From causation to conscious control

References

• Anscombe, G. E. M. 1963. Intention. 2nd ed. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Anscombe, G. E. M. 1983. “The Causation of Action.” In Knowledge and Mind: Philosophical Essays, edited by C. Ginet and S. Shoemaker, 174–190. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, J. 1989. Natural Agency: An Essay on the Causal Theory of Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bratman, M. E. 1987. Intention, Plans, and Practical Reason. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, J. J. 2021. “Home Runs, Strikeouts and Low Averages are Trending Throughout Baseball.” Baseball America. https://www.baseballamerica.com/stories/home-runs-strikeouts-and-low-averages-are-trending-throughout-baseball/.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, D. 1963. “Actions, Reasons and Causes.” The Journal of Philosophy 60 (23): 685–700. https://doi.org/10.2307/2023177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, D. 1973. “Freedom to act.” In Essays on Freedom of Action, edited by T. Hondrich, 63–81. Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, A. 2016. “On What is in Front of One’s Nose.” Philosophical Topics 44 (1): 141–161. https://doi.org/10.5840/philtopics20164419.
   Google Scholar
• Fourneret, P., and M. Jeannerod. 1998. “Limited Conscious Monitoring of Motor Performance in Normal Subjects.” Neuropsychologia 36 (11): 1133–1140. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(98)00006-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fridland, E. 2017. “Skill and Motor Control: Intelligence all the way Down.” Philosophical Studies 174 (6): 1539–1560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-016-0771-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher, S. 2006. “Where’s the Action? Epiphenomenalism and the Problem of Free Will.” In Does Consciousness Cause Behavior? An Investigation of the Nature of Volition, edited by S. Pockett, W. Banks, and S. Gallagher, 109–124. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grünbaum, T. 2012. “Commonsense Psychology, Dual Visual Streams, and the Individuation of Action.” Philosophical Psychology 25 (1): 25–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2011.569911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horst, D. 2015. “Actions and Accidents.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 45 (3): 300–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/00455091.2015.1080045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeannerod, M. 1997. The Cognitive Neuroscience of Action. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Kalis, A., and D. Ometto. 2019. “An Anscombean Perspective on Habitual Action.” Topoi 40 (3): 637–648. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-019-09651-8.
   Google Scholar
• Kloosterboer, N. J. G. 2023. “Anscombe’s Approach to Rational Capacities.” In In Women in the History of Analytic Philosophy: Selected Papers of the Tilburg–Groningen Conference, 2019, edited by J. Peijnenburg and S. Verhaegh, 195–222. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Löwenstein, D. 2017. Know-how as competence. A Rylean responsibilist account. Studies in Theoretical Philosophy vol. 4. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.
   Google Scholar
• Marcus, E. 2012. Rational Causation. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marcus, E. 2018. “Practical Knowledge as Knowledge of a Normative Judgment.” Manuscrito 41 (4): 319–347. https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-6045.2018.v41n4.em.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mascolo, M. F., and E. Kallio. 2019. “Beyond Free Will: The Embodied Emergence of Conscious Agency.” Philosophical Psychology 32 (4): 437–462. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2019.1587910.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayr, E. 2011. Understanding Human Agency. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mele, A. R., and P. K. Moser. 1994. “Intentional Action.” Noûs 28 (1): 39–68. https://doi.org/10.2307/2215919.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milner, R. D., and M. A. Goodale. 1995. The Visual Brain in Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morsella, E. 2005. “The Function of Phenomenal States: Supramodular Interaction Theory.” Psychological Review 112 (4): 1000–1021. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.112.4.1000.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connell, R. 2020. ““I do What Happens”: The Productive Character of Practical Knowledge.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 50 (5): 670–686. https://doi.org/10.1017/can.2020.12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pacherie, E. 2014. “Can Conscious Agency be Saved?” Topoi 33 (1): 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-013-9187-6.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, S. 2009. “How we Know What We’re Doing.” Philosophers’ Imprint 9 (11): 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Peacocke, C. 1979. Holistic Explanation: Action, Space, Interpretation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rödl, S. 2005. Kategorien des Zeitlichen: eine Untersuchung der Formen des endlichen Verstandes. 1748 vols. Berlin: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Rödl, S. 2007. Self-consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rödl, S. 2011. “Two Forms of Practical Knowledge and Their Unity.” In In Essays on Anscombe’s Intention, edited by A. Ford, J. Hornsby, and F. Stoutland, 211–241. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ryle, G. 1949. The Concept of Mind. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schlosser, M. E. 2007. “Basic Deviance Reconsidered.” Analysis 67 (3): 186–194. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/67.3.186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seth, A. K. 2009. “Functions of Consciousness.” Encyclopedia of Consciousness 1: 279–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012373873-8.00033-5.
   Google Scholar
• Setiya, K. 2008. “Practical Knowledge.” Ethics 118 (3): 388–409. https://doi.org/10.1086/528781.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepherd, J. 2014. “The Contours of Control.” Philosophical Studies 170:395–411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-013-0236-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepherd, J. 2015. “Conscious Control Over Action.” Mind & Language 30 (3): 320–344. https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12082.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepherd, J. 2021. The Shape of Agency: Control, Action, Skill, Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, K. 2020. “Anscombe on Acting for Reasons.” In The Routledge Handbook of Practical Reason, edited by R. Chang and K. Sylvan, 172–184. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Small, W. 2012. “Practical Knowledge and the Structure of Action.” In Rethinking Epistemology, 2 vols, edited by G. Abel and J. Conant, 133–228. Berlin: De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Steward, H. 2012. A Metaphysics for Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, M. 2008. Life and Action. Elementary Structures of Practice and Practical Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, M. 2011. “Anscombe’s Intention and Practical Knowledge.” In In Essays on Anscombe’s Intention, edited by A. Ford, J. Hornsby, and F. Stoutland, 198–210. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Todorov, E., and M. I. Jordan. 2002. “Optimal Feedback Control as a Theory of Motor Coordination.” Nature Neuroscience 5 (11): 1226–1235. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn963.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, C. H. 2014. “The Structure of Practical Expertise.” Philosophia 42 (2): 539–554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-013-9513-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valaris, M. 2015. “The Instrumental Structure of Actions.” The Philosophical Quarterly 65 (258): 64–83. https://doi.org/10.1093/pq/pqu054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Miltenburg, N. 2011. “Practical Knowledge and Foreseen Side Effects.” Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 6 (1): 1–7. https://doi.org/10.26556/jesp.v6i1.147.
   Google Scholar
• Van Miltenburg, N. 2022. “Causality, Determination and Free Will: Towards an Anscombean Account of Free Action.” Synthese 200 (4): 279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-03700-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yarrow, K., P. Brown, and J. W. Krakauer. 2009. “Inside the Brain of an Elite Athlete: The Neural Processes That Support High Achievement in Sports.” Nature Reviews Neuroscience 10:585–596. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2672.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar