European Dreams of the Cloud: Imagining Innovation and Political Control

References

• Altmaier, P. 2019. Die zweite Welle der Digitalisierung ist Europas Chance. Handelsblatt, October 27. Accessed February 20, 2020. https://www.handelsblatt.com/meinung/gastbeitraege/gastkommentar-die-zweite-welle-der-digitalisierung-ist-europas-chance/25160092.html.
   Google Scholar
• Amoore, L. 2016. Cloud geographies: Computing, data, sovereignty. Progress in Human Geography 42 (1):1–21. doi:10.1177/0309132516662147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlow, J. P. 1996. A declaration of the independence of cyberspace. Accessed November 15, 2014. https://homes.eff.org/~barlow/Declaration-Final.html.
   Google Scholar
• Baur-Ahrens, A. 2017. The power of cyberspace centralisation: Analysing the example of data territorialisation. In Security/Mobility: Politics of movement, ed. M. Leese and S. Wittendorp, pp. 37–56. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bellanova, R., K. L. Jacobsen, and L. Monsees. 2020. Taking the trouble: Science, technology and security studies. Critical Studies on Security 8 (2):87–100. doi:10.1080/21624887.2020.1839852.
   Google Scholar
• Bendiek, S. 2020. Für ein starkes Europa im Cyberspace. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, January 14. Accessed January 24, 2020. https://www.faz.net/aktuell/wirtschaft/digitec/sabine-bendiek-fordert-ein-starkes-europa-im-cyberspace-16579503.html.
   Google Scholar
• BMWi. 2019. The project GAIA-X: A federated data infrastructure as the cradle of a vibrant European ecosystem, Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy. Accessed February 18, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• BMWi. 2020. GAIA-X: Technical architecture: Release – June 2020, Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy, Berlin. Accessed August 10, 2020. https://www.data-infrastructure.eu/GAIAX/Redaktion/EN/Publications/gaia-x-technical-architecture.html.
   Google Scholar
• Cogburn, D. L. 2016. The multiple logics of post-Snowden restructuring of internet governance. In The turn to infrastructure in internet governance, ed. F. Musiani, D. L. Cogburn, L. DeNardis, and N. S. Levinson, pp. 25–45. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Dachwitz, I., A. Biselli, and T. Rudl. 2019. Schornsteine zu Cloudspeichern. Accessed February 21, 2020. https://netzpolitik.org/2019/schornsteine-zu-cloudspeichern/.
   Google Scholar
• David, M. 2017. Moving beyond the heuristic of creative destruction: Targeting exnovation with policy mixes for energy transitions. Energy Research & Social Science 33:138–46. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deibert, R. J., J. Palfrey, R. Rohozinski, and J. Zittrain, ed. 2010. Access controlled. The shaping of power, rights, and rule in cyberspace. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• DeNardis, L. 2012. Hidden levers of internet control: An infrastructure-based theory of internet governance. Information, Communication & Society 15 (5):720–38. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2012.659199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2020a. Europe: The keys to sovereignty – by Thierry Breton. News 11 September 2020. Accessed May 6, 2021. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/commissioners/2019-2024/breton/announcements/europe-keys-sovereignty_en.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2020b. For a united, resilient and sovereign Europe. News 10 June 2020. Accessed May 6, 2021. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/commissioners/2019-2024/breton/announcements/united-resilient-and-sovereign-europe_en.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2020c. Communication: A European strategy for data. COM (2020) 66 final. Accessed April 19, 2020. https://ec.europa.eu/info/files/communication-european-strategy-data_en.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, S. W., M. Leese, and D. Rychnovská. 2021. Science, technology, security: Towards critical collaboration. Social Studies of Science 51 (2):189–213. doi:10.1177/0306312720953515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felt, U. 2015. Keeping technologies out: Sociotechnical imaginaries and the formation of Austria’s technopolitical identity. In Dreamscapes of modernity: Sociotechnical imaginaries and the fabrication of power, ed. S. Jasanoff and S.-H. Kim, pp. 103–25. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• GAIA-X. 2020. Peter Altmaier and Bruno Le Maire present the European data infrastructure project GAIA-X. Accessed June 15, 2020. https://www.data-infrastructure.eu/GAIAX/Redaktion/EN/Video/20200604-GAIA-X-Ministerial-talk/20200604-ministerial-talk.html.
   Google Scholar
• GAIA-X. n.d. GAIA-X: A federated data infrastructure for Europe. Accessed May 6, 2021. https://www.data-infrastructure.eu/GAIAX/Navigation/EN/Home/home.html.
   Google Scholar
• Galloway, A. R. 2004. Protocol: How control exists after decentralization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gehlert, A. 2016. Cloud-Computing in der öffentlichen Verwaltung – Nur ein Hype oder echte Innovation? Aufbau der Bundescloud. Fachkongress des IT-Planungsrats. Accessed 23, February 2020. https://www.it-planungsrat.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/Fachkongress/4FK2016/3Mai_FIII_InfoSic_33-7_Aufbau_Bundescloud.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Godin, B., and D. Vinck. 2017. Introduction: Innovation – from the forbidden to a cliché. In Critical studies of innovation: Alternative approaches to the pro-innovation bias, ed. B. Godin and D. Vinck, pp. 1–14. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, J. L., and T. Wu. 2006. Who controls the internet? Illusions of a borderless world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gros, V., M. de Goede, and B. İ̇şleyen. 2017. The Snowden files made public: A material politics of contesting surveillance. International Political Sociology 11 (1):73–89. doi:10.1093/ips/olw031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haeberlen, T., D. Liveri, and M. Lakka. 2013. Good practice guide for securely deploying governmental clouds, ENISA, Heraklion. Accessed August 7, 2019. https://www.enisa.europa.eu/publications/good-practice-guide-for-securely-deploying-governmental-clouds.
   Google Scholar
• Harvard Kennedy School. n.d. STS research platform sociotechnical imaginaries: Methodological pointers. Accessed November 8, 2019. http://sts.hks.harvard.edu/research/platforms/imaginaries/ii.methods/methodological-pointers/.
   Google Scholar
• Herrera, G. L. 2007. Cyberspace and sovereignty: Thoughts on physical space and digital space. In Power and security in the information age. Investigating the role of the state in cyberspace, ed. M. D. Cavelty, V. Maurer, and S. F. Krishna-Hensel, pp. 67–93. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Hilgartner, S. 2015. Capturing the imaginary: Vanguards, visions and the synthetic biology revolution. In Science and democracy: Making knowledge and making power in the biosciences and beyond, ed. S. Hilgartner, C. A. Miller, and R. Hagendijk, pp. 33–55. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hoijtink, M., and M. Leese, ed. 2019. Technology and agency in international relations. Emerging technologies, ethics and international affairs. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, T. -H. 2015. A prehistory of the cloud. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• ITZBund. 2018. Geschäftsbericht 2017. Accessed October 26, 2019. https://www.itzbund.de/DE/UeberUns/Imagematerial/Geschaeftsbericht_2017.html.
   Google Scholar
• ITZBund. 2019a. Bundescloudentwicklungsplattform 2.0 online. Accessed August 10, 2020. https://www.itzbund.de/SharedDocs/Pressemitteilungen/DE/20190606_Bundescloud_Entwicklungsplattform.html.
   Google Scholar
• ITZBund. 2019b. Geschäftsbericht 2018. Accessed October 26, 2019. https://www.itzbund.de/DE/UeberUns/Imagematerial/Geschaeftsbericht_2018.html.
   Google Scholar
• ITZBund. 2020. Die Bundescloud: Das IT-Fundament der Bundesverwaltung. Accessed February 16, 2020. https://www.itzbund.de/Webs/DfD/SharedDocs/Projekte/Bundescloud.html.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. 2015. Future imperfect: Science, technology, and the imaginations of modernity. In Dreamscapes of modernity: Sociotechnical imaginaries and the fabrication of power, ed. S. Jasanoff and S.-H. Kim, pp. 1–33. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S., and S. -H. Kim. 2009. Containing the atom: Sociotechnical imaginaries and nuclear power in the United States and South Korea. Minerva 47 (2):119–46. doi:10.1007/s11024-009-9124-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S., and S. -H. Kim, ed. 2015. Dreamscapes of modernity: Sociotechnical imaginaries and the fabrication of power. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, L. 2020. Gaia X: Microsoft backtracks and wants to join Europe’s public cloud. Accessed January 20, 2020. https://winbuzzer.com/2020/01/14/gaia-x-microsoft-backtracks-and-wants-to-join-europes-public-cloud-xcxwbn/.
   Google Scholar
• KPMG. 2019. Cloud-Monitor 2019: Public Cloud und Cloud Security sind kein Widerspruch. Accessed August 9, 2019. https://hub.kpmg.de/cloud-monitor-2019.
   Google Scholar
• Krempl, S. 2019. Microsoft: Europäische “Staats-Cloud” Gaia X “wird nicht erfolgreich sein”. Accessed February 18, 2020. https://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Microsoft-Europaeische-Staats-Cloud-Gaia-X-wird-nicht-erfolgreich-sein-4570976.html?seite=all.
   Google Scholar
• Kühl, E. 2019. Der Traum von der europäischen Wolke. Die Zeit, October 29. Accessed February 18, 2020. https://www.zeit.de/digital/internet/2019-10/gaia-x-peter-altmaier-europaeische-cloud-zentrale-datensammlung-firmen/komplettansicht.
   Google Scholar
• Lambach, D. 2020. The territorialization of cyberspace. International Studies Review 22 (3):482–506. doi:10.1093/isr/viz022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leese, M., and M. Hoijtink. 2019. How (not) to talk about technology: International relations and the question of agency. In Technology and agency in international relations, ed. M. Hoijtink and M. Leese, pp. 1–23. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mager, A. 2017. Search engine imaginary: Visions and values in the co-production of search technology and Europe. Social Studies of Science 47 (2):240–62. doi:10.1177/0306312716671433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Microsoft. 2015. Microsoft announces plans to offer cloud services from German datacenters. Accessed February 11, 2020. https://news.microsoft.com/europe/2015/11/11/45283/.
   Google Scholar
• Microsoft. 2018. Microsoft to deliver cloud services from new datacentres in Germany in 2019 to meet evolving customer needs. Accessed November 9, 2019. https://news.microsoft.com/europe/2018/08/31/microsoft-to-deliver-cloud-services-from-new-datacentres-in-germany-in-2019-to-meet-evolving-customer-needs/.
   Google Scholar
• Möllers, N. 2021. Making digital territory: Cybersecurity, techno-nationalism, and the moral boundaries of the state. Science, Technology, & Human Values 46 (1):112–38. doi:10.1177/0162243920904436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosco, V. 2014. To the cloud: Big data in a turbulent world. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Office of the Federal Chief Information Officer. n.d. Federal cloud computing strategy: From cloud first to cloud smart. Accessed February 24, 2020. https://cloud.cio.gov/strategy/.
   Google Scholar
• Pfotenhauer, S., and S. Jasanoff. 2017. Panacea or diagnosis? Imaginaries of innovation and the ‘MIT model’ in three political cultures. Social Studies of Science 47 (6):783–810. doi:10.1177/0306312717706110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfotenhauer, S. M., and J. Juhl. 2017. Innovation and the political state: Beyond the myth of technologies and markets. In Critical studies of innovation: Alternative approaches to the pro-innovation bias, ed. B. Godin and D. Vinck, pp. 68–93. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Pohle, J. 2020. Digital sovereignty. A new key concept of digital policy in Germany and Europe. Berlin: Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung.
   Google Scholar
• Pohle, J., and T. Thiel. 2020. Digital sovereignty. Internet Policy Review 9 (4). doi:10.14763/2020.4.1532.
   Google Scholar
• Sadowski, J., and R. Bendor. 2019. Selling smartness: Corporate narratives and the smart city as a sociotechnical imaginary. Science, Technology, & Human Values 44 (3):540–63. doi:10.1177/0162243918806061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sagatz, K. 2015. Microsoft kündigt deutsche Cloud an. Tagesspiegel, November 11. Accessed February 12, 2020. https://www.tagesspiegel.de/themen/digitalisierung-ki/satya-nadella-in-berlin-microsoft-kuendigt-deutsche-cloud-an/12571808.html.
   Google Scholar
• Schiølin, K. 2020. Revolutionary dreams: Future essentialism and the sociotechnical imaginary of the fourth industrial revolution in Denmark. Social Studies of Science 50 (4):542–66. doi:10.1177/0306312719867768.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strassner, R. 2015. Insights: Microsoft Cloud in Deutschland . Berlin: Microsoft. Technical Summit 2015 – The Next Level. Accessed 12, February 2020. https://channel9.msdn.com/Events/microsoft-techncial-summit/Technical-Summit-2015-The-Next-Level/Insights-Microsoft-Cloud-in-Deutschland.
   Google Scholar
• Trauttmansdorff, P., and U. Felt. 2021. Between infrastructural experimentation and collective imagination: The digital transformation of the EU border regime. Science, Technology, & Human Values 1–28. doi:10.1177/01622439211057523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dijck, J. 2021. Seeing the forest for the trees: Visualizing platformization and its governance. New Media & Society 23 (9):2801–19. doi:10.1177/1461444820940293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Es, K., and T. Poell. 2020. Platform imaginaries and Dutch public service media. Social Media + Society 6 (2):1–10. doi:10.1177/2056305120933289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vonderau, A. 2017. Technologies of imagination: Locating the cloud in Sweden’s north. Imaginations Journal of Cross-Cultural Image Studies/Revue d’études interculturelle de l’image 8 (2):8–21. doi:10.17742/IMAGE.LD.8.2.2.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, A. 2019. GAIA-X webinar, December 9.
   Google Scholar
• White, B. n.d. Methods vignettes: Sociotechnical imaginaries. Accessed November 8, 2019. https://steps-centre.org/pathways-methods-vignettes/methods-vignettes-sociotechnical-imaginaries/.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, C., B. Szerszynski, and B. Wynne. 2018. The making of power shortage: The sociotechnical imaginary of nationalist high modernism and its pragmatic rationality in electricity planning in taiwan. East Asian Science, Technology and Society 12 (3):277–308. doi:10.1215/18752160-4386762.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar