Re-examining the State/Non-State Binary in the Study of (Civil) War

References

• Arjona, A., 2016. Rebelocracy. Social order in the Colombian civil war. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ashour, O., 2021. How ISIS fights. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aydinli, E., 2016. Violent non-state actors. From anarchists to jihadists. Abingdon/New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Azani, E., 2013. The hybrid terrorist organization. Hezbollah as a case study. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 36 (11), 899–916. doi:10.1080/1057610X.2013.832113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behera, N.C., 2020. State and sovereignty. In: A.B. Tickner and K. Smith, eds. International relations from the global South. Worlds of difference. Abingdon, New York, NY: Routledge, 139–160.
   Google Scholar
• Berti, B., 2016. What’s in a name? Re-conceptualizing non-state armed groups in the Middle East. Palgrave Communications, 2 (1), 1–8. doi:10.1057/palcomms.2016.89.
   Google Scholar
• Berti, B., 2023. From cooperation to competition. Localization, militarization and rebel co-governance arrangements in Syria. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 46 (2), 209–227. doi:10.1080/1057610X.2020.1776964.
   Google Scholar
• Biddle, S.D., 2021. Nonstate warfare. The military methods of guerillas, warlords, and militias. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biersteker, T.J. and Weber, C., 1996. The social construction of state sovereignty. In: T.J. Biersteker and C. Weber, eds. State sovereignty as social construct. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Bigo, D., 2011. Pierre Bourdieu and international relations. Power of practices, practices of power. International Political Sociology, 5 (3), 225–258. doi:10.1111/j.1749-5687.2011.00132.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boege, V., Brown, M.A., and Clements, K.P., 2009. Hybrid political orders, not fragile states. Peace Review, 21 (1), 13–21. doi:10.1080/10402650802689997.
   Google Scholar
• Bogaards, M., 2009. How to classify hybrid regimes? Defective democracy and electoral authoritarianism. Democratization, 16 (2), 399–423. doi:10.1080/13510340902777800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buscemi, F., 2023. ‘Blunt’ biopolitical rebel rule. On weapons and political geography at the edge of the state. Small Wars & Insurgencies, 34 (1), 81–112. doi:10.1080/09592318.2022.2121389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Call, C.T.M., 2008. The fallacy of the ‘failed state’. Third World Quarterly, 29 (8), 1491–1507. doi:10.1080/01436590802544207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cambanis, T., et al., 2019. Hybrid actors. Armed groups and state fragmentation in the Middle East. New York, NY: The Century Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Chivvis, C.S., 2017. Understanding Russian 'hybrid warfare’ and what can be done about it. In: Testimony presented before the house armed services committee on March 22, 2017. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation. doi:10.7249/CT468.
   Google Scholar
• Clément, M., Geis, A., and Pfeifer, H., 2021. Recognising armed non-state actors. Risks and opportunities for conflict transformation. In: A. Geis, M. Clément, and H. Pfeifer, eds. Armed non-state actors and the politics of recognition. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 3–29.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, M. and Miscik, J., 2010. The rise of the mezzanine rulers. Foreign Affairs, 89 (6), 123–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham, D.E. and Lemke, D., 2013. Combining civil and interstate wars. International Organization, 67 (3), 609–627. doi:10.1017/S0020818313000167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daase, C., et al., eds. 2015. Recognition in international relations. In: Rethinking a political concept in a global context. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1057/9781137464729.
   Google Scholar
• Darwich, M., 2021. Foreign policy analysis and armed non-state actors in world politics. Lessons from the Middle East. Foreign Policy Analysis, 17 (4), 1–11. doi:10.1093/fpa/orab030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day, C.R. and Reno, W.S., 2014. In harm’s way. African counter-insurgency and patronage politics. Civil Wars, 16 (2), 105–126. doi:10.1080/13698249.2014.927699.
   Google Scholar
• Decina, A. and Nazemi, K., 2019. Assad’s control over syria’s security apparatus is limited Washington Post, 01 Aug 2019. Avaliable from: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2019/07/30/assads-control-over-syrias-security-apparatus-is-limited/ [ Avaliable from].
   Google Scholar
• Eleftheriadou, M., 2023. Non-state armed actors and contested sovereignties in internationalized civil wars. The case of yemen’s civil war (2015–). International Politics, 60 (1), 134–153. doi:10.1057/s41311-021-00279-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fazal, T.M. and Konaev, M., 2019. Homelands versus Minelands. Why do armed groups commit to the laws of war? Journal of Global Security Studies, 4 (2), 149–168. doi:10.1093/jogss/ogz005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filiu, J.-P., 2015. From deep state to Islamic State. The Arab Counter-revolution and its jihadi legacy. London: Hurst & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Florea, A., 2020. Rebel governance in de facto states. European Journal of International Relations, 26 (4), 1004–1031. doi:10.1177/1354066120919481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furlan, M., 2020. Understanding governance by insurgent non-state actors. A multi-dimensional typology. Civil Wars, 22 (4), 478–511. doi:10.1080/13698249.2020.1785725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geis, A., Clément, M., and Pfeifer, H., eds., 2021. Armed non-state actors and the politics of recognition. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glawion, T., 2020. The security arena in Africa. Local order-making in the central African republic, somaliland, and South Sudan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grzybowski, J., 2019. The paradox of state identification. De facto states, recognition, and the (re-)production of the international. International Theory, 11 (3), 241–263. doi:10.1017/S1752971919000113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunning, J., 2008. Hamas in politics. Democracy, religion, violence. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hagmann, T. and Péclard, D., 2010. Negotiating statehood. Dynamics of power and domination in Africa. Development and Change, 41 (4), 539–562. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7660.2010.01656.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heydemann, S., 2018. Civil war, economic governance & state reconstruction in the Arab Middle East. Daedalus, 147 (1), 48–63. doi:10.1162/DAED_a_00473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jentzsch, C., 2017. Auxiliary armed forces and innovations in security governance in Mozambique’s civil war. Civil Wars, 19 (3), 325–347. doi:10.1080/13698249.2017.1412752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jo, H. and Thomson, C.P.M., 2014. Legitimacy and compliance with international law. Access to detainees in civil conflicts, 1991–2006. British Journal of Political Science, 44 (2), 323–355. doi:10.1017/S0007123412000749.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalyvas, S.N., 2019. The landscape of political violence. In: E. Chenoweth, R. English, A. Gofas, and S.N. Kalyvas, eds. The Oxford handbook of terrorism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 11–33. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198732914.013.1.
   Google Scholar
• Kao, K. and Revkin, M.R., 2021. Retribution or reconciliation? Post‐conflict attitudes toward enemy collaborators. American Journal of Political Science, 67 (2), 358–373. doi:10.1111/ajps.12673.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karahamad, M. and Schwab, R., 2023. Arab states’ incentives towards (not) normalizing relations with Syria. Islamists and drug trafficking?. PRIF Blog. Available from: https://blog.prif.org/2023/05/16/arab-states-incentives-towards-not-normalizing-relations-with-syria-islamists-and-drug-trafficking/ Available from.
   Google Scholar
• Karlén, N. et al., 2021. Forum: Conflict delegation in civil wars. International Studies Review, 23 (4), 2048–2078. doi:10.1093/isr/viab053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlén, N. and Rauta, V., 2023. Dealers and brokers in civil wars. Why states delegate rebel support to conduit countries. International security, 47 (4), 107–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasfir, N., Frerks, G., and Terpstra, N., 2017. Introduction. Armed groups and multi-layered governance. Civil Wars, 19 (3), 257–278. doi:10.1080/13698249.2017.1419611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilcullen, D., 2020. The dragons and the snakes. How the rest learned to fight the West. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kleczkowska, A., 2018. Armed non-state actors and customary international law. In: J. Summers and A. Gough, eds. Non-state actors and international obligations. Creation, evolution and enforcement. Leiden: Brill, 60–85. doi:10.1163/9789004340251_005.
   Google Scholar
• Krieg, A., 2023. Security assistance to surrogates. How the UAE secures its regional objectives. Mediterranean Politics, 1–24. doi:10.1080/13629395.2023.2183659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruck, A. and Schneiker, A., eds., 2017. Researching non-state actors in international security. Theory and practice. Abingdon/New York, NY: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315669830.
   Google Scholar
• Leenders, R. and Giustozzi, A., 2022. Foreign sponsorship of pro-government militias fighting syria’s insurgency. Whither proxy wars? Mediterranean Politics, 27 (5), 614–643. doi:10.1080/13629395.2020.1839235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mampilly, Z.C., 2011. Rebel rulers. Insurgent governance and civilian life during war. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mansour, R., 2021. The ‘hybrid armed actors’ paradox. A necessary compromise? War on the Rocks. Available from: https://warontherocks.com/2021/01/the-hybrid-armed-actors-paradox-a-necessary-compromise/ [ Available from].
   Google Scholar
• Meier, V., et al., 2023. External support in armed conflicts. Introducing the UCDP external support dataset (ESD), 1975–2017. Journal of Peace Research, 60 (3), 545–554. doi:10.1177/00223433221079864.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Migdal, J.S. and Schlichte, K., 2005. Rethinking the state. In: K. Schlichte, ed. The dynamics of states. The formation and crises of state domination. Aldershot: Ashgate, 1–40.
   Google Scholar
• Moghadam, A. and Wyss, M., 2020. The political power of proxies. Why nonstate actors use local surrogates. International Security, 44 (4), 119–157. doi:10.1162/isec_a_00377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumford, A., 2013. Proxy warfare. War and conflict in the modern world. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mutschler, M. and Bales, M., 2023. Liquid or solid warfare? Autocratic states, non-state armed groups and the socio-spatial dimension of warfare in Yemen. Geopolitics, 1–29. doi:10.1080/14650045.2023.2165915.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nance, M.W., 2015. The terrorists of Iraq. Inside the strategy and tactics of the Iraq insurgency 2003–2014. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press/Taylor & Francis Group. doi:10.1201/b17944
   Google Scholar
• Ostovar, A., 2019. The grand strategy of militant clients. Iran’s way of war. Security Studies, 28 (1), 159–188. doi:10.1080/09636412.2018.1508862.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeifer, H., 2021. Recognition dynamics and Lebanese Hezbollah’s role in regional conflicts. In: A. Geis, M. Clément, and H. Pfeifer, eds. Armed non-state actors and the politics of recognition. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 148–170.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeifer, H. and Schwab, R., 2023. Politicising the rebel governance paradigm. Critical appraisal and expansion of a research agenda. Introduction to the special issue. Small Wars & Insurgencies, 34 (1), 1–23. doi:10.1080/09592318.2022.2144000.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, C. and Valbjørn, M., 2018. ‘What is in a name?’ The role of (different) identities in the multiple proxy wars in Syria. Small Wars & Insurgencies, 29 (3), 414–433. doi:10.1080/09592318.2018.1455328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podder, S., 2014. Mainstreaming the non-state in bottom-up state-building. Linkages between rebel governance and post-conflict legitimacy. Conflict, Security & Development, 14 (2), 213–243. doi:10.1080/14678802.2014.889878.
   Google Scholar
• Revkin, M.R., 2021a. Competitive governance and displacement decisions under rebel rule. Evidence from the Islamic State in Iraq. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 65 (1), 46–80. doi:10.1177/0022002720951864.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revkin, M.R., 2021b. Insurgent legality. State-building and failure of the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria. Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting, 115, 297–302. doi:10.1017/amp.2021.116
   Google Scholar
• Rondeaux, C. and Sterman, D., 2019. Twenty-first century proxy warfare. Confronting strategic innovation in a multipolar world since the 2011 NATO intervention. Washington, DC: New America Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Sambanis, N., 2004. What is civil war? Journal of Conflict Resolution, 48 (6), 814–858. doi:10.1177/0022002704269355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saouli, A., 2018. Hezbollah. Socialisation and its tragic ironies. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. doi:10.1515/9781474419529
   Google Scholar
• Sarkees, M.R., 2014. Patterns of civil wars in the twenty-first century. The decline of civil war? In: E. Newman and K.R. DeRouen, eds. Routledge handbook of civil wars. London/New York, NY: Routledge, 236–256.
   Google Scholar
• Sarkees, M.R. and Wayman, F.W., 2010. Resort to war. A data guide to inter-state, extra-state, intra-state, and non-state wars, 1816–2007. Washington, DC: CQ Press. doi:10.4135/9781608718276
   Google Scholar
• Schlichte, K., 2012. The limits of armed contestation. power and domination in armed groups. Geoforum, 43 (4), 716–724. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2012.03.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlichte, K. and Schneckener, U., 2015. Armed groups and the politics of legitimacy. Civil Wars, 17 (4), 409–424. doi:10.1080/13698249.2015.1115573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwab, R., 2023. Escalate or negotiate? Constraint and rebel strategic choices towards rivals in the Syrian civil war. Terrorism and Political Violence, 35 (4), 1007–1026. doi:10.1080/09546553.2021.1998007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sosnowski, M., 2020. Negotiating statehood through ceasefires. Syria’s de-escalation zones. Small Wars & Insurgencies, 31 (7–8), 1395–1414. doi:10.1080/09592318.2020.1829872.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speckhard, A. and Yayla, A.S., 2017. The ISIS emni. Origins and inner workings of ISIS’s intelligence apparatus. Perspectives on Terrorism, 11 (1), 2–16.
   Google Scholar
• Staniland, P., 2012. States, insurgents, and wartime political orders. Perspectives on Politics, 10 (2), 243–264. doi:10.1017/S1537592712000655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staniland, P., 2021. Ordering violence. Explaining armed group-state relations from conflict to cooperation. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stanton, J.A., 2015. Regulating militias. Governments, militias, and civilian targeting in civil war. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 59 (5), 899–923.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stel, N., 2017. Mediated stateness as a continuum. Exploring the changing governance relations between the PLO and the Lebanese state. Civil Wars, 19 (3), 348–376. doi:10.1080/13698249.2017.1396096.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoddard, E., 2023. Maoist hybridity? A comparative analysis of the links between insurgent strategic practice and tactical hybridity in contemporary non-state armed groups. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 46 (6), 913–937.
   Google Scholar
• Terpstra, N. and Frerks, G., 2017. Rebel governance and legitimacy. Understanding the impact of rebel legitimation on civilian compliance with the LTTE rule. Civil Wars, 19 (3), 279–307. doi:10.1080/13698249.2017.1393265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Transfeld, M., et al., 2022. Local security governance in Yemen in times of war. The cases of al-Hudayda, Ta‘iz and Aden. YPC/CAPRO Policy Report, 4, 1–88.
   Google Scholar
• Waterman, A., 2023. The shadow of ‘the boys’. Rebel governance without territorial control in Assam’s ULFA insurgency. Small Wars & Insurgencies, 34 (1), 279–304. doi:10.1080/09592318.2022.2120324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waterman, A. and Worrall, J., 2020. Spinning multiple plates under fire. The importance of ordering processes in civil wars. Civil Wars, 22 (4), 567–590. doi:10.1080/13698249.2020.1858527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, C., 1998. Performative states. Millennium – Journal of International Studies, 27 (1), 77–95. doi:10.1177/03058298980270011101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, M., 1946. Politics as vocation. In: H.H. Gerth and C. Wright Mills, eds. From Max Weber. Essays in sociology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 77–128.
   Google Scholar
• Wille, T., 2023. Bureaucracy and the everyday practices of contested state diplomacy. The paradigmatic case of Kosovo. Review of International Studies, 1–19. doi:10.1017/S0260210522000602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worrall, J., 2017. (Re-)emergent orders. Understanding the negotiation(s) of rebel governance. Small Wars & Insurgencies, 28 (4–5), 709–733.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worrall, J., Mabon, S., and Clubb, G., 2015. Hezbollah: From Islamic resistance to government. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Ziaja, S., Grävingholt, J., and Kreibaum, M., 2019. Constellations of fragility. An empirical typology of states. Studies in Comparative International Development, 54 (2), 299–321. doi:10.1007/s12116-019-09284-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar