Civil Wars: Escalation and De-Escalation

References

• Barkawi, T., 2016. Decolonising war. European Journal of International Security, 1 (2), 199–214. doi:10.1017/eis.2016.7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartusevičius, H. and Gleditsch, K.S., 2019. A two-stage approach to civil conflict: contested incompatibilities and armed violence. International Organization, 73 (1), 225–248. doi:10.1017/S0020818318000425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartusevičius, H. and van Leeuwen, F., 2022. Poor prospects—not inequality—motivate political violence. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 66 (7–8), 1393–1421. doi:10.1177/00220027221074647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, M., 2017. Why violence abates: imposed and elective declines in terrorist attacks. Terrorism and Political Violence, 29 (2), 215–235. doi:10.1080/09546553.2015.1011799.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bejarano, A. and Pizarro, E., 2010. Colombia: el colapso parcial del Estado y la emergencia de los protoestados. El Estado en Colombia, 381–412.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, A. and Checkel, J.T., eds., 2015. Process tracing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beyerchen, A., 1992. Clausewitz, nonlinearity, and the unpredictability of war. International Security, 17 (3), 59–90. doi:10.2307/2539130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biddle, S., 2021. Nonstate warfare: the military methods of guerillas, warlords, and militias. Cambridge, UK: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bjørgo, T., ed., 2004. Root causes of terrorism: myths, reality and ways forward. New Jersey, USA: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Blair, R.A. and Sambanis, N., 2020. Forecasting civil wars: theory and structure in an age of “big data” and machine learning. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 64 (10), 1885–1915. doi:10.1177/0022002720918923.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodea, C. and Elbadawi, I., 2007. Riots, coups and civil war: revisiting the greed and grievance debate. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, (4397).
   Google Scholar
• Bosi, L., Della Porta, D., and Malthaner, S., 2019. Organizational and institutional approaches. In: E. Chenoweth, A. Gofas, S. Kalyvas, and R English (eds.), The Oxford handbook of terrorism. Oxford, Oxford University Press, p. 133.
   Google Scholar
• Breznau, N., et al., 2022. Observing many researchers using the same data and hypothesis reveals a hidden universe of uncertainty. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119 (44), e2203150119. doi:10.1073/pnas.2203150119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cable, V., 1969. The ‘football war’ and the central American common market. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-), 45 (4), 658–671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chenoweth, E., 2020. The future of nonviolent resistance. Journal of Democracy, 31 (3), 69–84. doi:10.1353/jod.2020.0046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chenoweth, E., et al., 2022. A dynamic model of nonviolent resistance strategy. Plos One, 17 (7), e0269976. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0269976.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chenoweth, E. and Perkoski, E., 2019. A source of escalation or a source of restraint? An empirical investigation of how civil society affects mass killings. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3451355.
   Google Scholar
• Chenoweth, E. and Shay, C.W., 2022. Updating nonviolent campaigns: introducing NAVCO 2.1. Journal of Peace Research, 59 (6), 876–889. doi:10.1177/00223433221092938.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chenoweth, E. and Ulfelder, J., 2017. Can structural conditions explain the onset of nonviolent uprisings? Journal of Conflict Resolution, 61 (2), 298–324. doi:10.1177/0022002715576574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clausewitz, C.V., 1993. On war [Vom Kriege]. Michael Howard and Peter Paret eds. transl. New York: Everyman’s Library.
   Google Scholar
• Clayton, G., et al., 2022. Ceasefires in civil conflict: a research agenda. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 67, 00220027221128300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier, P. and Hoeffler, A., 2005. Resource rents, governance, and conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 49 (4), 625–633. doi:10.1177/0022002705277551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cramer, C., 1997. “Civil war is not a stupid thing”: exploring growth, distribution and conflict linkages . Department of Economics, School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London. https://www.soas.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2022-10/economics-wp073.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, D.E. and Lemke, D., 2014. Beyond civil war: a quantitative examination of causes of violence within countries. Civil Wars, 16 (3), 328–345. doi:10.1080/13698249.2014.976356.
   Google Scholar
• Della Porta, D., et al., 2017. Social movements and civil war: when protests for democratization fail. New York, USA: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Diaz, F.A. and Murshed, S.M., 2013. ‘Give war a chance’: all-out war as a means of ending conflict in the cases of Sri Lanka and Colombia. Civil Wars, 15 (3), 281–305. doi:10.1080/13698249.2013.842743.
   Google Scholar
• Díaz Pabón, F.A. (2022). Connecting expressions of discontent: the processes of escalation, de-escalation, and recurrence of conflict in Colombia and South Africa. Thesis (PhD). Erasmus University Rotterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Douek, D.L., 2020. Insurgency and counterinsurgency in South Africa. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Drury, J., et al., 2020. A social identity model of riot diffusion: From injustice to empowerment in the 2011 London riots. European Journal of Social Psychology, 50 (3), 646–661. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudouet, V., 2013. Dynamics and factors of transition from armed struggle to nonviolent resistance. Journal of Peace Research, 50 (3), 401–413. doi:10.1177/0022343312469978.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durán, M.G., 2006. Paz en el territorio: dinámica de expansión geográfica del accionar colectivo por la paz en Colombia 1978-2003. Territorios, 15, 9–32.
   Google Scholar
• Duyvesteyn, I., 2021. Rebels and conflict escalation: explaining the rise and decline in violence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duyvesteyn, I. and Fumerton, M., 2009. Insurgency and terrorism: is there a difference? In: The character of war in the 21st century. Abingdon, UK: Routledge, pp. 39–53.
   Google Scholar
• Ellefsen, R., 2021. The unintended consequences of escalated repression. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 26 (1), 87–108. doi:10.17813/1086-671X-26-1-87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galtung, J., 1999. Conflict transformation by peaceful means: the transcend method. Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations Disaster Management Training Programme (DMTP).
   Google Scholar
• Germann, M. and Sambanis, N., 2021. Political exclusion, lost autonomy, and escalating conflict over self-determination. International Organization, 75 (1), 178–203. doi:10.1017/S0020818320000557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurr, T.R., 2011. Why men rebel. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez-Sanín, F. and Wood, E.J., 2017. What should we mean by “pattern of political violence”? Repertoire, targeting, frequency, and technique. Perspectives on Politics, 15 (1), 20–41. doi:10.1017/S1537592716004114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegre, H., Nygård, H.M., and Ræder, R.F., 2017. Evaluating the scope and intensity of the conflict trap: a dynamic simulation approach. Journal of Peace Research, 54 (2), 243–261. doi:10.1177/0022343316684917.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holsti, O.R., 1972. Crisis, escalation, war. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kahn, H., 2012. On escalation: metaphors and scenarios. New Brunswick: Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• Kalyvas, S., 2006. The logic of violence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kalyvas, S. and Straus, S., 2020. Stathis Kalyvas on 20 years of studying political violence. Violence: An International Journal, 1 (2), 389–407.
   Google Scholar
• Kang, S., 2023. Upping the ante without taking up arms: Why mass movements escalate demands. Journal of Peace Research, 60 (1), 73–87. doi:10.1177/00223433221137614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karl, R.A., 2018. La paz olvidada: Políticos, letrados, campesinos y el surgimiento de las FARC en la formación de la Colombia contemporánea. Bogotá: Librería Lerner.
   Google Scholar
• Kocaman, I., Haskologlu, I., and Kirisci, M., 2023. Why do some terrorist campaigns escalate to civil wars but others do not? Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict, 16 (1), 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Krulak, C., 1999. The “strategic corporal”; leadership in the three block war. Marines Magazine (January).
   Google Scholar
• Lederach, J.P., 1996. Preparing for peace: conflict transformation across cultures. Syracuse, NY.: Syracuse University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lenin, V., 1968. The state and revolution. In: U. Books, eds. The essential left: four classic texts on the principles of socialism. Liverpool: Unwin Books, pp. 147–254.
   Google Scholar
• López, C., 2010. Y refundaron la patria … De cómo mafiosos y políticos reconfiguraron el Estado colombiano. Bogotá: Debate.
   Google Scholar
• Luttwak, E.N., 1999. Give war a chance. Foreign Affairs, 78 (4), 36. doi:10.2307/20049362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAdam, D., Tarrow, S., and Tilly, C., 2001. Dynamics of contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCauley, C. and Moskalenko, S., 2008. Mechanisms of political radicalization: pathways toward terrorism. Terrorism and Political Violence, 20 (3), 415–433. doi:10.1080/09546550802073367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, F.E., et al., 2008. Dangerous thresholds: managing escalation in the 21st century. Santa Monica, CA.: Rand Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Neumann, P. and Kleinmann, S., 2013. How rigorous is radicalization research? Democracy and Security, 9 (4), 360–382. doi:10.1080/17419166.2013.802984.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, E., 2006. Exploring the “root causes” of terrorism. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 29 (8), 749–772. doi:10.1080/10576100600704069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, M., 2009. The logic of collective action: public goods and the theory of groups. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paoletti, E., 2011. Libya: roots of a civil conflict. Mediterranean Politics, 16 (2), 313–319. doi:10.1080/13629395.2011.583757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, P., 2005. No peace, no war: the anthropology of contemporary armed conflicts. Suffolk: James Currey.
   Google Scholar
• Rød, E.G. and Weidmann, N.B., 2021. Protests and armed conflict in autocracies explaining escalation trajectories. [Paper presentation] Conflict research society 2021 conference, 8–10 September. Virtual Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Ryckman, K.C., 2020. A turn to violence: the escalation of nonviolent movements. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 64 (2–3), 318–343. doi:10.1177/0022002719861707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sambanis, N., 2004. Using case studies to expand economic models of civil war. Perspectives on Politics, 2 (2), 259–279. doi:10.1017/S1537592704040149.
   Google Scholar
• Schelling, T.C., 2008. Arms and influence. New Haven, CT.: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schock, K. and Demetriou, C., 2018. Nonviolent and violent trajectories in social movements.In: David A. Snow, Sarah A. Soule, Hanspeter Kriesi, Holly, and J. McCammon (eds.), The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, 338–353. New Jersey: USA, Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Shaheen, S., 2015. Social uprisings: conceptualization, measurement, causes and implications. Thesis (PhD). Marburg University Library.
   Google Scholar
• Shultziner, D. and Goldberg, S., 2019. The stages of mass mobilization: separate phenomena and distinct causal mechanisms. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 49 (1), 2–23. doi:10.1111/jtsb.12187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skocpol, T., 1979. States and social revolutions: a comparative analysis of France, Russia and China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M.L.R., 2003. Guerrillas in the mist: reassessing strategy and low intensity warfare. Review of International Studies, 29 (1), 19–37. doi:10.1017/S0260210503000020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smoke, R., 1977. War: controlling escalation. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, J., 1977. The soviet strategic culture. implications for limited nuclear operations. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
   Google Scholar
• Tarrow, S., 1993. Cycles of collective action: between moments of madness and the repertoire of contention. Social Science History, 17 (2), 281–307. doi:10.2307/1171283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarrow, S., 2021. Progress outside of paradise: old and new comparative approaches to contentious politics. Comparative Political Studies, 54 (10), 1885–1901. doi:10.1177/00104140211024297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarrow, S.G., 2015. War, states, and contention: a comparative historical study. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tilly, C., 2006. Regimes and repertoires. 1st ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tilly, C. and Wood, L.J., 2016. Social movements 1768–2012. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tschantret, J., 2023. Social origins of modern terrorism, 1860–1945. Security Studies, 32 (1), 66–100. doi:10.1080/09636412.2023.2178962.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Riper, P., 2014. The foundation of strategic thinking. Infinity Journal, 2 (3), 4–10.
   Google Scholar
• Waldman, T., 2010. Politics and war: Clausewitz’s paradoxical equation. The US Army War College Quarterly: Parameters, 40 (3), 13.
   Google Scholar
• Wieviorka, M., 2016. Salir de la violencia Una obra pendiente para las ciencias humanas y sociales. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales, 61 (226), 89–106. doi:10.1016/S0185-1918(16)30004-6.
   Google Scholar
• Wohlstetter, A. and Wohlstetter, R., 1965. Controlling the risks in Cuba. Adelphi Papers, 5 (17), 3–24.
   Google Scholar
• Zartman, I.W., 2000. Ripeness: the hurting stalemate and beyond. International Conflict Resolution After the Cold War, 2, 225–250.
   Google Scholar