Managing uncertainty in multidisciplinary renal team meetings: decision-making processes and complex challenges in kidney transplant listing

References

• Arber, A. (2007). “Pain talk” in hospice and palliative care team meetings: An ethnography. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 44(6), 916–926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.04.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arber, A. (2008). Team meetings in specialist palliative care: Asking questions as a strategy within interprofessional interaction. Qualitative Health Research, 18(10), 1323–1335. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732308322588
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbour, R. S., & Barbour, M. (2003). Evaluating and synthesizing qualitative research: The need to develop a distinctive approach. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 9(2), 179–186. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2753.2003.00371.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beresford, E. (1991). Uncertainty and the shaping of medical decisions. Hastings Centre Report, 21(4), 6–11.8. https://doi.org/10.2307/3562993
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blazeby, J. M., Wilson, L., Metcalfe, C., Nicklin, J., English, R., & Donovan, J. L. (2006). Analysis of clinical decision-making in multi-disciplinary cancer teams. Annals of Oncology, 17(3), 457–460. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdj102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosch, M., Faber, M., & Voernan, G. (2009). Quest for quality and improved performance: Quality enhancing interventions: Patient care teams. The Health Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Brown, P., Hashem, F., & Calnan, M. (2016). Trust, regulatory processes and NICE decision-making: Appraising cost-effectiveness models through appraising people and systems. Social Studies of Science, 46(1), 87–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312715609699
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burri, R. V. (2008). Doing distinctions: Boundary work and symbolic capital in radiology. Social Studies of Science, 38(1), 35–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312707082021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buttny, R. (1993). Social accountability in communication. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, J. H., Vines, E., Bertsch, H., Fraker, D. L., Czerniecki, B. J., Rosato, E. F., Lawton, T., Conant, E. F., Orel, S. G., Schuchter, L., Fox, K. R., Zieber, N., Glick, J. H., & Solin, L. J. (2001). The impact of a multidisciplinary breast cancer center on recommendations for patient management. Cancer, 91(7), 1231–1237. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(20010401)91:7<1231:AID-CNCR1123>3.0.CO;2-K
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conn, L. G., Haas, B., Cuthbertson, B. H., Amaral, A. C., Coburn, N., & Nathens, A. B. (2016). Communication and culture in the surgical intensive care unit: Boundary production and the improvement of patient care. Qualitative Health Research, 26(7), 895–906. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315609901
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Health. (2007a). Creating Capable Teams Approach (CCTA): Best practice guidance to support the implementation of New Ways of Working (NWW) and new roles.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health. (2007b). New Ways of Working for Everyone: A Best Practice Implementation Guide, Care Service Improvement Partnership & National Institute for Mental Health in England. Department of Health.
   Google Scholar
• Dibben, M. R., & Lean, M. E. J. (2003). Achieving compliance in chronic illness management: Illustrations of trust relationships between physicians and nutrition clinic patients. Health, Risk & Society, 5(3), 241–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698570310001606950
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donovan, J. L., & Blake, D. R. (1992). Patient non-compliance: Deviance or reasoned decision-making? Social Science &medicine, 34(5), 507–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(92)90206-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, M. (2002). Natural symbols. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, J., Colville, S., Brown, P., & Christie, D. (2014). Exploring uncertainty in adolescent bariatric teams: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. Clinical Obesity, 4(1), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/cob.12039
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fleissig, A., Jenkins, V., Catt, S., & Fallowfield, L. (2006). Multidisciplinary teams in cancer care: Are they effective in the UK? The Lancet Oncology, 7(11), 935–943. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-20450670940-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, R. C. (2002). ‘Medical uncertainty revisited. In G. Bendelow, M. Carpenter, C. Vautier, & S. Williams (Eds.), Gender, health and healing: The public/private divide (Vol. 2002, pp. 236–253). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, E. J. (2000). Preventing waste: A ritual analysis of candidate selection for kidney transplantation. Anthropology & Medicine, 7(3), 351–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/713650608
   Google Scholar
• Gorovitz, S., & MacIntyre, A. (1976). Toward a theory of medical fallibility. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 1(1), 51–71.7. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/1.1.51
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, B., Oeppen, R. S., Smith, D. W., & Brennan, P. A. (2017). Challenging hierarchy in healthcare teams–ways to flatten gradients to improve teamwork and patient care. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 55(5), 449–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2017.02.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffiths, F., Green, E., & Tsouroufli, M. (2005). The nature of medical evidence and its inherent uncertainty for the clinical consultation: Qualitative study. BMJ, 330(7490), 511. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38336.482720.8F
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hall, K. H. (2002). Reviewing intuitive decision‐making and uncertainty: The implications for medical education. Medical Education, 36(3), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01140.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman, S. R. (2013). Fairness and the tyranny of potential in kidney transplantation. Current Anthropology, 54(S7), S56–S66. https://doi.org/10.1086/670193
   Google Scholar
• Ke, K. M., Blazeby, J. M., Strong, S., Carroll, F. E., Ness, A. R., & Hollingworth, W. (2013). Hollingworth W. Are multidisciplinary teams in secondary care cost-effective? A systematic review of the literature. Cost Effectiveness & Resource Allocation, 11(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-7547-11-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kidger, J., Murdoch, J., Donovan, J. L., & Blazeby, J. M. (2009). Clinical decision‐making in a multidisciplinary gynaecological cancer team: A qualitative study. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics &gynaecology, 116(4), 511–517. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.02066.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamb, B. W., Sevdalis, N., Vincent, C., & Green, J. S. (2012). Development and evaluation of a checklist to support decision making in cancer multidisciplinary team meetings: MDT-QuIC. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 19(6), 1759–1765. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-011-2187-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanceley, A., Savage, J., Menon, U., & Jacobs, I. (2008). Influences on multidisciplinary team decision‐making. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, 18(2), 215–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1438.2007.00991.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, S. (2004). “Symbiotic niceness”: Constructing a therapeutic relationship in psychosocial palliative care. Social Science and Medicine, 58(12), 2571–2583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.09.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, S. (2005). Doing criticism in “symbiotic niceness”: A study of palliative care nurses’ talk. Social Science and Medicine, 60(9), 1949–1959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.08.060
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, M., Jordens, C. F., Paul, K., Montgomery, K., & Philipson, B. (1998). Liminality: A major category of the experience of cancer illness. Social Science & Medicine, 47(10), 1485–1494.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-95369800248-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, C., Rapley, T., Moreira, T., Finch, T., & Heaven, B. (2006). Technogovernance: Evidence, subjectivity, and the clinical encounter in primary care medicine. Social Science & Medicine, 62(4), 1022–1030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.07.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mickan, S. (2005). Evaluating the effectiveness of health care teams. Australian Health Review, 29(2), 211–217. https://doi.org/10.1071/AH050211
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mishler, E. G. (1984). The discourse of medicine: Dialectics of medical interviews. Ablex Publishing Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Moreira, T., May, C., & Bond, J. (2009). Regulatory objectivity in action: Mild cognitive impairment and the collective production of uncertainty. Social Studies of Science, 39(5), 665–690. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312709103481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichol, M. B., Venturini, F., & Sung, J. C. (1999). A critical evaluation of the methodology of the literature on medication compliance. Annals of Pharmacotherapy, 33(5), 531–540. https://doi.org/10.1345/aph.18233
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickersgill, M. (2011). Ordering disorder: Knowledge production and uncertainty in neuroscience research. Science as Culture, 20(1), 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2010.508086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, J. D. H, & Grange, J. M. Eds. 1999. Tuberculosis: An Interdisciplinary Perspective, Published by imperial college press and distributed by world scientific publishing co.https://doi.org/10.1142/p123.
   Google Scholar
• Pruthi, R., Tonkin-Crine, S., Calestani, M., Leydon, G., Eyles, C., Oniscu, G. C., Tomson, C., Bradley, A., Forsythe, J. L., Bradley, C., Cairns, J., Dudley, C., Watson, C., Draper, H., Johnson, R., Metcalfe, W., Fogarty, D., Ravanan, R., & Roderick, P. J. (2018). Variation in practice patterns for listing patients for renal transplantation in the United Kingdom: A national survey. Transplantation, 102(6), 961–968. https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000002046
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn Patton, M. Q. (2005). Qualitative research. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Raine, R., Xanthopoulou, P., Wallace, I., a’Bháird, C. N., Lanceley, A., Clarke, A., Livingston, G., Prentice, A., Ardron, D., Harris, M., & King, M. Determinants of treatment plan implementation in multidisciplinary team meetings for patients with chronic diseases: A mixed-methods study. (2014). BMJ Quality &safety, bmjqs. 2014(10), 867–876. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2014-002818
   Google Scholar
• Rapley, T., & May, T. (2009). Evidence and risk: The sociology of health care grappling with knowledge and uncertainty. In A. Edwards & G. Elwy (Eds.), Shared decision-making in health care. Achieving evidence-based patient choice (pp. 53–58). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Riesch, H. (2013). Levels of uncertainty. In S. Roeser, R. Hillerbrand, P. Sandin, & M. Peterson (Eds.), Essentials of risk theory (pp. 29–56). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rudin, R. S., Gidengil, C. A., Predmore, Z., Schneider, E. C., Sorace, J., & Hornstein, R. (2017). Identifying and coordinating care for complex patients: Findings from the leading edge of analytics and health information technology. Rand Health Quarterly, 6(3).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sacks, H., & Jefferson, G. (1995). Lectures on conversation, in Human Studies. Human Studies, 18(2–3), 327–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01323215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharp, L. A. (2013). The transplant imaginary: Mechanical hearts, animal parts, and moral thinking in highly experimental science. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, D. (1981). The child as a social object: Down’s syndrome children in a paediatric cardiology clinic. Sociology of Health & Illness, 3(3), 254–274. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.ep10486744
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, D. (Ed.). (2006). Interpreting Qualitative Data. In Methods for Analizying talk, text and interaction. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Swazey, J. P. (2017 [2002]). The courage to fail: A social view of organ transplants and dialysis. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tanenbaum, S. (1993). What physicians know. The New England Journal of Medicine, 329(17), 1268–1271. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199310213291713
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanenbaum, S. (1999). Evidence and expertise: The challenge of the outcomes movement tomedical professionalism. Acad Med1, 74(7), 757–763. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-199907000-00008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, C., Atkins, L., Richardson, A., Tarrant, R., & Ramirez, A. J. (2012). Measuring the quality of MDT working: An observational approach. BMC Cancer, 12(1), 202. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-12-202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volk, M. L., Biggins, S. W., Huang, M. A., Argo, C. K., Fontana, R. J., & Anspach, R. R. (2011). Decision making in liver transplant selection committees: A multicenter study. Annals of Internal Medicine, 155(8), 503–508. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, E. (2004). Effective teamwork and quality of care. Medical Care, 42(11), 1037–1039. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlr.0000145875.60036.ed
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, A. F., & West, R. R. (2002). Clinical decision-making: Coping with uncertainty. Postgraduate Medical Journal, 78(920), 319–321. https://doi.org/10.1136/pmj.78.920.319
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilcoxon, H., Luxford, K., Saunders, C., Peterson, J., & Zorbas, H. (2011). Multidisciplinary cancer care in Australia: A national audit highlights gaps in care and medico‐legal risk for clinicians. Asia‐Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology, 7(1), 34–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-7563.2010.01369.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittenberg-Lyles, E. (2005). Information sharing in interdisciplinary team meetings: An evaluation of hospice goals. Qualitative Health Research, 15(10), 1377–1391. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305282857
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittenberg-Lyles, E., & Parker Oliver, D. (2007). The power of interdisciplinary collaboration in hospice. Progress in Palliative Care, 15(1), 6–12. https://doi.org/10.1179/096992607X177764
   Google Scholar
• Woolley, A., & Kostopoulou, O. (2013). Clinical intuition in family medicine: More than first impressions. The Annals of Family Medicine, 11(1), 60–66. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1433
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zinn, J. O. (2006). Recent developments in sociology of risk and uncertainty. Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung, 31(2), 275–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zinn, J. O. (2016). ‘In-between’and other reasonable ways to deal with risk and uncertainty: A review article. Health, Risk & Society, 18(7–8), 348–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698575.2016.1269879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar