Global Termination and Recurrence Macro Trends: A Follow-Up to Licklider and Dixon

References

• Collier, P., 2003. Breaking the conflict trap: civil war and development policy. 41181 (4). World Bank Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Collier, P. and Sambanis, N., 2002. Understanding civil war: a new agenda. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 46 (1), 3–12. doi:10.1177/0022002702046001001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David Mason, T., et al., 2011. When civil wars recur: Conditions for durable peace after civil wars. International Studies Perspectives, 12 (2), 171–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Rouen, K., Jr and Sobek, D., 2004. The dynamics of civil war duration and outcome. Journal of Peace Research, 41 (3), 303–320. doi:10.1177/0022343304043771.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon, J., 2009. Emerging consensus: results from the second wave of statistical studies on civil war termination. Civil Wars, 11 (2), 121–136. doi:10.1080/13698240802631053.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, M.W. and Sambanis, N., 2000. International peacebuilding: A theoretical and quantitative analysis. The American Political Science Review, 94 (4), 779–801.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duyvesteyn, I., 2021. Rebels and conflict escalation: explaining the rise and decline of Rebel Violence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fontana, G. and Neudorfer, N., 2021. The dataset of political agreements in internal conflicts (PAIC). Conflict Management and Peace Science, 38 (3), 338–364. doi:10.1177/0738894220944123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glassmyer, K. and Sambanis, N., 2008. Rebel—military integration and civil war termination. Journal of Peace Research, 45 (3), 365–384. doi:10.1177/0022343308088816.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gromes, T. and Ranft, F., 2021. Preventing civil war recurrence: do military victories really perform better than peace agreements? Causal claim and underpinning assumptions revisited. Civil Wars, 23 (4), 612–636. doi:10.1080/13698249.2022.2004043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurses, M. and Rost, N., 2013. Sustaining the peace after ethnic civil wars. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 30 (5), 469–491. doi:10.1177/0738894213499667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harff, B., 2003. No lessons learned from the holocaust? Assessing risks of genocide and political mass murder since 1955. The American Political Science Review, 97 (1), 57–73. doi:10.1017/S0003055403000522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Högbladh, S., 2022. UCDP peace agreement dataset codebook v 22.1.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, L.M. and Stark, A., 2017. How civil wars end: the international system, norms, and the role of external actors. International Security, 42 (3), 127–171. doi:10.1162/ISEC_a_00305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi, M., Quinn, J., and Patrick, R., 2015. Annualised implementation data on comprehensive intrastate peace accords, 1989–2012. Journal of Peace Research, 52 (4), 551–562. doi:10.1177/0022343314567486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreutz, J., 2010. How and when armed conflicts end: introducing the UCDP conflict termination dataset. Journal of Peace Research, 47 (2), 243–250. doi:10.1177/0022343309353108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Licklider, R., 1995. The consequences of negotiated settlements in civil wars, 1945–1993. The American Political Science Review, 89 (3), 681–690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Licklider, R., 1998. Early returns: results of the first wave of statistical studies of civil war termination. Civil Wars, 1 (3), 121–132. doi:10.1080/13698249808402384.
   Google Scholar
• Mattes, M. and Savun, B., 2010. Information, agreement design, and the durability of civil war settlements. American Journal of Political Science, 54 (2), 511–524. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00444.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukherjee, S., 2014. Why are the longest insurgencies low violence? Politician motivations, sons of the soil, and civil war duration. Civil Wars, 16 (2), 172–207. doi:10.1080/13698249.2014.927702.
   Google Scholar
• Pettersson, T., Högbladh, S., and Öberg, M., 2019. Organized violence, 1989–2018 and peace agreements. Journal of Peace Research, 56 (4), 589–603. doi:10.1177/0022343319856046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poe, S. and Tate, N., 1994. Repression of human rights to personal integrity in the 1980s: a global analysis. American Political Science Review, 88 (4), 853–872. doi:10.2307/2082712.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, J.M. and Thyne, C.L., 2011. Global instances of coups from 1950 to 2010: a new dataset. Journal of Peace Research, 48 (2), 249–259. doi:10.1177/0022343310397436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn, J., Joshi, M., and Melander, E., 2019. One dyadic peace leads to another? Conflict systems, terminations, and net reduction in fighting groups. International Studies Quarterly, 63 (4), 863–875. doi:10.1093/isq/sqz073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn, J., Michael, T.D.M., and Gurses, M., 2007. Sustaining the peace: Determinants of civil war recurrence. International Interactions, 33 (2), 167–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sambanis, N., 2004. What is civil war? Conceptual and empirical complexities of an operational definition. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 48 (6), 814–858. doi:10.1177/0022002704269355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentino, B., 2000. Final solutions: the causes of mass killing and genocide. Security Studies, 9 (3), 1–59. doi:10.1080/09636410008429405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter, B., 2004. Does conflict beget conflict? Explaining recurring civil war. Journal of Peace Research, 41 (3), 371–388. doi:10.1177/0022343304043775.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter, B., 2015. Why bad governance leads to repeat civil war. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 59 (7), 1242–1272. doi:10.1177/0022002714528006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter, B.F., 1997. The critical barrier to civil war settlement. International Organization, 51 (3), 335–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, R., 2010. Rebel capability and strategic violence against civilians. Journal of Peace Research, 47 (5), 601–614. doi:10.1177/0022343310376473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar