Civil Wars and Civil Wars 2017–2021: A Reflection

References

• Access Now. 2023. After years in the dark, Tigray is slowly coming back online. 1 February. Available from: https://www.accessnow.org/tigray-shutdown-slowly-coming-back-online/ [Accessed 10 Aug 2023].
   Google Scholar
• Arjona, A., 2016. Rebelocracy: social order in the Colombian civil war. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Autesserre, S., 2014. Peaceland: conflict resolution and the everyday politics of international intervention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bareebe, G., 2020. Predators or protectors? Military corruption as a pillar of regime survival in Uganda. Civil Wars, 22 (2–3), 313–332. doi:10.1080/13698249.2020.1730640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg, L.-A., 2020. Elite bargains and external influence: security assistance and civil-military relations in post-war Liberia and Sierra Leone. Civil Wars, 22 (2–3), 266–288. doi:10.1080/13698249.2020.1707495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bliesemann de Guevara, B., 2014. Ed. Special issue: knowledge production in conflict: the international crisis group. Third World Quarterly, 35 (4), 545–562. doi:10.1080/01436597.2014.924060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bliesemann de Guevara, B., Furnari, E., and Julian, R., 2020. Researching with “local” associates: power, trust, and data in an interpretive project on communities’ conflict knowledge in Myanmar. Civil Wars, 22 (4), 427–452. doi:10.1080/13698249.2020.1755161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bliesemann de Guevara, B. and Kostić, R., 2017. Knowledge production in/about conflict and intervention: finding “facts”, telling “truth”. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 11 (1), 1–20. doi:10.1080/17502977.2017.1287635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cárdenas, M.L., 2019. Women-to-women diplomacy in Georgia: a peacebuilding strategy in frozen conflict. Civil Wars, 21 (3), 385–409. doi:10.1080/13698249.2019.1667713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charbonneau, B. and Sandor, A., eds., 2019. Special issue: the politics of comparing armed conflicts. Civil Wars, 21 (4), 437–447. doi:10.1080/13698249.2019.1706144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day, C., Khisa, M., and Reno, W., 2020. Special issue: “revisiting the civil-military conundrum in Africa”. Civil Wars, 22 (2–3), 156–173. doi:10.1080/13698249.2020.1736808.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dirkx, T., 2017. The unintended consequences of US support on militia governance in Kunduz Province, Afghanistan. Civil Wars, 19 (3), 377–401. doi:10.1080/13698249.2017.1416851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Distler, W., et al., 2018. Special issue: “economies of peace: economy formation processes and outcomes in conflict-affected societies”. Civil Wars, 20 (2), 139–150. doi:10.1080/13698249.2018.1500164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudek, N., 2021. Understanding violence by non-state armed groups: the case of the RUF. Civil Wars, 23 (3), 371–395. doi:10.1080/13698249.2021.1963587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffield, M., 2010. Risk management and the fortified aid compound: everyday life in post-interventionary society. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 4 (4), 453–474. doi:10.1080/17502971003700993.
   Google Scholar
• Dunia, O.A., et al., 2023. Visibilising hidden realities and uncertainties: the “post-covid” move towards decolonized and ethical field research practices. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 26 (5), 549–564. doi:10.1080/13645579.2023.2173427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson Baaz, M. and Utas, M., eds., 2019. Special issue: research brokers in conflict zones. Civil Wars, 21 (2), 157–178. doi:10.1080/13698249.2019.1656357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farooq, T., Lucas, S., and Wolff, S., 2020. Predators and peace: explaining the failure of the Pakistani conflict settlement process in 2013-4. Civil Wars, 22 (1), 26–63. doi:10.1080/13698249.2020.1704603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fast, L., 2017. Diverging data: exploring the epistemologies of data collection and use among those working on and in conflict. International Peacekeeping, 24 (5), 706–732. doi:10.1080/13533312.2017.1383562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiori, J., et al., 2016. The echo chamber: results, management, and the humanitarian effectiveness agenda. London: Save the Children and Humanitarian and Conflict Response Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, J. and Meressa, T.G., 2019. “Game over”? Abiy Ahmed, the Tigray people’s liberation front, and Ethiopia’s political crisis. African Affairs, 118 (470), 194–206. doi:10.1093/afraf/ady056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HCRI (Humanitarian and Conflict Response Institute). 2014. Making peacekeeping data work for the international community. Available from: https://www.hcri.manchester.ac.uk/research/projects/making-peacekeeping-data-work/ [Accessed 10 Aug 2023].
   Google Scholar
• Israelsen, S., 2018. Women in charge: the effect of rebel governance and women’s organisations on Karen women’s political participation. Civil Wars, 20 (3), 379–407. doi:10.1080/13698249.2018.1497315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasfir, N., Frerks, G., and Terpstra, N., eds., 2017. Special issue: armed groups and multilayered governance. Civil Wars, 19 (3), 257–278. doi:10.1080/13698249.2017.1419611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy-Pipe, C., 2023. Why a journal of civil wars? In: Civil Wars. TBC.
   Google Scholar
• Khisa, M., 2020. Politicisation and professionalisation: the progress and perils of civil-military transformation in Museveni’s Uganda. Civil Wars, 22 (2–3), 289–312. doi:10.1080/13698249.2020.1724727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kühn, F., 2016. The ambiguity of things: souvenirs from Afghanistan. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 10 (1), 97–115. doi:10.1080/17502977.2015.1137397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahdawi, A., 2021. The pandemic made the childcare crisis and urgent talking point – will the US finally change things? Guardian, 16 Jan. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2021/jan/16/coronavirus-pandemic-women-workforce-childcare-crisis [Accessed 10 Aug 2023].
   Google Scholar
• Malejacq, R. and Sandor, A., 2020. Sahelistan? Military intervention and patronage politics in Afghanistan and Mali. Civil Wars, 22 (4), 543–566. doi:10.1080/13698249.2020.1813405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mampilly, Z., 2011. Rebel rulers: insurgent governance and civilian life during war. New York, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raineri, L. and Martini, A., 2017. ISIS and Al-Qaeda as strategies and political imaginaries in Africa: a comparison between Boko Haram and Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb. Civil Wars, 19 (4), 425–447. doi:10.1080/13698249.2017.1413226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reno, W. and Matisek, J., 2018. A new era of insurgent recruitment: have “new” civil wars changed the dynamic? Civil Wars, 20 (3), 358–378. doi:10.1080/13698249.2018.1497314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richmond, O.P., Kappler, S., and Björkdahl, A., 2015. The “field” in the age of intervention: power, legitimacy, and authority versus the “local”. Millennium, 44 (1), 23–44. doi:10.1177/0305829815594871.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, N., 2019. Authority, legitimacy, and support for armed groups: a case study of the Ejército Zapatista de Liberación Nacional. Civil Wars, 21 (3), 303–328. doi:10.1080/13698249.2019.1604934.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanaullah, 2021. An understanding of social violence: how insurgents use it as a strategy of control. Civil Wars, 23 (1), 57–81. doi:10.1080/13698249.2021.1846350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smirl, L., 2015. Spaces of aid: how cars, compounds, and hotels shape humanitarianism. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Sosnowski, M., 2018. Violence and order: the February 2016 cease-fire and the development of rebel governance institutions in Southern Syria. Civil Wars, 20 (3), 309–332. doi:10.1080/13698249.2018.1466092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waterman, A. and Worrall, J., 2020. Spinning multiple plates under fire: the importance of ordering processes in civil wars. Civil Wars, 22 (4), 567–590. doi:10.1080/13698249.2020.1858527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar