A Rocket to Protect? Sociotechnical Imaginaries of Strategic Autonomy in Controversies About the European Rocket Program

References

• Aarden, E., L. Marelli, and A. Blasimme. 2021. The translational lag narrative in policy discourse in the United States and the European Union: A comparative study. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 8 (1):107. doi:10.1057/s41599-021-00777-y.
   Google Scholar
• Adams, V., M. Murphy, and A. E. Clarke. 2009. Anticipation: Technoscience, life, affect, temporality. Subjectivity 28 (1):246–65. doi:10.1057/sub.2009.18.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Ekabi, C.ed. 2015. European autonomy in spaceVol. 10. Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978-3-319-11110-0.
   Google Scholar
• Alvarez, T. 2020. The eighth continent: An ethnography of twenty-first century Euro-American plans to settle the moon. Dissertation. New York: The New School.
   Google Scholar
• Appadurai, A. 1996. Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of globalization (Vol. 1). Minneapolis: Univesity of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aradau, C., and R. V. Munster. 2011. Politics of catastrophe: Genealogies of the unknown. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Badenoch, A., & Fickers, A. (Eds.). 2010. Materializing Europe: Transnational infrastructures and the project of Europe. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Balibar E. (2009). Europe as Borderland. Environ Plan D, 27 (2): 190–215. doi:10.1068/d13008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banchoff, T. 2002. Institutions, inertia and European Union research policy. Journal of Common Market Studies 40 (1):1–21. doi:10.1111/1468-5965.00341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry, A. (2001). Political machines: Governing a technological society. London: Athlone Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barry, A., Walters, and W. William. 2003. From EURATOM to “Complex Systems”: Technology and European Government. Alternatives 28 (3):305–29. doi:10.1177/030437540302800301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battaglia, D., D. Valentine, and V. Olson. 2015. Relational space: An earthly installation. Cultural Anthropology 30 (2):245–56. doi:10.14506/ca30.2.07.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckert, J. (2016). Imagined futures: Fictional expectations and capitalist dynamics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beery, J. 2016. Unearthing global natures: Outer space and scalar politics. Political Geography 55:92–101. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2016.04.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birch, K. 2017. Techno-economic Assumptions. Science as Culture 26 (4):433–44. doi:10.1080/09505431.2017.1377389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bormann, N., and M. Sheehan, ed. 2009. Securing outer space. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Borup, M., N. Brown, K. Konrad, and H. Van Lente. 2006. The sociology of expectations in science and technology. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 18 (3–4):285–98. doi:10.1080/09537320600777002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen, B. E. 2020. War in space: Strategy, spacepower, geopolitics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, B., and S. Whatmore, ed. 2010. Political matter: Technoscience, democracy, and public life. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, N., and M. Michael. 2003. A sociology of expectations: Retrospecting prospects and prospecting retrospects. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 15 (1):3–18. doi:10.1080/0953732032000046024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clormann, M. (2021). Switching between worlds apart: Negotiating European space sector cultures through innovation. Science and Public Policy 48 (4): 521–530. doi:10.1093/scipol/scab038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csernatoni, R. 2021. The technology challenge in the transatlantic relationship. European View 20 (2):157–65. doi:10.1177/17816858211059251.
   Google Scholar
• Dunnett, O., A. S. Maclaren, J. Klinger, K. M. D. Lane, and D. Sage. 2019. Geographies of outer space: Progress and new opportunities. Progress in Human Geography 43 (2):314–36. doi:10.1177/0309132517747727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdbrink, T., and C. Anderson (2021, May 23). In sweden’s far north, a space complex takes shape. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/23/world/europe/sweden-space-arctic-satellites.html
   Google Scholar
• European Council. 2013. https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-217-2013-INIT/en/pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ezrahi, Y. 2012. Imagined democracies: Necessary political fictions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Felt, U. 2015. Keeping Technologies Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Formation OfAustria’s Technopolitical Identity. In Dreamscapes Of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power, ed. S. Jasanoff and S.-H. Kim, pp. 103–25. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Felt, U. 2016. The temporal choreographies of participation: Thinking innovation and society from a time-sensitive perspective. In Remaking participation: Science, environment and emergent publics, ed. J. Chilvers and M. Kearnes, pp. 178–98. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fiott, D. (2021). European Sovereignty. Strategy and Interdependence (Chaillot Paper, 169). European Union Institute for Security Studies. www.iss.europa.eu/content/european-sovereignty
   Google Scholar
• Gugganig, M., and N. Klimburg-Witjes. 2021. Island imaginaries: Introduction to a special section. Science as Culture 30 (3):321–41. doi:10.1080/09505431.2021.1939294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haddad, C., and M. Benner. 2021. Situating innovation policy in Mediterranean Arab countries: A research agenda for context sensitivity. Research Policy 50 (7):104273. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2021.104273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. A. 2009. Authoritative governance: Policy-making in the age of mediatization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, B. 2003. Europe’s space programme: To Ariane and beyond. London: Springer ; published in association with Praxis Pub.
   Google Scholar
• Henke, C., and B. Sims. 2020. Repairing infrastructures: The maintenance of materiality and power. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoerber, T., and A. Forganni. 2020. European integration and space policy: A growing security discourse. T. Hoerber and A. Forgannied., 1st Routledge, 10.4324/9780429328718
   Google Scholar
• Hoerber, T. C., and S. Lieberman, ed. 2019. A European space policy: Past consolidation, present challenges and future perspectives. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Järvenpää, P. 2019. European strategic autonomy: Operationalising a buzzword. Talinn: International Centre for Defence and Security.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S., and S. -H. Kim. 2009. Containing the Atom: Sociotechnical imaginaries and nuclear power in the United States and South Korea. Minerva 47 (2):119–46. doi:10.1007/s11024-009-9124-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S., S. Pfotenhauer, E. Aarden, and M. Boenig-Liptsin (2015). Traveling imaginaries of innovation: The practice turn and its transnational implementation. NSF proposal, approved Dec 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, W., and J. Schot. 2014. Writing the Rules for Europe. Experts, Cartels, International Organizations. Basingstoke: Palgrave/MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kinnvall, C., I. Manners, and J. Mitzen. 2018. Introduction to 2018 special issue of European Security: “Ontological (in)security in the European Union. European Security 27 (3):249–65. doi:10.1080/09662839.2018.1497977.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klimburg-Witjes, N. 2021. Shifting articulations of space and security: Boundary work in European space policy making. European Security 30 (4):1–21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2021.1890039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konrad, K., and K. Böhle. 2019. Socio-technical futures and the governance of innovation processes—an introduction to the special issue. Futures 109:101–07. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2019.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakoff, A. 2015. Global Health Security and the Pathogenic Imaginary. In Dreamscapes Of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power, ed. S. Jasanoff and S.-H. Kim, pp. 300–20. London and Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lambach, D. 2020. The territorialization of cyberspace. International Studies Review 22 (3):482–506. doi:10.1093/isr/viz022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, K. M. D. 2011. Geographies of Mars: Seeing and knowing the red planet. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laurent, B. 2022. European objects: The troubled dreams of harmonization. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Law, J., and W. Lin. 2017. Provincializing Sts: Postcoloniality, symmetry, and method. East Asian Science, Technology and Society: An International Journal 11 (2):211–27. doi:10.1215/18752160-3823859.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDonald, F. 2007. Anti- Astropolitik—outer space and the orbit of geography. Progress in Human Geography 31 (5):592–615. doi:10.1177/0309132507081492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mager, A. 2017. Search engine imaginary: Visions and values in the co-production of search technology and Europe. Social Studies of Science 47 (2):240–62. doi:10.1177/0306312716671433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mager, A., and C. Katzenbach. 2021. Future imaginaries in the making and governing of digital technology: Multiple, contested, commodified. New Media & Society 23 (2):223–36. doi:10.1177/1461444820929321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martins, B. O., and J. Mawdsley. 2021. Sociotechnical Imaginaries of EU Defence: The Past and the Future in the European Defence Fund. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 59 (6):jcms.13197. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzucato, M., M. Cimoli, G. Dosi, J. E. Stiglitz, M. A. Landesmann, M. Pianta, R. Walz, and T. Page. 2015. Which industrial policy Does Europe need? Intereconomics 50 (3):120–55. doi:10.1007/s10272-015-0535-1.
   Google Scholar
• McNeil, M., M. Arribas-Ayllon, J. Haran, A. Mackenzie, and R. Tutton. 2017. Conceptualizing imaginaries of science, technology, and society. In The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, ed. U. Felt, R. Fouché, C. A. Miller, and L. Smith-Doerr, pp. 435–64. 4th ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Messeri, L. 2016. Placing outer space: An Earthly ethnography of other worlds. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Messina, P. 2021. Europe’s strategic autonomy in space, through space. ELF Policy Papers 6:1–10. doi:10.53121/ELFPP6.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, C. 2015. Globalizing Security: Science and the Transformation of Contemporary Political Imagination. In Dreamscapes of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power, ed. S. Jasanoff and S.-H. Kim, pp. 277–99. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Misa, T., and J. Schot. 2005. Introduction. Inventing Europe: Technology and the hidden integration of Europe. History and Technology 21 (1):1–19. doi:10.1080/07341510500037487.
   Google Scholar
• Mitzen, J. 2018. Anxious community: EU as (in)security community. European Security 27 (3):393–413. doi:10.1080/09662839.2018.1497985.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moranta, S. 2022. The Space Downstream Sector: Challenges for the Emergence of a European Space Economy. IFRI: Institut Français des Relations Internationales. https://policycommons.net/artifacts/2273450/the-space-downstream-sector/3033273/
   Google Scholar
• Morillas, P. 2021. An architecture fit for strategic autonomy: Institutional and operational steps towards a more autonomous EU External action (Strategic Autonomy Series)[Policy Brief]. Foundation for Progressive European Studies. https://amofordesign.dev/feps-europe/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/An-Architecture-fit-for-Strategic-Autonomy.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ntousas, V. (2019, December 3). How Can the EU Learn the Language of Power? Chatham House. https://www.chathamhouse.org/2019/12/how-can-eu-learn-language-power
   Google Scholar
• Opitz, S, and U Tellmann. (2015). Europe as Infrastructure: Networking the Operative Community. South Atlantic Quarterly 114 (1):171–190. doi:10.1215/00382876-2831356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patarin-Jossec, J. 2020. Materialising sovereignty: European space industries in the Europeanisation-nationalism nexus. Journal of Contemporary European Studies 28 (2):257–68. doi:10.1080/14782804.2020.1734551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulino, V. D. S. (2020). Innovation trends in the space industry. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Pesonen, T. (2022, February 2). EU Space Policy: New challenges, new opportunities. The Parliamet. https://www.theparliamentmagazine.eu/news/article/new-challenges-new-opportunities
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, J., and M. Sharp. 1998. Technology Policy in the European Union. Houndmills: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Pfotenhauer, S., and S. Jasanoff (2015). Panacea or diagnosis? Imaginaries of innovation and the “MIT model” in three political cultures. Working Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Pfotenhauer, S. M., J. Juhl, and E. Aarden. (2019). Challenging the “deficit model” of innovation: Framing policy issues under the innovation imperative. Research Policy, 48(4), 895–904. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pohl, J. H. 2021. Strategic autonomy as a means to counter protectionism. ERA Forum 22 (2):183–91. doi:10.1007/s12027-021-00670-w.
   Google Scholar
• Posaner, J., and L. Cerulus (2021). EU pitches broadband satellite plan. Politico. https://www.politico.eu/article/eu-pitches-catch-all-cyber-secure-broadband-satellite-plan/
   Google Scholar
• Pultarova, T. (2022, May 5). Europe’s life-hunting Mars rover unlikely to launch before 2028 due to Russia-Ukraine war. Space.Com. https://www.space.com/exomars-rover-launch-unlikely-before-2028
   Google Scholar
• Redfield, P. 2000. Space in the tropics: From convicts to rockets in French Guiana. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Remuss, N. -L. (2018). Theorising institutional change: The impact of the European integration process on the development of space activities in Europe. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=1863833
   Google Scholar
• Sage, D. 2014. How outer space made America: Geography, organization and the cosmic sublime. Farnham: Asgate.
   Google Scholar
• Schiølin, K. 2020. Revolutionary dreams: Future essentialism and the sociotechnical imaginary of the fourth industrial revolution in Denmark. Social Studies of Science 50 (4):542–66. doi:10.1177/0306312719867768.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schipper, F., and J. Schot. 2011. Infrastructural Europeanism, or the project of building Europe on infrastructures: An introduction. History and Technology 27 (3):245–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schrogl, K. -U., M. Adriaensen, C. Giannopapa, P. L. Hays, J. Robinson, and N. Antoni (2020). Handbook of space security: Policies, applications and programs.
   Google Scholar
• Sheehan, M. 2009. Profaning the path to the sacred: The militarisation of the European space programmeProfaning the path to the sacred: The militarisation of the European space programme. In ed. N. Bormann and M. Sheehan, pp. 170–85. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stajano, A. 2009. Research, Quality, Competitiveness: European Union Technology Policy for the Knowledge-Based Society. 2nd ed. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Tocci, N. 2021. European Strategic Autonomy: What it is, why we need it, how to achieve it. Istituto Affari Internazionali. https://www.iai.it/sites/default/files/9788893681780.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Trauttmansdorff, P., and U. Felt. 2021. Between infrastructural experimentation and collective imagination: The digital transformation of the EU border regime. Science, Technology, & Human Values, Technology, & Human Values 016224392110575. doi:10.1177/01622439211057523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trischler, H., and H. Weinberger. 2005. Engineering Europe: Big technologies and military systems in the making of 20th century Europe. History and Technology 21 (1):49–83. doi:10.1080/07341510500037503.
   Google Scholar
• Tutton, R. 2020. Sociotechnical Imaginaries and Techno-Optimism: Examining outer space Utopias of silicon valley. Science as Culture 30 (3):1–24. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2020.1841151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulrike Felt. 2015. Keeping Technologies Out: Sociotechnical imaginaries and the formation of austria’s technopolitical identity. In Dreamscapes of Modernity. Sociotechnical imaginaries and the fabrication of power. In eds. Jasanoff, S., S.H. Kim. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vertesi, J. (2015). Seeing like a rover. In Seeing Like a Rover. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Witjes, N., and P. Olbrich. 2017. A fragile transparency: Satellite imagery analysis, non-state actors, and visual representations of security. Science & Public Policy 44 (4):524–34. doi:10.1093/scipol/scw079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar