A moral freedom to which we might aspire

References

• Annas, Julia. 2011. Intelligent Virtue. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arpaly, Nomy, and Timothy Schroeder. 1999. “Praise, Blame and the Whole Self.” Philosophical Studies 93 (2): 161–188. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004222928272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, Jonathan. 1974. “The Conscience of Huckleberry Finn.” Philosophy 49 (188): 123–134. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031819100048014.
   Google Scholar
• Bobzien, Susanne. 1997. “Stoic Conceptions of Freedom and the Relation to Ethics.” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 41 (Supplement_68): 71–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-5370.1997.tb02263.x.
   Google Scholar
• Bobzien, Susanne. 1998. “The Inadvertent Conception and Late Birth of the Free-Will Problem.” Phronesis (Barcelona, Spain) 43 (2): 133–175. https://doi.org/10.1163/15685289860511069.
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, Tad. 2005. The Stoic Life: Emotions, Duties, and Fate. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Callard, Agnes. 2018. Aspiration: The Agency of Becoming. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coates, D. Justin. 2017. “A Wholehearted Defense of Ambivalence.” The Journal of Ethics 21 (4): 419–444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10892-017-9257-x.
   Google Scholar
• Coates, D. Justin. 2022. In Praise of Ambivalence. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, John M. 1999. Reason and Emotion: Essays on Ancient Moral Psychology and Ethical Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Diogenes, Laertius. 1970. Lives of Eminent Philosophers. 2 vols. Translated by R. D. Hicks. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Epictetus. 2014. Discourses, Fragments, Handbook. Translated by Robin Hard. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eshleman, Andrew. 2004. “Responsibility for Character.” Philosophical Topics 32 (1-2): 65–94. https://doi.org/10.5840/philtopics2004321/216.
   Google Scholar
• Eshleman, Andrew. 2014. “Worthy of Praise: Responsibility and Better-Than-Minimally-Decent Agency.” In Vol. 2 of Oxford Studies in Agency and Responsibility, edited by David Shoemaker and Neal Tognazzini, 216–242. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, John M. 1987. “Responsiveness and Moral Responsibility.” In Responsibility, Character, and the Emotions, edited by Ferdinand Schoeman, 81–106. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, John M., and Mark Ravizza. 1998. Responsibility and Control: A Theory of Moral Responsibility. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frankfurt, Harry. 1988. The Importance of What We Care About. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frankfurt, Harry. 1992. “The Faintest Passion.” Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 66 (3): 5–16. https://doi.org/10.2307/3130658.
   Google Scholar
• Frankfurt, Harry. 2002. “Reply to Michael E. Bratman.” In Contours of Agency, edited by Sarah Buss and Lee Overton, 86–90. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frankfurt, Harry. 2004. The Reasons of Love. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frede, Michael. 2012. A Free Will: Origins of the Notion in Ancient Thought. Oakland: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gorman, August. 2019. “The Minimal Approval View of Attributability.” In Oxford Studies of Agency and Responsibility. Vol. 6, edited by David Shoemaker, 140–164. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gushee, David. 2015. Changing Our Minds. Canton, MI: Read the Spirit Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gushee, David. 2020. “Changing Our Minds.” YouTube video, 2:05: 28. September 26, 2020. https://youtu.be/q-fCyoagAEE.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, Margaret. 2012. “Social Convention and Neurosis as Obstacles to Moral Freedom.” In Iris Murdoch, Philosopher, edited by Justin Broackes, 255–273. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holroyd, Jules. 2018. “Ways of Socializing Moral Responsibility.” In Social Dimensions of Responsibility, edited by Katrina Hutchison, Catriona Mackenzie, and Marina Oshana, 137–162. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Inwood, Brad. 1985. Ethics and Human Action in Early Stoicism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, Jonathan A. 2001. Choosing Character: Responsibility for Virtue and Vice. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kendi, Abram X. 2019. How to Be An Anti-Racist. New York: One World.
   Google Scholar
• McGeer, Victoria. 2015. “Building a Better Theory of Responsibility.” Philosophical Studies 172 (10): 2635–2649. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-015-0478-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenna, Michael. 2013. “Reasons-Responsiveness, Agents, and Mechanisms.” In Vol. 1 of Oxford Studies in Agency and Responsibility, edited by David Shoemaker, 151–184. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McKenna, Michael, and Chad Van Schoelandt. 2015. “Crossing a Mesh Theory with a Reasons-Responsive Theory.” In Agency, Freedom, and Responsibility, edited by Andrei Buckareff, Carlos Moya, and Sergi Rosell, 44–64. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell-Yellin, Benjamin. 2014. “In Defense of the Platonic Model: A Reply to Buss.” Ethics 124 (2): 342–357. https://doi.org/10.1086/673432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moody-Adams, Michele M. 1994. “Culture, Responsibility, and Affected Ignorance.” Ethics 104 (2): 291–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murdoch, Iris. 1971. The Sovereignty of the Good. New York: Routledge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Murdoch, Iris, and Peter J. Conradi, eds. 1998. Existentialists and Mystics: Writings on Philosophy and Literature. New York: Allen Lane/The Penguin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nelkin, Dana K. 2011. Making Sense of Freedom and Responsibility. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O'Keefe, Tim. 2005. Epicurus on Freedom. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pawl, Timothy, and Kevin Timpe. 2009. “Incompatibilism, Sin, and Free Will in Heaven.” Faith and Philosophy 26 (4): 398–419. https://doi.org/10.5840/faithphil200926437.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, Daniel C. 2009. Practical Intelligence and the Virtues. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Salles, Ricardo. 2005. The Stoics on Determinism and Compatibilism. Burlington, VT: Ashgate Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Sartorio, Caroline. 2018. “Situations and Responsiveness to Reasons.” Noûs 52 (4): 796–807. https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shoemaker, David. 2003. “Caring, Identification, and Agency.” Ethics 114 (1): 88–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shoemaker, David. 2015. “Ecumenical Attributability.” In The Nature of Moral Responsibility, edited by Randolph Clarke, Michael McKenna, and Angela Smith, 115–140. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Slingerland, Edward, trans. 2003. Analects. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Sripada, Chandra. 2016. “Self-Expression: A Deep Self Theory of Responsibility.” Philosophical Studies 173 (5): 1203–1232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, Shannon, and Nancy Tuana. 2007. Race and Epistemologies of Ignorance. Albany, NY: State Univ of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vargas, Manuel. 2015. Building Better Beings: A Theory of Responsibility. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, Gary. 2004. Agency and Answerability. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, Susan. 1987. “Sanity and the Metaphysics of Responsibility.” In Responsibility, Character, and the Emotions, edited by Ferdinand Schoeman, 46–62. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, Susan. 1990. Freedom Within Reason. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar