508
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
General Articles

Sounding Out Borderscapes: A Sonic Geography of the US–Mexico Border at Otay Mountain, California

ORCID Icon

References

  • Augoyard, J.F., Torgue, H. ed. 2006. Sonic experience: A guide to everyday sounds. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s Press.
  • Balibar, E. 2002. World Borders, Political Borders. PMLA 117 (1):68–78.
  • Barad, K. 2003. Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 28 (3):801–31. doi:10.1086/345321.
  • Bigo, D. 2008. Globalized (in) security: The field and the ban-opticon. In Terror, insecurity and liberty: Illiberal ractices of Liberal regimes after 9/11. Didier, B, Tsoukala, A, pp. 20–58. London: Routledge.
  • Blum, V. L., and A. J. Secor. 2011. Psychotopologies: Closing the circuit between psychic and material space. Environment and Planning D: Society & Space 29 (6):1030–47. doi:10.1068/d11910.
  • Blum, V. L., and A. J. Secor. 2016. Mapping trauma: Topography to topology. In Psychoanalytic Geographies Kingsbury, P, Pile, S, pp. 127–40. London: Routledge.
  • Boyce, G. A. 2016. The rugged border: Surveillance, policing and the dynamic materiality of the US/Mexico frontier. Environment and Planning D: Society & Space 34 (2):245–62. doi:10.1177/0263775815611423.
  • Boyce, G. A., S. N. Chambers, and S. Launius. 2019. Bodily inertia and the weaponization of the Sonoran desert in us boundary enforcement: A GIS Modeling of migration routes through Arizona’s Altar valley. Journal on Migration and Human Security 7 (1):23–35. doi:10.1177/2331502419825610.
  • Brambilla, C. 2015. Exploring the critical potential of the borderscapes concept. Geopolitics 20 (1):14–34. doi:10.1080/14650045.2014.884561.
  • Brooks, A. 2020. Listening beyond the border: Self-representation, witnessing, and the white sonic field. Law Text Culture 24:96–116.
  • Cadava, G. L. 2011. Borderlands of modernity and abandonment: The Lines within Ambos Nogales and the Tohono o’odham nation. Journal of American History 98 (2):362–83. doi:10.1093/jahist/jar209.
  • Chao, S., E. Kirksey, and K. Bolender. 2022. The promise of multispecies justice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Country, B., S. Wright, S. Suchet-Pearson, K. Lloyd, L. Burarrwanga, R. Ganambarr, M. Ganambarr-Stubbs, B. Ganambarr, D. Maymuru, and J. Sweeney. 2016. Co-becoming bawaka: Towards a relational understanding of place/space. Progress in Human Geography 40 (4):455–75. doi:10.1177/0309132515589437.
  • De León, J. 2015. The land of open graves. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Dickinson, H. 2022. Caviar matter (s): The material politics of the European caviar grey market. Political Geography 99:102737. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2022.102737.
  • Dixon, D. P. 2014. The way of the flesh: Life, geopolitics and the weight of the future. Gender, Place & Culture 21 (2):136–51. doi:10.1080/0966369X.2013.879110.
  • Dixon, D. P. 2016. Feminist geopolitics: Material states. London: Routledge.
  • Doughty, K., M. Duffy, and T. Harada. 2019. Sounding places: More-than-representational geographies of sound and music. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Duffy, M., G. Waitt, and T. Harada. 2016. Making sense of sound: Visceral sonic mapping as a research tool. Emotion, Space and Society 20:49–57. doi:10.1016/j.emospa.2016.06.006.
  • Enns, C., B. Bersaglio, and R. Karmushu. 2022. Disaster management takes to the skies: How new technologies are reconfiguring spatialities of power in desert locust management. Political Geography 98:102732. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2022.102732.
  • Fleischmann, L. More-than-human bordertextures: Rethinking viruses and animals as co-constitutive border agents. In Bordertextures: A complexity approach to cultural border studies. C. Wille, A.M. Fellner, and E. Nossem, transcript Verlag. Forthcoming.
  • Gallagher, M. 2015. Field recording and the sounding of spaces. Environment and Planning D: Society & Space 33 (3):560–76. doi:10.1177/0263775815594310.
  • Gallagher, M. 2016. Sound as affect: Difference, power and spatiality. Emotion, Space and Society 20:42–48. doi:10.1016/j.emospa.2016.02.004.
  • Gallagher, M., A. Kanngieser, and J. Prior. 2017. Listening geographies: Landscape, affect and geotechnologies. Progress in Human Geography 41 (5):618–37. doi:10.1177/0309132516652952.
  • Gallagher, M., and J. Prior. 2014. Sonic geographies: Exploring phonographic methods. Progress in Human Geography 38 (2):267–84.
  • Garduño, E. 2017. Cartografía simbólica sobre el territorio tradicional de los kumiai. Desacatos Revista de Ciencias Sociales 55 (September):90. doi:10.29340/55.1806.
  • Gentry, B., G. A. Boyce, J. M. Garcia, and S. N. Chambers. 2019. Indigenous survival and settler colonial dispossession on the Mexican frontier: The case of cedagĭ wahia and wo’oson o’odham indigenous communities. Journal of Latin American Geography 18 (1):65–93. doi:10.1353/lag.2019.0003.
  • Ginn, F. 2014. Sticky lives: Slugs, detachment and more-than-human ethics in the garden. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 39 (4):532–44. doi:10.1111/tran.12043.
  • Haraway, D. J. 2008. When species meet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Hobson, K. 2007. Political animals? On animals as subjects in an enlarged political geography. Political Geography 26 (3):250–67. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2006.10.010.
  • Jasper, S. 2018. Sonic refugia: Nature, noise abatement and landscape design in West Berlin. The Journal of Architecture 23 (6):936–60. doi:10.1080/13602365.2018.1505773.
  • Jasper, S. 2020. Acoustic Ecologies: Architecture, Nature, and Modernist Experimentation in West Berlin. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 110 (4):1114–33.
  • Johnson, C., R. Jones, A. Paasi, L. Amoore, A. Mountz, M. Salter, and C. Rumford. 2011. Interventions on rethinking ‘the border’ in border studies. Political Geography 30 (2):61–69. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2011.01.002.
  • Jones, R. 2016. Violent borders: Refugees and the right to move. London: Verso Books.
  • Jones, R. 2021. White Borders: The history of race and immigration in the United States from Chinese exclusion to the border wall. Boston: Beacon Press.
  • Kanngieser, A. 2012. A sonic geography of voice: Towards an affective politics. Progress in Human Geography 36 (3):336–53. doi:10.1177/0309132511423969.
  • Kanngieser, A. 2014. A proposition toward a politics of listening (geographies and atmospheres). Invisible Places, June 20-24, Viseu, Portugal. 1–6.
  • Kanngieser, A. 2015. Geopolitics and the anthropocene: Five propositions for sound. GeoHumanities 1 (1):80–85. doi:10.1080/2373566X.2015.1075360.
  • King, T. L. 2019. The black shoals: Offshore formations of black and native studies. Durham: Duke University Press.
  • Kingsbury, P., and A. J. Secor2021. Introduction: Into the void. In a place more void. P. Kingsbury and A. J. Secor. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Presspp. 1–28.
  • Kinkaid, E. 2020. Re-encountering Lefebvre: Toward a critical phenomenology of social space. Environment and Planning D: Society & Space 38 (1):167–86. doi:10.1177/0263775819854765.
  • Kinkaid, E. 2021. Is post-phenomenology a critical geography? subjectivity and difference in post-phenomenological geographies. Progress in Human Geography 45 (2):298–316. doi:10.1177/0309132520909520.
  • Krause, B. 1987. Bioacoustics, habitat ambience in ecological balance. Whole Earth Review 57 (472): 14–18.
  • Kun, J. D. 2000. The aural border. Theatre Journal 52 (1):1–21. doi:10.1353/tj.2000.0016.
  • Kun, J. D. 2011. Playing the fence, listening to the line: Sound, sound art, and acoustic politics at the US-Mexico border. Performance in the borderlands. In Rivera-Servera , R.H., Young, H. ed. 17–36. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Lally, N., and L. Bergmann2021. Enfolding: An experimental geographical imagination system (gis). In a place more void. P. Kingsbury and A. J. Secor. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Presspp. 167–80.
  • Larsen, S. C., and J. T. Johnson. 2017. Being together in place: Indigenous coexistence in a more than human world. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Launius, S., and G. A. Boyce. 2021. More than metaphor: Settler colonialism, frontier logic, and the continuities of racialized dispossession in a Southwest US City. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 111 (1):157–74. doi:10.1080/24694452.2020.1750940.
  • Leppert, R. 2012. Reading the sonoric landscape. The Sound Studies Reader. In Sterne, J. ed. 409-18. London: Routledge. 409–18.
  • Lerman, R. 2015. Sounds, images, politics and place. Leonardo Music Journal 25:57–62. doi:10.1162/LMJ_a_00936.
  • Lorimer, J., T. Hodgetts, and M. Barua. 2019. Animals’ Atmospheres. Progress in Human Geography 43 (1):26–45. doi:10.1177/0309132517731254.
  • Loveless, N. 2019. How to make art at the end of the World. Durham: Duke University Press.
  • Luiselli, V. 2020. Lost children archive. New York: Vintage.
  • Luna, S. 2018. Affective atmospheres of terror on the Mexico–U.S. border: Rumors of violence in reynosa’s prostitution zone. Cultural Anthropology 33 (1):58–84. doi:10.14506/ca33.1.03.
  • MacFarlane, K. 2020a. Governing the noisy sphere: Geographies of noise regulation in the US. Environment & Planning C: Politics and Space 38 (3):539–56. doi:10.1177/2399654419872774.
  • MacFarlane, K. 2020b. Negative research: Sonic methods in geography and their limits. The Professional Geographer 72 (2):297–308. doi:10.1080/00330124.2019.1657913.
  • Madsen, K. D. 2011. Barriers of the US Mexico border as landscapes of domestic political compromise. Cultural Geographies 18 (4):547–56. doi:10.1177/1474474011418575.
  • Madsen, K. D. 2014. A basis for bordering: Land, migration, and inter-Tohono O'odham distinction along the US-Mexico line. Placing the Border in Everyday Life. In Jones, R., Johnson, C. ed. London: Routledge. 93–116.
  • Mann, G. 2008. A negative geography of necessity. Antipode 40 (5):921–34.
  • Margulies, J. D., and B. Bersaglio. 2018. Furthering post-human political ecologies. Geoforum 94 (August):103–06. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.03.017.
  • Margulies, J. D., and K. K. Karanth. 2018. The production of human-wildlife conflict: A political animal geography of encounter. Geoforum 95:153–64. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.06.011.
  • Massé, F. 2018. Topographies of security and the multiple spatialities of (conservation) power: verticality, surveillance, and space-time compression in the bush. Political Geography 67:56–64. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2018.10.001.
  • McCormack, D. P. 2018. Atmospheric things. Durham: Duke University Press.
  • Merleau-Ponty, M. 2013. Phenomenology of perception. London: Routledge.
  • Mezzadra, S., and B. Neilson. 2012. Between inclusion and exclusion: On the topology of global space and borders. Theory, Culture & Society 29 (4–5):58–75. doi:10.1177/0263276412443569.
  • Minca, C. 2021. Of werewolves, jungles, and refugees: more-than-human figures along the Balkan route. Geopolitics 1–20. doi:10.1080/14650045.2021.1931840.
  • Müller, M. 2015. More‐than‐representational political geographies. In The Wiley Blackwell companion to political geography, ed. John Agnew, et al., pp. 407–23. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
  • Nyers, P. 2012. Moving borders. Radical Philosophy 174:2–6.
  • Ozguc, U. 2020. Borders, detention, and the disruptive power of the noisy-subject. International Political Sociology 14 (1):77–93. doi:10.1093/ips/olz026.
  • Paiva, D. 2018. Sonic geographies: Themes, concepts, and deaf spots. Geography Compass 12 (7):e12375. doi:10.1111/gec3.12375.
  • Paiva, D., and H. Cachinho. 2022. Soundmaking and the making of worlds and territories: A case of street football games in Quinta da Piedade. Social & Cultural Geography 23 (1):120–39. doi:10.1080/14649365.2019.1704046.
  • Pallister-Wilkins, P. 2022. Whitescapes: A posthumanist political ecology of alpine migrant (im) mobility. Political Geography 92:102517. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2021.102517.
  • Panelli, R. 2010. More-than-human social geographies: Posthuman and other possibilities. Progress in Human Geography 34 (1):79–87. doi:10.1177/0309132509105007.
  • Parker, N., and N. Vaughan-Williams. 2009. Lines in the sand? Towards an agenda for critical border studies. Geopolitics 14 (3):582–87.
  • Parker, N., and N. Vaughan-Williams. 2012. Critical border studies: Broadening and deepening the ‘lines in the sand’ agenda. Geopolitics 17 (4):727–33. doi:10.1080/14650045.2012.706111.
  • Perera, S. 2007. A Pacific Zone?(In) security, sovereignty, and stories of the pacific borderscape. In Borderscapes: Hidden geographies and politics and territory’s edge. In Rajaram, P.K., Grundy-Warr, C. ed. 201–27. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Pijanowski, B. C., A. Farina, S. H. Gage, S. L. Dumyahn, and B. L. Krause. 2011. What is soundscape ecology? an introduction and overview of an emerging new science. Landscape Ecology 26 (9):1213–32. doi:10.1007/s10980-011-9600-8.
  • Rajaram, P. K., and C. Grundy-Warr. 2007. Borderscapes: Hidden geographies and politics at territory’s edge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Revill, G. 2016. How is space made in sound? spatial mediation, critical phenomenology and the political agency of sound. Progress in Human Geography 40 (2):240–56. doi:10.1177/0309132515572271.
  • Rossiter, D. A. 2011. Leave the lemons at home: Towards a political ecology of border space. Geopolitics 16 (1):107–20. doi:10.1080/14650045.2010.493777.
  • Sakr, R. 2018. The More-than-Human Refugee Journey: Hassan Blasim’s Short Stories. Journal of Postcolonial Writing 54 (6):766–80. doi:10.1080/17449855.2018.1551269.
  • Schafer, R. M. 1993. The soundscape: Our sonic environment and the tuning of the world. Rochester, VT: Destiny Books.
  • Sharp, J. 2021. Materials, forensics and feminist geopolitics. Progress in Human Geography 45 (5):990–1002. doi:10.1177/0309132520905653.
  • Shipek, F. C. 1985. Kuuchamaa: The Kumeyaay sacred mountain. Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology 7 (1):67–74.
  • Squire, V. 2014. Desert ‘trash’: Posthumanism, border struggles, and humanitarian politics. Political Geography 39:11–21. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2013.12.003.
  • Squire, R. 2020. Companions, zappers, and invaders: The animal geopolitics of sealab I, II, and III (1964–1969). Political Geography 82:102224. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2020.102224.
  • Srinivasan, K. 2016. Towards a political animal geography? Political Geography 50 (50):76–78. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2015.08.002.
  • St John, R. 2020. Place and music: Composing concrete antenna. In The Routledge handbook of place, ed. T. Edensor and A. Kalandides, Kothari, U., pp. 707–18. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
  • St John, R., 2021. Exploded scales, island imaginaries: The new landscape in art and geography (Doctoral dissertation, University of Glasgow).
  • St John, R., and R. Ferraby. 2019. Soundmarks. Bowland, UK: Pattern + Process Press.
  • Sundberg, J. 2011. Diabolic caminos in the desert and cat fights on the rio: A posthumanist political ecology of boundary enforcement in the United States–Mexico borderlands. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 101 (2):318–36. doi:10.1080/00045608.2010.538323.
  • Sundberg, J. 2014. Decolonizing posthumanist geographies. Cultural Geographies 21 (1):33–47. doi:10.1177/1474474013486067.
  • Sundberg, J., and B. Kaserman. 2007. Cactus carvings and desert defecations: Embodying representations of border crossings in protected areas on the Mexico—US border. Environment and Planning D: Society & Space 25 (4):727–44. doi:10.1068/d75j.
  • Todd, Z. 2016. An Indigenous feminist’s take on the ontological turn: ‘Ontology’is just another word for colonialism. Journal of Historical Sociology 29 (1):4–22. doi:10.1111/johs.12124.
  • Waitt, G., E. Ryan, and C. Farbotko. 2014. A visceral politics of sound. Antipode 46 (1):283–300. doi:10.1111/anti.12032.
  • Watts, V. 2013. Indigenous place-thought and agency amongst humans and non humans (first woman and sky woman go on a European world tour!). Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society 2 (1):20–34.
  • Whatmore, S. 2002. Hybrid geographies: Natures cultures spaces. London: Sage.
  • Whatmore, S., and L. Thorne. 1998. Wild(er)ness: Reconfiguring the geographies of wildlife. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 23 (4):435–54. doi:10.1111/j.0020-2754.1998.00435.x.
  • Wilson, H. F. 2017. On geography and encounter: Bodies, borders, and difference. Progress in Human Geography 41 (4):451–71. doi:10.1177/0309132516645958.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.