European Foreign Policy Towards Hybrid Actors in the Middle East and North Africa: An Exploration of Diplomatic Practices

References

• Adler-Nissen, R. 2016. Towards a practice turn in EU Studies: the everyday of European integration. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 54 (1):87–103. doi:10.1111/jcms.12329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adler, E., and V. Pouliot. 2011. International practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aslan, M. 2020. Hybrid political order in Libya: state, non-state, and armed actors. Insight Turkey 22 (4):139–56. doi:10.25253/99.2020224.09.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austermann, F. 2014. European Union delegations in EU foreign policy: A diplomatic service of different speeds. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bachmann. 2015. Spaces of interaction: enactments of sociospatial relations and an emerging EU diplomacy in Kenya. Territory, Politics, Governance 4(1):75–96. doi:10.1080/21622671.2015.1005124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachmann, V. 2016. European external action: the making of EU diplomacy in Kenya. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bagayoko, N., E. Hutchful, and R. Luckham. 2016. Hybrid security governance in Africa: rethinking the foundations of security, justice and legitimate public authority. Conflict, Security & Development 16 (1):1–32. doi:10.1080/14678802.2016.1136137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes-Dacey, J., E. Geranmayeh, and H. Lovatt. 2020. Guns and governance: how Europe should talk with non-state armed groups in the Middle East . European Council on Foreign Relations. https://ecfr.eu/special/mena-armed-groups/
   Google Scholar
• Bauder, H., and R. Mueller. 2021. Westphalian vs. Indigenous sovereignty: challenging colonial territorial governance. Geopolitics 28 (1):1–18. doi:10.1080/14650045.2021.1920577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berti, B. 2016. What’s in a name? Re-conceptualizing non-state armed groups in the Middle East. Palgrave Communications 2 (1):1–8. doi:10.1057/palcomms.2016.89.
   Google Scholar
• Bicchi, F. 2021. The ‘practice turn’ in the study of EU external action. In The external action of the European Union: concepts, approaches, theories, eds. S. Gstöhl and S. Schunz, pp. 242–55. London: Macmillan International Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Bicchi, F., and N. Bremberg. 2019. European diplomacy in practice: interrogating power, agency and change. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bicchi, F., and H. Maurer. 2018. European cooperation abroad: European diplomatic cooperation outside EU borders. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy 13 (1):1–19. doi:10.1163/1871191X-13010003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biedenkopf, K., and F. Petri. 2019. EU delegations in European Union climate diplomacy: the role of links to Brussels, individuals and country contexts. Journal of European Integration 41 (1):47–63. doi:10.1080/07036337.2018.1551389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bøås, M., and F. Strazzari. 2020. Governance, fragility and insurgency in the Sahel: A hybrid political order in the making. The International Spectator 55 (4):1–17. doi:10.1080/03932729.2020.1835324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borrell, J. 2021. A Strategic Compass to make Europe a security provider. Foreword by HR/VP Josep Borrell.
   Google Scholar
• Bouris, D., and B. İ̇şleyen. 2020. The European Union and practices of governing space and population in contested states: insights from EUPOL COPPS in Palestine. Geopolitics 25 (2):428–48. doi:10.1080/14650045.2018.1552946.
   Google Scholar
• Bueger, C. 2016. Doing Europe: agency and the European Union in the field of counter-piracy practice. European Security 25 (4):407–22. doi:10.1080/09662839.2016.1236020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bueger, C., and F. Gadinger. 2018. International practice theory. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Calculli, M., and L. Sadiki. 2020. Reconceiving the struggle betweent non-state armed organizations, the state and ‘the international’ in the Middle East. In The Routledge handbook of Middle East politics, ed. L. Sadiki, pp. 419–31. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cambanis, T., D. Esfandiary, S. Ghaddar, M. Wahid Hanna, A. Lund, and R. Mansour. 2019. Hybrid actors. Armed groups and state fragmentation in the Middle East. New York: The Century Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Cavatorta, F., and M. Pace. 2010. The post-normative turn in European Union (EU)-Middle East and North Africa (MENA) relations: an introduction. European Foreign Affairs Review 15 (5):581–87. doi:10.54648/EERR2010042.
   Google Scholar
• Charrett, C. 2019. The EU, Hamas and the 2006 Palestinian elections: A performance in politics. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Colombo, S., and N. Shapovalova. 2017. The European neighbourhood policy promotion of civil society. In The Routledge handbook on the European neighbourhood policy, eds. T. Schumacher, A. Marchetti, and T. Demmelhuber, pp. 494-505. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Constantinou, C. M., J. Dittmer, M. Kuus, F. McConnell, S. O. Opondo, and V. Pouliot. 2021. Thinking with diplomacy: within and beyond practice theory. International Political Sociology 15 (4):559–87. doi:10.1093/ips/olab028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornut, J. 2017. The practice turn in international relations theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cornut, J. 2018. Diplomacy, agency, and the logic of improvisation and virtuosity in practice. European Journal of International Relations 24 (3):712–36. doi:10.1177/1354066117725156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cusumano, E., and S. Hofmaier. 2020. Projecting resilience across the Mediterranean. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Dandashly, A., and G. Noutcheva. 2019. Unintended consequences of EU democracy support in the European neighbourhood. The International Spectator 54 (1):105–20. doi:10.1080/03932729.2019.1554340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darwich, M. 2021. Foreign policy analysis and armed non-state actors in world politics: lessons from the Middle East. Foreign Policy Analysis 17 (4):1–11. doi:10.1093/fpa/orab030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudouet, V., A. Eshaq, E. Basilaia, and N. Macharashvili. 2018. From policy to action: assessing the European Union’s approach to inclusive mediation and dialogue support in Georgia and Yemen. Peacebuilding 6 (3):183–200. doi:10.1080/21647259.2018.1491279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duke, S. 2015. Diplomatic training in the European Union. In The European External Action Service: European diplomacy post-Westphalia, eds. D. Spence and J. Bátora, pp. 403–18. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ehteshami, A., D. Huber, and M. C. Paciello, ed. 2017. The Mediterranean reset: geopolitics in a new age. Durham: Global Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Ekengren, M. 2018. Explaining the European Union’s foreign policy: A practice theory of translocal action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Emerson, M., and R. Youngs. 2007. Political Islam and European foreign policy: perspectives from muslim democrats of the Mediterranean. Brussels: CEPS.
   Google Scholar
• Fakhoury, T., and N. Stel. 2022. EU engagement with contested refugee returns in Lebanon: the aftermath of resilience. Geopolitics: 1–26. doi:10.1080/14650045.2022.2025779.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girke, N. C. 2015. A matter of balance: the European Union as a mediator in Yemen. European Security 24 (4):509–24. doi:10.1080/09662839.2015.1027766.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruber, M., J. -M. Eberl, F. Lind, and H. G. Boomgaarden. 2021. Qualitative interviews with irregular migrants in times of covid-19: recourse to remote interview techniques as a possible methodological adjustment. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum. 22 (1). doi:10.17169/fqs-22.1.3563.
   Google Scholar
• Gstöhl, S., and S. Schunz, eds. 2020. Studying the European Union’s external action: concepts, approaches, theories. London: Macmillan International Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Hazbun, W. 2017. (In)security in an era of turbulence: mapping post-statist geopolitics in the Middle East. In The frailty of authority: borders, non-state actors and power vacuums in a changing Middle East, ed. L. Kamel, pp. 85-105. Rome: Edizioni Nuova Cultura.
   Google Scholar
• Hiltermann, J. 2015. Europe’s Middle East myopia. POLITICO, August 12.
   Google Scholar
• Hofius, M. 2016. Community at the border or the boundaries of community? The case of EU field diplomats. Review of International Studies 42 (5):939–67. doi:10.1017/S0260210516000085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, T. 2018. Paradiplomacy and political geography: the geopolitics of substate regional diplomacy. Geography Compass 12 (2):e12357. doi:10.1111/gec3.12357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph, J., and A. E. Juncos. 2019. Resilience as an emergent European project? The EU’s place in the resilience turn. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 57 (5):995–1011. doi:10.1111/jcms.12881.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juncos, A. E., and K. Pomorska. 2011. Invisible and unaccountable? National representatives and council officials in EU foreign policy. Journal of European Public Policy 18 (8):1096–114. doi:10.1080/13501763.2011.615197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juncos, A. E., and K. Pomorska. 2014. Manufacturing esprit de corps: the case of the European External Action Service. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 52 (2):302–19. doi:10.1111/jcms.12107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kakabadse, N. K., and E. Louchart. 2012. Delicate empiricism: an action learning approach to elite interviewing. In Global elites. The opaque nature of transnational policy determination, eds. A. Kakabadse and N. Kakabadse, pp. 286–307. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kausch, K., ed. 2015. Geopolitics and democracy in the Middle East. Madrid: Fride.
   Google Scholar
• Kausch, K. 2017. State and non-state alliances in the Middle East. The International Spectator 52 (3):36–47. doi:10.1080/03932729.2017.1347250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keukeleire, S. 2016. Lessons for the practice and analysis of EU Diplomacy from an ‘outside-in’ perspective. In The neighbours of the European Union’s neighbours, eds. S. Gstöhl and E. Lannon, pp. 227–41. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Keukeleire, S., and T. Delreux. 2022. The foreign policy of the European Union. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Keukeleire, S., F. Keuleers, and K. Raube. 2015. The EU, structural diplomacy and the challenge of learning. In The diplomatic system of the European Union. eds. M. Smith, S. Keukeleire and S. Vanhoonacker, pp. 227–42. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Keukeleire, S., and S. Lecocq. 2021. Decentring European foreign policy analysis. In The external action of the European Union: concepts, approaches, theories. S. Gstöhl and S. Schunz, eds. pp. 297-312. London: Macmillan International Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Khakee, A., and S. Wolff. 2021. EU democracy projection in the southern Mediterranean: A practice analysis. Mediterranean Politics 27 (4):1–16. doi:10.1080/13629395.2021.1883283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleine, M. 2014. Informal governance in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy 21 (2):303–14. doi:10.1080/13501763.2013.870023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuus, M. 2014. Geopolitics and expertise: knowledge and authority in European diplomacy. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Kuus, M. 2020. Professions and their expertise: charting the spaces of ‘elite’ occupations. Progress in Human Geography 45 (6):1339–55. doi:10.1177/0309132520950466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuus, M. 2021. Bureaucratic sociability, or the missing eighty percent of effectiveness: the case of diplomacy. Geopolitics 28 (1):1–22. doi:10.1080/14650045.2021.1934672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lecocq, S. 2020. Hamas and Hezbollah: Hybrid actors between resistance and governance. International Affairs 96 (4):1069–79. doi:10.1093/ia/iiaa104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lecocq, S. 2021. EU foreign policy and hybrid actors in the Middle East: ready for geopolitical contestation? Global Affairs 6 (4–5):363–80. doi:10.1080/23340460.2021.1872401.
   Google Scholar
• Lecocq, S., and S. Keukeleire. 2018. Decentring the analysis of EU foreign policy and external-internal legitimacy: (re-) introducing polity. Global Affairs 4 (2–3):341–51. doi:10.1080/23340460.2018.1532307.
   Google Scholar
• Marchetti, R., and Y. Al Zahrani. 2017. Hybrid partnerships in Middle East turbulence. In The frailty of authority: borders, non-state actors and power vacuums in a changing Middle East, ed. L. Kamel, pp. 107–22. Rome: Edizioni Nuova Cultura.
   Google Scholar
• McConnell, F., T. Moreau, and J. Dittmer. 2012. Mimicking state diplomacy: the legitimizing strategies of unofficial diplomacies. Geoforum 43 (4):804–14. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2012.01.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier, D. 2018. Special issue: bordering the Middle East. Geopolitics 23 (3):495–504. doi:10.1080/14650045.2018.1497375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mogherini, F. 2015. The European Union in a changing global environment. A more connected, contested and complex world. Strategic Assessment by High Representative Federica Mogherini.
   Google Scholar
• Mohamed, A. N. 2017. Crisis of identity in a hybrid polity: the case of Somaliland. In State building and national identity reconstruction in the Horn of Africa. ed. R. Bereketeab, pp 145–64. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Moret, E. S. 2015. Humanitarian impacts of economic sanctions on Iran and Syria. European Security 24 (1):120–40. doi:10.1080/09662839.2014.893427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouawad, J., and Baumann, H. 2017. Wayn al-Dawla? Locating the Lebanese state in social theory. The Arab Studies Journal 25 (1): 66–91.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, P., and J. Bergmann. 2020. Orchestrating peace in South Sudan: exploring the effectiveness of the European Union’s mediation support. European Security 29 (2):149–69. doi:10.1080/09662839.2020.1751616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolini, D. 2012. Practice theory, work, and organization: an introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pace, M. 2009. Paradoxes and contradictions in EU democracy promotion in the Mediterranean: the limits of EU normative power. Democratization 16 (1):39–58. doi:10.1080/13510340802575809.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pace, M., and P. Pallister-Wilkins. 2018. EU–Hamas: actors in a state of permanent liminality. Journal of International Relations and Development 21 (1):223–46. doi:10.1057/s41268-016-0080-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pouliot, V., and J. Cornut. 2015. Practice theory and the study of diplomacy: A research agenda. Cooperation and Conflict 50 (3):297–315. doi:10.1177/0010836715574913.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, S. B. 2018. The ideas and practices of the European Union’s structural antidiplomacy: an unstable equilibrium. Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Rieker, P., and S. Blockmans. 2021. The EU’s comprehensive response to out of area crises: plugging the capability-expectations gap. In The Palgrave handbook of EU crises, eds. M. Riddervold, J. Trondal, and A. Newsome, pp. 585–602. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Santini, R. H., Polese, A., and Kevlihan, R. 2020. Limited statehood and informal governance in the Middle East and Africa. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. R., K. K. Cetina, and E. Von Savigny. 2005. The practice turn in contemporary theory. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Seeberg, P. 2010. European neighbourhood policy, post-normativity, and pragmatism. European Foreign Affairs Review 15 (5):663–79. doi:10.54648/EERR2010047.
   Google Scholar
• South, A. 2018. ‘Hybrid governance’ and the politics of legitimacy in the Myanmar peace process. Journal of Contemporary Asia 48 (1):50–66. doi:10.1080/00472336.2017.1387280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stollenwerk, E., T. A. Börzel, and T. Risse. 2021. Theorizing resilience-building in the EU’s neighbourhood: introduction to the special issue. Democratization 28 (7):1219–38. doi:10.1080/13510347.2021.1957839.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundaram, S., and V. Thakur. 2019. A pragmatic methodology for studying international practices. Journal of International Political Theory 17 (3):337–55. doi:10.1177/1755088219879177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tholens, S. 2017. Border management in an era of ‘statebuilding lite’: security assistance and lebanon’s hybrid sovereignty. International Affairs 93 (4):865–82. doi:10.1093/ia/iix069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villa, R. D., and M. C. Souza Pimenta. 2019. Violent non-state actors and new forms of governance: exploring the Colombian and Venezuelan border zone. Journal of Human Security 15 (1):6–18. doi:10.12924/johs2019.15010006.
   Google Scholar
• Zardo, F., and S. Wolff. 2021. Decentering the study of migration governance in the Mediterranean. Geopolitics 27 (3):687–702. doi:10.1080/14650045.2021.1978944.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziadeh, A. 2019. EU foreign policy and Hamas: inconsistencies and paradoxes. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar