The Security-Innovation Nexus in (Geo-)Political Imagination

References

• Abrahamsen, R., and A. Leander, eds. 2015. Routledge handbook of private security studies. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Amicelle, A., C. Aradau, and J. Jeandesboz. 2015. Questioning security devices: Performativity, resistance, politics. Security Dialogue 46 (4):293–306. doi:10.1177/0967010615586964.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amoore, L. 2011. Data derivatives: On the emergence of a security risk calculus for our times. Theory, Culture & Society 28 (6):24–43. doi:10.1177/0263276411417430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aradau, C. 2010. Security that matters: Critical infrastructure and objects of protection. Security Dialogue 41 (5):491–514. doi:10.1177/0967010610382687.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aradau, C., and T. Blanke. 2010. Governing circulation: A critique of the biopolitics of security. In Security and global governmentality: Globalization, governance and the state, ed. M. de Larrinaga and M. G. Doucet, 44–58. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Aradau, C., and R. van Munster. 2011. Politics of catastrophe: Genealogies of the unknown. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Baird, T. 2017. Knowledge of practice: A multi-sited event ethnography of border security fairs in Europe and North America. Security Dialogue 48 (3):187–205. doi:10.1177/0967010617691656.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balmer, B. 2013. Secrecy and science: A historical sociology of biological and chemical warfare. Farnham and Burlington: Ashgate Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Baur, A. 2023. European Dreams of the Cloud: Imagining Innovation and Political Control. Geopolitics, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2022.2151902.
   Google Scholar
• Barry, A. 2001. Political machines: Governing a technological society. London: A&C Black.
   Google Scholar
• BBC. 2018. ‘Fitness app strava lights up staff at military bases’. BBC News, 29 January 2018. https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-42853072.
   Google Scholar
• Bellanova, R., and M. de Goede. 2021. Co-producing security: Platform content moderation and European security integration. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 60 (5):1316–34. doi:10.1111/jcms.13306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellanova, R., K. Lindskov Jacobsen, and L. Monsees. 2020. Taking the trouble: Science, technology and security studies. Critical Studies on Security 8 (2):87–100. doi:10.1080/21624887.2020.1839852.
   Google Scholar
• Berling, T. V., and C. Bueger, eds. 2015. Security expertise: Practice, power, responsibility. Oxon and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Berling, T. V., Surwillo, I., & Slakaityte, V. 2022. Energy Security Innovation in the Baltic Sea Region: Competing Visions of Technopolitical Orders. Geopolitics, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2022.2131546.
   Google Scholar
• Borup, M., N. Brown, K. Konrad, and H. Van Lente. 2006. The sociology of expectations in science and technology. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 18 (3–4):285–98. doi:10.1080/09537320600777002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourne, M., H. Johnson, and D. Lisle. 2015. Laboratizing the border: The production, translation and anticipation of security technologies. Security Dialogue 46 (4):307–25. doi:10.1177/0967010615578399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brian, R., B. Brian, and S. John. 2008. Science, technology, and the military: Priorities, preoccupations, and possibilities. In The handbook of science and technology studies, ed. E. J. Hackett, O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch, and J. Wajcman, 719–40. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burgess, J. P., G. Reniers, K. Ponnet, W. Hardyns, and W. Smit, eds. 2018. Socially responsible innovation in security: Critical reflections. 1st ed. London ; New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ceyhan, A. 2002. Technologization of security: Management of uncertainty and risk in the Age of biometrics. Surveillance & Society 5 (2). doi:10.24908/ss.v5i2.3430.
   Google Scholar
• Collier, S. J., and A. Lakoff. 2015. Vital systems security: Reflexive biopolitics and the government of emergency. Theory, Culture & Society 32 (2):19–51. doi:10.1177/0263276413510050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csernatoni, R. 2018. Constructing the EU’s high-tech borders: FRONTEX and dual-use drones for border management. European Security 27 (2):175–200. doi:10.1080/09662839.2018.1481396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csernatoni, R. 2022. The EU’s hegemonic imaginaries: From European strategic autonomy in defence to technological sovereignty. European Security 31 (3):395–414. doi:10.1080/09662839.2022.2103370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csernatoni, R., & Martins, B. O. 2023. Disruptive Technologies for Security and Defence: Temporality, Performativity and Imagination. Geopolitics, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2023.2224235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Goede, M. 2008. Beyond risk: Premediation and the post-9/11 security imagination. Security Dialogue 39 (2–3):155–76. doi:10.1177/0967010608088773.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillon, M., and L. Lobo-Guerrero. 2008. Biopolitics of security in the 21st Century: An introduction. Review of International Studies 34 (2):265–92. doi:10.1017/S0260210508008024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elbe, S. 2012. Bodies as battlefields: Toward the medicalization of insecurity. International Political Sociology 6 (3):320–22. doi:10.1111/j.1749-5687.2012.00166_3.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elbe, S. 2018. Pandemics, pills, and politics: Governing global health security. Baltimore, MD: JHU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elbe, S., A. Roemer-Mahler, and C. Long. 2014. Securing circulation pharmaceutically: Antiviral stockpiling and pandemic preparedness in the European Union. Security Dialogue 45 (5):440–57. doi:10.1177/0967010614530072.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Defence Agency. 2022. Hub for EU defence innovation established within EDA. 17 May 2022. https://eda.europa.eu/news-and-events/news/2022/05/17/hub-for-eu-defence-innovation-established-within-eda.
   Google Scholar
• EUROPOL. 2022. EU Innovation Hub Highlights. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Yb3suMmdow.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, S. W., M. Leese, and D. Rychnovská. 2021. Science, technology, security: Towards critical collaboration. Social Studies of Science 51 (2):189–213. doi:10.1177/0306312720953515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felt, U. 2015. Keeping technologies out: Sociotechnicalimaginaries and the formation of Austria’s technopolitical identity. In Dreamscapes of modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the fabrication of power, ed. S. Jasanoff and S.-H. Kim, 103–25. University of Chicago Press. doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226276663.003.0005.
   Google Scholar
• Glynos, J., and D. Howarth. 2007. Logics of critical explanation in social and political theory. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Godin, B. 2015. Innovation contested: The idea of innovation over the centuries. Vol. 98. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Goede, M. D. 2021. Finance/Security Infrastructures. Review of International Political Economy 28 (2):351–68. doi:10.1080/09692290.2020.1830832.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González, R. J. 2023. Militarising Big Tech | Transnational Institute. Transnational Institute, 21 April 2023. https://www.tni.org/en/article/militarising-big-tech.
   Google Scholar
• Gottweis, H. 1998. Governing molecules: The discursive politics of genetic engineering in Europe and the United States. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haddad, C. 2023. A remedy for European preparedness deficits?: Deepening pharmaceuticalized security logics through the EU Health Union. In Technopolitics and the making of Europe, ed. N. Klimburg-Witjes and P.Trauttmansdorff. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haddad, C., and M. Benner. 2021. Situating innovation policy in Mediterranean Arab countries: A research agenda for context sensitivity. Research Policy 50 (7):104273. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2021.104273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haddad, C., and C. Binder. 2019. Governing through cybersecurity: National policy strategies, globalized (in‑)security and sociotechnical visions of the digital society. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Soziologie 44 (1):115–34. doi:10.1007/s11614-019-00350-7.
   Google Scholar
• Haddad, C., C. Günay, S. Gharib, and N. Komendantova. 2022. Imagined inclusions into a “green modernisation”: Local politics and global visions of morocco’s renewable energy transition. Third World Quarterly 43 (2):393–413. doi:10.1080/01436597.2021.2014315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. 2002. Discourse analysis and the study of policy making. European Political Science 2 (1):61–65. doi:10.1057/eps.2002.49.
   Google Scholar
• Hilgartner, S., C. Miller, and R. Hagendijk, eds. 2015. Science and democracy: Making knowledge and making power in the biosciences and beyond. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hoijtink, M. 2014. Capitalizing on emergence: The “new” civil security market in Europe. Security Dialogue 45 (5):458–75. doi:10.1177/0967010614544312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoijtink, M., and M. Leese, eds. 2019. Technology and agency in international Relations. Emerging technologies, ethics and international affairs. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Huysmans, J. 2014. Security unbound: Enacting democratic limits. 1st ed. London ; New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S., and S.-H. Kim. eds. 2015. Dreamscapes of modernity: Sociotechnical imaginaries and the fabrication of power. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/D/bo20836025.html.
   Google Scholar
• King, N. B. 2002. Security, disease, commerce: Ideologies of postcolonial global health. Social Studies of Science 32 (5–6):763–89. doi:10.1177/030631270203200507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinnvall, C., I. Manners, and J. Mitzen. 2018. Introduction to 2018 special issue of European security: “ontological (in)Security in the European Union”. European Security 27 (3):249–65. doi:10.1080/09662839.2018.1497977.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klimburg-Witjes, N. 2023. A Rocket to Protect? Sociotechnical Imaginaries of Strategic Autonomy in Controversies About the European Rocket Program. Geopolitics, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2023.2177157.
   Google Scholar
• Klimburg-Witjes, N., and P. Trauttmansdorff, eds. 2023. Technopolitics and the making of Europe: Infrastructures of security. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Klimburg-Witjes, N., and A. Wentland. 2021. Hacking humans? Social engineering and the construction of the “deficient user” in cybersecurity discourses. Science, Technology, & Human Values 46 (6):1316–39. doi:10.1177/0162243921992844.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. 1990. New reflections on the revolution of our time. First ed. London ; New York: Verso Books.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, A. 2017. A fragile assemblage: Mutant bird flu and the limits of risk assessment. Social Studies of Science 47 (3):376–97. doi:10.1177/0306312716666420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leander, A. 2005. The market for force and public security: The destabilizing consequences of Private military companies. Journal of Peace Research 42 (5):605–22. doi:10.1177/0022343305056237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leander, A., ed. 2013. Commercialising security in Europe: Political consequences for peace operations. London ; New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Leary, J. P. 2019. The Innovator’s Agenda. The Baffler 44 (March):52–59.
   Google Scholar
• Leary, J. P. 2022. Keywords for capitalism: Power, society, politics. Chicago: Haymarket Books.
   Google Scholar
• Leese, M., K. Lidén, and B. Nikolova. 2019. Putting critique to work: Ethics in EU security research. Security Dialogue 50 (1):59–76. doi:10.1177/0967010618809554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemberg-Pedersen, M. 2012. Private security companies and the European Borderscapes. In The Migration Industry and the commercialization of international Migration Vol. 69. ed. T. Gammeltoft-Hansen and N.N. Sørensen, 1–21. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lisle, D. 2018. Failing worse? Science, security and the birth of a border technology. European Journal of International Relations 24 (4):887–910. doi:10.1177/1354066117738854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loader, I. 1999. Consumer culture and the commodification of policing and security. Sociology 33 (2):373–92. doi:10.1177/S003803859900022X.
   Google Scholar
• Long, C. 2021. Medical countermeasures, stockpiling and the governance of biological threats. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003137153.
   Google Scholar
• Martins, B. O., and N. Ahmad. 2020. The security politics of innovation: Dual-use technology in the EU’s security research programme. In Emerging security technologies and EU governance, ed. A. Calcara, R. Csernatoni and C. Lavallée, 58–73. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Martins, B. O., and C. Küsters. 2019. Hidden security: EU public research funds and the development of European drones. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 57 (2):278–97. doi:10.1111/jcms.12787.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martins, B. O., and J. Mawdsley. 2021. Sociotechnical imaginaries of EU defence: The past and the future in the European defence fund. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 59 (6):1458–74. doi:10.1111/jcms.13197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, M., M. Carpes, and R. Knoblich. 2014. The global politics of science and technology: An introduction, 1–35. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, D. R. 2021. Imagining the security of innovation: Technological innovation, national security, and the American way of life. Critical Studies on Security 9 (3):196–211. doi:10.1080/21624887.2021.1934640.
   Google Scholar
• McNeil, M. C., A. Bruce MacKenzie, R. James Christopher Tutton, J. Haran, and M. Arribas-Ayllon. 2017. Conceptualizing imaginaries of science, technology, and society. In The handbook of science and technology studies, ed. U. Felt, R. Fouche, C. A. Miller, and L. Smith-Doerr, 435–64. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. https://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/id/eprint/84450/.
   Google Scholar
• Monsees, L., and D. Lambach. 2022. Digital sovereignty, geopolitical imaginaries, and the reproduction of European identity. European Security 31 (3):377–94. doi:10.1080/09662839.2022.2101883.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, F., and M. Aaron Richmond. 2023. The technopolitics of security: Agency, temporality, sovereignty. Security Dialogue 54 (1):3–20. doi:10.1177/09670106221141373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NATO. 2022a. ACT marks 10 years of NATO’s innovation hub: NATO’s ACT. 22 December 2022. https://www.act.nato.int/articles/10-years-innovation-hub.
   Google Scholar
• NATO. 2022b. Speech by NATO Deputy Secretary General Mircea Geoană at the GoTech World 2022 Conference. NATO. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/opinions_208704.htm.
   Google Scholar
• NATO. 2023. About Innovation Hub | Innovation Hub. https://www.innovationhub-act.org/about.
   Google Scholar
• NATO Innovation Hub. 2022. THE NATO INNOVATION HUB: Innovation for security and defence. NATO. https://www.act.nato.int/activities/innovation-hub/.
   Google Scholar
• Nele, J., A. Barry, and A. H. Kelly. 2023. More-than-national and Less-than-Global: The biochemical infrastructure of vaccine manufacturing. Economy and Society 52 (1):9–36. doi:10.1080/03085147.2022.2087899.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nina, K.-W., N. Poechhacker, and G. C. Bowker, eds. 2021. Sensing In/Security: Sensors as transnational security infrastructures. Manchester: Mattering Press. 10.28938/9781912729111
   Google Scholar
• Nolte, A., and C. Westermeier. 2020. Between public and private: The Co-production of infrastructural security. Politikon 47 (1):62–80. doi:10.1080/02589346.2020.1712831.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peer, S., and M. Maximilian. 2017. Materiality. In Routledge Handbook of International Political Sociology, by Xavier Guillaume and Pinar Bilgin, eds. 309–18. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Petryna, A., and A. Kleinman. 2006. The pharmaceutical nexus. In Global pharmaceuticals, 1–32. Duke University Press. doi:10.1515/9780822387916-002.
   Google Scholar
• Pfotenhauer, S., and S. Jasanoff. 2017. Panacea or Diagnosis? Imaginaries of Innovation and the “MIT Model” in Three Political Cultures. Social Studies of Science 47 (6):783–810. doi:10.1177/0306312717706110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfotenhauer, S., J. Juhl, and E. Aarden. 2019. Challenging the “deficit model” of innovation: Framing policy issues under the innovation imperative. Research Policy 48 (4):895–904. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2018.10.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfotenhauer, S., and D. Winickoff. 2018. Technology governance and the innovation process. In OECD science, technology and innovation Outlook, by OECD, 221. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/sti_in_outlook-2018-15-en.
   Google Scholar
• Rath, J., M. Ischi, and D. Perkins. 2014. Evolution of different dual-use concepts in international and national law and its implications on research ethics and governance. Science and Engineering Ethics 20 (3):769–90. doi:10.1007/s11948-014-9519-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rid, T. 2016. Rise of the machines: A cybernetic history. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, S. L. 2019. Big data, algorithmic governmentality and the regulation of pandemic risk. European Journal of Risk Regulation 10 (1):94–115. doi:10.1017/err.2019.6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, N., and P. Miller. 2010. Political power beyond the state: Problematics of government. The British Journal of Sociology 61:271–303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rychnovská, D. 2016. Governing dual-use knowledge: From the politics of responsible science to the ethicalization of security. Security Dialogue 47 (4):310–28. doi:10.1177/0967010616658848.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rychnovská, D., M. Pasgaard, and T. Villumsen Berling. 2017. Science and security expertise: Authority, knowledge, subjectivity. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences 84 (August):327–31. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.06.010.
   Google Scholar
• Schot, J., and W. E. Steinmueller. 2018. Three frames for innovation policy: R&D, systems of innovation and transformative change. Research Policy 47 (9):1554–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. A. 2021. The theory of economic development. 1st ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Scott-Smith, T. 2016. Humanitarian Neophilia: The “Innovation Turn” and its implications. Third World Quarterly 37 (12):2229–51. doi:10.1080/01436597.2016.1176856.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sebastian, P., and J. Joakim. 2017. Innovation and the political state: Beyond the myth of technologies and markets. In Critical studies of innovation, ed. Benoît Godin and Dominique Vinck, 68–94. Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://www.elgaronline.com/display/edcoll/9781785366963/9781785366963.00012.xml.
   Google Scholar
• Sébastien, L., and L. Sandra. 2019. Innovation beyond technology—introduction. In Creative economy. ed. Sébastien Lechevalier, 1–21. Springer. https://ideas.repec.org//h/spr/crechp/978-981-13-9053-1_1.html
   Google Scholar
• Seper, M. 2022. How the department of defense can help you build your next startup. Entrepreneur, 16 February 2022. https://www.entrepreneur.com/growing-a-business/how-the-department-of-defense-can-help-you-build-your-next/412622.
   Google Scholar
• Soete, L. 2019. Science, technology and innovation studies at a crossroad: SPRU as case study. Research Policy 48 (4):849–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stilgoe, J. 2020. Who’s driving innovation?: New technologies and the collaborative state. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Stockmarr, L. 2015. Security fairs. In Routledge handbook of Private security studies, ed. Rita Abrahamsen and Anna Leander, 187–96. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, L., K. Follis, and J. Weber. 2017. Tracking and targeting: Sociotechnologies of (In)security. Science, Technology, & Human Values 42 (6):983–1002. doi:10.1177/0162243917731524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarvainen, A. 2022. The modern/colonial hell of innovation economy: Future as a return to colonial mythologies. Globalizations 0 (0):1–23. doi:10.1080/14747731.2022.2048460.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. 2003. Modern social Imaginaries. Public planet books. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trauttmansdorff, P., and U. Felt. 2023. Between infrastructural experimentation and collective imagination: The digital transformation of the EU border regime. Science, Technology, & Human Values 48 (3):635–62. doi:10.1177/01622439211057523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNDP. 2020. “Be safe” - a mobile app to protect victims of violence | United Nations Development Programme. UNDP. https://www.undp.org/eurasia/blog/%E2%80%9Cbe-safe%E2%80%9D-mobile-app-protect-victims-violence.
   Google Scholar
• Valkenburg, G., and I. van der Ploeg. 2015. Materialities between security and privacy: A constructivist account of airport security scanners. Security Dialogue 46 (4):326–44. doi:10.1177/0967010615577855.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel, K. M. 2013. Expert knowledge in intelligence assessments: Bird flu and bioterrorism. International Security 38 (3):39–71. doi:10.1162/ISEC_a_00150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wellerstein, A. 2021. Restricted data: The history of nuclear secrecy in the United States. University of Chicago Press. doi:10.7208/9780226020419.
   Google Scholar