From 30 percent to gender parity in everything: the steady route to raising women’s political representation in Mexico

References

• Albaine, Laura. 2015. “Obstáculos y desafíos de la paridad de género: Violencia política, sistema electoral e interculturalidad.” Íconos: Revista de Ciencias Sociales 19 (May): 145–162. doi:10.17141/iconos.52.2015.1675.
   Google Scholar
• Archenti, Nélida. 2014. “El proceso hacia la paridad en América Latina: Argentina y Costa Rica, experiencias comparadas.” Revista Derecho Electoral 17: 304–332.
   Google Scholar
• Archenti, Nélida, and María Inés Tula. 2017. “Critical Challenges of Quotas and Parity in Latin America.” In Women, Politics, and Democracy in Latin America, edited by Tomáš Došek, Flavia Freidenberg, Mariana Caminotti, and Betilde Muñoz-Pogossian, 29–44. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Atenea. 2017. “La democracia paritaria en México: Avances y desafíos.” ONU Mujeres México. Accessed July 4, 2023. https://mexico.unwomen.org/es/digiteca/publicaciones/2017/10/diagnostico-atenea-la-democracia-paritaria-en-mexico.
   Google Scholar
• Baldez, Lisa. 2004. “Elected Bodies: The Gender Quota Law for Legislative Candidates in Mexico.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 29 (2): 231–258. doi:10.3162/036298004X201168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bareiro, Line, and Lilian Soto. 2015. La hora de la igualdad sustantiva: Participación política de las mujeres en América Latina y el Caribe Hispano. New York: ONU Mujeres.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, Gretchen. 2021. “Women in African Parliaments: Progress and Prospects.” In Palgrave Handbook of African Women’s Studies, edited by Olajumoke Yacob-Haliso and Toyin Falola, 335–352. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bruhn, Kathleen. 2003. “Whores and Lesbians: Political Activism, Party Strategies, and Gender Quotas in Mexico.” Electoral Studies 22: 101–119. doi:10.1016/S0261-3794(01)00039-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bush, Sarah. 2011. “International Politics and the Spread of Quotas for Women in Legislatures.” International Organization 65 (1): 103–137. doi:10.1017/S0020818310000287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cámara de Senadores. 2018. “LXIV Legislatura: Session Number 32.” Diario de los debates de la Cámara de Senadores, December 11. Accessed January 7, 2022. https://www.senado.gob.mx/65/diario_de_los_debates/documento/3049.
   Google Scholar
• Cámara de Senadores. 2019. “LXIV Legislatura: Session Number 4.” Diario de los debates de la Cámera de Senadores, May 14. Accessed November 9, 2022. https://www.senado.gob.mx/65/diario_de_los_debates/documento/3095.
   Google Scholar
• Caminotti, Mariana, and Flavia Freidenberg. 2016. “Electoral Federalism, the Strength of Gender Quotas and Women’s Political Representation in the Subnational Spheres in Argentina and Mexico.” Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales 61 (228): 121–144. doi:10.1016/S0185-1918(16)30042-3.
   Google Scholar
• CEPAL (United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean). 2021. “Gender Equality Observatory in Latin America: Regulations: Quota Legislation.” Gender Equality Observatory in Latin America. Accessed July 4, 2023. https://oig.cepal.org/en/laws/quota-legislation.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlerup, Drude, and Lenita Freidenvall. 2005. “Quotas as a ‘Fast Track’ to Equal Representation for Women.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 7 (1): 26–48. doi:10.1080/1461674042000324673.
   Google Scholar
• Fallon, Kathleen, Liam Swiss, and Jocelyn Viterna. 2012. “Resolving the Democracy Paradox: Democratization and Women’s Legislative Representation in Developing Nations, 1975 to 2009.” American Sociological Review 77 (3): 380–408. doi:10.1177/0003122412443365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freidenberg, Flavia, and Sara Lajas García. 2015. De la cuota a la paridad: Las reformas para mejorar la representación política de las mujeres en América Latina. Washington, DC: Secretaría de Asuntos Políticos de la Organización de los Estados Americanos. Accessed July 4, 2023. https://reformaspoliticas.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/DT-11.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Freidenberg, Flavia, and Raymundo Alva Huitrón. 2017. “¡Las reglas importan! Impulsando la representación política de las mujeres desde las leyes electorales en perspectiva multinivel.” In La representación política de las mujeres en México, edited by Flavia Freidenberg, 1–43. Mexico City: Instituto Nacional Federal.
   Google Scholar
• Gatto, Malu. 2016. “Endogenous Institutionalism and the Puzzle of Gender Quotas: Insights from Latin America.” PhD thesis, University of Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Gatto, Malu. 2017. “Gender Quotas, Legislative Reform, and Non-Legislative Reform.” In Law and Policy in Latin America: Transforming Courts, Institutions, and Rights, edited by Pedro Fortes, Larissa Boratti, Andrés Palacios Lleras, and Tom Gerald Daly, 239–255. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hinojosa, Magda. 2008. “¿Más Mujeres? Mexico’s Mixed Member System.” In Women and Legislative Representation: Electoral Systems, Political Parties, and Sex Quotas, edited by Manon Tremblay, 177–189. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hinojosa, Magda, and Jennifer M. Piscopo. 2013. “Promoción del derecho de las mujeres a ser elegidas.” In Cuotas de género: Visión comparada, 55–107. Mexico City: TEPJF.
   Google Scholar
• Htun, Mala, and Mark P. Jones. 2002. “Electoral Quotas and Women’s Leadership in Latin America.” In Gender and the Politics of Rights and Democracy in Latin America, edited by Nikki Craske and Maxine Molyneux, 32–56. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, Melanie M., Mona Lena Krook, and Pamela Paxton. 2015. “Transnational Women’s Activism and the Global Diffusion of Gender Quotas.” International Studies Quarterly 59 (2): 357–372. doi:10.1111/isqu.12190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, Melanie M., Pamela Paxton, Amanda Clayton, and Pär Zetterberg. 2019. “Global Gender Quota Adoption, Implementation, and Reform.” Comparative Politics 51 (2): 219–238. doi:10.5129/001041519X15647434969795.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IDEA (International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance). 2022. “Gender Quotas Database.” IDEA. Accessed July 4, 2023. https://www.idea.int/data-tools/data/gender-quotas.
   Google Scholar
• INE (Instituto Nacional Electoral). 2020. “Sesión Extraordinaria del Consejo General del Instituto Nacional Electoral.” YouTube, November 6. Accessed July 4, 2023. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MqFP1IkbZdk.
   Google Scholar
• Inmujeres. 2021. “Encuentro de Gobernadoras, Diputadas Federales y Locales, Presidentas Municipales y Alcaldesas Electas 2021.” Facebook, August 26. Accessed July 4, 2023. https://www.facebook.com/InmujeresMx/videos/171123818429829.
   Google Scholar
• IPU (Inter-Parliamentary Union). 2021. “Monthly Ranking of Women in National Parliaments.” IPU. Accessed July 4, 2023. https://data.ipu.org/women-ranking?month=11&year=2021.
   Google Scholar
• Kang, Alice, and Aili Mari Tripp. 2018. “Coalitions Matter: Citizenship, Women, and Quota Adoption in Africa.” Perspectives on Politics 16 (1): 73–91. doi:10.1017/S1537592717002225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larracoechea Bohigas, Edurne. 2020. “La segunda revolución de Ortega en Nicaragua: ¿Restituyendo los derechos de las mujeres y la diversidad sexual?” In Género, sexualidad e izquierdas latinoamericanas, edited by Elisabeth Jay Friedman, Felicitas Rossi, and Constanza Tabbush, 279–317. Mexico City: CLACSO.
   Google Scholar
• Larson, Anna. 2012. “Collective Identities, Institutions, Security, and State-Building in Afghanistan.” In The Impact of Gender Quotas, edited by Susan Franceschet, Mona Lena Krook, and Jennifer M. Piscopo, 136–153. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lépinard, Éléonore, and Ruth Rubio-Marín. 2018. Transforming Gender Citizenship: The Irresistible Rise of Gender Quotas in Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Magaloni, Beatriz. 2005. “The Demise of Mexico’s One-Party Dominant Regime.” In The Third Wave of Democratization in Latin America: Advances and Setbacks, edited by Frances Hagopian and Scott Mainwaring, 121–146. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, Jutta, Jutta Borner, and Mariana Caminotti. 2007. Las legisladoras: Cupos de género y política en Argentina y Brasil. Buenos Aires: Siglo XI.
   Google Scholar
• Meier, Petra. 2004. “The Mutual Contagion Effect of Legal and Party Quotas.” Party Politics 10 (5): 583–600. doi:10.1177/1354068804045389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, Rainbow, Mona Lena Krook, and Katherine A. R. Opello. 2012. “Why Are Gender Quotas Adopted? Party Pragmatism and Parity in France.” Political Research Quarterly 65 (3): 529–543. doi:10.1177/1065912911414590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palma, Esperanza. 2021. “Paridad de género.” Prontuario de la Democracia, March 26. Accessed July 4, 2023. https://prontuario-democracia.sociales.unam.mx/paridad-de-genero/.
   Google Scholar
• Palma, Esperanza, and Daniela Cerva. 2014. “La importancia de las instituciones y la organización de las mujeres.” Política y Gobierno 21 (2): 291–235.
   Google Scholar
• Piscopo, Jennifer M. 2015. “States as Gender Equality Activists: The Evolution of Quota Laws in Latin America.” Latin American Politics and Society 57 (3): 29–42. doi:10.1111/j.1548-2456.2015.00278.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piscopo, Jennifer M. 2016. “When Informality Advantages Women: Quota Networks, Electoral Rules, and Candidate Selection in Mexico.” Government and Opposition 51 (3): 285–309. doi:10.1017/gov.2016.11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piscopo, Jennifer M. 2017. “Leveraging Informality, Rewriting Formal Rules: The Implementation of Gender Parity in Mexico.” In Gender and Informal Institutions, edited by Georgina Waylen, 137–160. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez Gustá, Ana Laura. 2015. “Espacios organizacionales para la igualdad de género en el poder legislativo.” Hologramática 23 (3): 23–42.
   Google Scholar
• Sagot, Montserrat. 2010. “Does the Political Participation of Women Matter? Democratic Representation, Affirmative Action, and Quotas in Costa Rica.” IDS Bulletin 41 (5): 25–34. doi:10.1111/j.1759-5436.2010.00163.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie A. 2009. “Making Quotas Work: The Effect of Gender Quota Laws on the Election of Women.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 34 (1): 5–28. doi:10.3162/036298009787500330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie A. 2018. Gender and Representation in Latin America. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie A., and Santiago Alles. 2018. “Women in Legislatures: Gender, Institutions, and Democracy.” In Gender and Representation in Latin America, edited by Leslie A. Schwindt-Bayer, 56–73. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• SenadoresPANTV. 2019. “Senadora Kenia López Rabadán, conferencia de prensa en conjunto con integrantes del colectivo 50+1.” YouTube, May 6. Accessed July 4, 2023. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wNbmmgxcDgM&t=76s.
   Google Scholar
• Tarrés, María Luisa. 2006. “The Political Participation of Women in Contemporary Mexico, 1980–2000.” In Changing Structure of Mexico: Political, Social, and Economic Prospects, edited by Laura Randall, 406–423. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Towns, Ann E. 2012. “Norms and Social Hierarchies: Understanding International Policy Diffusion ‘from Below.’” International Organization 66 (2): 179–209. doi:10.1017/S0020818312000045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tula, María Inés. 2021. “Elecciones y paridad de género en Bolivia.” Estudios 46: 55–74. doi:10.31050/re.vi46.34009.
   Google Scholar
• Valdini, Melody E. 2019. The Inclusion Calculation: Why Men Appropriate Women’s Representation. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Verge, Tània. 2012. “Institutionalising Gender Equality in Spain: From Party Quotas to Electoral Gender Quotas.” West European Politics 35 (2): 395–414. doi:10.1080/01402382.2011.648014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weeks, Anna Catalano. 2018. “Why Are Gender Quota Laws Adopted by Men? The Role of Inter- and Intra-Party Competition.” Comparative Political Studies 51 (14): 1935–1973. doi:10.1177/0010414018758762.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wylie, Kristin, Pedro dos Santos, and Daniel Marcelino. 2019. “Extreme Non-Viable Candidates and Quota Maneuvering in Brazilian Legislative Elections.” Opinião Pública 25 (1): 1–28. doi:10.1590/1807-019120192511.
   Google Scholar