civil Wars, 24 (1), 97–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Waal, A., 2017. Peace and the security sector in Sudan, 2002–11. African Security Review, 26 (2), 180–198. doi:10.1080/10246029.2017.1297582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duursma, A., 2014. A current literature review of international mediation. International Journal of Conflict Management, 25 (1), 81–98. doi:10.1108/IJCMA-02-2012-0020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duursma, A., 2017. Counting deaths while keeping peace: an assessment of the JMAC’s field information and analysis capacity in Darfur. International Peacekeeping, 24 (5), 823–847. doi:10.1080/13533312.2017.1383567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duursma, A., 2018. Information processing challenges in peacekeeping operations: a case study on peacekeeping information collection efforts in Mali. International Peacekeeping, 25 (3), 446–468. doi:10.1080/13533312.2018.1446757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duursma, A., 2019. Obstruction and intimidation of peacekeepers: how armed actors undermine civilian protection efforts. Journal of Peace Research, 56 (2), 234–248. doi:10.1177/0022343318800522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duursma, A., 2020. Making disorder more manageable: the short-term effectiveness of local mediation in Darfur. Journal of Peace Research, 58 (3), 554–567. doi:10.1177/0022343319898241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duursma, A., 2021. Pinioning the peacekeepers: sovereignty, host-state resistance against peacekeeping operations, and violence against civilians. International Studies Review, 23 (3), 670–695. doi:10.1093/isr/viaa063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duursma, A., 2022a. Non-state conflicts, peacekeeping, and the conclusion of local agreements. Peacebuilding, 10 (2), 138–155. doi:10.1080/21647259.2022.2032946.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duursma, A., 2022b. State weakness, a fragmented patronage-based system, and protracted local conflict in the Central African Republic. African Affairs, 121 (483), 251–274. doi:10.1093/afraf/adac012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fjelde, H., Hultman, L., and Nilsson, D., 2019. Protection through presence: UN peacekeeping and the costs of targeting civilians. International Organisation, 73 (1), 103–131. doi:10.1017/S0020818318000346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorur, A., 2019. Managing host state consent and the protection of civilians. In: L. Sharland, ed. Evolution of the protection of civilians in UN peacekeeping. Evolution of the protection of civilians in UN peacekeeping. Canberra: Australian Strategic Policy Institute, 11–22.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, L.M., 2019. Power in peacekeeping. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• ICG, 2020. Saving the Central African Republic’s elections and averting another cycle of violence. Brussels: International Crisis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, H.F., 2016. South Sudan: the untold story from independence to the Civil War. I.B. Tauris.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, H.F., 2019. Protection of civilians in the United Nations: a peacekeeping illusion? In: C. de Coning and M. Peter, eds. United Nations peace operations in a changing global order. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 133–152.
   Google Scholar
• Johnstone, I., 2011. Managing consent in contemporary peacekeeping operations. International Peacekeeping, 18 (2), 168–182. doi:10.1080/13533312.2011.546091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlsrud, J., 2017. The UN at war: peace operations in a New Era. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Labuda, P.I., 2020. With or against the state? Reconciling the protection of civilians and host-state supporting UN peacekeeping. New York: International Peace Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Lanz, D., 2015. African Union-United Nations hybrid operation in Darfur (Unamid). In: J.A. Koops, et al., eds. Oxford handbook of United Nations peacekeeping operations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 779–790.
   Google Scholar
• Lindberg Bromley, S., 2018. Introducing the peacemakers at risk dataset, Sub-Saharan Africa 1989–2009. Journal of Peace Research, 55 (1), 122–131. doi:10.1177/0022343317735882.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindberg Bromley, S., 2022. Hazards of peacekeeping: peacekeepers as targets of violence. In: H.D. Dorussen, ed. Handbook on Peacekeeping and International Relations. Edward Elgar Publishing, 300–313.
   Google Scholar
• Lombard, L., 2016. State of rebellion: violence and intervention in the Central African Republic. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• O’Bryan, T., Rendtorff-Smith, S., and Donati, M., 2017. The role of United Nations peacekeeping operations in addressing local conflicts: a study of practice. United Nations departments of peacekeeping operations and field support policy, evaluation and training division policy and best practices service.
   Google Scholar
• Passmore, T., Karreth, J., and Tir, J. (2022) Consent in peacekeeping. In: H. Dorussen, ed. Handbook on Peacekeeping and International Relations. Edward Elgar Publishing, 46–59.
   Google Scholar
• Piccolino, G. and Karlsrud, J., 2011. Withering consent, but mutual dependency: UN peace operations and African assertiveness. Conflict, Security & Development, 11 (4), 447–471. doi:10.1080/14678802.2011.614128.
   Google Scholar
• Pushkina, D., Siewert, M.B., and Wolff, S., 2022. Mission (Im)possible? UN military peacekeeping operations in civil wars. European Journal of International Relations, 28 (1), 158–186. doi:10.1177/13540661211046602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayroux, A. and Wilén, N., 2014. Resisting ownership: the paralysis of EU peacebuilding in the Congo. African Security, 7 (1), 24–44. doi:10.1080/19392206.2014.880030.
   Google Scholar
• Rhoads, E.P., 2016. Taking sides in peacekeeping: impartiality and the future of the United Nations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rhoads, E.P., 2019. Putting human rights up front: implications for impartiality and the politics of UN peacekeeping. International Peacekeeping, 26 (3), 281–301. doi:10.1080/13533312.2018.1561184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roger, B., 2022. Mass grave in Niono: MINUSMA accuses Malian army and Wagner group. The Africa Report, 15 March 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Seawright, J. and Gerring, J., 2008. Case selection techniques in case study research: a menu of qualitative and quantitative options. Political Research Quarterly, 61 (2), 294–308. doi:10.1177/1065912907313077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sebastián, S. and Gorur, A., 2018. U.N. peacekeeping & host-state consent: how missions navigate relationships with governments. Washington, DC: Stimson Center.
   Google Scholar
• Sharland, L., 2019 Protection of civilians in UN peacekeeping: a decade of seeking consensus. In: L. Sharland, ed. Evolution of the protection of civilians in UN peacekeeping. Canberra: Australian Strategic Policy Institute, 34–41.
   Google Scholar
• Smidt, H.M., 2020. United Nations peacekeeping locally: enabling conflict resolution, reducing communal violence. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 64 (2–3), 344–372. doi:10.1177/0022002719859631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sudan Tribune, 22 August 2017. S. Sudan rebels urge government and UN to resolve impasse.
   Google Scholar
• UN, 2014. Report of the secretary-general on South Sudan, S/2014/537. 25 July 2014.
   Google Scholar
• UN, 2019. Report of the secretary-general on the Central African Republic Report, S/2019/147. 15 February 2019.
   Google Scholar
• UN, 2020a. Protection of civilians In united nations peacekeeping handbook. New York: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• UN, 2020b. Report of the secretary-general on the Central African Republic Report, S/2020/994. 12 October 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Vertin, Z., 2018. A poisoned well: lessons in mediation from south sudan’s troubled peace process. New York: International Peace Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, P.W., 2013. Protection, resilience and empowerment: United Nations peacekeeping and violence against civilians in contemporary war zones. Politics, 33 (4), 287–298. doi:10.1111/1467-9256.12014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuen, A., 2020. Negotiating peacekeeping consent: information and peace outcomes. Journal of Peace Research, 57 (2), 297–311. doi:10.1177/0022343319861424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahar, M.-J. and Mechoulan, D., 2017. Peace by pieces? Local mediation and sustainable peace in the Central African Republic. New York: International Peace Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, S., 2020. Defining state authority: UN peace operations efforts to extend state authority in Mali and the Central African Republic. Stability: International Journal of Security and Development, 9 (1). doi:10.5334/sta.762.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar