References
- Ruiz J., Mintzer M, Leipzig R. The impact of e-learning in medical education. Acad Med 2006; 81: 207–12
- Sandars J.. E-learning for GP educators. Radcliffe, Oxford 2006
- Fordis M, King JE, Ballantyne CM, Jones PH, Schneider KH, Spann SJ, et al. Comparison of the instructional efficacy of Internet-based CME with live interactive CME workshops: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2005; 294: 1043–51
- Davies DA. E-learning. A practical guide for medical teachers2nd edition, JA Dent, RM Harden. Elsevier, Edinburgh 2005; 221–7
- Gordon DL, Issenberg SB, Gordon MS, Lacombe D, McGaghie WC, Petrusa ER. Stroke training of prehospital providers: an example of simulation-enhanced blended learning and evaluation. Med Teach 2005; 27: 114–21
- Butzlaff M, Vollmar H, Floer B, Koneczny N, Isfort J, Lange S. Learning with computerized guidelines in general practice? A randomized controlled trial. Fam Pract 2004; 21: 183–8
- Schultze-Mosgau S, Zielinski T, Lochner J. Web-based, virtual course units as a didactic concept for medical teaching. Med Teach 2004; 26: 336–42
- McKenney R. The next level of distributed learning: the introduction of the personal digital assistant. J Oncol Manag 2004; 13: 18–25
- Bernard R, Abrami P, Lou Y, Borokhovski E. How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Rev Educ Res 2004; 74: 379–439
- Chumley-Jones H, Dobbie A, Alford C. Web-based learning sound educational method or hype? A review of the evaluation literature. Acad Med 2002; 77: 86–93
- Liebhardt H, Mueller M, Steinhauser S, Scholz W. A survery of sources in the fields of E-learning in medicine. GMS Zeitschrift für Medizinische Ausbildung 2006; 23: 23–6
- Pill J. The Delphi method – substance context a critique and an annotated bibliography. Socio-Economic Planning Services 1997; 5: 57–71
- Rowe G, Wright G, Bolger F. Delphi – a re-evaluation of research and theory. Technol Forecast Soc Change 1991; 39: 235–51
- Jónes J, Hunter D. Qualitative research – consensus methods for medical and health services research. BMJ 1995; 311: 376–80
- German Society for General Practice and Family Medicine (DEGAM), E-Learning in Primary Care Education, Frankfurt a.M., 8–9 July 2005. Available at URL: www.e-learning-allgemeinmedizin.de (accessed 10 December 2007).
- Mayring, P. Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Forum: Qualitative Social Research 1(2). Available au URL: http://www.qualitative-research.net/fqs-texte/2-00/2-00mayring-d.htm (accessed 10 December 2007).
- Pulichino, J. Future directions in e-Learning. The E-Learning Guild, 2006, Available at URL: http//www.learningguild.com (accessed 10 December 2007).
- Gibbons A, Fairweather P. Computer-based instruction. Training and retraining: a handbook for business, industry, government, and the military, S Tobias, I Flechter. Macmillan, New York 2000; 410–42
- Brennan T, Rothman D, Blank L, Blumenthal D, Chimonas S, Cohen J, et al. Health industry practices that create conflict of interest – a policy proposal for academic medical center. JAMA 2006; 295: 429–33
- Harden R. Planning a curriculum. A practical guide for medical teachers, J Dent, M Harden. Harcourt, Edinburgh 2001
- Statistical indicators benchmarking the information society. Measuring the information society in the EU, the EU accession countries, Switzerland and the US. Brussels: European Commission; 2003.
- Hoffmann M, Blake J. Computer literacy: today and tomorrow. Journal of Computing Science in College 2003; 18: 221–33
- Barker Z. Standards and accreditation for e-learning. E-learning for GP educators, J Sandars. Radcliffe, Oxford 2006
- King R, Murphy-Cullen CL, Mayo H, Marcee A, Schneider G. Use of computer and the internet by residents in US family medicine programmes. Med Inform Internet Med 2007; 32: 149–55
- Cook A. The research we still are not doing: an agenda for the study of computer-based learning. Acad Med 2005; 80: 541–8