Energy Security Innovation in the Baltic Sea Region: Competing Visions of Technopolitical Orders

References

• Baliszewski, D. 2006. Rury Wojny. Wprost. http://www.wprost.pl/ar/86453/Rury-wojny/.
   Google Scholar
• Baranauskas, T. n.d. ‘On the origin of the name of Lithuania - Tomas Baranauskas’. Accessed 26 January 2022. http://www.lituanus.org/2009/09_3_02%20Baranauskas.html.
   Google Scholar
• Berenskötter, F. 2021. Anxiety and the biographical gestalt of political leaders. Journal of International Relations and Development 24 (4):1057–63. doi:10.1057/s41268-021-00225-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berling, T. V., I. Surwillo, and S. Sørensen. 2021. Norwegian and Ukrainian energy futures. Exploring the role of national identity in sociotechnical imaginaries of energy security. Journal of International Relations Development 25 (1):1–30. doi:10.1057/s41268-021-00212-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BNS. 2009. 26 December. https://www.delfi.lt/verslas/energetika/dgrybauskaite-2010-uosius-vadina-energetines-nepriklausomybes-pradzios-metais.d?id=27213047.
   Google Scholar
• BNS. 2016. ‘BNS primena svarbiausias gazprom“veiklos Lietuvoje datas. gazprom“dominavimo Lietuvoje istorija: Svarbiausios jos datos’. 1 March 2016. https://www.lrytas.lt/verslas/energetika/2016/03/01/news/-gazprom-dominavimo-lietuvoje-istorija-svarbiausios-jos-datos-826340.
   Google Scholar
• BNS. 2021. ‘Lietuva išlieka priklausoma nuo importuojamos energijos’. 15 June. https://www.lrt.lt/naujienos/verslas/4/1431821/lietuva-islieka-priklausoma-nuo-importuojamos-energijos.
   Google Scholar
• Browning, C. S. 2018. Geostrategies, Geopolitics and ontological security in the eastern neighbourhood: The European Union and the “New Cold War”. Political Geography 62:106–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browning, C. S., and P. Joenniemi. 2017. Ontological security, self-articulation and the securitization of identity. Cooperation and Conflict 52 (1):31–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budrytė, D. 2021. Memory politics and the study of crises in international relations: Insights from Ukraine and Lithuania. Journal of International Relations and Development 24 (4):980–1000. doi:10.1057/s41268-021-00231-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cash, J. 2017. The dilemmas of ontological insecurity in a postcolonising Northern Ireland. Postcolonial Studies 20 (3):387–410. doi:10.1080/13688790.2017.1391671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chekaleva–Demidovskaya, M. 2005. Russian-Polish relations: Need for new strategic approach. Fellowship Program for Young Russian Policy and Opinion Maker 1 (5): 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, J., and A. Jones. 2019. Geopolitical Teleconnections: Diplomacy, Events, and Foreign Policy. Political Geography 75 (November):102049. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2019.102049.
   Google Scholar
• Cloke, J., A. Mohr, and E. Brown. 2017. Imagining Renewable energy: towards a social energy systems approach to community renewable energy projects in the global south. Narratives and Storytelling in Energy and Climate Change Research 31 (September):263–72.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, A. 2006a. ‘The North European Gas Pipeline Threatens Europe’s Energy Security’. The Heritage Foundation 26. http://www.massenbach-world.de/media/116800689f529cf2ffff831aac144225.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, A. 2006b. Geopolityczna Smycz. Wprost. http://www.wprost.pl/ar/96425/Geopolityczna-smycz/.
   Google Scholar
• Delina, L. L. 2018. Whose and What Futures? Navigating the Contested Coproduction of Thailand’s Energy Sociotechnical Imaginaries. Energy and the Future 35 (January):48–56.
   Google Scholar
• Della Sala, V. 2017. Homeland Security: Territorial Myths and Ontological Security in the European Union. Journal of European Integration 39 (5):545–58. doi:10.1080/07036337.2017.1327528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudała, J. 2021. ‘Tu Zaszła Zmiana. Czyli, Co Politycy PiS o Górnictwie Mówili … ’. 21 January. https://www.wnp.pl/gornictwo/tu-zaszla-zmiana-czyli-co-politycy-pis-o-gornictwie-mowili,444091.html.
   Google Scholar
• Eaton, W. M., S. P. Gasteyer, and L. Busch. 2014. Bioenergy Futures: Framing Sociotechnical Imaginaries in Local Places. Rural Sociology 79 (2):227–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ejdus, F. 2017. “Not a Heap of Stones”: Material Environments and Ontological Security in International Relations. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 30 (1):23–43. doi:10.1080/09557571.2016.1271310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ejdus, F. 2020. Conflict, Peace, and Ontological Security. In The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Peace and Conflict Studies, 1–9. Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-11795-5_126-1.
   Google Scholar
• ELTA. 2022. Lietuvos kariniai laivai lydi dujas į saugyklą;independence“transportuojančius laivu. 14 April 2022. https://www.lrt.lt/naujienos/verslas/4/1673918/lietuvos-kariniai-laivai-lydi-dujas-i-saugykla-independence-transportuojancius-laivus.
   Google Scholar
• Energetyka 24. 2021. ‘W Sejmie Powstał Zespół Ds. Suwerenności Energetycznej. Przeciwko,ideologicznej Dekarbonizacji”’. 22 April 2021. https://www.energetyka24.com/w-sejmie-powstal-zespol-ds-suwerennosci-energetycznej-przeciwko-ideologicznej-dekarbonizacji.
   Google Scholar
• EP: Briefing No. 11. 2000. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/enlargement/briefings/11a3_en.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, K. 2008. Dywersyfikacja Kierunków Dostaw Gazu Do Polski w Latach 1997-2007. Warsaw: Warsaw School of Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Gaidamavičius, G. 2022. ‘Dujų srautai iš Lietuvos į Lenkiją siekia trečdalį GIPL pajėgumo’. lrt.Lt. 2 May 2022. https://www.lrt.lt/naujienos/verslas/4/1685710/duju-srautai-is-lietuvos-i-lenkija-siekia-trecdali-gipl-pajegumo.
   Google Scholar
• Gawlikowska-Fyk, A., and J. Maćkowiak Pandera. 2019. PEP2040 Pod Lupą Forum Energii. Warsaw: Forum Energii.
   Google Scholar
• Gerutis, A. 1984. TextsLithuania 700 Years. New York: Manyland Books.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. 1991. Modernity and Self-Identity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gonchar, M. 2006. Gazowy Blitzkrieg? Wprost. http://www.wprost.pl/ar/88038/Gazowy-blitzkrieg.html.
   Google Scholar
• Grigas, A. 2013. The Politics of Energy and Memory between the Baltic States and Russia. 1st ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Grigas, A., A. Kasekamp, K. Maslauskaite, and L. Zorgenfreija 2013. ‘THE baltic states in the eu: Yesterday, today and tomorrow’, Norte Europe Report.
   Google Scholar
• Gustafsson, K. 2021. Why is Anxiety’s Positive Potential so Rarely Realised? Creativity and Change in International Politics. Journal of International Relations and Development 24 (4):1044–49. doi:10.1057/s41268-021-00224-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustafsson, K., and N. C. Krickel-Choi. 2020. Returning to the Roots of Ontological Security: Insights from the Existentialist Anxiety Literature. European Journal of International Relations 26 (3):875–95. doi:10.1177/1354066120927073.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, L. 2006. Security as Practice. Discourse Analysis and the Bosnian War. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, F. S. 2016. Russia’s Relations with the West: Ontological Security through Conflict. Contemporary Politics 22 (3):359–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, L., and O. Wæver. 2002. European Integration and National Identity. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Heinrich, A. 2007. Poland as a Transit Country for Russian Natural Gas: Potential for Conflict. Koszalin: Koszalin Institute of Comparative European Studies (KICES).
   Google Scholar
• Holm, U. 2004. The EU’s Security Policy towards the Mediterranean: An (Im)possible Combination. Copenhagen, Denmark: Danish Institute for International Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Huysmans, J. 1998. Security! What Do You Mean? From Concept to Thick Signifier. European Journal of International Relations 4 (2):226–55. doi:10.1177/1354066198004002004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innes, A. J. 2017. Mobile Diasporas, Postcolonial Identities: The Green Line in Cyprus. Postcolonial Studies 20 (3):353–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Interviewee 21. 2021. Interview 21. Copenhagen, Denmark (online).
   Google Scholar
• Interviewee 1. 2021. Interview 1, Vilnius, Lithuania (online).
   Google Scholar
• Interviewee 11. 2021. Interview 11. Vilnius, Lithuania.
   Google Scholar
• Interviewee 12. 2021. Interview 12. Vilnius, Lithuania.
   Google Scholar
• Interviewee 16. 2021. Interview 16. Klaipeda, Lithuania.
   Google Scholar
• Interviewee 17. 2021. Interview 17. Vilnius, Lithuania.
   Google Scholar
• Interviewee 18. 2021. Interview 18. Copenhagen, Denmark (online).
   Google Scholar
• Interviewee 19. 2021. Interview 19. Copenhagen, Denmark (online).
   Google Scholar
• Interviewee 2. 2021. Interview 2. Vilnius, Lithuania.
   Google Scholar
• Interviewee 20. 2021. Interview 20. Copenhagen, Denmark (online).
   Google Scholar
• Interviewee 4, and Interviewee 5. 2021. Group interview 1. Vilnius, Lithuania (online).
   Google Scholar
• Interviewee 6. 2021. Interview 6. Vilnius, Lithuania.
   Google Scholar
• Interviewee 7. 2021. Interview 7. Vilnius, Lithuania.
   Google Scholar
• Interviewee 8. 2021. Interview 8. Vilnius, Lithuania.
   Google Scholar
• Interviewee 9. 2021. Interview 9. Vilnius, Lithuania.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. and Sang-Hyun Kim (Eds). 2015. Dreamscapes of Modernity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. 2015. Future Imperfect: Science, Technology, and the Imaginations of Modernity. In Dreamscapes of Modernity Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S., and S.-H. Kim. 2009. Containing the Atom: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and Nuclear Power in the United States and South Korea. Minerva 47 (2):119–46. doi:10.1007/s11024-009-9124-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaworski, R. 1985. History and Tradition in Contemporary Poland. East European Quarterly 19:3.
   Google Scholar
• Judge, A., T. Maltby, and J. D. Sharples. 2016. Challenging Reductionism in Analyses of EU-Russia Energy Relations. Geopolitics 21 (4):751–62. doi:10.1080/14650045.2016.1222520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn, K. B. 2018. Understanding Innovation. Business Horizons 61 (3):453–60. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2018.01.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karaliūtė, A. n.d. ‘„gazprom“turės Susitaikyti: Lietuva žengia Kitą Atsijungimo Nuo Rusijos Energetinių Sistemų žingsnį’. DELFI. Accessed 26 January 2022. https://www.delfi.lt/a/79558059.
   Google Scholar
• Kay, S. 2012. Ontological Security and Peace-Building in Northern Ireland. Contemporary Security Policy 33 (2):236–63. doi:10.1080/13523260.2012.693823.
   Google Scholar
• Kazharski, A. 2020. Civilizations as Ontological Security?: Stories of the Russian Trauma. Problems of Post-Communism 67 (1):24–36. doi:10.1080/10758216.2019.1591925.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinnvall, C. 2004. Globalization and Religious Nationalism: Self, Identity, and the Search for Ontological Security. Political Psychology 25 (5):741–67. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00396.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinnvall, C. 2006. Globalization and Religious Nationalism in India. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Koselleck, R. 1972. Begriffsgeschichte and Social History. In Futures Past: On the Semantics of Historical Time, pp. 75–92. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krickel-Choi, N. C. 2021. Rethinking Ontological Security Theory. Stockholm Studies in International Relations 2021(4):1–57.
   Google Scholar
• Kubacki, A. 2009. ‘Nord Stream, Czyli Jak Nie Robi Się Biznesu’. Newsweek, 9 November 2009. http://www.redakcja.newsweek.pl/Tekst/Polityka-Polska/533090,Nord-stream-czyli-jak-nie-robi-sie-biznesu.html.
   Google Scholar
• Kuchler, M. 2014. Sweet Dreams (Are Made of Cellulose): Sociotechnical Imaginaries of Second-Generation Bioenergy in the Global Debate. Ecological Economics 107 (November):431–37. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.09.014.
   Google Scholar
• Kuchler, M. 2017. Post-Conventional Energy Futures: Rendering Europe’s Shale Gas Resources Governable. Energy Research & Social Science September 31:32–40. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2017.05.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuchler, M., and G. Bridge. 2018. Down the Black Hole: Sustaining National Socio-Technical Imaginaries of Coal in Poland. Energy Infrastructure and the Fate of the Nation 41 (July):136–47.
   Google Scholar
• Laing, R. D. 1990. The Divided Self. New York: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Lasoń, M. 2008. Polska Wobec Wyzwań Bezpieczeństwa Energetycznego. In Międzynarodowe Bezpieczeństwo Energetyczne w XXI Wieku, ed. M. Ruszel and S. Podmiotko, p. 242. Kraków: Oficyna Wydawnicza AFM.
   Google Scholar
• Levenda, A. M., J. Richter, T. Miller, and E. Fisher. 2019. Regional Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Governance of Energy Innovations. Futures 109:181–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levidow, L., and T. Papaioannou. 2013. State Imaginaries of the Public Good: Shaping UK Innovation Priorities for Bioenergy. SI: Environmental and Developmental Discourses: Technical Knowledge, Discursive Spaces and Politics 30 (June):36–49.
   Google Scholar
• Lithuanian Ministry of Energy. 2021. ‘Lrv.Lt’. 4 August 2021. https://enmin.lrv.lt/lt/apie-ministerija/istorija.
   Google Scholar
• ‘LNG Factsheet 2014’. n.d.
   Google Scholar
• LRP. 2014. President’s speech. Dujų terminalas - Lietuvos energetinės nepriklausomybės įtvirtinimas | Lietuvos Respublikos Prezidentas. 19 February 2014. https://www.lrp.lt/lt/duju-terminalas-lietuvos-energetines-nepriklausomybes-itvirtinimas/18734.
   Google Scholar
• LRV. 2014. 27 October. https://ministraspirmininkas.lrv.lt/lt/naujienos/ministro-pirmininko-a-butkeviciaus-kalba-oficialioje-klaipedos-sgd-terminalo-laivo-independence-pasitikimo-ceremonijoje.
   Google Scholar
• Mach, Z. 2007. The Roman Catholic Church in Poland and the Dynamics of Social Identity in Polish Society. In The Religious Roots of Contemporary European Identity, ed. L. Faltin and M. J. Wright, pp. 117–33. Centre for European Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Mälksoo, M. 2015. “Memory Must Be Defended”: Beyond the Politics of Mnemonical Security. Security Dialogue 46 (3):221–37. doi:10.1177/0967010614552549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McSweeney, B. 1999. Security, Identity and Interests. A Sociology of International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Economy and Labor. 2005. Polityka Energetyczna Polski Do 2025 r. Polish Energy Policy until 2025. https://www.prawo.pl/akty/m-p-2005-42-562,17205399.html
   Google Scholar
• Mitzen, J. 2006. Ontological Security in World Politics: State Identity and the Security Dilemma. European Journal of International Relations 12 (3):341–70. doi:10.1177/1354066106067346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moulioukova, D., and R. E. Kanet. 2021. Ontological Security: A Framework for the Analysis of Russia’s View of the World. Global Affairs 7 (5):831–53.
   Google Scholar
• Mutter, A. 2019. Mobilizing Sociotechnical Imaginaries of Fossil-Free Futures – Electricity and Biogas in Public Transport in Linkoping. Energy Research & Social Science 49:1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NES Resolution. 1994.
   Google Scholar
• NES Resolution. 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Neumann, I. B. 2003. This Little Piggy Stayed at Home: Why Norway is Not a Member of the EU. In European Integration and National Identity, ed. L. Hansen and O. Wæver, pp. 100–41. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nowakowski, J. M. 2006. Miotacz Gazu. Wprost. http://www.wprost.pl/ar/85836/Miotacz-gazu/.
   Google Scholar
• Oksińska, B. 2021. ‘W Sejmie Powstał Zespół Ds. Suwerenności Energetycznej’. Energia.Rp.Pl. 19 April 2021. https://energia.rp.pl/energetyka-zawodowa/transformacja-energetyczna/30744-w-sejmie-powstal-zespol-ds-suwerennosci-energetycznej.
   Google Scholar
• PAP/AT. 2021. ‘Prezydent: Jedyną Drogą Do Suwerenności Energetycznej Jest Atom’, 23 April 2021. https://www.wnp.pl/energetyka/prezydent-jedyna-droga-do-suwerennosci-energetycznej-jest-atom,464732.html.
   Google Scholar
• Parnes, L. 2007. ‘Lęk Przed Pustą Rurą’. Wiadomosci.Polska.Pl, 15 July 2007. http://wiadomosci.polska.pl/specdlapolski/article,Lek_przed_pusta_rura,id,285019.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Patel, S. 2022. ‘Poland Secures NuScale SMR as Urgency for Nuclear Energy Ramps Up Across Central, Eastern Europe’. Poland Secures NuScale SMR as Urgency for Nuclear Energy Ramps Up Across Central, Eastern Europe. https://www.powermag.com/poland-secures-nuscale-smr-as-urgency-for-nuclear-energy-ramps-up-across-central-eastern-europe/.
   Google Scholar
• Pawelczyk, G., and P. Kudzia. 1999. Nabici w Rurę. Wprost. http://www.wprost.pl/ar/5295/Nabici-w-rure/.
   Google Scholar
• Perreault, T., and G. Valdivia. 2010. Hydrocarbons, Popular Protest and National Imaginaries: Ecuador and Bolivia in Comparative Context. Geoforum 41 (5):689–99. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2010.04.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen, K. L. 2019. Teaching for innovation: Preparing for an uncertain future. Copenhagen: Djoef Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Piński, J. 2006. ‘Zabór Energetyczny’. Wprost. http://www.wprost.pl/ar/97179/Zabor-energetyczny/.
   Google Scholar
• Platūkytė, D. 2020. 75 dienos ekonominės blokados – klastingas Sovietų Sąjungos planas kirto atgal jai pačiai. 18 April. https://www.lrt.lt/naujienos/lietuvoje/2/1164609/75-dienos-ekonomines-blokados-klastingas-sovietu-sajungos-planas-kirto-atgal-jai-paciai.
   Google Scholar
• Polish Ministry of Climate and Environment. 2020. ‘Polityka Energetyczna Polski Do 2040 r. (PEP2040). Poland’s Energy Policy until 2040. https://www.gov.pl/web/klimat/polityka-energetyczna-polski?fbclid=IwAR3doNwBub6EqZ0aoFzxN_yLFY7wAK2Oxr0q5UKgF1CQ2AVa7ISkrd30rHA
   Google Scholar
• Polish Ministry of Energy. 2016. ‘Minister Tchórzewski: Potrafimy Zamienić Polskie Czarne Złoto w Sukces’. 14 December 2016. http://portal.mg.gov.pl/node/26739.
   Google Scholar
• ‘Polish Nuclear Energy Program’. 2020. Governmental portal. https://www.gov.pl/web/polski-atom/program-polskiej-energetyki-jadrowej.
   Google Scholar
• Prizel, I. 1998. National Identity and Foreign Policy: Nationalism and Leadership in Poland, Russia and Ukraine. Cambridge: Cambridge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ragana, Š. 1922. Sename Dvare. Vilnius: Margi raštai.
   Google Scholar
• Rammert, W. 2000. Auf dem Weg zu einer post-schumpeterianischen Innovationsweise. Technik aus soziologischer Perspektive, Vol. 2, pp. 157–73. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Rammert, W. 2021. Technology and innovation. In Soziologie - Sociology in the German-Speaking World, ed. B. Hollstein, R. Greshoff, U. Schimank, and A. Weiß, pp. 515–34. Berlin: De Gruyter. doi:10.1515/9783110627275-034.
   Google Scholar
• Rossdale, C. 2015. Enclosing critique: the limits of ontological security. International Political Sociology 9 (4):369–86. doi:10.1111/ips.12103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rumelili, B. 2021. [Our] Age of Anxiety: Existentialism and the Current State of International Relations. Journal of International Relations and Development 24 (4):1020–36. doi:10.1057/s41268-021-00226-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rzeczpospolita. 2021. ‘Skarb Państwa Przejął Udziały w Spółce Jądrowej’. 26 March. https://www.rp.pl/biznes/art207841-skarb-panstwa-przejal-udzialy-w-spolce-jadrowej
   Google Scholar
• Šatūnienė, Ž. 2004. Lietuvos energetinė (ne)priklausomybė ir šalies saugumas. Lietuvos Metinė Strateginė Apžvalga [Lithuanian Annual Strategic Review] 233–51. doi:10.47459/lmsa.2004.2.10.
   Google Scholar
• Scheer, D., K. Wilfried, and S. Wassermann. 2017. The good, the bad, and the ambivalent: a qualitative study of public perceptions towards energy technologies and portfolios in Germany. Energy Policy 100:89–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schelhas, J., S. Hitchner, and P. Brosius. 2018. Envisioning and Implementing Wood-Based Bioenergy Systems in the Southern United States: Imaginaries in Everyday Talk. Energy Research & Social Science 35:182–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senat. 2017. Konferencja ,polska Liderem Czystych Technologii Węglowych w Unii Europejskiej”. https://www.senat.gov.pl/aktualnosci/art,9712,konferencja-polska-liderem-czystych-technologii-weglowych-w-unii-europejskiej.html.
   Google Scholar
• Steele, B. J. 2008. Ontological Security in International Relations: Self-Identity and the IR State. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Subotić, J. 2019. Yellow Star, Red Star. Holocaust Remembrance after Communism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Subramanian, S. 2022. ‘How a Baltic Nation Ended Its Reliance on Russian Gas’. Quartz. 11 April 2022. https://qz.com/2152999/lithuania-became-the-first-eu-nation-to-stop-russian-gas-imports/.
   Google Scholar
• Surwillo, I. 2019. Energy Security Logics in Europe: Threat, Risk or Emancipation?. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Švedas, R. 2017. EU energy Island – characteristics, threats, and how to break out of it: a case study of Lithuania. Lithuanian Annual Strategic Review 15 (1):1. doi:10.1515/lasr-2017-0008.
   Google Scholar
• Szulecki, K., A. Ancygier, and D. Szwed. 2015. Energy democratization? Societal aspects of de-carbonization in the German and polish energy sectors. Environmental Studies and Policy Research Institute: Wroclaw, Working paper number 5, March 2015: 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Terleckas, R. 2022. ‘Ramūnas Terleckas. Atominės nuotaikos prezidentūroje’. 6 January 2022. https://www.lrt.lt/naujienos/nuomones/3/1582167/ramunas-terleckas-atomines-nuotaikos-prezidenturoje.
   Google Scholar
• ‘The Lithuanian Word’. n.d. ‘Spaudos Draudimo Laikotarpio Lietuviški Leidiniai. „AUŠRA“’. Accessed 5 July 2022. http://www.spaudos.lt/spauda/ausra.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Tidwell, A. S. D., and J. M. Smith. 2015. Morals, materials, and technoscience: the energy security imaginary in the United States. Science, Technology, & Human Values 40 (5):687–711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tierney, W. G., and M. Lanford. 2016. Conceptualizing Innovation in Higher Education. In Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, ed. M. B. Paulsen. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• TR. 1956. ‘Trybuna Robotnicza’, 4 December 1956. https://www.sbc.org.pl/dlibra/publication/107968/edition/101589.
   Google Scholar
• TR. 1962. ‘Trybuna Robotnicza’, 4 December 1962. https://www.sbc.org.pl/dlibra/publication/120769/edition/113571.
   Google Scholar
• TR. 1973. ‘Trybuna Robotnicza’, 4 December 1973. https://www.sbc.org.pl/dlibra/publication/90720/edition/85598.
   Google Scholar
• TR. 1974. ‘Trybuna Robotnicza’, 4 December 1974. https://www.sbc.org.pl/dlibra/publication/89885/edition/84763.
   Google Scholar
• ‘Vert 2006’. n.d. Accessed 26 January 2022. https://www.vert.lt/SiteAssets/vkekk-metines-veiklos-ataskaitos/vkekk-ataskaita06.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Vesnic-Alujevic, L., M. Breitegger, and A. Guimaraes Pereira. 2016. What smart grids tell about innovation narratives in the European Union: hopes, imaginaries and policy. Energy Research & Social Science 12:16–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ‘Vilniaus istorija’. n.d. Accessed 26 January 2022. https://www.vle.lt/straipsnis/vilniaus-istorija/.
   Google Scholar
• Voiška, K. 2020. ‘Tarpukario Lietuva – Aukso Amžius Tautai Ar Jos Išnaudotojams?’. https://www.ekspertai.eu/tarpukario-lietuva-aukso-amzius-tautai-ar-jos-isnaudotojams/?id.
   Google Scholar
• Walicki, A. 1990. The three traditions of polish patriotism. In Polish Paradoxes, ed. S. Gomulka and A. Polonsky. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wendt, A. 1994. Collective identity formation and the international state. The American Political Science Review 88 (2):384–96. doi:10.2307/2944711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarakol, A. 2017. States and ontological security: A historical rethinking. Cooperation and Conflict 52 (1):48–68. doi:10.1177/0010836716653158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar