Disruptive Technologies for Security and Defence: Temporality, Performativity and Imagination

References

• Amicelle, A., C. Aradau, and J. Jeandesboz. 2015. Questioning security devices: Performativity, resistance, politics. Security Dialogue 46 (4):293–306. doi:10.1177/0967010615586964.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amoore, L. 2023. Machine learning political orders. Review of International Studies 49 (1):20–36. doi:10.1017/S0260210522000031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aradau, C. 2010. Security that matters: Critical infrastructure and objects of protection. Security Dialogue 41 (5):491–514. doi:10.1177/0967010610382687.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aradau, C., and T. Blanke. July-December 2015. The (big) data-security assemblage: Knowledge and critique. Big Data & Society 2(2):1–15. doi: 10.1177/2053951715609066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balzacq, T., and M. D. Cavelty. 2017. A theory of actor-network for cyber-security. European Journal of International Security 1 (2):176–98. doi:10.1017/eis.2016.8.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, K. 2007. Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bellanova, R., and M. de Goede. 2021. Co-producing security: Platform content moderation and European security integration. JCMS – Journal of Common Market Studies 60 (5):1316–34. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, J. 2010. Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bijker, W. E., T. P. Hughes, and T. J. Pinch, eds. 1987. The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boot, M. 2006. War made new: Technology, warfare and the course of history: 1500 to Today. New York: Gotham Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bourne, M., H. Johnson, and D. Lisle. 2015. Laboratizing the border: The production, translation and anticipation of security technologies. Security Dialogue 46 (4):307–25. doi:10.1177/0967010615578399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bousquet, A. 2022. The scientific way of warfare: Order and chaos on the battlefields of modernity. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bower, J. L., and C. M. Christensen. 1995. Disruptive technologies: Catching the wave. Harvard Business Review 73(3):24–6. January-February .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braidotti, R. 2002. Metamorphoses: Towards a materialist theory of becoming. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Bratton, B. H. 2006. Logistics of habitable circulation: A brief introduction to the 2006 edition of speed and politics. In Speed and politics, ed. P. Virilio, 7–26. Los Angeles: Semiotexte.
   Google Scholar
• Bryant, R., and D. M. Knight. 2019. The anthropology of the future. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Calcara, A., R. Csernatoni, and C. Lavallée, eds. 2020. Emerging security technologies and EU Governance: Actors, practices and processes. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell-Verduyn, M., and M. Hütten. 2022. Governing techno-futures: OECD anticipation of automation and the multiplication of managerialism. Global Society 36 (2):240–60. doi:10.1080/13600826.2021.2021148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cebrowski, A. K., and J. J. Garstka. 1998. Network-centric warfare: Its origin and future. US Naval Institute Proceedings 124 (1):28–35.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, C. M. 1997. The innovator’s dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, C. M., R. McDonald, E. J. Altman, and J. E. Palmer. 2018. Disruptive innovation: An intellectual history and direction for future research. Journal of Management Studies 55 (7):1043–78. doi:10.1111/joms.12349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, C. M., M. E. Raynor, and R. McDonald. 2015. What is disruptive innovation? Harvard Business Review 93 (12):44–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chua, C. 2023. Disruption from above, the middle and below: Three terrains of governance. Review of International Studies 49 (1):37–52. doi:10.1017/S0260210522000432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coole, D. H., and S. Frost, eds. 2010. New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crogan, P. 1999. The tendency the accident and the untimely: Paul virilio’s engagement with the future. Theory, Culture & Society 16 (5–6):161–76. doi:10.1177/02632769922050926.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csernatoni, R. 2020. New states of emergency: Normalizing techno-surveillance in the time of COVID-19. Global Affairs 6 (3):301–10. doi:10.1080/23340460.2020.1825108.
   Google Scholar
• Csernatoni, R. 2021a. Between rhetoric and practice: Technological efficiency and defence cooperation in the European drone sector. Critical Military Studies 7 (2):212–36. doi:10.1080/23337486.2019.1585652.
   Google Scholar
• Csernatoni, R. 2021b. The EU’s defense ambitions: Understanding the emergence of a European defense technological and industrial complex. Working Paper, Carnegie Europe, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Csernatoni, R. 2022. The EU’s hegemonic imaginaries: from European strategic autonomy in defence to technological sovereignty. European Security 31 (3):395–414. doi:10.1080/09662839.2022.2103370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLanda, M. 2016. Assemblage Theory. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Defense (DoD). 2022. DoD announces Dr. Craig Martell as chief digital and artificial intelligence officer. Press Release, April 25. Accessed December 12, 2022. https://www.defense.gov/News/Releases/Release/Article/3009684/dod-announces-dr-craig-martell-as-chief-digital-and-artificial-intelligence-.
   Google Scholar
• Der Derian, J. 1999. The conceptual cosmology of Paul Virilio. Theory, Culture & Society 16 (5–6):215–27. doi:10.1177/02632769922050809.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillon, M., and J. Reid. 2001. Global liberal governance: Biopolitics, security and war. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 30 (1):41–66. doi:10.1177/03058298010300010501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, B. 2019. Insecurity and Emerging Biotechnology: Governing Misuse Potential. Basingstoke: Palgrave. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-02188-7.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, P. 1997. The closed world: computers and the politics of discourse in cold war America. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. doi:10.7551/mitpress/1871.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2021) Action plan on Synergies between civil, defence, and space industries. Accessed January 19, 2022. https://ec.europa.eu/info/files/action-plan-synergies-between-civil-defence-and-space-industries_en.
   Google Scholar
• European External Action Service (2022) ‘A Strategic Compass for Security and Defence,’ available at: https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/strategic-compass-security-and-defence-0_en
   Google Scholar
• Fagerberg, J. 2009. Innovation: A guide to the literature. In The oxford handbook of innovation, ed. F. Jan and D. C. Mowery. Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286805.003.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Feenberg, A. 1995. Alternative modernity: The technical turn in philosophy and social theory. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feenberg, A. 2005. Critical theory of technology: An overview. Tailoring Biotechnologies I (I):47–64.
   Google Scholar
• Feenberg, A. 2017. Critical theory of technology and STS. Thesis Eleven 138 (1):3–12. doi:10.1177/0725513616689388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, C., and L. Soete. 1997. The economics of industrial innovation. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, S. 2016. Military innovation studies: Multidisciplinary or lacking discipline? Journal of Strategic Studies. doi:10.1080/01402390.2016.1196358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grove, N. 2023. Receding resilience: On the planetary moods of disruption. Review of International Studies 49 (1):3–19. doi:10.1017/S0260210522000456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heo, K., and Y. Seo. 2021. Anticipatory governance for newcomers: Lessons learned from the UK, the Netherlands, Finland, and Korea. European Journal of Futures Research 9 (1):1–14. doi:10.1186/s40309-021-00179-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilgartner, S., C. A. Miller, and R. Hagendijk. 2015. Introduction. In science and democracy. Making knowledge and making power in the biosciences and beyond, ed. S. Hilgartner, C. A. Miller, and R. Hagendijk, 1–14. New York and London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hoijtink, M., and M. E. Leese. eds. 2019. Technology and Agency in International Relations. Oxon and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Holmqvist, C. 2013. Undoing War: War ontologies and the materiality of drone warfare. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 41 (3):535–52. doi:10.1177/0305829813483350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hundley, R. 1999. Past revolutions, future transformation: what can history of revolutions in military affairs tell us about transforming the US Military? Santa Monica: RAND.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobsen, K. R., and L. Monses. 2019. Co-production: The study of productive processes at the level of materiality and discourse. In Technology and Agency in International Relations, ed. M. Hoijtink and M. E. Leese, 24–41. London/New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S., ed. 2004. State of Knowledge. The co-production of science and social order. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S., and S.-H. Kim. 2015a. Dreamscapes of modernity: Sociotechnical imaginaries and the fabrication of power. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S., and S.-H. Kim. 2015b. Future imperfect: Science, technology, and the imaginations of Modernity. In (2015) Dreamscapes of modernity: Sociotechnical imaginaries and the fabrication of power, ed. S. Jasanoff and S.-H. Kim. University of Chicago Press. 10.7208/chicago/9780226276663.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Kathleen, M. 2017. Knowledge and security. In The handbook of science and technology studies, ed. U. Felt, 973–1001. 4th ed. Massachusstes: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kellner, D. 1999. Virilio, war and technology: Some critical reflections. Theory, Culture & Society 16 (5–6):103–25. doi:10.1177/02632769922050890.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klimburg-Witjes, N. 2023. A rocket to protect? Sociotechnical imaginaries of strategic autonomy in controversies about the European rocket program. Geopolitics 1–28. doi:10.1080/14650045.2023.2177157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krepinevich, A. F. 1994. Cavalry to computer: The pattern of military revolutions. The National Interest (37):30–32.
   Google Scholar
• Lacy, M. 2014. Security, Technology and Global Politics: Thinking with Virilio. 1st ed. Oxon and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2005. Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leander, A. 2013. Technological agency in the co-constitution of legal expertise and the US drone program. Leiden Journal of International Law 26 (4):811–31. doi:10.1017/S0922156513000423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, B. R. 2016. Twenty challenges for innovation studies. Science and Public Policy 43 (3):432–50. doi:10.1093/scipol/scv077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martins, B. O., and N. Ahmad. 2020. The security politics of innovation: Sual-use technology in the EU’S security research programme. In Emerging security technologies and EU Governance: Actors, practices and processes, ed. A. Calcara, R. Csernatoni, and C. Lavallée, 58–73. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Martins, B. O., and M. G. Jumbert. 2022. EU Border technologies and the co-production of security ‘problems’ and ‘solutions’. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 48 (6):1430–47. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2020.1851470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martins, B. O., and J. Mawdsley. 2021. Sociotechnical imaginaries of EU defence: The past and the future in the European defence fund. Journal of Common Market Studies online first. 59(6):1458–74. doi:10.1111/jcms.13197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy, D., and D. R. McCarthy. 2017. Technology and world politics: An introduction. Oxon and New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781317353836.
   Google Scholar
• Millar, C., M. Lockett, and T. Ladd. 2018. Disruption: Technology, innovation and society. Technological Forecasting and Social Change an International Journal 129:254–60. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.10.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) (2022) Emerging and disruptive technologies. Accessed December 12, 2022. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_184303.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W. J., and S. V. Scott. 2008  Sociomateriality: Challenging the separation of technology, work and organization. The Academy of Management Annals 2 (1):433–74. doi:10.5465/19416520802211644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peoples, C. 2009. Technology, philosophy and international relations. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 22 (4):559–61. doi:10.1080/09557570903516987.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M. 1995. Diffusion of innovations. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rychnovská, D. 2021. Anticipatory governance in biobanking: Security and risk management in digital health. Science and Engineering Ethics 27 (3):30. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-021-00305-w.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salter, M., C. Cohn, A. W. Neal, A. T. Wibben, J. P. Burgess, S. Elbe, J. L. Austin, J. Huysmans, R. Walker, O. Wæver et al. 2019. Horizon scan: Critical security studies for the next 50 years. Security Dialogue. 50(4_suppl):9–37. doi:10.1177/0967010619862912.
   Google Scholar
• Salter, M. B., and W. Walters. 2016. Bruno Latour encounters international relations: An interview. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 44 (3):524–46. doi:10.1177/0305829816641497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. A. 1934. The theory of economic development. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, T. 2015. Cyber security and the politics of time. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, L. 2007. Human-machine reconfigurations: Plans and situated actions. 2nd. Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511808418.
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, L. 2020. Algorithmic warfare and the reinvention of accuracy. Critical Studies on Security 8 (2):175–18. doi:10.1080/21624887.2020.1760587.
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, L. 2022. Imaginaries of omniscience: Automating intelligence in the US Department of Defense. Social Studies of Science. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/03063127221104938.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbeek, P.-P. 2011. Moralizing technology understanding and designing the morality of things. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press. doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226852904.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Virilio, P. 1977/2006. Speed and politics. Los Angeles: Semiotexte.
   Google Scholar
• Virilio, P. 2000. The information bomb. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Walters, W. 2014. Drone strikes, dingpolitik and beyond: Furthering the debate on materiality and security. Security Dialogue 45 (2):101–18. doi:10.1177/0967010613519162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zammuto, R. F., T. L. Griffith, A. Majchrzak, D. J. Dougherty, and S. Faraj. 2007. Information technology and the changing fabric of organization. Organization Science 18 (5):749–62. doi:10.1287/orsc.1070.0307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar