Negotiating Borders through a Politics of Scale: Municipalities and Urban Civil Society Initiatives in the Contested Field of Migration

References

• Agustín, O. G., and M. B. Jørgensen. 2015. Politics of dissent. Hamburg: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Agustín, Ó. G., and M. B. Jørgensen. 2019. Solidarity and the ‘refugee crisis’ in Europe. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, W., B. Anderson, F. Düvell, J. Hough, R. Humphris, L. Rose, M. Sumption, N. van Hear, and S. Walker. 2018. Who counts in crises? The new geopolitics of international migration and refugee governance. Geopolitics 23 (1):217–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambrosini, M. 2013. ‘We are against a multi-ethnic society’: Policies of exclusion at the urban level in Italy. Ethnic and Racial Studies 36 (1):136–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambrosini, M., and P. Boccagni. 2015. Urban multiculturalism beyond the ‘backlash’: New discourses and different practices in immigrant policies across European cities. Journal of Intercultural Studies 36 (1):35–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansems De Vries, L. A., and E. Guild. 2019. Seeking refuge in Europe: Spaces of transit and the violence of migration management. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 45 (12):2156–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antentas, J. M. 2015. Sliding scale of spaces and dilemmas of internationalism. Antipode 47 (5):1101–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ataç, I. 2019. Deserving shelter: Conditional access to accommodation for rejected asylum seekers in Austria, the Netherlands, and Sweden. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies 17 (1):44–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ataç, I., K. Rygiel, and M. Stierl. 2021. Building transversal solidarities in European cities: Open harbours, safe communities, home. Critical Sociology 47 (6):923–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ataç, I., and S. Schilliger. 2022. Civil society organisations engaged with illegalised migrants in Bern and Vienna: Co-production of urban citizenship. In Contending global apartheid: Transversal solidarities and politics of possibility, ed. M. B. Jørgensen and C. Schierup. Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Ataç, I., T. Schütze, and V. Reitter. 2020. Local responses in restrictive national policy contexts: welfare provisions for non-removed rejected asylum seekers in Amsterdam, Stockholm and Vienna. Ethnic and Racial Studies 43 (16):115–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aumüller, J. 2009. Die Kommunale Integration von Flüchtlingen [The municipal integration of refugees]. In Lokale Integrationspolitik in der Einwanderungsgesellschaft: Migration Und Integration Als Herausforderung von Kommunen [Local integration policy in immigration society: migration and integration as a challenge for municipalities], 111–30. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Ballet, S. (2021). A site of power imbalance or political potential? A comparative case study of the accommodation infrastructure for illegalized migrants in Brussels. Master thesis, Ghent University.
   Google Scholar
• Bauder, H. 2016. Possibilities of urban belonging. Antipode 48 (2):252–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauder, H. 2021. Urban migrant and refugee solidarity beyond city limits. Urban Studies. doi:10.1177/0042098020976308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauder, H., and J. Darling. 2019. Sanctuary cities and urban struggles. Rescaling migration, citizenship, and rights. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bauder, H., and L. Juffs. 2020. ‘Solidarity’ in the migration and refugee literature: Analysis of a concept. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 46 (1):46–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bommes, M. 2008. Integration findet vor Ort statt: über die Neugestaltung kommunaler Integrationspolitik [Integration takes place on site: About the recreation of municipal integration policy. In Migrationsreport 2008: Fakten-Analysen-Perspektiven [Migration report 2008: facts analyses perspectives], ed. M. Bommes and M. Krüger-Potratz, 159–94. Frankfurt a.M./New York: Campus Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, N., P. Marcuse, and M. Mayer. eds. 2012. Cities for People, not for Profit: Critical Urban Theory and the Right to the City. London.
   Google Scholar
• Burschel, F. 2020. Asyl als Falle. Staatlicher Rassismus im Umgang mit Geflüchteten in der Corona-Krise [Asylum as a trap. Governmental racism in dealing with refugees during corona crisis]. Accessed May 15, 2021. https://www.rosalux.de/news/id/41971/asyl-als-falle
   Google Scholar
• Çağlar, A., and N. Glick Schiller. 2018. Migrants and city-making: Dispossession, displacement, and urban regeneration. Durham, London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crage, S. M. 2009. Ideological conflict and refugee aid policy development in Munich. German Politics 18 (1):71–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling, J. 2019. Sanctuary, presence, and the politics of urbanism. In Sanctuary cities and urban struggles, 242–64. Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Genova, N., G. Garelli, and M. Tazzioli. 2018. Autonomy of asylum? The autonomy of migration undoing the refugee crisis script. South Atlantic Quarterly 117 (2):239–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delanty, G., and C. Rumford. 2005. Rethinking Europe: Social theory and the implications of Europeanization. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Delclós, C. 2017. We want to welcome! Barcelona demands open borders for refugees. Accessed May 25, 2021 https://roarmag.org/essays/barcelona-refugee-solidarity-protest/
   Google Scholar
• Della Porta, D., and E. Steinhilper. 2020. Introduction: Solidarities in motion: Hybridity and change in migrant support practices. Critical Sociology 26:1–11. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0896920520952143.
   Google Scholar
• Delvino, N., and S. Spencer. 2019. Migrants with irregular status in Europe: Guidance for municipalities. Oxford: COMPAS and C-MISE findings for inclusive measure.
   Google Scholar
• Depraetere, A., and S. Oosterlynck. 2017. ‘I finally found my place’: a political ethnography of the Maximilian refugee camp in Brussels. Citizenship Studies 21 (6):693–709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deserteurs- und Flüchtlingsberatung. n.d. Accessed May 3, 2012. https://deserteursberatung.at/
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. W. 2012. Rebel cities: From the right to the city to the urban revolution. London.
   Google Scholar
• Hinger, S., A. Pott, and P. Schäfer. 2016. The local production of asylum. Journal of Refugee Studies 29 (4):440–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isin, E. 2009. Citizenship in flux: The figure of the activist citizen. Subjectivity Issue 29:367–88.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, R. 2019. Open borders. In defense of free movement. Athens: The University of Georgia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jørgensen, M. B., and D. R. Olsen. 2020. Challenging misconceptions: Danish civil society in times of crisis. In Hope and nostalgia at the intersection between welfare and culture, ed. O. C. Noroce, A. Hellström, and M. B. Jørgensen, 153–67. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kasparek, B., M. Kirchhoff, J. Neuhauser, and H. Schwiertz. 2017. The return of the national? Migration, borders and nationalism. Journal for Critical Migration and Border Regime Studies 3 (2).
   Google Scholar
• Kreichauf, R., and M. Mayer. 2021. Negotiating urban solidarities: Multiple agencies and contested meanings in the making of solidarity cities. Urban Geography. doi:10.1080/02723638.2021.1890953.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert, S., and T. Swerts. 2019. ’From sanctuary to welcoming cities’: Negotiating the social inclusion of undocumented migrants in Liège, Belgium. Social Inclusion 7 (4):90–99. doi:10.17645/si.v7i4.2326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leitner, H., E. Sheppard, and K. M. Sziarto. 2008. The spatialities of contentious politics. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 33 (2):157–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massey, D. 2007. World City. Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, M. 2017. Cities as sites of refuge and resistance. European Urban and Regional Studies 25 (3):232–49. doi:10.1177/0969776417729963.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meeus, B., B. Van Heur, and K. Arnaut. 2019. Migration and the infrastructural politics of urban arrival. In Arrival Infrastructures, 1–32. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Muy, S. 2020. Mit Corona gegen Familiennachzug [With Corona against family reunification]. Accessed April 27, 2021. https://www.migazin.de/2020/05/15/fluechtlingspolitik-mit-corona-gegen-den-familiennachzug/
   Google Scholar
• Nicholls, W. J., and J. Uitermark. 2016. Cities and social movements: Immigrant rights activism in the US, France, and the Netherlands, 1970–2015. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Oomen, B., et al. 2021. Strategies of divergence: Local authorities, law, and discretionary spaces in migration governance. Journal of Refugee Studies 34 (4):3608–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pascucci, E. 2017. Community infrastructures: Shelter, self-reliance and polymorphic borders in urban refugee governance. Territory, Politics, Governance 5 (3):332–45. doi:10.1080/21622671.2017.1297252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pott, A., and V. Tsianos. 2014. Verhandlungszonen des Lokalen. Potentiale der Regime-perspektive für die Erforschung der städtischen Migrationsgesellschaft [Area of local negotiation. Potentials of the regime analysis for the research on urban migration society]. In Theorien in der Raum- und Stadtforschung Einführungen [Theories of the spatial and urbanism studies introduction], ed. J. Oßenbrügge and A. Vogelpohl, 116–35. Münster: Westphälisches Dampfbot.
   Google Scholar
• Pruijt, H. 2007. Urban movements. In Blackwell encyclopaedia of sociology, ed. G. Ritzer, 5115–19. Malden.
   Google Scholar
• Purcell, M. 2006. Urban democracy and the local trap. Urban Studies 43 (11):1921–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riße, D. 2021a. “Katastrophe für mich. “31 Bewohner in Kölner Unterkunft positiv auf Mutante ges-testet [“Disaster for me.“ 31 inhabitants of accommodation in Cologne have been tested positive for mutant]. Kölner Stadt-Anzeiger. February 1, 2021. https://www.ksta.de/koeln/-katastrophe-fuer-mich–31-bewohner-in-koelner-unterkunft-positiv-auf-mutante-getestet-38003324
   Google Scholar
• Riße, D. 2021b. Kölner Flüchtlinge in der Corona-Krise [Cologne refugees during the corona crisis]. Kölner Stadt-Anzeiger February, 25, 2021 Accessed May 15, 2021. https://www.ksta.de/koeln/koelner-fluechtlinge-in-der-corona-krise–die-pandemie-hat-die-situation-verschaerft–38104742?cb=1615900948021
   Google Scholar
• Rokem, J., S. Fregonese, A. Ramadan, E. Pascucci, G. Rosen, and I. Charney. 2017. Interventions in urban geopolitics. Political Geography 61:253–62. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2017.04.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, B. 2019. Beyond the Local trap: New municipalism and the rise of the fearless cities. Antipode 51 (3):989–1010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruszczyk, S. P. 2019. Non-State actors in the regularisation of undocumented youths: The role of the ‘education without borders network’ in Paris. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 45 (15):3023–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saifee, J., C. Franco-Paredes, and S. R. Lowenstein. 2021. Refugee health during COVID-19 and future pandemics. Current Tropical Medicine Reports 8:1–4. doi:10.1007/s40475-021-00245-2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Saltiel, R. 2020. Urban arrival infrastructures between political and humanitarian support: The ‘Refu-gee Welcome’Mo (ve) ment revisited. Urban Planning 5 (3):67–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schilliger, S. 2018. Urban citizenship. Teilhabe für alle, da, wo wir leben. [Urban citizenship. Participation for all, where we live]. In Stadt für alle! Analysen und Aneignungen. [City for all! Analyses and appropriations], ed. H. Aigner and S. Kumnig, 14–35. Wien: Mandelbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Schwiertz, H. 2022. Radical democratic theory and migration. The refugee protest march as a democratic practice. Philosophy & Social Criticism 48 (2):289–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwiertz, H., and H. Schwenken. 2020. Introduction: inclusive solidarity and citizenship along migratory routes in Europe and the Americas. Citizenship Studies 24 (4):405–23. doi:10.1080/13621025.2020.1755155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwiertz, H., and E. Steinhilper. 2021. Countering the Asylum Paradox Through Strategic Humanitarianism: Evidence from Safe Passage Activism in Germany. Critical Sociology 47 (2):203–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sears, A. 2014. The next new left: A history of the future. Halifax, Nova Scotia: Fernwood Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Swerts, T., and N. Walter. 2020. Undocumented immigrant activism and the political: Disrupting the order or reproducing the status quo? Antipode 1–12. doi:10.1111/anti.12678.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, M. 2020. What’s so new about new municipalism? Progress in Human Geography 45 (2):317–42. doi:10.1177/0309132520909480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandevoordt, R. 2019a. Eroding rights, crafting solidarity? Shifting dynamics in the state–civil society nexus in Flanders and Brussels. Social Inclusion 7 (2):106–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandevoordt, R. 2019b. Subversive humanitarianism: rethinking refugee solidarity through grass-roots initiatives. Refugee Survey Quarterly 38 (3):245–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandevoordt, R. 2020a. A more personal shelter: How citizens are hosting forced migrants in and around Brussels. In Structures of protection? Rethinking refugee shelter, ed. T. Scott-Smith and M. Breeze, 149–62. Oxford: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Vandevoordt, R. 2020b. Resisting bare life: civil solidarity and the hunt for illegalized mi-grants. International Migration.
   Google Scholar
• Vandevoordt, R., and L. Fleischmann. 2020. Impossible futures? The ambivalent temporalities of grassroots humanitarian action. Critical Sociology 47 (2):0896920520932655. doi:10.1177/0896920520932655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandevoordt, R., and G. Verschraegen. 2019. The European refugee controversy: Civil solidarity. Cultural Imaginaries and Political Change. Social Inclusion 7 (2):48. doi:10.17645/si.v7i2.2260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welander, M. 2020. The politics of exhaustion and the externalization of British border control. An articulation of a strategy designed to deter, control and exclude. International Migration 59 (3):29–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendel, K. 2014. Unterbringung von Flüchtlingen in Deutschland. Regelungen Und Praxis Der Bundesländer Im Vergleich [Refugee accommodation in Germany. Regulations and practice. States in comparision]. Accessed March 15, 2021. https://www.proasyl.de/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Laendervergleich_Unterbringung_2014-09-23_02.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wotzlaw, S. 2021. Verbesserung der Internetgrundversorgung in Unterkünften für Geflüchtete [Improving internet access in refugee accommodations]. Accessed May 2, 2021. https://www.stadt-koeln.de/politik-und-verwaltung/presse/mitteilungen/22831/index.html
   Google Scholar